General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWm. McPhail nails it in his New Yorker cartoon ..
And as a smug, retired airline captain, I LOVE IT!!!
oberliner
(58,724 posts)The suggestion being that ordinary people are too stupid to choose who will lead them?
blue cat
(2,415 posts)Is just plain stupid.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)It seems to be saying that most people are morons.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)But then, you know that.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)But the cartoon specifically shows a group of people voting, so, one would think, the cartoonist is saying something about democracy.
blue cat
(2,415 posts)Even though it's obviously not what it's about. I'm sorry that you don't get it.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)It could be making a broader statement than you realize. It's worth thinking about, at least.
Schema Thing
(10,283 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)I guess I was overthinking it.
Akamai
(1,779 posts)speaker system in a plane, saying: "Our captain and co-captain are incapacitated -- can anyone back there fly a plane?"
And at that point (in the joke), Joe Garigiola, the baseball player, is urged by friends on board that flight. "Joe, you can do it! Go fly the plane!"
And so Joe lumbers forward, maybe not willingly, and flies the plane and it crashes immediately into the side of a mountain.
Al Franken then said: "If you sit in the pilot's chair, you are assuring others that you can do the job." And Trump has shown no sign he is able to do the job. (Actually, this cartoon is so close to the Al Franken joke that it may have been based on a joke like that.)
My uncle was a captain in the navy for 20 years in command of a missile frigate and he said that to be captain, you had to take all responsibilities associated with the job. Bush was an example of what happens when we have a president not up for the job. (And so was Reagan.)
Roy Rolling
(6,908 posts)But in closing, it carries that message, too. A charismatic and convincing person DID convince 66 million Americans to cast a vote for someone with neither experience nor training.
So the cartoon carries two messages. Three would be overthinking it. LOL
pangaia
(24,324 posts)That makes 2 best comments of the day..
😆😅
LeftishBrit
(41,203 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)to someone on the street at the close of the Constitutional Convention of 1787 on what kind of government they'd decided on. The potentially capricious will of the electorate has always been understood to be the great weakness that destroys republics.
Thanks, DemoTex. It is a terrific illustration.
Best post of the day...
😂😂😂😆
Skittles
(153,113 posts)truth hurts, does it?
The cartoon seems to be saying that most people are idiots, and that making choices based on voting is therefore foolish.
Skittles
(153,113 posts)it's SAYING to DON'T EXPECT A COMPLETELY UNQUALIFIED PERSON TO DO A JOB THAT AFFECTS LIVES - and YES, THINKING DONALD FUCKING TRUMP is qualified to be PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES is indeed STUPID / FOOLISH
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Can be foolish.
I guess I see how it is more of an attack on those who went after the supposed "smugness" of Democrats and/or liberals and then chose a totally unqualified person to take charge instead.
Hard for me to tell exactly who are what the cartoon is spoofing, but I might just be a little out of it right now.
Skittles
(153,113 posts)he is PATHETIC
oberliner
(58,724 posts)I just wasn't sure if the cartoon was making a broader point about democracy in general or was just directed at Trump in particular.
Skittles
(153,113 posts)and by the way, the Electoral College OVERRIDES democracy
and Trump was installed with the help of VOTER SUPPRESSION, RUSSIA and the FBI
NO DEMOCRACY THERE
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Maybe it is about something more than just Trump.
Skittles
(153,113 posts)*OVER AND OUT*
blue cat
(2,415 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)This is a discussion forum. The cartoon is interesting. Seems worth thinking/talking about. Good satirical cartoons in theory inspire that sort of thing.
It seems highly doubtful that the cartoon is about dissing democracy. I found it very frustrating that some Americans would vote for someone clearly not up to the job.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Of how should our "pilots" be chosen.
Akamai
(1,779 posts)for the job.
Have to have some expertise in the area if your job requires a skill-set.
moda253
(615 posts)Are all 42k of your posts like this?
oberliner
(58,724 posts)I do try to look at things in a thoughtful way, whenever possible.
This cartoon seemed to have quite a lot going on.
More than meets the eye perhaps!
Chico Man
(3,001 posts)Anger and emotion are the usual culprits.
I appreciate you going above and beyond and offering up a critique in such an echo chamber environment.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)I gave it a shot. Somewhat surprised by the reaction, but oh well.
YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)or should I have said 'Bush the pretender'?
pangaia
(24,324 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)Of the more subtle implications of the cartoon.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)you confuse "imply" and "infer." Bias can do that.
