Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

elleng

(130,861 posts)
3. Prolly not for personal liability but
Sun Jan 8, 2017, 01:06 AM
Jan 2017

if the Secretary/Administration/Department of Education fails to do it job in a particular way, yes, with difficulty. See Sovereign Immunity above.

An old, difficult case: Flast v. Cohen, 392 U.S. 83 (1968),[1] was a United States Supreme Court case holding that a taxpayer has standing to sue the government to prevent an unconstitutional use of taxpayer funds.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flast_v._Cohen

BainsBane

(53,029 posts)
4. Not for what they do in their government positions
Sun Jan 8, 2017, 01:07 AM
Jan 2017

but if it is something outside their government responsibilities, I believe they can be. The Paula Jones established that the President can be sued. But no one can sue the Secretary of Education because they believe the education policy harmful. There would have to be a constitutional issue, and the suit would be to the federal government and not toward the individual.

Hopefully we'll hear from a lawyer, but that's my understanding based on what I've read in the past.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,661 posts)
6. Nope.
Sun Jan 8, 2017, 01:30 AM
Jan 2017

At least not personally for what they do in the course of their work. You can sue one for negligence if he runs over you with his car, but you can't sue Rick Perry for fucking up the Department of Energy, for example. There are legal principles of sovereign immunity and discretionary act immunity that shield government officials from liability for most of what they do as government officials.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,661 posts)
7. Even if you could (which you can't, as explained in this thread),
Sun Jan 8, 2017, 01:40 AM
Jan 2017

they wouldn't have to pay damages out of their own pockets. The government (in other words, us) would indemnify them.

The only kinds of legal claims against cabinet officers that I can think of that could be remotely possible would be a writ of mandamus - a court commands a government official to do something that the law requires him to do - or a writ of prohibition, where a court tells a government official not to do something the law prohibits him from doing. These are limited to very unusual circumstances and are rarely used.

Hamlette

(15,411 posts)
8. You name the agency as the defendant, it happens all the time.
Sun Jan 8, 2017, 01:53 AM
Jan 2017

My agency gets sued on a regular basis. Taxpayer suits get thrown out quickly but some can linger. Think Kelly v Goldberg (establishing rights for welfare recipients) or Java v California Unemployment office (to establish rights for unemployment recipients. (I'm not sure of the exact name of the case, we cite it as Java and I have to do a google or Lexis search for the correct citation). We get sued by former employees (after they have gone through civil review) by clients who argue we have violated their civil rights etc etc etc. There are some hoops to jump through (like you have to give the agency a chance to review it first). But it happens all the time. You don't get millions in damages but they will pay you what you lost (welfare unemployment etc).

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,661 posts)
11. That's already been to the Supreme Court, which upheld most of it.
Sun Jan 8, 2017, 02:23 AM
Jan 2017

However, although they upheld its constitutionality, the Supreme Court can't prevent Congress from repealing it, which is a legislative function (separation of powers and all that).

Hamlette

(15,411 posts)
13. you mean could you challenge another law? Sure, but you need constitutional grounds
Sun Jan 8, 2017, 02:54 AM
Jan 2017

like unlawful taking of property which is what they argued was wrong with Obamacare mandate.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,661 posts)
10. But you can't sue the official personally - which I think was the OP's question.
Sun Jan 8, 2017, 02:22 AM
Jan 2017

If you jump through all the hoops of the Federal Tort Claims Act or other requirements you might be able to sue the agency (although the agency head will be named as the defendant), but not the agency head personally.

Hamlette

(15,411 posts)
12. you can only get the head of the agency if he/she was not acting in official capacity
Sun Jan 8, 2017, 02:52 AM
Jan 2017

or acting beyond his/her authority.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,661 posts)
14. Exactly.
Sun Jan 8, 2017, 02:55 AM
Jan 2017

I can sue Betsy DeVos if she runs over me with her car but not if she screws up the Department of Education.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Can Cabinet Secretaries B...