Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

lumberjack_jeff

(33,224 posts)
Thu Oct 6, 2016, 07:53 PM Oct 2016

"Working class white men make less than they did in 1996"

http://money.cnn.com/2016/10/05/news/economy/working-class-men-income/index.html

Working class white men saw their income drop 9% between 1996 and 2014, according to a new report from Sentier Research. This group, who Sentier defines as having only a high school diploma, earned only $36,787, on average, in 2014, down from $40,362 in 1996.
Meanwhile, college educated white men saw their income soar nearly 23% over the same period, from $77,209 to $94,601.
Published by two former Census Bureau officials, the Sentier report shines yet another light on the fortunes of the white working class. This group has become a force in the 2016 presidential election, serving as the backbone of Donald Trump's support. And the Republican candidate's campaign has tailored much of his campaign to the working class, with promises that he will bring back the manufacturing jobs that once allowed them to support their families.
29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Working class white men make less than they did in 1996" (Original Post) lumberjack_jeff Oct 2016 OP
They are still doing much better than most of the rest of us, and those jobs are NEVER coming back. bravenak Oct 2016 #1
I'm deeply suspicious of this statistic. Donald Ian Rankin Oct 2016 #2
Here's what WaPo found lumberjack_jeff Oct 2016 #3
I'm not surprized by this at all. The University campuses are overwhelmingly female underahedgerow Oct 2016 #4
I teach community college, and my classes are at least 75% female. Coventina Oct 2016 #11
Do you consider that observation a problem that should be solved? n/t lumberjack_jeff Oct 2016 #12
Of course. This situation has a massive backlash across all of society in countless ways. underahedgerow Oct 2016 #13
It is extremely troubling to me, for all the reasons underahedgerow mentions. Coventina Oct 2016 #15
To what would you attribute this attitudinal change? lumberjack_jeff Oct 2016 #16
I have no idea. And, I agree that by college the trend is extremely difficult to reverse. Coventina Oct 2016 #17
I think young men are "opting out". MindPilot Oct 2016 #21
A number of Redditors also attributed part of it to college degree creep. Xithras Oct 2016 #24
I'm thinking its similar for blacks and Latinos, income insecurity is hear most by those who have uponit7771 Oct 2016 #5
"Trump's supporters might be comparatively well off" Starry Messenger Oct 2016 #6
it's hard to admit what it is that upsets them so much. JI7 Oct 2016 #7
Yup. Starry Messenger Oct 2016 #8
That posit doesn't explain why so many of them are overwhelmingly functionally illiterate underahedgerow Oct 2016 #14
It's the bigoted, jingoistic, hyper-masculine rhetoric. ronnie624 Oct 2016 #20
Less because of loss of jobs, less because of the loss of unions? ismnotwasm Oct 2016 #9
Both lumberjack_jeff Oct 2016 #10
More accurately, working class people are not all secure. LanternWaste Oct 2016 #19
We've had stagnant wages for decades. Rex Oct 2016 #18
I think white men have figured out where they stand nowadays AngryAmish Oct 2016 #22
The problem is that working class white men blame their losses TexasBushwhacker Oct 2016 #23
Agree. lumberjack_jeff Oct 2016 #27
Often blaming their lack of success on people of color TexasBushwhacker Oct 2016 #29
GOP has been systematically busting unions for years. Kingofalldems Oct 2016 #25
It's a lot easier to bust unions when the employment to population ratio is low. n/t lumberjack_jeff Oct 2016 #28
This is last years numbers Go Vols Oct 2016 #26
 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
1. They are still doing much better than most of the rest of us, and those jobs are NEVER coming back.
Thu Oct 6, 2016, 08:23 PM
Oct 2016

There has been quite a bit of automation in the last 20 years.

Donald Ian Rankin

(13,598 posts)
2. I'm deeply suspicious of this statistic.
Thu Oct 6, 2016, 08:25 PM
Oct 2016

Whether or not you're working class is going to be closely tied to your income. So this sounds like it could very easily not actually mean what it sounds like it means.

