Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jimbo101

(776 posts)
Fri Jan 13, 2017, 03:31 PM Jan 2017

Half the work people do can be automated

https://www.techinasia.com/work-people-automated-mckinsey-study-shows

Here’s a scary thought or a reason to rejoice, depending on which side of the equation you belong. Half the work people do in their jobs can be automated, shows a McKinsey Global Institute study released today.

Instead of assessing the impact of automation on specific jobs, the study went to a more granular level by looking at the activities involved in various jobs. The logic is that every occupation has a range of activities, each with varying potential for automation.

McKinsey found that 49 percent of the activities people are paid to do in the global economy can be automated with “currently demonstrated technology.” That involves US$11.9 trillion in wages and touches 1.1 billion people
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Half the work people do can be automated (Original Post) Jimbo101 Jan 2017 OP
Just wait until they program safeinOhio Jan 2017 #1
No matter which side you fall on, it's scary mythology Jan 2017 #2
Very good assessment ConnorMarc Jan 2017 #5
If we didn't tie health care, minimum wage or moral worth to a job, this wouldn't be an issue. RedWedge Jan 2017 #3
Machines will never be able to taste taught_me_patience Jan 2017 #4
Those will probably be some of the first to go. linuxman Jan 2017 #8
+1, Yes it can be automated at a cost and the automation takes a while to work smoothly into uponit7771 Jan 2017 #6
Futurists have been predicting this for decades. Warren DeMontague Jan 2017 #7

safeinOhio

(32,641 posts)
1. Just wait until they program
Fri Jan 13, 2017, 03:36 PM
Jan 2017

a machine to replace all management jobs. My guess is that will take less time and effort than cars and trucks that do not need a human.

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
2. No matter which side you fall on, it's scary
Fri Jan 13, 2017, 03:48 PM
Jan 2017

I believe we will transition to a new economy over time, new jobs will become available. But getting there won't be easy, and the transition is already having an impact.

Trump campaigned on a promise of bringing back jobs, specifically manufacturing jobs. While Clinton won poor voters, Trump won among those places where jobs are most vulnerable to automation and outsourcing. Trump won where more men have stopped working, where incomes declined the most in the aftermath of the Bush recession. That anxiety helps bring out the racism and sexist in people. Look at much of Europe where slow economic growth has led to extreme racist right wing parties.

It's scary what can happen when people fear losing their economic place. It can bring out the worst in people.

RedWedge

(618 posts)
3. If we didn't tie health care, minimum wage or moral worth to a job, this wouldn't be an issue.
Fri Jan 13, 2017, 03:53 PM
Jan 2017

Letting go of those three ties would be easier than trying to get people trained and competing for the jobs that will be left, really.

 

linuxman

(2,337 posts)
8. Those will probably be some of the first to go.
Fri Jan 13, 2017, 08:26 PM
Jan 2017

Sure, there may be some trained chef working at corporate or wherever that does indeed taste and concoct recipes, but those formulas can all be uploaded to a computer and created with the touch of a button. Restaurants with human cooks and staff will become niche, so while some may still exist, I can't see them beeing more than a novelty, and it certainly won't save the jobs of those in the industry today. Becky Barista is as good as gone in a few short years, and bartenders likely before that. Drinkmaking is especially formulaic, and can easily be done with automation.

As an aside, machines certainly can "taste". Hell, I've used a handheld computer that could tell me what sample I placed into the testing chamber out of a possible 20,000+ stored substances. Not much of a stretch to figure out which chemical profiles are "Tasty", then tell a machine to modify whatever it's making in order to more closely fit that profile.

One step closer to univeral basic income. Bring it on.

uponit7771

(90,301 posts)
6. +1, Yes it can be automated at a cost and the automation takes a while to work smoothly into
Fri Jan 13, 2017, 08:15 PM
Jan 2017

... a whole operation.

BUT

There is more crap to do in regards to inovations that can make things cheaper and work better etc...

Companies more interested in profit vs putting people to work which is their mandate.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
7. Futurists have been predicting this for decades.
Fri Jan 13, 2017, 08:18 PM
Jan 2017

Seems to me there's two ways we can go. Either a Universal Basic Income/Leisure economy where the benefits of massive technological advances are at least somewhat shared among the entire populace, or a dystopian future of walled enclaves of mega-rich people served by robots while everyone else starves.

I admit I have more trouble envisioning the first one than the second.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Half the work people do c...