General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMore than 40 Democratic lawmakers now skipping Trumps inauguration-- look whose name is missing
Here is the list. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2017/01/16/more-than-30-democratic-lawmakers-now-skipping-trumps-inauguration/?utm_term=.9c19a171b2cd
One name I don't see on there is Bernie Sanders. There are other sources saying he does plan to attend. https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=Sanders+inauguration
What's up with that? How do the DUers who pilloried Hillary for agreeing to attend feel about that?
My own view on the subject remains unchanged. I really wish Hillary would not attend, and I don't understand why she feels compelled to do so. As for Sanders, I'm not surprised. I wonder, however, if some of his most ardent supporters are, particularly those who were so critical of Clinton's decision?
SunSeeker
(51,518 posts)FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)And will get lots of press doing so too
BainsBane
(53,016 posts)that makes it alright then. What did you have to say about Clinton's attending?
FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)uhnope
(6,419 posts)That he worked in Congress quietly and effectively for years, but is suddenly motivated by personal fame? Is that the BS that supposedly progressive detractors are actually alleging?
BainsBane
(53,016 posts)that FreakingDJ suggested the importance of publicity. Take it up with him.
tecelote
(5,122 posts)Maybe if he had significant publicity when he was running. We'd have a Democrat in office now.
Good to see someone who had been campaigning so hard continue the fight.
Too bad he and Hillary are attending the inauguration. It legitimizes it. If Bernie skipped, it would be no big deal. But here's Hillary's chance to say this election was stolen but... status quo.
BainsBane
(53,016 posts)It sucks only being the politician with the second highest number of TV appearances in the country.
If the press did it's job, it would have covered him and only him 24/7.
It's good to see you are at least honest about maintaining a blatant double standard.
tecelote
(5,122 posts)There's my double standard for you.
BainsBane
(53,016 posts)Any thoughts on that?
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)but somehow neglected to cover the plan aspect of Clinton's candidacy.
Who needs a plan when we have catchy slogans?
Gothmog
(144,939 posts)Sanders is on a book tour
George II
(67,782 posts)...regardless of how they feel about it, it will be out of respect for the Presidency, not trump.
George II
(67,782 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)QC
(26,371 posts)Nope, nothing at all anti-Semitic about that.
mcar
(42,278 posts)What's he got planned?
sheshe2
(83,655 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)Gothmog
(144,939 posts)Gothmog
(144,939 posts)To us SOLIDARITY!
NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)Those books aren't going to sell themselves.
BainsBane
(53,016 posts)and apparently, according to another poster in this thread, he needs the publicity.
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)we'll have to listen to "sore loser" crap for months.
BainsBane
(53,016 posts)I don't know why that matters though. What could they possibly say about her than is worse than what they already have?
I think she feels a sense of responsibility to attend. I just don't understand it. I don't have a fraction of her strength though. I avoid all kinds of things I don't want to attend.
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)some requirement to respect the office, if not the occupant.
It's really not such a big deal to go.
BainsBane
(53,016 posts)He savaged her during the election. Every day he engaged in malicious lies. He brought those women out that Bill had affairs with and then proceeded to stalk her around the stage? I found that incredibly disturbing just to watch on TV, and I didn't have to deal with it.
I would find it impossible to be civil to him. Of course, there is a reason I'm not a politician.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)All circumstances. At this time especially, when DT seems intent on doing as much damage to our institutions and traditions as he can there's a comfort in reminding us it's all much bigger and more enduring than he. I think it's good they are going and not acting spiteful.
When they hit him with something, I want it to do actual damage- not just satisfy some punitive urges.
BainsBane
(53,016 posts)especially this: "When they hit him with something, I want it to do actual damage- not just satisfy some punitive urges."
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)I guess we should expect it from people who want to burn it down but I don't think it makes sense to roll in the gutter with pigs like these. I think we are going to need some reassurances that there are grownups in DC pretty soon.
jmowreader
(50,530 posts)A living former president attends the presidential inauguration, and his First Lady accompanies him.
Nothing says she has to say anything to the bastard.
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)presidents wanted to take a picture with him?
I don't think anyone really likes or respects Twitler. All of them are attending out of a sense of decorum.
