Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(118,613 posts)
Mon Jan 9, 2017, 08:07 PM Jan 2017

Howard Dean rallies the Internet with plan to destroy Breitbart and its already working

Last edited Tue Jan 10, 2017, 01:08 AM - Edit history (1)

Howard Dean rallies the Internet with plan to ‘destroy’ Breitbart — and it’s already working

by David Edwards at the Raw Story

http://www.rawstory.com/2017/01/howard-dean-rallies-the-internet-with-plan-to-destroy-breitbart-and-its-already-working/

"SNIP............


Former Vermont Governor Howard Dean (D) on Sunday called on progressives to help cripple Breitbart News’ business model with an aggressive and shrewd campaign of boycotting advertisers.

In a tweet on Sunday, Dean encouraged his followers to share a plan highlighted in a recent New York Times article titled “How to Destroy the Business Model of Breitbart and Fake News.”

Follow
Howard Dean ✔ @GovHowardDean
Thanks to NYT article I am going to look at Breitbart next week and refuse to buy any product I see advertised there. Please RT.
7:55 PM - 8 Jan 2017
2,383 2,383 Retweets 2,509 2,509 likes

According to the Times, a group called Sleeping Giants have been successful at forcing advertisers to blacklist Breitbart by taking screen shots of advertisements that appear next to hate speech on the conservative website. The group then uses the screen shots to shame the advertisers on social media.


.............SNIP"
66 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Howard Dean rallies the Internet with plan to destroy Breitbart and its already working (Original Post) applegrove Jan 2017 OP
I'm willing to do anything to take down those liars radical noodle Jan 2017 #1
Anything to make life difficult romana Jan 2017 #2
Yes, but it makes the site less believable to casual readers. Dustlawyer Jan 2017 #28
I like it orangecrush Jan 2017 #3
Better late than never. Wellstone ruled Jan 2017 #4
Here ya go! renate Jan 2017 #5
Thanks! Great website! I'm sharing and e-mailing wherever I can! LAS14 Jan 2017 #6
yay! they make it so easy to take action--I wish I knew more people to tell about it! renate Jan 2017 #8
Request for tech help. LAS14 Jan 2017 #11
LOL you definitely don't want to ask me for tech help! renate Jan 2017 #12
The problem went away. Check out my new post. LAS14 Jan 2017 #14
Too many posts in short timeframe raises a SPAM flag - its quite common. pkdu Jan 2017 #27
Thanks! LAS14 Jan 2017 #35
K&R burrowowl Jan 2017 #32
i was wondering what to do to stop fake news and this is a great start! Takket Jan 2017 #7
I saw Earthlink on the list of advertisers. Stonepounder Jan 2017 #9
EarthLink was my first internet provider in 1996 kimbutgar Jan 2017 #21
I suspect a lot of businesses might not know their ads are appearing there... hexola Jan 2017 #10
But they are able to specify sites where they don't want... LAS14 Jan 2017 #16
But they CAN opt out, when they know. n/t TygrBright Jan 2017 #19
Works for me Augiedog Jan 2017 #13
KNR Lucinda Jan 2017 #15
Wish Howard Was In Running to Be DNC Chair TomCADem Jan 2017 #17
Howard Dean, Run, we need you! Alice11111 Jan 2017 #26
I know how to contact him DFW Jan 2017 #41
Well, maybe u could point him to this thread. Alice11111 Jan 2017 #43
Howard isn't going to do what we want him to because WE want it DFW Jan 2017 #45
I respect that devotion to his wife. Alice11111 Jan 2017 #46
Thank you for pointing these things out, DFW. Regardless of what WE want, Howard has the niyad Jan 2017 #58
Howard Dean NO! Beartooth Bronsky Jan 2017 #63
Well, they just had their chance, and they Alice11111 Jan 2017 #66
maybe this is one of the reasons he dropped out JI7 Jan 2017 #56
For more info got to "Sleeping Giants" jg10003 Jan 2017 #18
How do we destroy Alex Jones? He's self funded. Initech Jan 2017 #20
Yes! coco22 Jan 2017 #24
Alex Jones & InfoWars.com Beartooth Bronsky Jan 2017 #64
I forced myself to go to Breitbart last week so I could tweet to a company advertising there. femmedem Jan 2017 #22
+100 Duppers Jan 2017 #29
K & R SunSeeker Jan 2017 #23
KnR. Breitbart's already starting a campaign in Germany. Talk about returning to the Fatherland.... Hekate Jan 2017 #25
We do NOT want his ilk DFW Jan 2017 #42
From everything I've read in my lifetime, Germany as a country had gone to great lengths.... Hekate Jan 2017 #53
It's hilarious how they're whining about this... JHan Jan 2017 #30
And the assumption behind economic models is that 'given perfect information, applegrove Jan 2017 #50
reason number 500 DonCoquixote Jan 2017 #31
Please Howard, your country needs you! Alice11111 Jan 2017 #49
A boycott of Breitbart's advertiser is a great idea Gothmog Jan 2017 #33
Amazon is advertising on Breitbart flyingfysh Jan 2017 #34
Bezos, a sellout. Alice11111 Jan 2017 #47
They will just move into the WH. Rex Jan 2017 #36
Brietbart has already lost over 400 -advertisers thanks to sleeping giants Thekaspervote Jan 2017 #37
Hat tip to Spocko, who blazed the trail in 2007. Tactical Peek Jan 2017 #38
Why can't we do this with FOX News? KittyWampus Jan 2017 #39
we can LaydeeBug Jan 2017 #40
And Alex jones infowars Thekaspervote Jan 2017 #44
wow, that list was a surprise. NONE of the stations here in reichwingfundieville are on that list. niyad Jan 2017 #60
K$R yortsed snacilbuper Jan 2017 #48
K&R, and thanks! Dark n Stormy Knight Jan 2017 #51
Shut 'em down. oasis Jan 2017 #52
Wouldn't that also be hostile work environment for people Brietbart are denigrating? I wouldn't want uponit7771 Jan 2017 #54
This is awesome. I'll have to find them. lindysalsagal Jan 2017 #55
This message was self-deleted by its author citizen blues Jan 2017 #57
Careful, it seems you are confusing WSJ for NYT. Got link? Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2017 #61
Are you sure about that? herding cats Jan 2017 #62
Hey, this is an effective tactic. lark Jan 2017 #59
How to destroy the business model of Breitbart and fake news site Madam45for2923 Jan 2017 #65

