Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
95 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wm. McPhail nails it in his New Yorker cartoon .. (Original Post) DemoTex Jan 2017 OP
It seems like this cartoon is mocking the idea of democracy oberliner Jan 2017 #1
It seems like your statement blue cat Jan 2017 #3
What is the message of the cartoon? oberliner Jan 2017 #8
Complex jobs require people with advanced skill sets. KittyWampus Jan 2017 #17
Of course oberliner Jan 2017 #21
Of course you would blue cat Jan 2017 #26
Maybe there is more to the cartoon than you think oberliner Jan 2017 #27
GOOD FUCKING LORD MAN, IT IS ABOUT THE ELECTION OF DONALD TRUMP. Schema Thing Jan 2017 #32
OK oberliner Jan 2017 #34
Al Franken in the earliest days of Air America posed the question like this: A voice comes over the Akamai Jan 2017 #38
Overthinking? A tad, perhaps Roy Rolling Jan 2017 #67
LOL !!! pangaia Jan 2017 #45
Also relevant to Brexit, I'd say LeftishBrit Jan 2017 #76
"A republic . . . if you can keep it." Ben Franklin's reply Hortensis Jan 2017 #62
LOL !!!! pangaia Jan 2017 #43
you are REALLY starting to give yourself away now Skittles Jan 2017 #4
Huh? oberliner Jan 2017 #7
that's not what it says at ALL Skittles Jan 2017 #9
The voting aspect of the cartoon seems to imply that making important choices democratically oberliner Jan 2017 #13
Donald Trump is NOT A SOLUTION Skittles Jan 2017 #14
Well, that goes without saying oberliner Jan 2017 #16
good lawd Skittles Jan 2017 #18
Again, I'm just contemplating the cartoon oberliner Jan 2017 #23
it's about Trump's IDIOTIC SUPPORTERS Skittles Jan 2017 #28
Contemplate 🤔 away blue cat Jan 2017 #29
Just thought it was worth discussing oberliner Jan 2017 #31
Sure blue cat Jan 2017 #40
It does beg the question though oberliner Jan 2017 #54
Certainly they should not be chosen by votes cast by people who do not know the requirements Akamai Jan 2017 #71
Holy fuck. moda253 Jan 2017 #74
What do you mean? oberliner Jan 2017 #75
Critical thinking ebbs and flows on DU Chico Man Jan 2017 #81
Thanks! oberliner Jan 2017 #84
Not to mention the SCOTUS gave 'Bush the younger' the Presidency.. YOHABLO Jan 2017 #44
My god, if you went to Oberlin, one would assume you got the joke...Lol... pangaia Jan 2017 #46
I credit my Oberlin education for my perceptive analysis oberliner Jan 2017 #51
Well, as you wish. pangaia Jan 2017 #53
you confuse "imply" and "infer." LanternWaste Jan 2017 #79
It is not that voting as such can be foolish; but that deliberately voting for the non-expert can be LeftishBrit Jan 2017 #87
I'm Not Sure RobinA Jan 2017 #65
That poster gave themselves away a longggg time ago. KittyWampus Jan 2017 #19
What does that mean? oberliner Jan 2017 #24
Long ago and far away in another galaxy Hekate Jan 2017 #42
Lol.... pangaia Jan 2017 #48
Which is why the Founders set up the USA as a republic, not a democracy. baldguy Jan 2017 #11
Is the plane a metaphor for the USA? oberliner Jan 2017 #15
THE "PEERS" selected HILLARY Skittles Jan 2017 #20
Very true oberliner Jan 2017 #22
EXACTLY Skittles Jan 2017 #25
They didn't do a very good job, considering that their system gave us fuckface as President. JustinL Jan 2017 #57
The Founders didn't give us gerrymandering, voter suppression, the influence of corporate money, baldguy Jan 2017 #63
The antidemocratic system I was referring to was the Electoral College. JustinL Jan 2017 #92