I think all senators will attend because they will be the ones to convict Twitler if he's there long enough to get impeached.
melman
(7,681 posts)Again.
BainsBane
(53,016 posts)What precisely constitutes "raging" in my OP?
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Reading your op.
BainsBane
(53,016 posts)That any view other than absolute adulation is unacceptable.
ProfessorGAC
(64,865 posts). . .that any view other than absolute denigration is unacceptable.
Is there no middle ground?
BainsBane
(53,016 posts)Last edited Thu Jan 19, 2017, 01:45 AM - Edit history (1)
Tell me what constitutes "absolute denigration" in my OP? I asked a question to those who condemned Hillary for agreeing to attend the inauguration: Do they hold Sanders to the same standard? Rather than reflecting on that question, the response is to insist my asking that question is bashing or "absolute denigration." I didn't insult him, malign him, or call him any of the names that are commonly leveled at Hillary and other Democrats. In fact I called him nothing. To label anything I've said here as "absolute denigration" is blatantly false and frankly bizarre. It's also reflective of what we saw during the primary, in which any question about Bernie's views or policy positions was met with condemnation that we had no right to even ask. Is it that commitment to hierarchy over equality that I find so unacceptable, but it is absolutely central to the climate around Sanders. My view is that elected representatives should serve the people, not the other way around. That is why I will never be able to establish common ground with those who insist on holding one man above the rest of humanity.
ProfessorGAC
(64,865 posts)I'm just tossing your own term back at you. I basically copied exactly what you wrote and changed the tenor to describe your constant berating of anybody who still thinks Sanders is an ally.
Somehow you have proven my point with this statement: "...I will never be able to establish common ground with those who insist on holding one man above the rest of humanity." Since i didn't do or suggest any such thing, and this reply was to me, it appears that you are the one showing complete inflexibility.
BTW: I like an awful lot of your posts, but this belittling of allies who have the slightest difference of opinion is unbecoming of an otherwise thoughtful poster.
a la izquierda
(11,791 posts)Why I've mostly stayed off DU since August or so.
progree
(10,893 posts)BainsBane
(53,016 posts)El Haaretz and some other papers are saying he has decided to attend.
progree
(10,893 posts)I looked at Hareetz and several of the others, and there's no indication of him saying that, or someone saying that on his behalf. I think it is just some bullshit that got picked up from somewhere. What are the "other papers" (other than Hareetz) besides Breitbart and echo chamber websites?
BainsBane
(53,016 posts)and the reporting may not be accurate.
progree
(10,893 posts)Liberal stalwart and one-time presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders had a simple response when asked about going to the inauguration as he blazed past reporters in the Capitol basement: Probably.
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/house-democrats-inauguration-233613
Fri. Jan. 13, updated Sunday Jan. 15 11 a.m. ET
As much as I hate to post it.
But we'll see. Keith Ellison didn't make or announce his decision until Monday afternoon,
Context: Trump twitter-attacked Rep. John Lewis Saturday morning, and that's what Ellison cites. FWIW
JustAnotherGen
(31,781 posts)Not raging. However, maybe Sanders will have a change of heart. There's still time.
BainsBane
(53,016 posts)That raging comment is a riot.
JustAnotherGen
(31,781 posts)LOL! You are plutocracy oligarchy loving non pure Democratic party member so if you even say or write "good morning" you are raging! Raging I tell ya!
uhnope
(6,419 posts)DeminPennswoods
(15,265 posts)I am surprised that Brendan Boyle isn't going. Boyle's kind of on the conservative Dem side unlike most of the other Dems on the list. I guess it's a good thing that Trump is offending even Dems who might, in some cases, be willing to be policy allies.
Disappointing not to see Mike Doyle's name.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)Nobody is going to ever be able to call her a sore loser OR keep her out of the spotlight. She would have looked like a coward not going (not that I personally would have blamed her, I'm speaking of the narrative that would have formed).
Mike Nelson
(9,944 posts)...Bill and Hillary Clinton lived in the White House for two terms. We need some leaders who still model decorum, especially around a crude bully like Trump. As for Bernie, I would respect his decision. It would be nice for him to join the "protest" but he can make up his own mind how to oppose Trump - an he's off to a great start!