romana

(765 posts)
2. Anything to make life difficult
Mon Jan 9, 2017, 08:13 PM
Jan 2017

But I don't think most of the site's revenue comes from advertising. I'm sure there's a ton of dark money bankrolling it. The ads are just for show.

By all means we should target their advertisers, but that won't put them out if business.

Dustlawyer

(10,495 posts)
28. Yes, but it makes the site less believable to casual readers.
Mon Jan 9, 2017, 10:39 PM
Jan 2017

I will give you a real life example:

Several years ago the U.S. Chamber of Commerce decided to create courthouse newspapers to influence juries sitting to decide cases, especially civil lawsuits against corporations and doctors. Their original plan was to place newspapers in what they had identified as "Judicial Hellholes." The first one was in West Virginia, the next one was in my area and is called the Southeast Texas Record Southeasttexasrecord.com. The have some others, another one I know of is the Louisiana record out of NOLA. They all have "Record" in the name and none identify the Chamber as the owner.

When it first came out they were free right outside the jury assembly room to the courthouse. They even handed their first edition to jury panels sitting outside the courtroom they were about to go in to see if they would be picked for the jury. I know because we were about to start a mesothelioma (fatal cancer caused by asbestos exposure) trial. Across the hall a medical malpractice case was about to start. Coincidentally, (not) the two front page stories were about Trial lawyers filing fraudulent asbestos cases and doctors leaving he state due to the trial lawyers filing so many frivolous medical malpractice cases in the state.

These first issues contained no ads and were treated like the corporate rag they were, no one was taking them. Then they started running advertising and made the layout resemble a legitimate paper and they got a much better response. They have gone online now and had to remove them from our courthouse. I see them for sale now in the convenience store by my house. While the stories got more objective, the editorials are as bad or worse than you would expect.

I hope this works, but the RW media National Enquirer formula has so many hooked already the regulars will still come. Hopefully as they die out they will not be replaced.

renate

(13,776 posts)
5. Here ya go!
Mon Jan 9, 2017, 08:23 PM
Jan 2017
http://adstrike.us/

Scroll down and you can find a list of those who are still advertising as well as those who have stopped.

renate

(13,776 posts)
8. yay! they make it so easy to take action--I wish I knew more people to tell about it!
Mon Jan 9, 2017, 08:33 PM
Jan 2017

I'm glad you're spreading the word! I'm posting about it here wherever I can.

LAS14

(13,783 posts)
11. Request for tech help.
Mon Jan 9, 2017, 08:56 PM
Jan 2017

I tweeted thanks to about 25 delisted companies, but after that I kept getting told "Your message could not be sent." I got out and got in again and was able to launch another dozen or so tweets but then got the same message. Is it me?

