Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
Thu Sep 15, 2016, 11:17 PM Sep 2016

Rep. Steve King: Only ‘natural families’ should get a child care tax credit — not LGBT families

http://www.rawstory.com/2016/09/rep-steve-king-only-natural-families-should-get-a-child-care-tax-credit-not-lgbt-families/

Donald Trump unveiled something resembling a plan to give new parents a child-care tax credit, but one of his strongest supporters already sounds wary of it.

While being interviewed by CNN’s Chris Cuomo on Wednesday, Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) expressed skepticism about whether Trump could really find enough money to pay for his plan just by eliminating “waste, fraud and abuse” in unemployment insurance.

Even more interesting, however, was King’s assertion that only “natural families” ought to benefit from the proposed policy....

“I want to respect all people, but I want to promote the natural family, Chris, and I think that’s the most wholesome thing we can do,” King said. “The natural family is a man and a woman joined together in — hopefully — holy matrimony, blessed by God with children.”


Really, Steverino? Even if they were "blessed by God" through IVF?
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rep. Steve King: Only ‘natural families’ should get a child care tax credit — not LGBT families (Original Post) KamaAina Sep 2016 OP
idiot makes my head hurt.... dhill926 Sep 2016 #1
Steve King is an ignorant man. madaboutharry Sep 2016 #2
He's smart enough to play the religious right for fools. Hieronymus Sep 2016 #9
K&R disgraceful Jeffersons Ghost Sep 2016 #3
I am so sick of these haters. Cracklin Charlie Sep 2016 #4
Monster nt IADEMO2004 Sep 2016 #5
What about single parents? Intergenrational aprents/guardians? What about adopted children? Behind the Aegis Sep 2016 #6
but lgbt should be thankful that he doesn't want to kill them JI7 Sep 2016 #7
Is a virgin birth a "natural family"? Midnight Writer Sep 2016 #8
I guess that would rule out all adoptive parents, too. eShirl Sep 2016 #10
Him Again? ProfessorGAC Sep 2016 #11
It keeps ryan_cats Sep 2016 #12

Behind the Aegis

(53,944 posts)
6. What about single parents? Intergenrational aprents/guardians? What about adopted children?
Fri Sep 16, 2016, 12:21 AM
Sep 2016

Are those examples of natural families?

I am amazed how often "natural" or "nature" comes up in the arguments of bigots, especially given 'nature' is often filled with anomalies and ambiguity.

ProfessorGAC

(64,988 posts)
11. Him Again?
Fri Sep 16, 2016, 08:16 AM
Sep 2016

He represents one reactionary district. Why does he get news coverage?

And, the kids are worth less, Steve? The kids?

ryan_cats

(2,061 posts)
12. It keeps
Fri Sep 16, 2016, 08:49 AM
Sep 2016

It keeps on getting better.

H*ll, they and their kids are not even human!

Not to disparage Iowa but, would they please get into the 19th century?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rep. Steve King: Only ‘na...