Response to BainsBane (Original post)
Post removed
BainsBane
(53,016 posts)on what I myself wrote about in the OP, almost as if two dozen words were too much to read?
How about you? Are you looking forward to the festivities? http://jackpineradicals.com/boards/topic/rec-if-youre-not-going-to-vote-for-hillary/
Cha
(296,869 posts)All the caring about People voted for Hillary
George II
(67,782 posts)Gothmog
(144,939 posts)George II
(67,782 posts).....there will be tens of thousands of Americans who don't believe Trump is a "legitimate" president - Democrats, republicans, and independents.
If you want to know if Hillary Clinton will be there, call her appointments secretary to find out. Will you be there or at any of the dozens of rallies around the country?
bowens43
(16,064 posts)the election is over, hillary lost, stop already.
BainsBane
(53,016 posts)As soon as people here continue to demand everyone pay homage to Bernie and insists on promoting double standards, you may on occasion see a post by someone who considers him mortal. it's a good thing none of you had to suffer through a GE with Bernie as a candidate because you are so easily put out by the most mild questions from lowly citizens.
A number of people here condemned Hillary for agreeing to attend the inauguration. And now you insist that we have no right to ask what they think about Bernie's decision to do the same thing. That's unfortunate for you, but I will not be following orders.
Gothmog
(144,939 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)jmg257
(11,996 posts)the new Democrat President's inauguration.
George II
(67,782 posts)jmg257
(11,996 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)You can find many explanations of the use of "Democrat", this one is the first one that pops up:
http://www.factcheck.org/2007/12/the-democratic-or-democrat-party/
The Democratic or Democrat Party?
By Justin BankPosted on December 7, 2007
Q: Is it the Democratic Party or the Democrat Party?
A: The proper term is Democratic Party.
FULL QUESTION
Why does everyone keep referring to the Democrats as Democratic?
Is the use of Democrat as an adjective by Republican talking heads grammatically incorrect? Is it malevolent? Does it have a strategic value?
FULL ANSWER
The party traces its roots to 1792 and the anti-federalist faction led by Thomas Jefferson. The Jeffersonians called themselves Republicans at first, and later Democratic-Republican. The party splintered in the late 1820s, and the faction led by Andrew Jackson in his successful presidential campaign of 1828 became the modern Democratic Party. It formally adopted the name Democratic Party at its convention in 1844.
However, some Republican leaders have made a habit of referring to their opposition incorrectly and discourteously as the Democrat Party. The reason isnt entirely clear; it may be meant to imply that the party isnt sufficiently democratic in the general sense, or may just be meant as a petty insult. In August 2006, Hendrik Hertzberg traced this Republican usage, which he termed a slur on his party, back to the 1940s. He says it was used by opponents to needle the powerful Pendergast organization in Kansas City, which backed Harry Truman. He also says it was used often by the late Sen. Joseph McCarthy.
More recently, President Bush has used the term regularly, even employing it in his 2007 State of the Union address when he said, I congratulate the Democrat majority in Congress, referring to his own partys defeat in the mid-term congressional elections the previous year. He did that either deliberately or out of habit; the prepared remarks that he was reading, and which had been given to reporters beforehand, used the proper name of the party.
jmg257
(11,996 posts)is still legit.
Humbly corrected!
Cheers!
George II
(67,782 posts)Vinca
(50,237 posts)Whether he goes or not makes no difference to me. The same goes for the other Democrats in Congress.
sheshe2
(83,655 posts)please explain. TIA
Vinca
(50,237 posts)and see how much he can get signed that we want before the GOP impeaches Trump and installs Pence (a sure thing IMO).
betsuni
(25,380 posts)lostnfound
(16,162 posts)What a waste of time.
BainsBane
(53,016 posts)and not because of a simple question like I posed.
R B Garr
(16,950 posts)now that Bernie is going, nothing should be said. We should all just move along, nothing to see here.
Personally, I'm okay with her going as it is a sign of strength and her husband is an ex-President. If anything, Bernie is the one who should not be going since he set himself up as the anti-Establishment lampooner. But he sure likes the cameras and seems to be relishing the spotlight, so I guess he's not so anti-Establishment after all.