The idea of democracy is not to be confused with our recent experience. hay rick Jan 2017 #41
It seems like this cartoon is mocking the idea of inexperience. LanternWaste Jan 2017 #77
If that was the case, why focus on the voting? oberliner Jan 2017 #82
Because it is about voting for the inexperienced person... LeftishBrit Jan 2017 #89
62 million people *actually* voted for trump. so yes. yodermon Jan 2017 #85
No - it is mocking the idea that experience in government should be a disqualification for office LeftishBrit Jan 2017 #86
Is he any relation to Andy McPhail? AngryAmish Jan 2017 #2
You don't even have to throw in the race or gender card to get it. ffr Jan 2017 #5
I'll take a smug out-of-touch pilot or surgeon over a sensitive wanna-be any day. lindysalsagal Jan 2017 #6
So politically this analogy humbled_opinion Jan 2017 #10
it is saying Skittles Jan 2017 #12
Herr Drumpf is unqualified to run a vacuum cleaner. greatauntoftriplets Jan 2017 #30
not even a manual carpet sweeper!! niyad Jan 2017 #37
Unfortunately the only measure that matters in this case Chico Man Jan 2017 #83
Yes, he had something going for him. $$$$$$$$, that's what he had going for him. LeftishBrit Jan 2017 #90
They both had plenty of $$$$$$$$$$$ Chico Man Jan 2017 #95
Well, people with some form of relevant experience. meadowlander Jan 2017 #50
He might not be, but I strongly think experience is a plus. n/t pnwmom Jan 2017 #58
Only experienced politicians treestar Jan 2017 #64
Not necessarily, but that only people with some knowledge about government should do so LeftishBrit Jan 2017 #88
jesus....ok, easy version.... dhill926 Jan 2017 #33
Fewer hands should be up oberliner Jan 2017 #35
artistic license.... dhill926 Jan 2017 #36
Maybe that was just the "business class" section. FailureToCommunicate Jan 2017 #39
Interesting how political satire can be interpreted in so many ways. YOHABLO Jan 2017 #47
Thanks for starting what has turned into the most entertaining thread of the day... pangaia Jan 2017 #49
I'll take most of the credit for the laughs oberliner Jan 2017 #52
That being a good sport... pangaia Jan 2017 #55
K&R nt ProudProgressiveNow Jan 2017 #56
I believe this is a commentary on the dangers of lumping all "professional politicians" King_Klonopin Jan 2017 #59
He probably stayed in a Holiday Inn last night too...... Historic NY Jan 2017 #60
This sim tech recommends awoke_in_2003 Jan 2017 #61
Airline pilots need specialized training... meaculpa2016 Jan 2017 #66
A decent and competent presidency requires experience. Paladin Jan 2017 #70
K&R mcar Jan 2017 #68
YOU can have my back--again--any day, Mac pinboy3niner Jan 2017 #69
If any Trump voter gets sick, they should get all their medical attention and advice from 4lbs Jan 2017 #72
Unfortunately, some of those types do have that attitude to medicine as well LeftishBrit Jan 2017 #78
I'm feeling pretty funny today. Let me give this a shot. crosinski Jan 2017 #73
Great cartoon Gothmog Jan 2017 #80
Missing the Red Hat !! flying-skeleton Jan 2017 #91
K & R Scurrilous Jan 2017 #93
Off Topic .............. are you still working your tower?? Angry Dragon Jan 2017 #94
 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
1. It seems like this cartoon is mocking the idea of democracy
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 09:02 PM
Jan 2017

