General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHere's My Scenario For What Will Happen If Trump Ever Tries To Use Nukes.
First, Kim Jong Un makes fun of Trump. Then Trump decides to nuke North Korea.
He sends for the officer carrying the nuclear football with the radio and launch codes. Tells him to launch nukes.
Instead of doing that, the guy says "Just a minute...." and disappears. He returns an hour later with the head of SAC, the Air Force Chief of Staff, and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and they say:
"Okay, Mr. President. Since nobody in the political world appears to have the guts to tell you that you're a useless piece of shit, with the emotional maturity of a five year old, I guess WE'LL have to do it. We're not going to carry out your order, and we're not going to pay attention to any similar orders in the future. Now you can do one of two things. You can either go crying to your base on twitter that the Generals are being mean to you, and admit that you're just a figure head that nobody in the Pentagon is paying attention to; or we can all just pretend none of this ever happened."
If he does the latter, nobody will ever need to know that America had its first 'military coup,' which actually saved the world. If he does the former, The United States will join a long list of former democratic republics that have experienced military coups. Either way, it's a really bad idea to have Donald Trump as President.
Am I being an optimist to think that Trump will never try to use nukes, or am I an optimist for thinking the U.S. military will disobey him if he does? *Sigh*
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)HassleCat
(6,409 posts)Remember Colin Powell? He knew damn well he was lying so Bush could start a bogus war. He did it because he thought it was his duty.
TrollBuster9090
(5,954 posts)a childish moron who a hand full of political hacks, with an assist from the Kremlin put into Office.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,681 posts)Vasili Arkhipov may have saved the world.
Unlike the other subs in the flotilla, three officers on board the B-59 had to agree unanimously to authorize a nuclear launch: Captain Savitsky, the political officer Ivan Semonovich Maslennikov, and the second-in-command Arkhipov. Typically, Russian submarines armed with the "Special Weapon" only required the captain to get authorization from the political officer to launch a nuclear torpedo. However, due to Arkhipov's position as flotilla commander, the B-59's captain also was required to gain Arkhipov's approval. An argument broke out, with only Arkhipov against the launch.
Even though Arkhipov was only second-in-command of the submarine B-59, he was in fact commander of the entire submarine flotilla, including the B-4, B-36 and B-130, and equal in rank to Captain Savitsky. According to author Edward Wilson, the reputation Arkhipov had gained from his courageous conduct in the previous year's Soviet submarine K-19 incident also helped him prevail. Arkhipov eventually persuaded Savitsky to surface and await orders from Moscow. This effectively averted the nuclear warfare which probably would have ensued if the nuclear weapon had been fired.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasili_Arkhipov
TrollBuster9090
(5,954 posts)flamingdem
(39,313 posts)Did not know
Eliot Rosewater
(31,109 posts)and accurate even.
My problem with this is long before he uses a nuclear weapon to "wag the dog" as in taking our attention away from any number of his crimes, he will have put in place a yes man to go along with his order.
Most military people would say no to the lunatic, but some are there who would say yes, he will put one of them in this position.
I am so taken with how you worded this that I brought it to a tiny part of the liberal message board world and shared it with others.
Well done!
TrollBuster9090
(5,954 posts)At the moment, however, it's hard for a President to move officers IN to certain positions. He can fire them, though. So, he could eventually move loyalist officers into position by firing everybody who's not a loyalist. That would take a bit of time, and hopefully there'd be resistance to this.
bowens43
(16,064 posts)dumbcat
(2,120 posts)but that's not the way it works. There's a lot more to the procedure.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)I can't believe those in charge would allow any president to use nukes in the absence of an existential threat.
Jacob Boehme
(789 posts)Best_man23
(4,897 posts)He will call the officer carrying the football into his office and he will tell him or her the following:
"Here is my cellphone number, put it into your speed dial. If the President attempts to use the football and I am not right there, you call me. And there is no hour too late to call me."
During the Watergate years, Nixon's Defense Secretary had given the officer responsible for the football the same sort of direction because Nixon and Johnny Walker were having daily "close discussions."