General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhite Man Shoots at Police, They Shot Him With Bean Bags, Then Arrest Him Alive,
But Unarmed Black People are Killedhttp://urbanintellectuals.com/2016/09/19/white-man-shoots-at-police-they-shot-him-with-bean-bags-then-arrest-him-alive-but-unarmed-black-people-are-killed/
When officers arrived at the scene, they said the man fired at them through the door.
After being barricaded for several hours with SWAT outside the motel, the man was eventually shot with bean bags and tackled by SWAT.
Apparently, police officers are capable of de-esculating and arresting suspects, even shooters, alive, but this only seems to apply to White people. Black people are routinely shot and killed in this country .even when they dont have a weapon.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Solly Mack
(90,762 posts)Good thing they didn't have to break out the water pistols.
(Yes, I am aware that bean bag projectiles hurt...but hurt ain't shot dead for merely existing while black)
JanMichael
(24,881 posts)Midnight Writer
(21,738 posts)sheshe2
(83,728 posts)What!?
Midnight Writer
(21,738 posts)sheshe2
(83,728 posts)Care to explain to me why a white man that shoots at police was taken into custody unharmed and a black man unarmed with hands in the air is shot dead? I would love to hear your explanation.
I am pretty sure it will be a great read.
I will read your explanation tomorrow. It is late. I await your response.
Response to sheshe2 (Reply #11)
Name removed Message auto-removed
NobodyHere
(2,810 posts)Different cops respond differently to situations. Police aren't a hive mind.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)as whites, that type of treatment of beanbags being used to stop the AA is the rare exception in the case of AA's stopped or involved in some police incident. It is "kill the fucker, ask questions later". These high profile executions are just the tip of the iceberg that Titanic America is heading toward full speed.
tblue37
(65,290 posts)ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts).....as the guys who shot the man in Charlotte?
Midnight Writer
(21,738 posts)1) Assessed the situation, backed off without escalating the situation
2) Made a plan to take the man alive without lethal force
3) Successfully implemented their plan, took the suspect alive, and no one was killed
The police in Tulsa did none of these things, the police in Charlotte did none of these things.
Would it be a good thing if the cops in this case charged the motel firing lethal weapons, killing the suspect and any one else caught in the crossfire? Would that somehow balance the murder of black citizens by the police who are sworn to serve and protect those citizens?
I am outraged at piss poor police work, especially when it results in unnecessary force, violence, injury or death.
I congratulate police when they defuse a dangerous situation in a professional manner and no one is killed.
Albertoo
(2,016 posts) When a shooter is barricaded with a gun, the SWAT gets called in, and they have better training and equipment.
It doesn't compare to police officers on the beat reacting to unplanned for scenarios.
The OP's premise that it would illustrate an institutionalized racism just doesn't make sense.
(Would Obama or Eric Holder have vetted such an "institutionalized racism"?)
May I humbly suggest to de-escalate the rampant conspiracy theories about the police on DU?
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)"May I humbly suggest to de-escalate the rampant conspiracy theories about the police on DU?"
The conspiracy that black men are shot by police at a per-capita higher rate? Or is there a different conspiracy you yourself wish to allege to argue against (which I find much more likely given your postings), or allege a premise to the OP not in fact made but merely inferred?
Albertoo
(2,016 posts)Straw man: you hint that I would deny that "black men are shot by police at a per-capita higher rate"
Non sequitur: you imply that that assertion in and by itself demonstrates an unsubstantiated claim, i.e. that that higher per capita rate would be proof of an institutionalized racism.
Open to any interpretation ad hominem: "given your postings". Even more vague: "Or is there a different conspiracy you yourself wish to allege to argue against"
Back to the main OP discussion: it is a fact established scientifically that all of us have unconscious biases, one of which being ethnicity. So random police officers might or might not hold such prejudices to varying degrees. But to directly conclude that the shootings of black men, sometimes by black police officers, systematically boil down to a nefarious and grand-sounding "institutionalized racism" is adding oil to whichever fire might exist.
melman
(7,681 posts)That's an interesting take.
sheshe2
(83,728 posts)I have no intention of repeating myself.
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)heaven05
(18,124 posts)hardluck
(638 posts)"A Burbank man who reportedly confronted a police officer with a butcher knife before being shot has been charged with felony assault.
Tom Bernard McCoy, 58, was arrested Friday on suspicion of attempted murder after he charged a police officer with a butcher knife and ignored the officer's orders to drop the weapon, Burbank Police Lt. Dave Gabriel said."
sheshe2
(83,728 posts)No.
Black people are and they never had a weapon and their hands were in the air. Your point? I am sure you have one.
melman
(7,681 posts)You can't possibly believe that.
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)... in the air.
I'm not sure how that was missed
Igel
(35,296 posts)The general tenor of the thread is "only."
We pick over 10s of thousands of police/civilian encounters and find deaths of unarmed blacks; that's our sample, and it's immediately judged representative and exhaustive.
We do the same and find cases where whites are not killed; that's our sample, and it's immediately judged representative and exhaustive.
