Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHeritage Foundation preview of things to come...
https://secured.heritage.org/money-votes-2017Appointing Conservative Leaders to the Supreme Court
For the last eight years, liberals have been stacking the federal courts with radical liberal judges judges who take it upon themselves to create laws rather than interpret them. The Heritage Foundation has given Donald Trump a list of conservatives who could be appointed to the Supreme Court. And we will continue to educate lawmakers about the importance of only confirming judges who will uphold the Constitution.
Their hypocrisy know no bounds.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 2438 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Heritage Foundation preview of things to come... (Original Post)
MythosMaster
Jan 2017
OP
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)1. Like Scalia recreated a Second Amendment more to his liking?
A masterful job of legislating from the bench.
Or Citizens United v FEC, another Judicial recreation of the First Amendment.
JHB
(37,158 posts)2. Translation: Any judge who isn't on their own list of approvees,...
...which will be any judge nominated by a Democratic president, is by (their) definition a radical liberal judge. Q.E.D.
There ain't no correctness like Conservatively Correct.
MythosMaster
(445 posts)5. And that they want to repeal their own
legislation....
Response to MythosMaster (Original post)
MythosMaster This message was self-deleted by its author.
OrwellwasRight
(5,170 posts)4. "Radical liberal judges"