Coventina

(27,052 posts)
11. I teach community college, and my classes are at least 75% female.
Fri Oct 7, 2016, 10:11 AM
Oct 2016

And no, I don't teach child and family studies.

underahedgerow

(1,232 posts)
13. Of course. This situation has a massive backlash across all of society in countless ways.
Fri Oct 7, 2016, 12:57 PM
Oct 2016

From men feeling inferior to women because women are taking the higher paying jobs, to a feeling of inequality in the home, to the generational effect it has on kids, and to the economic effect it has across the nation. It's no shock that the big tech companies are importing well qualified workers.

The problem could be approached, as Obama and Clinton have said, with (much) more subsidies for higher education, to begin with.

Coventina

(27,052 posts)
15. It is extremely troubling to me, for all the reasons underahedgerow mentions.
Fri Oct 7, 2016, 01:17 PM
Oct 2016

Our community college district is attempting to address the issue by instituting male mentor-ship programs, and other such outreach programs.

One of the issues has been the (seeming) reluctance college men have had to taking advantage of these initiatives.
Very few men end up participating.

Another observation I have had is that the women in my courses generally outperform the men by large margins. So not only are fewer men going to college, but the ones that do *generally* underperform compared to women.

Believe me, we are concerned and attempting to analyze this problem, but so far we (the college) has not found definitive answers nor a "fix".

On a personal level, I am available to my students via email virtually 24/7, and beyond my required office hours I also offer special tutoring sessions, and many additional office hours besides. So far, in the several years I have offered these additional options ONLY WOMEN have ever shown up for the extra help.

 

lumberjack_jeff

(33,224 posts)
16. To what would you attribute this attitudinal change?
Fri Oct 7, 2016, 01:40 PM
Oct 2016

In the 1970's men were overrepresented in college and primary education was reformed to remedy this imbalance.

My personal belief is that attempts to intervene by college faculty are far too late.

https://www.theguardian.com/education/2010/sep/01/girls-boys-schools-gender-gap

Coventina

(27,052 posts)
17. I have no idea. And, I agree that by college the trend is extremely difficult to reverse.
Fri Oct 7, 2016, 01:52 PM
Oct 2016

But, we are obligated to do whatever we can.

Community colleges, in spite of all the jokes made about us, take our mission to make higher education accessible to as many as possible, very seriously.

 

MindPilot

(12,693 posts)
21. I think young men are "opting out".
Mon Oct 10, 2016, 11:33 AM
Oct 2016

Men are eschewing the cultural expectation of college-career-family and the unrelenting debt and stress that surrounds that lifestyle.

They avoid the mortgage-like debt of college, work a low-stress job that pays the rent, remain single, childless and solvent. I think a lot of guys are seeing that there is a better way than the path society has laid out for us.

Xithras

(16,191 posts)
24. A number of Redditors also attributed part of it to college degree creep.
Mon Oct 10, 2016, 02:57 PM
Oct 2016

This topic was discussed extensively on Reddit last week, and several commentators made a very good point. The analysis draws the line between "working class" and "middle class" jobs along the "job requires a college degree" line. That's a questionable way to do the study, because there has been a tremendous amount of degree creep nationwide over the past 20 years. Skilled but degree-less jobs that filled out the upper end of the working class employment spectrum in 1996 overwhelmingly require a college degree today. It's very common for supervisory level jobs in the skilled trades, and often labor level positions in the trades, to have degree requirements for new hires.

By using a college degree as the defining line between the classes, the study shifted many higher paying 1996 working class jobs into the 2016 middle class column. It can be the same job, with the same payscale and same skillset, but the addition of a degree requirement shifts it to a higher class. By reclassifying many of the higher paying working class jobs this way, the working class average shifts downward even if NO real changes to compensation occurred.