LeftishBrit
(41,203 posts)foolish.
RobinA
(9,886 posts)that's what the cartoon is saying, but if the shoe fits...
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)I am not sure I understand that remark. Could you clarify?
Hekate
(90,556 posts)baldguy
(36,649 posts)Do you think that the pilot of an airliner should be selected from among the untrained passengers? Really?
oberliner
(58,724 posts)If so, what is the cartoon saying about how one should get to be president?
Presumably, not by being elected by one's peers is what the cartoon seems to be implying.
Maybe I'm just overthinking it (or underthinking it!)
Skittles
(153,113 posts)BY THREE MILLION VOTES
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Not sure how that relates to what the cartoon is supposed to be illustrating though.
Skittles
(153,113 posts)YOU brought it up
JustinL
(722 posts)The more democratic method of going by the popular vote would have given us a qualified President.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)a lazy corporate media, or Russian hacking. The fascists in the GOP did.
JustinL
(722 posts)Without the EC, Clinton would have won, despite all those other things you mentioned.
I think we agree, though, that the election of fuckface was the result of too little democracy, not too much.
hay rick
(7,588 posts)This cartoon is clearly commentary on the election of Trump, not democracy in general. And yes- uninformed, misinformed and irresponsible voters can make catastrophically bad decisions. It should also be noted that the majority of "ordinary people" were not "too stupid" to choose the right leader.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)The suggestion being that ordinary people are too inexperienced to fly an airplane.
But no doubt, our bias compels us to see that which we want to see, and we will indeed, rationalize that bias as something else.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)The totality of what we see in the cartoon is a group of people voting (foolishly).
If it was just meant to mock the idea of inexperience, one could certainly do so in a myriad of ones unconnected to voting.
LeftishBrit
(41,203 posts)Last edited Wed Jan 4, 2017, 05:28 PM - Edit history (1)
on the grounds that inexperience is being presented as a virtue!
One can ridicule a particular vote, without ridiculing the whole concept of voting. If one makes fun of the reasons why someone buys a car, or writes a book, this does not mean that no one should ever buy a car or write a book.
Admittedly, it might be a more accurate reflection of this particular election if a majority of the passengers voted for the experienced pilot, but a Pilot Selection College chose the non-expert anyway.
yodermon
(6,143 posts)Not exactly a new thought, e.g.
LeftishBrit
(41,203 posts)And perhaps more generally that 'experts' are not to be trusted.
In the run-up to Brexit, Michael Gove, former Education Secretary no less, said that the British had 'had enough of experts'.
The Unspeakable used 'anti-elitism' as part of his appeal. He certainly is very much of the elite as regards his wealth, but he portrayed himself as somehow more suitable precisely because he had less government experience than Clinton.
AngryAmish
(25,704 posts)ffr
(22,665 posts)These dummies need to be put in their place, instead of glorified as yesteryear heroes.
lindysalsagal
(20,582 posts)The cartoon is right. None of us is going on a date with the future potus: We require competence, not a drinking buddy.
humbled_opinion
(4,423 posts)is saying that only experienced politicians should run the country ?
Skittles
(153,113 posts)COMPLETELY UNQUALIFIED PEOPLE SHOULD NOT RUN THE COUNTRY
by ANY measure, Donald fucking Trump is COMPLETELY UNQUALIFIED
greatauntoftriplets
(175,729 posts)niyad
(113,062 posts)Chico Man
(3,001 posts)Is electoral votes (as has been the case with every president).
Playing devils advocate here, it is very hard for an ordinary citizen to gather enough electoral votes to win a presidential election. Obviously Trump had something going for him.
LeftishBrit
(41,203 posts)Chico Man
(3,001 posts)Just saying.
And ordinary citizens do not have a lot of $$$$$$$$$$$$$.
meadowlander
(4,388 posts)Why is that a difficult concept to grasp?
Yes, we live in a democracy. That doesn't mean any boob off the street is prepared to command a nuclear arsenal, direct public policy that affects millions of lives, and manage a budget of $3.8 trillion and a government that employs 2.8 million people.
As someone with a PhD and fifteen years busting my ass in the civil service, I'm sick of people like Sarah Palin saying things like being a mom qualifies her to be president and not being called out on it. I'm not qualified to be president and neither is anyone else who hasn't spent at least twenty or thirty years of their life dedicated to the sole purpose of accumulating relevant experience.
When did we decide to settle for so little in our leaders?
