WHAT DID THE DONALD KNOW ABOUT THE HACKING AND WHEN DID HE KNOW IT?

[shraby]

That is the question now.

[democratisphere]

1. That is the question that needs to be answered BEFORE

January 20.

[csziggy]

8. Yes - not YEARS later like it went with Nixon! nt

[montanacowboy]

2. Of course he knew

and so did the scum of the earth Rudy who was gleeful trying to keep his mouth shut about it

Putin and POS Elect did it together

What a world we live in

And there are Still those trying to normalize this filth like attending the inauguration... Smiling, Clapping oh, yes, everything is NORMAL, let's have a peaceful transition to HELL

It won't affect any of the 1%, only us poor schlubs- all is Normal

[SHRED]

3. Will we ever know?

CIA, FBI, NSA...where are you?

[Blanks]

4. Not too long after this speech...

He believed it was rigged and so he took steps to 'balance' that by recruiting help from Assange.

We see a lot of positive press about Assange from republicans. Palin has even reversed on being hacked herself.

That's why it's so important to them that:

1) Assange didn't get the info from the Russians.

2) The Russians didn't hack the election.

They were in touch with both. That's my theory anyway.

[Wellstone ruled]

5. Mitch McConnell will never let the American Pubic

see that info until January 21st. If you watched any of the so called hearing yesterday,the facial expressions on Clapper and the fellow next to him,told a scary story.

And yes Virginia,the Russians hacked the GOP as well.

[flamingdem]

6. I'm not convinced that the Clintons or Carters can justify

attending Caligula's inaugural ball.

Especially if they are aware of the facts regarding the Russian influence on the election, which they should be.

[mopinko]

12. yeah, they could know w a phone call, if they dont.

which i'm sure they do. jimmy not following this election? come on.

i can see attending the ceremony, but balls? ugh. unless it is put on by the dems, that makes me sad.

[shraby]

7. When did he tell Russia to hack Hillary's emails?

Found out, it was at least by this date:

Trump urges Russia to hack Clinton's email

The campaign later attempted to clarify Trump's remarks, saying he wanted Russia to hand over the emails if they had them.

By Michael Crowley and Tyler Pager
| 07/27/16 01:59 PM EDT
| Updated 07/27/16 05:17 PM EDT

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/07/trump-putin-no-relationship-226282

[csziggy]

9. July 27 it was in the news

Donald Trump Calls on Russia to Find Hillary Clinton’s Missing Emails

By ASHLEY PARKER and DAVID E. SANGERJULY 27, 2016

DORAL, Fla. — Donald J. Trump said on Wednesday that he hoped Russian intelligence services had successfully hacked Hillary Clinton’s email, and encouraged them to publish whatever they may have stolen, essentially urging a foreign adversary to conduct cyberespionage against a former secretary of state.

“Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,” Mr. Trump said during a news conference here in an apparent reference to Mrs. Clinton’s deleted emails. “I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press.”

Mr. Trump’s call was another bizarre moment in the mystery of whether Vladimir V. Putin’s government has been seeking to influence the United States’ presidential race.

His comments came amid questions about the hacking of the Democratic National Committee’s computer servers, which American intelligence agencies have told the White House they have “high confidence” was the work of the Russian government.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/28/us/politics/donald-trump-russia-clinton-emails.html

[shraby]

10. Another question, when did McConnell first refuse to give the Supreme Court

nominee a hearing I hold that it was known about the Russian plan to hack by at least this date.

I would say McConnell know at least by this date, and the donald probably did too.
Found the answer:
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/mitch-mcconnell-antonin-scalia-supreme-court-nomination-219248

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said the Senate should not confirm a replacement for Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia until after the 2016 election — an historic rebuke of President Obama’s authority and an extraordinary challenge to the practice of considering each nominee on his or her individual merits.

[csziggy]

11. The day the nomination was announced - Mar. 16

4:08 pm ETMar 16, 2016
Wed Mar 16 2016 16:08:06 GMT-0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
David M. Herszenhorn
Mitch McConnell Tells Garland the Senate Will Not Act

Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the majority leader, has called President Obama’s Supreme Court nominee, Judge Merrick B. Garland, and explained that no action would be taken in the Senate on the nomination, Mr. McConnell’s spokesman said.

Mr. McConnell also informed Judge Garland that they would not be meeting in person at the Capitol.

“Rather than put Judge Garland through more unnecessary political routines orchestrated by the White House, the leader decided it would be more considerate of the nominee’s time to speak with him today by phone,” Mr. McConnell’s spokesman, Don Stewart, said in a statement.

“The leader reiterated his position that the American people will have a voice in this vacancy and that the Senate will appropriately revisit the matter when it considers the qualifications of the person the next president nominates. And since the Senate will not be acting on this nomination, he would not be holding a perfunctory meeting, but he wished Judge Garland well.”
http://www.nytimes.com/live/obama-supreme-court-nomination/mcconnell-tells-garland/

[shraby]

13. Since this kind of action is virtually unheard of before, there must have been a

reason for coming up with it.

Maybe the alphabet departments should be finding out why the idea was put in stone.