Cha
(296,869 posts)nolabear
(41,936 posts)Though Kamala Harris has said she won't attend.
obamanut2012
(26,047 posts)So far, she's the only Senator.
obamanut2012
(26,047 posts)I bet you aren't, either.
BainsBane
(53,016 posts)truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)Oh, convenient framing: lawmakers.
But, unlike Hillary, Bernie doesn't have the option of snubbing Cheeto, since he--and all the other Democratic Senators--will have to be there to deal with his depredations as best he can.
Of course, given the Democratic penchant for shooting themselves in the foot, it is not surprising that some would want that to continue. Can't break with tradition, can we?
BainsBane
(53,016 posts)along with much of the congressional black caucus.
I fail to see how not attending the inauguration impairs Bernie's job. Do you envision him engaging in a lot of cooperation with Trump?
And I did discuss Hillary in the OP, which is quite short.
Gothmog
(144,939 posts)Congressman Al Green is a good man http://algreen.house.gov/press-release/congressman-al-green%E2%80%99s-statement-2017-presidential-inauguration
Today, we celebrate the legacy of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.; on Friday, President-elect Trump will be sworn-in. For some time, I have been hearing from many constituents with varying points of view on the question of whether I will attend the inauguration. My response is Dr. King was right when he indicated: On some issues cowardice asks the question, is it safe? Expediency asks the question, is it politic? Vanity asks the question, is it popular? But, conscience asks the question, is it right? And there comes a time when we must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular, but one must take it because it is right.
I will not attend the inauguration because conscience says it is the right thing to do.
Talk Is Cheap
(389 posts)Senator Sanders is always looking out for the good of all people.
otohara
(24,135 posts)it's only the 650,000 people of Vermont he looks out after.
MicaelS
(8,747 posts)To realize and accept Gun Prohibition is a losing policy for Democrats. Other Democrats still need to learn this.
otohara
(24,135 posts)not a damn thing...because his voice is the only voice he ever listens to.
and yeah he's tone deaf on guns ... especially that vote after Newtown.
MicaelS
(8,747 posts)Other Democrats are wrong. THAT is the point.
otohara
(24,135 posts)Why should any Democrat in "other states" with gun violence and states like mine where we've had two of the worst mass shootings listen to an Independent from a state who has never had a big problem with gun violence?
We're looking for solution's and he gives it all away with his fondness of the NRA
Gothmog
(144,939 posts)That is so very sad
MicaelS
(8,747 posts)Sanders is representing the people of his state and doing what THEY want, not what Lewis wants.
sheshe2
(83,655 posts)nini
(16,672 posts)it's his followers with the purity test that make me crazy.
I agree with his policies almost item by item.
Talk Is Cheap
(389 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)BainsBane
(53,016 posts)azmom
(5,208 posts)a priority for me.
CentralMass
(15,265 posts)ananda
(28,836 posts)I wish he'd join them!
Gothmog
(144,939 posts)Gothmog
(144,939 posts)That's great!
nini
(16,672 posts)or Hillary.
I don't agree but I understand why they are doing this. Not to mention it'll intimidate the idiot a bit.
panader0
(25,816 posts)BainsBane
(53,016 posts)Constitute "bashing"?
panader0
(25,816 posts)But you single Bernie out of all of them. I guess we'll see how the new rule applies eh?
BainsBane
(53,016 posts)And I don't malign Bernie in the OP at all. What I ask is how those who condemned Hillary Clinton for attended the inauguration feel about Bernie's attending. Rather than reflecting on that question, the response of you and others here is to attack me for asking it. That echoes the attitude from the point he first entered the race that mere citizens have no right to question him or his supporters are about anything. I do not share the view that a great man, whether Bernie or any other member of the political elite, is superior to citizens. We are repeatedly told he is the only one fighting against Trump, when that point isn't even remotely clear, when a number of elected officials have been far more forthright in doing so.
I have been repeatedly lecture that I need to pay homage to Bernie because he is superior to everyone else in public life, yet now you rely on an excuse that everyone else is doing it. In addition to not being true, it contradicts the assertion that he stands above the rest of politicians.
