General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsElizabeth Warren Asks Newly-Chatty FBI Director to Explain Why DOJ Didn’t Prosecute Banksters
David Dayen
Sep. 14 2016, 9:00 p.m.
Like a lot of other Americans, Sen. Elizabeth Warren wants to know why the Department of Justice hasnt criminally prosecuted any of the major players responsible for the 2008 financial crisis.
On Thursday, Warren released two highly provocative letters demanding some explanations. One is to DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz, requesting a review of how federal law enforcement managed to whiff on all 11 substantive criminal referrals submitted by the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission (FCIC), a panel set up to examine the causes of the 2008 meltdown.
The other is to FBI Director James Comey, asking him to release all FBI investigations and deliberations related to those referrals. The FBI typically doesnt release investigative details about cases that DOJ chooses not to pursue, but Warren pointed out that in releasing information about presidential candidate Hillary Clintons use of a private email server in July, he had pretty much shattered that precedent, and set a new one.
You explained these actions by noting your view that the American people deserve those details in a case of intense public interest, Warren wrote to Comey. If Secretary Clintons email server was of sufficient interest to establish a new FBI standard of transparency, then surely the criminal prosecution of those responsible for the 2008 financial crisis should be subject to the same level of transparency.
In other words, if Comey can spend hours relating FBI decision-making about State Department emails, he can do the same for the activity that made millions jobless and homeless.
https://theintercept.com/document/2016/09/14/warren-letter-to-doj-ig/
https://theintercept.com/document/2016/09/14/warren-letter-to-fbi/
https://theintercept.com/2016/09/15/elizabeth-warren-asks-newly-chatty-fbi-director-to-explain-why-doj-didnt-prosecute-banksters/
Mc Mike
(9,114 posts)Hugin
(33,120 posts)It would be nice if she'd query him about why the "Fraud" and "Racketeering" words haven't popped up in this whole Wells-Fargo organized crime spree.
5,300 people fired over 5 years? This is the first we're hearing about it?
Come on!
GummyBearz
(2,931 posts)And wells fargo has donated to both parties via its PAC. That is why
CentralMass
(15,265 posts)Yallow
(1,926 posts)And it ain't pretty.
It's called the golden rule.
Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)They bought off Republicans and Democrats. Until we admit that many of our Democratic politicians are complicit we will never get reform such as Publicly Funded Elections and an end to campaign contributions and Lobbiest's gifts.
LiberalLovinLug
(14,169 posts)awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)"Those who have the gold rule"?
Nitram
(22,788 posts)jalan48
(13,856 posts)mountain grammy
(26,614 posts)and that this appointment had to get past the Senate goons.
Guy Whitey Corngood
(26,500 posts)Jeffersons Ghost
(15,235 posts)Why hasn't the FBI arrested Trump for racketeering and crimes related to the RICO Act?
Jeffersons Ghost
(15,235 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)nolabels
(13,133 posts)Welcome to the USA, many of us folks out in the nation have been asking similar questions for fifty plus years.
Watching the appointed, non-elected G. Ford pardon a perjured crook in Nixon and then still get close to winning that office in an actual election leaves me with the wondering. If feels like this distinct understanding. It's a understanding that protesting what goes on in the self-appointment halls of the federal government is a waste of everyone's time.
Things have changed very little in that fifty years (probably have gotten worse)
Akamai
(1,779 posts)I thought the Comey editorial comments on Hillary Clinton after he decided not to prosecute was terrible. Sen. Warren, however, is looking at a real issue that has deep and grave importance for all Americans.
I agree with her about the importance of examining details "of this [financial] failure" to ensure it never happens again.
Response to kpete (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
TryLogic
(1,722 posts)I wonder how DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz came to be in that position.
FairWinds
(1,717 posts)Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)I like that!
But like all good Republicans, if it's not about hurting a Democrat, not much to say.
colsohlibgal
(5,275 posts)These filthy rich Banksters committed blatant and obvious fraud to further enrich themselves at the expense of others. The rating agencies enabled the con by rating the toxic financial instruments AAA.
Rather than going to prison like most of us who commit fraud to enrich ourselves they instead took hundreds of millions from us.
A few firms paid fines that would be like us paying $5....with no admission of guilt in most or all cases.
Hillary would be having an easier time if we had tossed the white collar crooks in prison where they should have gone.
deurbano
(2,894 posts)If Secretary Clintons email server was of sufficient interest to establish a new FBI standard of transparency, then surely the criminal prosecution of those responsible for the 2008 financial crisis should be subject to the same level of transparency.
I hope there will be some way (that won't cost her too much politically) for our new president to get rid of Comey (that snake).
raven mad
(4,940 posts)Bookmarked, and when the printer is up, distributed.