The suggestion being that ordinary people are too stupid to choose who will lead them?

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
21. Of course
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 09:53 PM
Jan 2017

But the cartoon specifically shows a group of people voting, so, one would think, the cartoonist is saying something about democracy.

blue cat

(2,415 posts)
26. Of course you would
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 09:56 PM
Jan 2017

Even though it's obviously not what it's about. I'm sorry that you don't get it.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
27. Maybe there is more to the cartoon than you think
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 09:58 PM
Jan 2017

It could be making a broader statement than you realize. It's worth thinking about, at least.

 

Akamai

(1,779 posts)
38. Al Franken in the earliest days of Air America posed the question like this: A voice comes over the
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 10:43 PM
Jan 2017

speaker system in a plane, saying: "Our captain and co-captain are incapacitated -- can anyone back there fly a plane?"

And at that point (in the joke), Joe Garigiola, the baseball player, is urged by friends on board that flight. "Joe, you can do it! Go fly the plane!"

And so Joe lumbers forward, maybe not willingly, and flies the plane and it crashes immediately into the side of a mountain.

Al Franken then said: "If you sit in the pilot's chair, you are assuring others that you can do the job." And Trump has shown no sign he is able to do the job. (Actually, this cartoon is so close to the Al Franken joke that it may have been based on a joke like that.)

My uncle was a captain in the navy for 20 years in command of a missile frigate and he said that to be captain, you had to take all responsibilities associated with the job. Bush was an example of what happens when we have a president not up for the job. (And so was Reagan.)

Roy Rolling

(6,908 posts)
67. Overthinking? A tad, perhaps
Tue Jan 3, 2017, 10:44 AM
Jan 2017

But in closing, it carries that message, too. A charismatic and convincing person DID convince 66 million Americans to cast a vote for someone with neither experience nor training.

So the cartoon carries two messages. Three would be overthinking it. LOL

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
62. "A republic . . . if you can keep it." Ben Franklin's reply
Tue Jan 3, 2017, 07:43 AM
Jan 2017

to someone on the street at the close of the Constitutional Convention of 1787 on what kind of government they'd decided on. The potentially capricious will of the electorate has always been understood to be the great weakness that destroys republics.

Thanks, DemoTex. It is a terrific illustration.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
7. Huh?
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 09:38 PM
Jan 2017

The cartoon seems to be saying that most people are idiots, and that making choices based on voting is therefore foolish.

Skittles

(153,113 posts)
9. that's not what it says at ALL
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 09:42 PM
Jan 2017

it's SAYING to DON'T EXPECT A COMPLETELY UNQUALIFIED PERSON TO DO A JOB THAT AFFECTS LIVES - and YES, THINKING DONALD FUCKING TRUMP is qualified to be PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES is indeed STUPID / FOOLISH

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
13. The voting aspect of the cartoon seems to imply that making important choices democratically
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 09:47 PM
Jan 2017

Can be foolish.

I guess I see how it is more of an attack on those who went after the supposed "smugness" of Democrats and/or liberals and then chose a totally unqualified person to take charge instead.

Hard for me to tell exactly who are what the cartoon is spoofing, but I might just be a little out of it right now.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
16. Well, that goes without saying
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 09:50 PM
Jan 2017

I just wasn't sure if the cartoon was making a broader point about democracy in general or was just directed at Trump in particular.

Skittles

(153,113 posts)
18. good lawd
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 09:52 PM
Jan 2017

and by the way, the Electoral College OVERRIDES democracy

and Trump was installed with the help of VOTER SUPPRESSION, RUSSIA and the FBI

NO DEMOCRACY THERE

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
31. Just thought it was worth discussing
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 10:05 PM
Jan 2017

This is a discussion forum. The cartoon is interesting. Seems worth thinking/talking about. Good satirical cartoons in theory inspire that sort of thing.

blue cat

(2,415 posts)
40. Sure
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 10:58 PM
Jan 2017

It seems highly doubtful that the cartoon is about dissing democracy. I found it very frustrating that some Americans would vote for someone clearly not up to the job.

 

Akamai

(1,779 posts)
71. Certainly they should not be chosen by votes cast by people who do not know the requirements
Tue Jan 3, 2017, 11:18 AM
Jan 2017

for the job.

