Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

tenorly

(2,037 posts)
Wed Jan 4, 2017, 04:53 PM Jan 2017

Ex-MI6 boss warns over electronic voting risk

Sir John Sawers told the BBC that casting a ballot with pencil and paper was "actually much more secure." He warned: "The more things that go online, the more susceptible you are to cyber attacks."

Campaigners for electronic voting said there was "no evidence" it was more open to fraud. Electronic voting allows people to make their choices via a computer or smartphone, instead of people having to go to a polling station.

'Robust systems needed'

Sawers' warning comes after the US government accused Russia of hacking into the emails of leading Democrats and interfering in the recent presidential election. This has increased concerns among security experts as to whether vital national electronic systems are vulnerable to malicious disruption by other countries.

Sawers, head of MI6 from 2009 until 2014, told the BBC Radio 4 documentary The New World: Axis of Power, which examines the state of international tensions between the world's leading powers: "We need to have systems which are robust," he said. "The only trouble is, the younger generation of people expect to be able to do things remotely and through electronic devices."

"Bizarrely the stubby pencil and piece of paper that you put your cross on in the ballot box is actually much more secure than anything which is electronic."

At: http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-38408296

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ex-MI6 boss warns over electronic voting risk (Original Post) tenorly Jan 2017 OP
Mechanical ones were much better Regginald Jan 2017 #1
Well said. tenorly Jan 2017 #3
word. nt TheFrenchRazor Jan 2017 #2
Ah, bon! tenorly Jan 2017 #4
Paper ballots. roamer65 Jan 2017 #5
Republicans are like their corporate johns. tenorly Jan 2017 #6
 

Regginald

(3 posts)
1. Mechanical ones were much better
Wed Jan 4, 2017, 05:26 PM
Jan 2017

Those electronic voting machines will be nothing but trouble in the years to come. If it's not real hacking then it will be disruptions due to people insinuating that the machines were tampered with. In my home state we used to have these very easy to use mechanical units. They did away with them because they said repair parts were no longer available and we now have the electronic machines. I just don't trust them.

tenorly

(2,037 posts)
3. Well said.
Wed Jan 4, 2017, 08:58 PM
Jan 2017

As Napoleon put it: 'You make a crime possible, you make it inevitable.'

And these things, with their read-and-write software, were practically designed to be tampered with.

That said, welcome to DU Regginald! It's always good to have well-informed newcomers, and goodness knows we'll need them now more than ever.

Again, welcome!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ex-MI6 boss warns over el...