Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

canetoad

(17,137 posts)
Fri Jan 13, 2017, 04:36 PM Jan 2017

A disaster in the making?

The news that Maj. Gen. Errol R. Schwartz is to be removed from his post at 12:01 on Inaguration day means that someone must immediately step into that position. This brings to mind another disastrous example of inexperienced command over a large event that resulted in 96 deaths.

The Hillsborough disaster happened in Sheffield, England in April 1989. The previous police commander, Chief Superintendent Brian L. Mole was experienced in large scale crowd control at football matches. He was transferred from his post in March 1989. The new commander was newly promoted Chief Superintendent David Duckenfield.

This left planning for the semi-final match to Duckenfield, who had never commanded a sell-out football match before, and who had "very little, if any" training or personal experience in how to do so.*

You probably know the end result. Gates that should have remained shut were opened, the crowd surged and 96 innocent supporters were crushed to death.

This is a worst case scenario and I hope that there are no incidents of this sort. I also hope whoever is handling risk management and public liability for the event is on the ball.


* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillsborough_disaster

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

braddy

(3,585 posts)
2. What would have changed in Sheffield if the commanders were switched as the game was ending?
Fri Jan 13, 2017, 05:48 PM
Jan 2017

The answer is nothing, everything was already in place, already arranged and planned for, activated, and being performed, the "interim" commander (who in this case will probably the current 2nd in command) would only come into play if something happens after 12:01 and a completely new situation is happening because of the current commander's mistakes.

canetoad

(17,137 posts)
3. Not sure I understand your comment
Fri Jan 13, 2017, 06:42 PM
Jan 2017

After 12:01, if there is any unforseen happening, all the force/troops will be waiting for an instantaneous decision from someone who may not be as well-prepared to make that decision as the original commander.

I don't see how hypothesizing about switching commanders at the end of the Sheffield game is relevant.

 

braddy

(3,585 posts)
4. The event security is all being planned, assigned, led, coordinated, and executed, by the current
Fri Jan 13, 2017, 07:36 PM
Jan 2017

commander, he isn't being replaced a month before the event.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A disaster in the making?