If we example the entire set, we find that more whites than blacks are killed (unarmed), and that some of those that the public "knows" were of unarmed blacks weren't of unarmed blacks. We find that unarmed blacks are disproportionately killed, but we're talking not hundreds in "excess," nor scores, but dozens in a black population of something like 42 million. We go to stats to show something that the absolute numbers don't merit.
But because we use stats and gobs of anecdotal non-representative samples, our little brains exaggerate the numbers--threats are exaggerated and help to foster a lot of hatred. When you get that kind of hatred and distrust, that kind of us-versus-them thinking, it means that if a member of that other group does something suspicious and you assume the worst. "Is that a gun or a book?" Hey, it's a member of the group that you distrust, assume it's a gun. "Did they shoot intentionally or was it an honest mistake?" Hey, it's a member of the group that you distrust, you assume it's intentional.
Lose the boundaries, lose a lot of the distrust. Except that too may find their self-identity in those boundaries, and justify too much bad attitude in terms of perceptions formed around and in order to justify those boundaries.
With the caveat that everybody's always willing to change, but really, it's all on the other guy because we are the good guys and don't do anything wrong. And if the stats and numbers say otherwise, then the stats are obviously incorrect.
jonno99
(2,620 posts)off half-cocked - acting on emotion, rather than waiting for the facts.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)a wait and seer to boot. A Twofer. Been hearing that wait and see BS too many times. Spot off!!!!! It was murder, pure and simple.
jonno99
(2,620 posts)seen that the half-cockers were wrong. So what do we end up with? An endless cycle of mistrust.
No thanks...
heaven05
(18,124 posts)well deserved. Au Contraire on the "WRONG", too many times, too many lies and coverups involved in these executions. You are entitled to believe what you please. I shall go off fully cocked and be right in my TOTAL mistrust of the "official" statements by perpetrators of the lies and coverups every time from Trayvon till now. I am finished dealing with murdering cop apologists. Forever.
EX500rider
(10,835 posts)....that's over 30,000 arrests a day.....
hardluck
(638 posts)First, unlike what is implied in the OP and some posts here, not all white people are treated with kid gloves as the one in the OPs news article because police "see whites as people." Some are just shot - especially the mentally ill. And yes, the man in the news article I posted did not die, but not because the police officer was lenient but because he was a bad shot and hit him in the hip.
Second, the police disproportionately shoot mentally ill people. Indeed, at least one study showed that between 25% to 50% of fatal police shootings involved the mentally ill.
The gentleman shot in Charlotte was reported to have a TBI and based on preliminary reports May have had a weapon (it is unclear if he did, or even if he did, whether he pointed it at the police). Similarly, the man in the article I posted had a TBI from a car accident approx 4 months before the shooting. He was in a coma a month and had just been released from physical therapy to spend x-mas with his family. He was 20 feet away, could barely walk and at least arguably not a deadly threat to the officer when he was shot.
We have a use of force problem in the US.
Waldorf
(654 posts)would come to the conclusion that only POC of are shot by police. Here is a link from the Washington Post. Yes, it shows that blacks (especially males) are shot at a higher percentage than whites based on population but more whites are still shot and killed by police.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2016/07/11/arent-more-white-people-than-black-people-killed-by-police-yes-but-no/?utm_term=.75bf13ab5cb0
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)... our hands in the air !!!
I have YET... YET to see a white person killed who had their hands in the air
7962
(11,841 posts)http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2015/09/01/video-apparently-shows-texas-police-officers-shooting-and-killing--man-who-had-his-hands-up--surrender/71511908/
"unclear what the suspect's intent was in raising his hands and cautioned against a rush to judgment." Sound familiar to other cases??
There's the 1st one that pops up
Enjoy
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)... LEO culture in some cities !?!?!?! why are they so comfortable with shooting first!?!?
Do you think it could be gun culture in the US??!
jus wow
7962
(11,841 posts)Too many thugs wearing blue these days. Not like when I was growing up in the 70s/80s
You cant tase a guy with his hands up? Or let your partner help take him down? Guy didnt even have a shirt on, so tough to say he was "hiding something"
ecstatic
(32,679 posts)Marr
(20,317 posts)More whites are killed by police than are blacks, in fact. I'd be the first to agree that our police are too trigger happy in this country, but it seems like many are primarily trying to make incendiary arguments, rather than useful ones.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)Response to KamaAina (Reply #23)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Marr
(20,317 posts)the number of unarmed whites and unarmed blacks killed by police was the same:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2016/07/11/arent-more-white-people-than-black-people-killed-by-police-yes-but-no/?utm_term=.0f142d7f3c06
Again, my point is not that there's no disparity-- there obviously is. But the article above, and your question-- both suggest an assumption that police simply do not shoot white people. They do.
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)Marr
(20,317 posts)uponit7771
(90,335 posts)... and whites shot was the same.
That's not the issue being talked about here, proportionality is
Lancero
(3,003 posts)You'd think that at least ONE person would be able to come up with a example of one getting shot and killed with their hands up in the air, just like how so many blacks had their hands when shot to death.