The GOP's game plan has been painfully obvious for years. They keep throwing monkey wrenches into the government and then complaining that it doesn't work and that therefore we need "outsiders" to come in and "drain the swamp". And then when they are in power, they just loot and pillage until enough people catch on to put them out of power again.
What I don't get is how so many people can fall for it, over and over and over again. It's only been 8 years since the Global Financial Crisis and the American public has handed the whole shebang, lock, stock and barrel, back over to the same asshats responsible for it.
pnwmom
(108,955 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)Should be president
LeftishBrit
(41,203 posts)dhill926
(16,314 posts)think of the guy standing up, as a Trump surrogate....
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Not such a large percentage of the passengers.
dhill926
(16,314 posts)FailureToCommunicate
(14,007 posts)YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)Lol..
😂
oberliner
(58,724 posts)As they seem to be primarily at my expense!
pangaia
(24,324 posts)🤗
ProudProgressiveNow
(6,129 posts)King_Klonopin
(1,306 posts)in the same basket of deplorables. The Pilot = The Professional Politician
The republicans have become masters of this sort of rhetoric. They have twisted the
term "Professional Politician" into one of derision, provided that the politician of interest
is a long-time Democratic politician. This is one of the narratives that Trump used
in his campaign to criticize Clinton: He was the regular guy with no political ambition;
she was the insider who has been an ambitious politician all of her life and, therefore,
has "lost touch" with the needs of regular people. Political ambition becomes a negative
for a politician, but these ambitions are perfectly acceptable for an "outsider" like Trump.
There are many people who have chosen public service (politics, government) as their
profession. Some of them are very good at their job, while others are not. Clinton has
been very good at her chosen "profession". Her experience should be valued, not
demeaned. Trump is completely incompetent and inexperienced, yet he won the election
through the illogical public appeal depicted in the cartoon above. Who would you rather
have piloting "the plane of State", Hillary or Trump ? The insane passengers of the
American electorate chose the idiot in aisle 3 instead of the 40-year veteran pilot.
The inertia of incumbency is an issue that perpetuates the status quo in politics. The
proposal of term limits in government is a two-edged sword, as it would eliminate the
good with the bad. The republicans have figured out a way to break through this by
demonizing the professional politician (i.e. Democrat), though it is blatantly hypocritical
and turns common sense and logic upside down. However, it results in the loss of competent
public servants who are then replaced by incompetent, partisan hacks.
A lengthy, successful resume in politics can now be used against you.
Historic NY
(37,449 posts)awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)When everything is good, the modern plane almost flies itself. Pilots are paid to know how to handle when the shit hits the fan.
meaculpa2016
(17 posts)experience and certification.
Any idiot can become a politician.
Paladin
(28,243 posts)Stick around for the foreseeable future and witness just how prescient this cartoon is.
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)The only time I was sent to do a pre-op aerial recon in Vietnam the loach pilot, trying to be funny, said, "Okay, you've got the stick" as he released the controls and the chopper started going batshit crazy. He quickly resumed control but it was definitely not funny to me!
4lbs
(6,831 posts)WebMD and a first-year medical student.
No way they should see a doctor that has been doing this for 20 years. They can't be trusted!
LeftishBrit
(41,203 posts)Don't follow 'expert' health advice; just go to your latest favourite quack or faith-healer.
If adults want to risk killing themselves, I suppose it's their choice, but sometimes they put their kids in danger as well; and, in the case of anti-vaccinators, other people's kids as well.
crosinski
(405 posts)We're supposed to assume that the passenger who thinks pilots are smug and have lost touch with regular passengers isn't a pilot. Then he wants to fly the plane! That's pretty funny because it's unexpected!!!
Then he takes a vote to see if the other passengers feel the same way. That's pretty funny also, because it's unexpected again!!!
And THEN, the OTHER passengers VOTE to make HIM the NEW PILOT, knowing that he probably isn't one! HaHaHa! Even more unexpected zaniness!!!
But wait, there's more. It suddenly occurs to us that this is EXACTLY what happened here when a bunch of people, who didn't know anything about government, elected someone who didn't know anything about piloting a government, and who is also so terrified of all those controls, that he keeps tweeting at us instead of learning how to fly the damned thing!!! LOL!!!!!
Get it now?!!! Hahahaha!!!! Good one!
I'm sorry. I thought I had it, but no, I'm just sad now. Very sad. I'm afraid someone else will have to step up to the plate.
Gothmog
(144,920 posts)flying-skeleton
(696 posts)Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)Liked the cartoon