Bernie and supporters here very recently falsely maligned Corey Booker as a corporate sell out. That I posted another perspective on that amendment was likewise condemned as trashing Bernie. You are of course free to take every word he says uncritically and reject any information that might contradict anything he says, but you will not succeed in enforcing blind obedience on those of us who care about more than one politician's career.
I have absolutely no respect for the type of mentality that takes a mere question as "bashing," particularly when those same people have spent months and years insulting Democratic representations if quite graphic and sometimes vulgar terms. And yet a simple question asked whether those people who regularly malign other Democrats will hold their hero to the same standard. The answer is of course no because, I believe, the point is not any particular principle or action but the enforcement of hierarchy, one that betrays a conservative worldview in which a great man as seen as superior to mere citizens. Bernie supporters are of course not alone in that view. It reaches across the political spectrum and is among the most troubling aspects of our current political culture.
Gothmog
(144,939 posts)Yeah. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2017/01/16/more-than-30-democratic-lawmakers-now-skipping-trumps-inauguration/?utm_term=.6596b3b9f41c This list will grow. Juanita Jean just e-mailed me that Congressman Castro is not attending and he is not on this list
annabanana
(52,791 posts)The WaPo site is a pain for non-subscribers.
Gothmog
(144,939 posts)This is from Huffington Post http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-inauguration-boycott_us_5877ce0ee4b0c42cb1758e0c
Heres the list of House Democrats planning to skip the inauguration in protest or, in a handful of cases, for vague reasons. So far, no senators have said they plan to boycott it.
Rep. Alma Adams (D-N.C.)
Rep. Karen Bass (D-Calif.)
Rep. Don Beyer (D-Va.)
Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.)
Rep. Brendan Boyle (D-Pa.)
Rep. Anthony Brown (D-Md.)
Rep. G.K. Butterfield (D-N.C.)
Rep. Tony Cárdenas (D-Calif.)
Rep. Joaquin Castro (D-Texas)
Rep. Judy Chu (D-Calif.)
Rep. Katherine Clark (D-Mass.)
Rep. Yvette Clarke (D-N.Y.)
Rep. Lacy Clay (D-Mo.)
Rep. Steve Cohen (D-Tenn.)
Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.)
Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-Ore.)*
Rep. Mark DeSaulnier (D-Calif.)
Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas)
Rep. Mike Doyle (D-Pa.)
Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.)
Rep. Adriano Espaillat (D-N.Y.)
Rep. Dwight Evans (D-Pa.)
Rep. Marcia Fudge (D-Ohio)
Rep. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.)
Rep. Al Green (D-Texas)
Rep. Raul Grijalva (D-Ariz.)
Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-Ill.)
Rep. Alcee Hastings (D-Fla.)
Rep. Jared Huffman (D-Calif.)
Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.)
Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.)
Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.)
Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.)
Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.)
Rep. Jerry McNerney (D-Calif.)*
Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.)
Rep. Grace Napolitano (D-Calif.)
Rep. Chellie Pingree (D-Maine)
Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Wis.)
Rep. Lucille Roybal-Allard (D-Calif.)
Rep. Raul Ruiz (D-Calif.)
Rep. Kurt Schrader (D-Ore.)
Rep. Jose Serrano (D-N.Y.)
Rep. Carol Shea-Porter (D-N.H.)
Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash.)*
Rep. Darren Soto (D-Fla.)
Rep. Mark Takano (D-Calif.)
Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.)
Rep. Juan Vargas (D-Calif.)
Rep. Nydia Velazquez (D-N.Y.)
Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.)
Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-N.J.)
Rep. Frederica Wilson (D-Fla.)
Rep. John Yarmuth (D-Ky.)
This list is moving and does not list Senator Harris from Calif.
annabanana
(52,791 posts)Gothmog
(144,939 posts)The Washington Post list did not include Congressman Castro from Texas but this list does. I heard from a good source that Congressman Castro will boycott.
LeftInTX
(25,142 posts)Gothmog
(144,939 posts)The Castro brothers have helped in local fundraisers. They are good people
brooklynite
(94,363 posts)Not Bernie Sanders
Not Elizabeth Warren
Not Sherrod Brown
This is symbolism, and not much else.
