General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsExplosive memos suggest a Trump-Russia tit-for-tat was at heart of the GOP's dramatic Ukraine shift
An unverified dossier provided to US intelligence officials alleges that President-elect Donald Trump "agreed to sideline" the issue of Russian intervention in Ukraine during his campaign after Russia promised to feed the emails it stole from prominent Democrats' inboxes to WikiLeaks.
The dossier was part of an opposition-research project conducted by a former British spy, Christopher Steele, at the behest of anti-Trump Republicans and, later, Democrats. Steele was the former head of the Russia desk in Moscow for Britain's Secret Intelligence Service, also known as MI6. The memos he wrote made their way to US intelligence officials sometime last year.
A summary of his findings, collected from the network of Russian intelligence sources he had cultivated, was presented to Trump, President Barack Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, and the country's top lawmakers on intelligence matters earlier this month as part of a classified briefing about Russia's intervention in the US presidential election.
The dossier's claim about a Ukraine-WikiLeaks tit-for-tat alleges that Trump would refrain from speaking forcefully, if at all, about Russia's incursion into eastern Ukraine in 2014. In return, Russia would provide WikiLeaks the documents it stole from the Democratic National Committee (DNC).
MORE:
http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-gop-policy-ukraine-wikileaks-dnc-2017-1
DeminPennswoods
(15,278 posts)There are many threads to pull here just as there were in Watergate. Lot of seemingly unrelated events and individuals turning out to be related afterall. I hope Trump kicks the press out of their digs in the WH. They won't be so worried about cultivating "administration sources" and can focus on real investigative journalism instead when their working spaces are someplace else.
dalton99a
(81,450 posts)Hugin
(33,120 posts)Idiots.
yardwork
(61,588 posts)DK504
(3,847 posts)they haven't met a propaganda piece they didn't like.
sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)malaise
(268,916 posts)asked Russia to leak Hillary Clinton's email. A presidential candidate asked a foreign power to leak the emails of the other candidate and party. If that is not treason, what is???
Takket
(21,555 posts)And I don't know why the media is so flippantly talking about Trumps Inauguration and what he will do after swearing in when the only thing we should talk about now is if he should be impeached As soon as the swearing in is over.
Jacob Boehme
(789 posts)Colluding with a foreign government to interfere with a US Presidential election; I think the other term for that is treason. But you'll only hear the sounds of crickets from our Congress when it comes to taking action on this.
Oh, wait.... Congress is probably going to schedule 5 or 6 more Benghazi investigations and hearings before this Summer. I feel much safer knowing that!
Achilleaze
(15,543 posts)Scurrilous
(38,687 posts).99center
(1,237 posts)Link to locked thread.
Explosive memos suggest that a Trump-Russia quid pro quo was at the heart of GOP's dramatic shift
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10141667258