Also, there doesn't seem to be a way to avoid attempting to thank a company you've already thanked. The order of companies seems random each time. Thoughts?

pkdu

(3,977 posts)
27. Too many posts in short timeframe raises a SPAM flag - its quite common.
Mon Jan 9, 2017, 10:36 PM
Jan 2017

Just spread them out a little

Stonepounder

(4,033 posts)
9. I saw Earthlink on the list of advertisers.
Mon Jan 9, 2017, 08:42 PM
Jan 2017

I've been an Earthlink subscriber for over 20 years, since before the web, when it was just the plain old internet and we shared info using Wildcat Bulletin Boards. I sent them an email letting them know that their advertising showed up on Breitbart and told them that I didn't think that they would want to be associated with a fake news, white supremacist site.

I'm waiting to see if I hear back.

kimbutgar

(21,127 posts)
21. EarthLink was my first internet provider in 1996
Mon Jan 9, 2017, 09:40 PM
Jan 2017

I thought they went out business. My internet connection was constantly out, could never get support. My husband and son were going crazy about the Internet dropping and was out all more than on Had to switch to ATT begrudgingly. I really tried to stay with a small company isp.

 

hexola

(4,835 posts)
10. I suspect a lot of businesses might not know their ads are appearing there...
Mon Jan 9, 2017, 08:51 PM
Jan 2017

I think the way this kind of advertising is sold - you may not exactly know where your ads might show up.

LAS14

(13,783 posts)
16. But they are able to specify sites where they don't want...
Mon Jan 9, 2017, 09:13 PM
Jan 2017

...to appear. It's called de-listing. Check out this site which makes it easy to encourage companies to de-list and to publicly thank those that have.

http://adstrike.us/

Alice11111

(5,730 posts)
26. Howard Dean, Run, we need you!
Mon Jan 9, 2017, 10:34 PM
Jan 2017

I've tried contacting him b4. No real luck! He wanted to be head of the DNC now! He dropped out because of pressure from Sen Schumer and others. If he wasn't wanted, he didn't want it. He is wanted by most of us though. He is much more effective! than the other candidates, plus experienced! I sat by him once at a fundraiser dinner. Those trips and fundraisers were unsung, but he worked very hard. He was the best DNC chair ever. The 50 state approach is what we need. Had he been chair, the Great Lake states would not have been ignored...lest the Dems stir things up with Trump (that was their reasoning?#?!, DNC and Hillary Camp). Hillary would be president!

Does anyone know how to start a petition?
Let's go for tested and proven! We can try new people when the stakes aren't so high.

DFW

(54,341 posts)
41. I know how to contact him
Tue Jan 10, 2017, 12:30 AM
Jan 2017

I've known Howard for about 15 years, from before he ever ran for president. But I can't very well go posting his cell phone or email on a blog. That would be the end of both his privacy and our friendship, and there aren't a whole lot of people I can both jam on Leo Kottke guitar tunes AND discuss national politics with.

If it helps, he has taken the stance that he is not going to get into a fight with other like-minded Democrats for the DNC chairmanship. if asked by the DNC, he will do it. But he had to fight tooth and nail for the post in 2004, and he's just not interested in going through that again. No one thinks he has to prove he knows how to do the job. The only question is whether Democrats want experience or want to try someone new. Howard is perfectly willing to let the party make that decision without pressure from him, and is cool with abiding by that decision.

Alice11111

(5,730 posts)
43. Well, maybe u could point him to this thread.
Tue Jan 10, 2017, 01:07 AM
Jan 2017

We could start a petition. What can I do? I'm an attorney. Dem forever. Politically savvy. I would work hard for him.
I understand his position though.

DFW

(54,341 posts)
45. Howard isn't going to do what we want him to because WE want it
Tue Jan 10, 2017, 01:20 AM
Jan 2017

He always follows his own instincts--especially if Judy is cool with them, and she is pretty tired of him coming up with projects that keep him away from Burlington five or six days a week. Plus they have grown children spread out all over the place, and Howard is a very private family man. I'll bet you have heard just about nothing about his family right? Well, Howard spends a LOT of time in contact with then when he's away. For a while, we used to attend a New Year's gathering together, but he always took off the morning of the 31st to home with Judy for the evening of the 31st. It was THAT important to him. He knows there are plenty of people out there/here who would love to have his back while he re-assumes the DNC chair (and he knows I'm one of them, because I told him so!), but he is not going to read some page on DU and let that turn his thinking around.

niyad

(113,257 posts)
58. Thank you for pointing these things out, DFW. Regardless of what WE want, Howard has the
Tue Jan 10, 2017, 01:40 PM
Jan 2017

right to do what HE wants, and believes to be in his, and the country's, best interests.