Gothmog
(144,939 posts)sheshe2
(83,655 posts)mnhtnbb
(31,374 posts)He is the Rep for the 4th District of NC, where I live.
Our other two Dem Reps have already said they won't go.
Before the Repubs gerrymandered NC, we had a ratio of 7 Dem and 6 Repub House Reps in 2010 which pretty much reflected
a fairly evenly split state. After they gerrymandered, the ratio went to 9 Repubs and 4 Dems in 2012 and then 10 Repubs to 3 Dems in 2014.
In 2016 Dem House Rep candidates received 2,142,661 votes across the state; Repub House Rep candidates received 2,447,324.
If districts were drawn to reflect those votes, there would be 6 Dem House Reps and 7 Repub House Reps.
Fu*king Republicans.
George II
(67,782 posts)Cha
(296,869 posts)Mahalo, Goth~
Gothmog
(144,939 posts)Gothmog
(144,939 posts)This is from Juanita Jean http://juanitajean.com/way-to-go-congressmen/
Every American should respect the office of the presidency and the fact that Donald Trump will be the 45th President of the United States. But winning an election does not mean a man can show contempt for millions of Americans and then expect those very people to celebrate him.
I come from a family and a place, Texas, where respect is a fundamental value respect for people regardless of what they look like, where they were born, or whether they share your view of the world. Donald Trump has shown an utter lack of respect for so many Americans. His attack on civil rights hero John Lewis is the latest example.
I will not attend this years inauguration ceremony. However, I will be in Washington to greet constituents who are traveling to our nations capital for the proceedings. I respect their choice to attend.
I am hopeful that Sheila Jackson Lee, Mark Veasey, Gene Green and a couple more Texas congresscritters join in
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)We should be sympathetic toward Hillary, but condemn Bernie, for doing exactly the same thing. Here's a novel idea! Maybe we could recognize that everybody has legitimate reasons for going or not going, and just refrain from attributing bad motives at the drop of a hat.
Arazi
(6,829 posts)Rehashing the primaries
This is bullshit
compsports
(91 posts)Gothmog
(144,939 posts)This appears to be the latest list http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-inauguration-boycott_us_5877ce0ee4b0c42cb1758e0c?fcqe1f93rn3vdkj4i
Rep. Alma Adams (D-N.C.)
Rep. Karen Bass (D-Calif.)
Rep. Don Beyer (D-Va.)
Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.)
Rep. Brendan Boyle (D-Pa.)
Rep. Bob Brady (D-Pa.)
Rep. Anthony Brown (D-Md.)
Rep. G.K. Butterfield (D-N.C.)
Rep. Michael Capuano (D-Mass.)
Rep. Tony Cárdenas (D-Calif.)
Rep. Joaquin Castro (D-Texas)
Rep. Judy Chu (D-Calif.)
Rep. Katherine Clark (D-Mass.)
Rep. Yvette Clarke (D-N.Y.)
Rep. Lacy Clay (D-Mo.)
Rep. Steve Cohen (D-Tenn.)
Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.)
Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.)
Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-Ore.)*
Rep. Mark DeSaulnier (D-Calif.)
Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas)
Rep. Mike Doyle (D-Pa.)
Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.)
Rep. Adriano Espaillat (D-N.Y.)
Rep. Dwight Evans (D-Pa.)
Rep. Marcia Fudge (D-Ohio)
Rep. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.)
Rep. Al Green (D-Texas)
Rep. Raul Grijalva (D-Ariz.)
Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-Ill.)
Rep. Alcee Hastings (D-Fla.)
Rep. Jared Huffman (D-Calif.)
Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.)
Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.)
Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.)
Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.)
Rep. Dan Lipinski (D-Ill.)*
Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.)
Rep. Jerry McNerney (D-Calif.)
Rep. Grace Meng (D-N.Y.)
Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.)
Rep. Grace Napolitano (D-Calif.)
Rep. Donald Payne, Jr. (D-N.J.)
Rep. Chellie Pingree (D-Maine)
Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Wis.)
Rep. Mike Quigley (D-Ill.)*
Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.)
Rep. Lucille Roybal-Allard (D-Calif.)