Have to have some expertise in the area if your job requires a skill-set.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
75. What do you mean?
Tue Jan 3, 2017, 01:17 PM
Jan 2017

I do try to look at things in a thoughtful way, whenever possible.

This cartoon seemed to have quite a lot going on.

More than meets the eye perhaps!

Chico Man

(3,001 posts)
81. Critical thinking ebbs and flows on DU
Tue Jan 3, 2017, 01:51 PM
Jan 2017

Anger and emotion are the usual culprits.

I appreciate you going above and beyond and offering up a critique in such an echo chamber environment.

 

YOHABLO

(7,358 posts)
44. Not to mention the SCOTUS gave 'Bush the younger' the Presidency..
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 11:45 PM
Jan 2017

or should I have said 'Bush the pretender'?

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
51. I credit my Oberlin education for my perceptive analysis
Tue Jan 3, 2017, 12:02 AM
Jan 2017

Of the more subtle implications of the cartoon.

LeftishBrit

(41,203 posts)
87. It is not that voting as such can be foolish; but that deliberately voting for the non-expert can be
Tue Jan 3, 2017, 02:27 PM
Jan 2017

foolish.

 

baldguy

(36,649 posts)
11. Which is why the Founders set up the USA as a republic, not a democracy.
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 09:43 PM
Jan 2017

Do you think that the pilot of an airliner should be selected from among the untrained passengers? Really?

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
15. Is the plane a metaphor for the USA?
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 09:49 PM
Jan 2017

If so, what is the cartoon saying about how one should get to be president?

Presumably, not by being elected by one's peers is what the cartoon seems to be implying.

Maybe I'm just overthinking it (or underthinking it!)

JustinL

(722 posts)
57. They didn't do a very good job, considering that their system gave us fuckface as President.
Tue Jan 3, 2017, 12:13 AM
Jan 2017

The more democratic method of going by the popular vote would have given us a qualified President.

 

baldguy

(36,649 posts)
63. The Founders didn't give us gerrymandering, voter suppression, the influence of corporate money,
Tue Jan 3, 2017, 08:46 AM
Jan 2017

a lazy corporate media, or Russian hacking. The fascists in the GOP did.

JustinL

(722 posts)
92. The antidemocratic system I was referring to was the Electoral College.
Tue Jan 3, 2017, 03:48 PM
Jan 2017

Without the EC, Clinton would have won, despite all those other things you mentioned.

I think we agree, though, that the election of fuckface was the result of too little democracy, not too much.

hay rick

(7,588 posts)
41. The idea of democracy is not to be confused with our recent experience.
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 11:07 PM
Jan 2017

This cartoon is clearly commentary on the election of Trump, not democracy in general. And yes- uninformed, misinformed and irresponsible voters can make catastrophically bad decisions. It should also be noted that the majority of "ordinary people" were not "too stupid" to choose the right leader.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
77. It seems like this cartoon is mocking the idea of inexperience.
Tue Jan 3, 2017, 01:22 PM
Jan 2017

The suggestion being that ordinary people are too inexperienced to fly an airplane.


But no doubt, our bias compels us to see that which we want to see, and we will indeed, rationalize that bias as something else.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
82. If that was the case, why focus on the voting?
Tue Jan 3, 2017, 01:52 PM
Jan 2017

The totality of what we see in the cartoon is a group of people voting (foolishly).

If it was just meant to mock the idea of inexperience, one could certainly do so in a myriad of ones unconnected to voting.

LeftishBrit

(41,203 posts)
89. Because it is about voting for the inexperienced person...
Tue Jan 3, 2017, 02:33 PM
Jan 2017

Last edited Wed Jan 4, 2017, 05:28 PM - Edit history (1)

on the grounds that inexperience is being presented as a virtue!

One can ridicule a particular vote, without ridiculing the whole concept of voting. If one makes fun of the reasons why someone buys a car, or writes a book, this does not mean that no one should ever buy a car or write a book.