63. Howard Dean NO!
Tue Jan 10, 2017, 05:14 PM
Jan 2017

People forget that Dean's "50 state strategy" resulted in running a number of Blue Dog Democrats in red states. In order to have a chance of winning, they had to be anti-abortion, anti-gun-regulation, anti-gay-marriage, strong on GOP-style "family values - basically Republican-Lite. Even when the Democrats had 60 seats, enough of the Blue Dogs voted with the GOP to allow them to filibuster Democratic bills and appointments for the last decade. We need to replace the remaining DINOs with a new generation of true progressives and Dean is too tied to the current neoliberal elite that caused too many progressive voters - especially among the young - to turn their backs on Clinton.

Alice11111

(5,730 posts)
66. Well, they just had their chance, and they
Wed Jan 11, 2017, 03:20 AM
Jan 2017

ran a mediocre camp at best. Ignoring Great Lake States.
Not fighting back against Comey. On and on.
We are in too dangerous a place for newbies. Get someone with a track record.

JI7

(89,247 posts)
56. maybe this is one of the reasons he dropped out
Tue Jan 10, 2017, 06:52 AM
Jan 2017

he thought he could be effective in other ways.

times are different and the media is a huge problem. and they are even worse when it comes to covering trump.

64. Alex Jones & InfoWars.com
Tue Jan 10, 2017, 06:12 PM
Jan 2017

Anybody so detached from reality as to believe Jones' assertions that the moon landings were faked, the Newtown school shootings were faked using 7 year old actors and fake blood, and the country and the entire world are ruled by shape-shifting alien reptiles is so beyond the reach of reason and sanity that there will probably be nothing the Reality-based community is going to be able to do (except round up all InfoWars subscribers and confine them to a well-padded acorn academy on a diet of anti-psychotic meds and an endless diet of Mr. Ed and PeeWee Herman reruns.

femmedem

(8,201 posts)
22. I forced myself to go to Breitbart last week so I could tweet to a company advertising there.
Mon Jan 9, 2017, 09:41 PM
Jan 2017

It's true that the companies aren't aware that they are there, but if you take a screen shot of the ad on Breitbart and say something like, "Did you know your product ads are on hate site Breitbart? Perhaps join >400 companies blocking them?" and then tag Sleeping Giant, dozens of people retweet. It's very effective!

Hekate

(90,642 posts)
25. KnR. Breitbart's already starting a campaign in Germany. Talk about returning to the Fatherland....
Mon Jan 9, 2017, 10:29 PM
Jan 2017

...whether they want his ilk or not.

I'll visit the links. Thanks.

Hekate

(90,642 posts)
53. From everything I've read in my lifetime, Germany as a country had gone to great lengths....
Tue Jan 10, 2017, 02:46 AM
Jan 2017

...to expunge the Nazis from their national soul. Not to erase their names from history like children waving rattles at Purim to blot out Haman's name, but to burn the memory of the Nazis into the consciousness of the nation so that the German people themselves would say: Never Again. There will always be those dregs lurking in the corners -- but if I understand correctly, they were outlawed and outcast for the longest time.

Somehow I always thought it hubristic that America felt itself so strong that we could allow white nationalists like Bannon the shelter of our nation in the name of the First Amendment, as though countenancing a purulent infection like that could ever be safe.

History has its cycles... and the world has come back to something very dark. This era will either be remembered for the Rise of the Strongmen in all nations, including ours, or for how we fought it back in the US and in Europe.

Once I connected it to global climate change (the desertification of farmland leading to migrations to cities in the home country leading to unrest and crackdowns leading to the refugee crisis hitting Europe) I couldn't get that aspect of it out of my mind.

Strongmen use fear of the Other as a potent weapon. I have no idea how this will end.

Sorry to be such a downer tonight. There, that's better.

applegrove

(118,613 posts)
50. And the assumption behind economic models is that 'given perfect information,
Tue Jan 10, 2017, 02:02 AM
Jan 2017

people will behave like..........' . Howard Dean just wants the people to have perfect information.

flyingfysh

(1,990 posts)
34. Amazon is advertising on Breitbart
Mon Jan 9, 2017, 10:59 PM
Jan 2017

I looked at Breitbart, and the only real ads were from Amazon. I thought that Bezos had stopped Amazon from appearing on Breitbart.