No one is saying that the police acting professionally is a bad thing - We're wanting to know why the average officer refuses to act professionally towards ALL races instead of just one.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Investigators are trying to determine whether the officers were justified in using deadly force during the shooting last month, Fresno Police Chief Jerry Dyer said at a news conference, according to the Washington Post. The teenager was unarmed when he was shot four times, authorities said.
Were the last two rounds fired by the officers necessary? Based on a reasonable fear, did the officers have to use deadly force? I do not have the answer to that today, Dyer said, according to the Guardian. That video was extremely disturbing to watch.
http://time.com/4406112/dylan-noble-fresno-video-shooting-police/
Lancero
(3,003 posts)Excusing this behavior with 'well, they do it to whites too!' is a prime example of how prevalent racism is among all groups.
exboyfil
(17,862 posts)Actually very similar to Terence Crutcher.
Lancero
(3,003 posts)Which is what the topic was about. That police, for some unknown reason refuse to treat AA's and Whites equally. And how many people, hidden racists the majority of em, justify that treatment with 'well, they do it to whites too!'
exboyfil
(17,862 posts)Lancero
(3,003 posts)"The police do it to whites too!"
7962
(11,841 posts)Lancero
(3,003 posts)"The police do it to whites too!"
you are losing this one, badly
Lancero
(3,003 posts)Police aggression affects whites as well, but not to the point that it does AA's. It's a racial disparity, one that many refuse to acknowledge and instead try to justify the racist treatment that AA's experience with 'The police do it to whites too!'
That is what this topic was about. How police take a, on average, lighter hand towards whites than they do AA's.
Since people seem to like Snopes, here's their article over the myth that police aggression affects blacks and whites equally.
http://www.snopes.com/do-police-kill-more-whites-than-blacks/
Skittles
(153,141 posts)you cannot infer POC are ALWAYS targeted, and white people, because they are so "privileged", NEVER ARE
Lancero
(3,003 posts)I've got something you should read. Really, I'd recommend that anyone who says 'but whites aren't privileged!' read this given how educational and informative it is.
https://www.deanza.edu/faculty/lewisjulie/White%20Priviledge%20Unpacking%20the%20Invisible%20Knapsack.pdf
It's a old writeup, so not all of the examples are as true as they once were - A testament to how much we've advanced since then - though a lot of it still applies today - A testament of how much further we still have to go.
Skittles
(153,141 posts)these leaps of logic are as silly as the nonsensical analogies
I have NEVER said that POC are not unfairly targeted
Lancero
(3,003 posts)A sarcastic dismissal - Which is what you gave to the idea that white people can be privileged in your above comment.
ALRIGHTY then
-DONE HERE-
7962
(11,841 posts)You tried changing the subject and now you wanna change it back after being shown the proof you said didnt exist
exboyfil
(17,862 posts)when Terence Crutcher was shot he did not have his hands in the air. His right hand was down by his body, and his left hand was obscured by his body. This can be seen by the helicopter video (he was shot right when the helicopter video was pointed at his back).
Two recent examples that are similar in nature are Jesse Beshaw and Joseph Weber
http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/story/news/2016/09/17/police-shooting-jesse-beshaw-stuns-winooski/90585130/
http://www.kwch.com/content/news/Man-killed-in-officer-involved-shooting-in-Hays-390653381.html
In the Hays shooting case the police have refused to release any information.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)These anecdotal stories are stupid and insulting.
exboyfil
(17,862 posts)You can search by weapon and other parameters.
UnFettered
(79 posts)There is a big problem with police and there training in general and it affects everybody.
lostnfound
(16,170 posts)And also mentally ill people.
How many 13 year old white kids with airsoft pistols or bb guns have been killed by cops?
UnFettered
(79 posts)I hear lots of talk but I have yet to hear anybody have anything meaningful to say other than the simple answer that there racists.
I have scene many situations that could have been easily avoided had police been trained to respond differently to situations.
Skittles
(153,141 posts)you were wrong last time so who knows?
heaven05
(18,124 posts)For dealing with people other than AA'S.
exboyfil
(17,862 posts)After being tasered they were shot
David Kassick
https://photographyisnotacrime.com/2015/11/09/pennsylvania-jury-foreman-explains-why-he-acquitted-killer-cop/
Michael Ireland
http://www.news-leader.com/story/news/crime/2015/09/24/sgf-police-city-settle-family-man-killed-officer/72760328/
doc03
(35,324 posts)with nail strips and he continued on until the engine blew in his truck. He gets out of his truck waves his handgun around
puts it to his head and chest. The cops had a major highway closed for 2 hours and they get him to surrender totally unharmed.
A few days later someone puts up his $25000 bail and the same day he goes through the same thing all over again and they again
arrest him unharmed, he is under $500,000 bail now. To top it off the Sheriff actually said the guy was trying to commit suicide by cop.
There is a guy that wanted to get shot and he gets a pass twice. I posted the incident a few weeks ago and I got flamed for it.
Stuff like are you disappointed he wasn't shot and such?
MrScorpio
(73,630 posts)Response to KamaAina (Original post)
deathrind This message was self-deleted by its author.