Rep. Raul Ruiz (D-Calif.)
Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.)
Rep. Kurt Schrader (D-Ore.)
Rep. Jose Serrano (D-N.Y.)
Rep. Terri Sewell (D-Ala.)
Rep. Carol Shea-Porter (D-N.H.)
Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-N.Y.)
Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash.)*
Rep. Darren Soto (D-Fla.)
Rep. Mark Takano (D-Calif.)
Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.)
Rep. Juan Vargas (D-Calif.)
Rep. Nydia Velazquez (D-N.Y.)
Rep. Peter Visclosky (D-Ind.)*
Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.)
Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-N.J.)
Rep. Frederica Wilson (D-Fla.)
Rep. John Yarmuth (D-Ky.)
Gothmog
(144,939 posts)DK has a good list http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/1/18/1621903/-More-than-50-House-Democrats-are-now-boycotting-Donald-Trump-s-inauguration
Check below to see if your representative is on the list. Then, sign and send the petition to your members of Congress: Boycott Trump's inauguration.
Rep. Alma Adams (North Carolina)
Rep. Karen Bass (California)
Rep. Don Beyer (Virginia)
Rep. Earl Blumenauer (Oregon)
Rep. Brendan Boyle (Pennsylvania)
Rep. Bob Brady (Pennsylvania)
Rep. Anthony Brown (Maryland)
Rep. G.K. Butterfield (North Carolina)
Rep. Tony Cardenas (California)
Rep. Joaquin Castro (Texas)
Rep. Judy Chu (California)
Rep. Katherine Clark (Massachusetts)
Rep. Yvette Clarke (New York)
Rep. William Lacy Clay (Missouri)
Rep. Steve Cohen (Tennessee)
Rep. Gerry Connolly (Virginia)
Rep. John Conyers (Michigan)
Rep. Peter DeFazio (Oregon)
Rep. Mark DeSaulnier (California)
Rep. Lloyd Doggett (Texas)
Rep. Mike Doyle (Pennsylvania)
Rep. Keith Ellison (Minnesota)
Rep. Adriano Espaillat (New York)
Rep. Dwight Evans (Pennsylvania)
Rep. Marcia Fudge (Ohio)
Rep. Ruben Gallego (Arizona)
Rep. Al Green (Texas)
Rep. Raul Grijalva (Arizona)
Rep. Luis Gutierrez (Illinois)
Rep. Alcee Hastings (Florida)
Rep. Jared Huffman (California)
Rep. Pramila Jayapal (Washington)
Rep. Barbara Lee (California)
Rep. John Lewis (Georgia)
Rep. Ted Lieu (California)
Rep. Dan Lipinski (Illinois)
Rep. Zoe Lofgren (California)
Rep. Jerry McNerney (California)
Rep. Grace Meng (New York)
Rep. Jerrold Nadler (New York)
Rep. Grace Napolitano (California)
Rep. Donald Payne Jr. (New Jersey)
Rep. Chellie Pingree (Maine)
Rep. Mark Pocan (Wisconsin)
Rep. Mike Quigley (Illinois)
Rep. Jamie Raskin (Maryland)
Rep. Lucille Roybal-Allard (California)
Rep. Raul Ruiz (California)
Rep. Jan Schakowsky (Illinois)
Rep. Kurt Schrader (Oregon)
Rep. Jose Serrano (New York)
Rep. Carol Shea-Porter (New Hampshire)
Rep. Louise Slaughter (New York)
Rep. Adam Smith (Washington)
Rep. Darren Soto (Florida)
Rep. Mark Takano (California)
Rep. Bennie Thompson (Mississippi)
Rep. Nydia Velazquez (New York)
Rep. Peter Visclosky (Indiana)
Rep. Maxine Waters (California)
Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman (New Jersey)
Rep. Frederica Wilson (Florida)
Rep. John Yarmuth (Kentucky)
Gothmog
(144,939 posts)Gothmog
(144,939 posts)I knew that Sheila would be boycotting http://www.click2houston.com/news/politics/rep-sheila-jackson-lee-joins-list-of-texas-politicians-not-attending-inauguration I would have been shocked to see Sheila not boycott