Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If Republicans could bring themselves to actually LOOK at a vagina, they might not be so afraid. (Original Post) MiddleFingerMom Jun 2012 OP
well... hrmjustin Jun 2012 #1
I support more people looking at vaginas. Poll_Blind Jun 2012 #2
Congress allows pictures of Politicalboi Jun 2012 #3
Are you serious? Xyzse Jun 2012 #4
Right, it's really about power over and control of all females. As objects, not people. LiberalLoner Jun 2012 #5
If you can't say it, don't legislate it. xfundy Jun 2012 #6
Bwaa...I LOL'd. Brickbat Jun 2012 #7
Larry David thinks some are to large.... deaniac21 Jun 2012 #8
The Republicans can't see the vagina for the vulvas. Uncle Joe Jun 2012 #9
What the heck is that? Quantess Jun 2012 #10
Glad you asked that question... PCIntern Jun 2012 #11
I'm PRETTY sure it's one of those Sheepdog/Waterdogs that look like they have dreadlocks. MiddleFingerMom Jun 2012 #12
I'm guessing an Afghan Hound catching a Frisbee. trof Jun 2012 #13
The birth of Donald Trump, his mouth is open as usual but he has lost a lot of hair since then. Uncle Joe Jun 2012 #14
repigs prefer.... bongbong Jun 2012 #15

Xyzse

(8,217 posts)
4. Are you serious?
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 03:10 PM
Jun 2012

If you go by supposed statistics, Porn usage is more prevalent in Red States.
That won't work.
I would wish it were that simple.

Also, since supposed "Religious" individuals tend to have a higher divorce rate, that merely shows that they are comfortable looking at it, playing with and so forth. They are just a little bit more like the taliban that want their women covered from any one else other than themselves.

LiberalLoner

(9,761 posts)
5. Right, it's really about power over and control of all females. As objects, not people.
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 03:27 PM
Jun 2012

Just "things" to be owned and used and thrown away when old or boring.

MiddleFingerMom

(25,163 posts)
12. I'm PRETTY sure it's one of those Sheepdog/Waterdogs that look like they have dreadlocks.
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 04:22 PM
Jun 2012

.
.
.
They may have ALWAYS been, but I've only noticed them as very popular
in the Dog Show competitions lately.
.
.
.
(edit to add): There are probably some Photoshop touches, too... at least at the front.
.
.
.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If Republicans could brin...