I'm not saying that the pay decline isn't real (it is VERY real), but their methodology may be masking the real numbers.

uponit7771

(90,301 posts)
5. I'm thinking its similar for blacks and Latinos, income insecurity is hear most by those who have
Fri Oct 7, 2016, 12:50 AM
Oct 2016

... something to lose in the first place.

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
6. "Trump's supporters might be comparatively well off"
Fri Oct 7, 2016, 01:00 AM
Oct 2016
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/08/12/a-massive-new-study-debunks-a-widespread-theory-for-donald-trumps-success/



According to this new analysis, those who view Trump favorably have not been disproportionately affected by foreign trade or immigration, compared with people with unfavorable views of the Republican presidential nominee. The results suggest that his supporters, on average, do not have lower incomes than other Americans, nor are they more likely to be unemployed.

<snip>

Among people who had similar educations, lived in similar places, belonged to the same religion and so on, those with greater incomes were modestly more likely to favor Trump. They were just as likely to be either working or looking for work as others.

In one respect, that conclusion was expected. White households tend be more affluent than other households, and Trump's supporters are overwhelmingly white. The same is true of Republicans in general. Yet when Rothwell focused only on white Republicans, he also found that demographically similar respondents who were more affluent viewed Trump more favorably.

These results suggest that personal finances cannot alone account for Trump's appeal. His popularity with less-educated men is probably due to some other trait that these supporters share.

<snip>

underahedgerow

(1,232 posts)
14. That posit doesn't explain why so many of them are overwhelmingly functionally illiterate
Fri Oct 7, 2016, 12:59 PM
Oct 2016

and incapable of forming a complete, coherent sentence.

ismnotwasm

(41,956 posts)
9. Less because of loss of jobs, less because of the loss of unions?
Fri Oct 7, 2016, 08:56 AM
Oct 2016

Less because of increased competition for fewer jobs, less because of wages not keeping up with inflation? I have questions...

 

lumberjack_jeff

(33,224 posts)
10. Both
Fri Oct 7, 2016, 10:04 AM
Oct 2016


Contrast the above graph with those of women



Notice that since 2008, both lines have trended down.

Decreasing employment among men has created the environment in which unions can't compete - there's always someone out there desperate enough to be willing to be a scab.

Republicans thrive when people are afraid and insecure. Working class men are not at all secure.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
19. More accurately, working class people are not all secure.
Mon Oct 10, 2016, 10:38 AM
Oct 2016

"Working class men are not at all secure..."

More accurately, working class people are not all secure... regardless of whether that strokes the appropriate narrative or not.

TexasBushwhacker

(20,131 posts)
23. The problem is that working class white men blame their losses
Mon Oct 10, 2016, 02:39 PM
Oct 2016

on the "liberals". Somehow, they've decided that it's the Democrats fault that good union jobs that you could get with a high school education have moved overseas. They don't blame the businesses that chose profits over jobs or people like Trump who gladly make their products overseas and buy steel from China.

 

lumberjack_jeff

(33,224 posts)
27. Agree.
Mon Oct 10, 2016, 04:16 PM
Oct 2016

That was the core reason for my support of Sanders - economic populism. Show people who really is screwing them.

Failing that, the guilty will step up to pin the blame on others.

TexasBushwhacker

(20,131 posts)
29. Often blaming their lack of success on people of color
Mon Oct 10, 2016, 04:27 PM
Oct 2016

The wgole "Make America Great Again" is just code for "Make America White Again". The good old days when you could get a decent job just because you were white and male. You didn't have to worry about competition from blacks or Latinos and certainly not from women!

Go Vols

(5,902 posts)
26. This is last years numbers
Mon Oct 10, 2016, 03:25 PM
Oct 2016

Wage is around $2 more this year and others went up some.Close to $60.00 an hour in the Ironworkers Union.

Hope it last another 22 years when my kid can retire.Its a few bucks more than I made in '94,should be more.


$32.36 - wage
$9.10 - welfare (insurance)
$10.37 - pension
$4.25 - annuity
$0.35 - apprentice training

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Working class white men ...