Alice11111

(5,730 posts)
47. Bezos, a sellout.
Tue Jan 10, 2017, 01:31 AM
Jan 2017

Follow the money. I just placed a big order last night on Amazon. Guess it's back to Ebay

Thekaspervote

(32,754 posts)
37. Brietbart has already lost over 400 -advertisers thanks to sleeping giants
Tue Jan 10, 2017, 12:19 AM
Jan 2017

Thanks Howard dean!! This will bring even more attention to sleeping giants. It's really easy to do. Gives lots of ideas on what to say, and nicely to the advertisers. Sleeping giants is already credited with ending further advancement of their toxic trash onto the British airwaves.

Go Howard.. go everyone!! WE ARE THE SLEEPING GIANTS

Tactical Peek

(1,208 posts)
38. Hat tip to Spocko, who blazed the trail in 2007.
Tue Jan 10, 2017, 12:23 AM
Jan 2017

Bloggers Take on Talk Radio Hosts

By NOAM COHENJAN. 15, 2007

A San Francisco talk radio station pre-empted three hours of programming on Friday in response to a campaign by bloggers who have recorded extreme comments by several hosts and passed on digital copies to advertisers.

The lead blogger, who uses the name Spocko, said that he and other bloggers had contacted more than 30 advertisers on KSFO-AM to inform them of comments made on the air and to ask them to pull their ads.

The comments were also posted on Spocko’s Web site, spockosbrain.com. In response, ABC Radio Networks, which owns KSFO and which in turn is owned by the Walt Disney Company, sent letters to the site’s service provider, demanding the clips be taken down from its servers. The provider complied, raising the issue of what constitutes fair use of copyrighted material by a critic.

. . . Spocko had recorded and disseminated other clips from the station in an effort to alarm advertisers. In one, Brian Sussman, an evening host on KSFO, described Senator Barack Obama, Democrat of Illinois, as a “halfrican,” because he has one African parent and one white parent. In another, from 2005, he challenged a caller who said he was not a Muslim to prove it by repeating back an insult to Allah. Mr. Sussman apologized for both comments during Friday’s three-hour show.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/15/technology/15radio.html

http://www.spockosbrain.com/about/



niyad

(113,257 posts)
60. wow, that list was a surprise. NONE of the stations here in reichwingfundieville are on that list.
Tue Jan 10, 2017, 01:46 PM
Jan 2017

uponit7771

(90,335 posts)
54. Wouldn't that also be hostile work environment for people Brietbart are denigrating? I wouldn't want
Tue Jan 10, 2017, 06:42 AM
Jan 2017

... to be anywhere near this issue

Response to applegrove (Original post)

Bernardo de La Paz

(48,988 posts)
61. Careful, it seems you are confusing WSJ for NYT. Got link?
Tue Jan 10, 2017, 03:13 PM
Jan 2017

Do you believe Democrats and progressives and liberals should set the standard and be more accurate and careful about facts than Republicans and conservatives?

Got a link to support your inflammatory accusation?

The editor of WSJ has refused to call tRump lies a lie.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-lies-and-honest-journalism-1483557700
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/dan-rather-scolds-wsj-for-refusing-to-call-a-trump-lie-a-lie_us_586b4023e4b0d9a5945c4592

Got a link saying the same about NYT?

lark

(23,091 posts)
59. Hey, this is an effective tactic.
Tue Jan 10, 2017, 01:40 PM
Jan 2017

It worked great against Limpballs, it will work against the Nazi Breitbart as well.

 

Madam45for2923

(7,178 posts)
65. How to destroy the business model of Breitbart and fake news site
Tue Jan 10, 2017, 07:47 PM
Jan 2017

Even when ad placements are automated, companies still have the power to control whether neo-Nazis or fake news hucksters profit. In fact, it’s actually rather simple for companies to impose ethical policies, according to Mr. Zeitz. Indeed, his own company (which handles programmatic advertising for other organizations) recently decided to get out ahead of the issue by removing Breitbart News from its advertising marketplace. “We’re not banning them because they’re alt-right or conservative. We banned them from our marketplace because they violate our hate speech policy, which prohibits ad serving on sites that incite violence and discrimination against minority groups.” (Breitbart has said that it condemns racism and bigotry “in any form.”)

He pointed out that brand-name companies had already figured out how to keep their ads from flowing onto porn sites, because “you really don’t want your ad for a breakfast cereal next to a hard-core pornographic video,” and so “there are tools in place that allow companies to control where their ads go.” A company can block a specific site like Breitbart News from its ad buy. Or it might pick a “white list” of sites that align with its values.


https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/07/opinion/sunday/how-to-destroy-the-business-model-of-breitbart-and-fake-news.html?_r=0

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Howard Dean rallies the I...