Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MythosMaster

(445 posts)
Tue Jan 10, 2017, 03:59 PM Jan 2017

Heritage Foundation preview of things to come...

https://secured.heritage.org/money-votes-2017

Appointing Conservative Leaders to the Supreme Court
For the last eight years, liberals have been stacking the federal courts with radical liberal judges — judges who take it upon themselves to create laws rather than interpret them. The Heritage Foundation has given Donald Trump a list of conservatives who could be appointed to the Supreme Court. And we will continue to educate lawmakers about the importance of only confirming judges who will uphold the Constitution.


Their hypocrisy know no bounds.
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Heritage Foundation preview of things to come... (Original Post) MythosMaster Jan 2017 OP
Like Scalia recreated a Second Amendment more to his liking? guillaumeb Jan 2017 #1
Translation: Any judge who isn't on their own list of approvees,... JHB Jan 2017 #2
And that they want to repeal their own MythosMaster Jan 2017 #5
This message was self-deleted by its author MythosMaster Jan 2017 #3
"Radical liberal judges" OrwellwasRight Jan 2017 #4

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
1. Like Scalia recreated a Second Amendment more to his liking?
Tue Jan 10, 2017, 04:01 PM
Jan 2017

A masterful job of legislating from the bench.

Or Citizens United v FEC, another Judicial recreation of the First Amendment.

JHB

(37,158 posts)
2. Translation: Any judge who isn't on their own list of approvees,...
Tue Jan 10, 2017, 04:05 PM
Jan 2017

...which will be any judge nominated by a Democratic president, is by (their) definition a radical liberal judge. Q.E.D.

There ain't no correctness like Conservatively Correct.

Response to MythosMaster (Original post)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Heritage Foundation previ...