Admittedly, it might be a more accurate reflection of this particular election if a majority of the passengers voted for the experienced pilot, but a Pilot Selection College chose the non-expert anyway.

LeftishBrit

(41,203 posts)
86. No - it is mocking the idea that experience in government should be a disqualification for office
Tue Jan 3, 2017, 02:25 PM
Jan 2017

And perhaps more generally that 'experts' are not to be trusted.

In the run-up to Brexit, Michael Gove, former Education Secretary no less, said that the British had 'had enough of experts'.

The Unspeakable used 'anti-elitism' as part of his appeal. He certainly is very much of the elite as regards his wealth, but he portrayed himself as somehow more suitable precisely because he had less government experience than Clinton.

ffr

(22,665 posts)
5. You don't even have to throw in the race or gender card to get it.
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 09:34 PM
Jan 2017

These dummies need to be put in their place, instead of glorified as yesteryear heroes.

lindysalsagal

(20,582 posts)
6. I'll take a smug out-of-touch pilot or surgeon over a sensitive wanna-be any day.
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 09:37 PM
Jan 2017

The cartoon is right. None of us is going on a date with the future potus: We require competence, not a drinking buddy.

Skittles

(153,113 posts)
12. it is saying
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 09:46 PM
Jan 2017

COMPLETELY UNQUALIFIED PEOPLE SHOULD NOT RUN THE COUNTRY

by ANY measure, Donald fucking Trump is COMPLETELY UNQUALIFIED

Chico Man

(3,001 posts)
83. Unfortunately the only measure that matters in this case
Tue Jan 3, 2017, 01:54 PM
Jan 2017

Is electoral votes (as has been the case with every president).

Playing devils advocate here, it is very hard for an ordinary citizen to gather enough electoral votes to win a presidential election. Obviously Trump had something going for him.

Chico Man

(3,001 posts)
95. They both had plenty of $$$$$$$$$$$
Tue Jan 3, 2017, 07:48 PM
Jan 2017

Just saying.

And ordinary citizens do not have a lot of $$$$$$$$$$$$$.

meadowlander

(4,388 posts)
50. Well, people with some form of relevant experience.
Mon Jan 2, 2017, 11:56 PM
Jan 2017

Why is that a difficult concept to grasp?

Yes, we live in a democracy. That doesn't mean any boob off the street is prepared to command a nuclear arsenal, direct public policy that affects millions of lives, and manage a budget of $3.8 trillion and a government that employs 2.8 million people.

As someone with a PhD and fifteen years busting my ass in the civil service, I'm sick of people like Sarah Palin saying things like being a mom qualifies her to be president and not being called out on it. I'm not qualified to be president and neither is anyone else who hasn't spent at least twenty or thirty years of their life dedicated to the sole purpose of accumulating relevant experience.

When did we decide to settle for so little in our leaders?

The GOP's game plan has been painfully obvious for years. They keep throwing monkey wrenches into the government and then complaining that it doesn't work and that therefore we need "outsiders" to come in and "drain the swamp". And then when they are in power, they just loot and pillage until enough people catch on to put them out of power again.

What I don't get is how so many people can fall for it, over and over and over again. It's only been 8 years since the Global Financial Crisis and the American public has handed the whole shebang, lock, stock and barrel, back over to the same asshats responsible for it.

King_Klonopin

(1,306 posts)
59. I believe this is a commentary on the dangers of lumping all "professional politicians"
Tue Jan 3, 2017, 02:23 AM
Jan 2017

in the same basket of deplorables. The Pilot = The Professional Politician

The republicans have become masters of this sort of rhetoric. They have twisted the
term "Professional Politician" into one of derision, provided that the politician of interest
is a long-time Democratic politician. This is one of the narratives that Trump used
in his campaign to criticize Clinton: He was the regular guy with no political ambition;
she was the insider who has been an ambitious politician all of her life and, therefore,
has "lost touch" with the needs of regular people. Political ambition becomes a negative
for a politician, but these ambitions are perfectly acceptable for an "outsider" like Trump.

There are many people who have chosen public service (politics, government) as their
profession. Some of them are very good at their job, while others are not. Clinton has
been very good at her chosen "profession". Her experience should be valued, not
demeaned. Trump is completely incompetent and inexperienced, yet he won the election
through the illogical public appeal depicted in the cartoon above. Who would you rather
have piloting "the plane of State", Hillary or Trump ? The insane passengers of the
American electorate chose the idiot in aisle 3 instead of the 40-year veteran pilot.

The inertia of incumbency is an issue that perpetuates the status quo in politics. The
proposal of term limits in government is a two-edged sword, as it would eliminate the
good with the bad. The republicans have figured out a way to break through this by
demonizing the professional politician (i.e. Democrat), though it is blatantly hypocritical
and turns common sense and logic upside down. However, it results in the loss of competent
public servants who are then replaced by incompetent, partisan hacks.

A lengthy, successful resume in politics can now be used against you.

 

awoke_in_2003

(34,582 posts)
61. This sim tech recommends
Tue Jan 3, 2017, 07:30 AM
Jan 2017

When everything is good, the modern plane almost flies itself. Pilots are paid to know how to handle when the shit hits the fan.

meaculpa2016

(17 posts)
66. Airline pilots need specialized training...
Tue Jan 3, 2017, 09:33 AM
Jan 2017

experience and certification.

Any idiot can become a politician.

Paladin

(28,243 posts)
70. A decent and competent presidency requires experience.
Tue Jan 3, 2017, 11:06 AM
Jan 2017

Stick around for the foreseeable future and witness just how prescient this cartoon is.

pinboy3niner

(53,339 posts)
69. YOU can have my back--again--any day, Mac
Tue Jan 3, 2017, 10:59 AM
Jan 2017

The only time I was sent to do a pre-op aerial recon in Vietnam the loach pilot, trying to be funny, said, "Okay, you've got the stick" as he released the controls and the chopper started going batshit crazy. He quickly resumed control but it was definitely not funny to me!

4lbs

(6,831 posts)
72. If any Trump voter gets sick, they should get all their medical attention and advice from
Tue Jan 3, 2017, 11:34 AM
Jan 2017

WebMD and a first-year medical student.

No way they should see a doctor that has been doing this for 20 years. They can't be trusted!

LeftishBrit

(41,203 posts)
78. Unfortunately, some of those types do have that attitude to medicine as well
Tue Jan 3, 2017, 01:22 PM
Jan 2017

Don't follow 'expert' health advice; just go to your latest favourite quack or faith-healer.

If adults want to risk killing themselves, I suppose it's their choice, but sometimes they put their kids in danger as well; and, in the case of anti-vaccinators, other people's kids as well.

crosinski

(405 posts)
73. I'm feeling pretty funny today. Let me give this a shot.
Tue Jan 3, 2017, 12:06 PM
Jan 2017

We're supposed to assume that the passenger who thinks pilots are smug and have lost touch with regular passengers isn't a pilot. Then he wants to fly the plane! That's pretty funny because it's unexpected!!!

Then he takes a vote to see if the other passengers feel the same way. That's pretty funny also, because it's unexpected again!!!

And THEN, the OTHER passengers VOTE to make HIM the NEW PILOT, knowing that he probably isn't one! HaHaHa! Even more unexpected zaniness!!!

But wait, there's more. It suddenly occurs to us that this is EXACTLY what happened here when a bunch of people, who didn't know anything about government, elected someone who didn't know anything about piloting a government, and who is also so terrified of all those controls, that he keeps tweeting at us instead of learning how to fly the damned thing!!! LOL!!!!!

Get it now?!!! Hahahaha!!!! Good one!

I'm sorry. I thought I had it, but no, I'm just sad now. Very sad. I'm afraid someone else will have to step up to the plate.




Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Wm. McPhail nails it in h...