Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If Drumpf orders a blockade of the South China Sea and China sends in aircraft, what happens next? (Original Post) DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2017 OP
Very bad scenario get the red out Jan 2017 #1
If there was a nuclear war with China we would of necessity fire first. DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2017 #2
he'll tweet something mean about Xi Jinping and/or his wife NewJeffCT Jan 2017 #3
Remember, the idiot said he would blow Iranian boats out of the water PearliePoo2 Jan 2017 #4
A war with China would be exponentially worse. DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2017 #6
China would financially ruin the USA SHRED Jan 2017 #5
Sociopath admits he thrives on revenge (to his deathbed) if he feels he's been slighted or dissed PearliePoo2 Jan 2017 #7
Then... Buckeye_Democrat Jan 2017 #8
China has their own nukes, albeit not a lot. DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2017 #9
I suspect that Trump will be a bully with the military and... Buckeye_Democrat Jan 2017 #10
China is an honor culture. Saving face is very important. DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2017 #11
Trump should make for anxious times, regardless. n/t Buckeye_Democrat Jan 2017 #12
I am reading about Sino-Soviet border conflicts DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2017 #13
China has only 1 aircraft carrier Motown_Johnny Jan 2017 #14
Why would they need an aircraft carrier? They have nearly 3,000 aircraft. DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2017 #15
I don't think it will come to that. Motown_Johnny Jan 2017 #16
You are 100% right. Trump is crazy but he's not that crazy... DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2017 #17
The same was said during the lead-up to World War I. thucythucy Jan 2017 #18
Remember when Thomas Friedman said there could never be a war between two nations that... DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2017 #19
It would never be a land invasion Lee-Lee Jan 2017 #21
Technology wise their aircraft would stand little change to success Lee-Lee Jan 2017 #20
I was upset when China was bullying the Philippines. DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2017 #23
Economic collapse then Nukes. sarcasmo Jan 2017 #22

get the red out

(13,461 posts)
1. Very bad scenario
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 10:04 AM
Jan 2017

We are not going to have a President with a clue on how to handle international problems. We could face nuclear war for his ego. I can only hope our military would disobey his insanity.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
2. If there was a nuclear war with China we would of necessity fire first.
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 10:07 AM
Jan 2017

A conventional war with them would bleed us dry. That was always the fear with the old USSR, that a NATO-Warsaw Pact war would end in a nuclear exchange.

NewJeffCT

(56,828 posts)
3. he'll tweet something mean about Xi Jinping and/or his wife
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 10:08 AM
Jan 2017

and his supporters and the media will cheer his toughness... while China ends up getting their way.

PearliePoo2

(7,768 posts)
4. Remember, the idiot said he would blow Iranian boats out of the water
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 10:13 AM
Jan 2017

if they were showing disrespect to our "our big, beautiful Navy ships". It seems he's got a "trigger finger".

 

SHRED

(28,136 posts)
5. China would financially ruin the USA
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 10:14 AM
Jan 2017

And besides...how strong is our military when China manufactures so much of our equipment?

They make the products we need.
It would get ugly quick.

PearliePoo2

(7,768 posts)
7. Sociopath admits he thrives on revenge (to his deathbed) if he feels he's been slighted or dissed
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 10:23 AM
Jan 2017

We're in for a hell of a ride for survival of the earth.

Buckeye_Democrat

(14,853 posts)
8. Then...
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 10:23 AM
Jan 2017

Trump would order several submarines, armed with nuclear missiles, near China.

China would wisely back down from such a conflict.

WalMart customers would struggle to find cheap stuff from China.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
9. China has their own nukes, albeit not a lot.
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 10:28 AM
Jan 2017

They have to believe the USA isn't going to nuke them over some sand bars. When they intervened in the Korean War we wisely sued for peace.

When has China backed down from anybody in recent history?

Buckeye_Democrat

(14,853 posts)
10. I suspect that Trump will be a bully with the military and...
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 10:32 AM
Jan 2017

if I'm right about such a scenario, China would be wise to back down because the nuclear subs would vaporize them.

Trump will have the USA and the rest of the world on pins and needles.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
11. China is an honor culture. Saving face is very important.
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 10:40 AM
Jan 2017

Remember what happened during the Bush administration. This is from memory. Chinese plane buzzes American jet in international waters. Chinese plane and pilot is lost. American jet is damaged in the skirmish and lands in China. China doesn't return jet and crew until America apologizes. America apologizes and China returns crew and jet in little pieces.

I don't see China backing down,

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
13. I am reading about Sino-Soviet border conflicts
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 10:54 AM
Jan 2017
China’s superiority in sheer numbers of troops was the cornerstone of Beijing’s strategy to deter a Soviet nuclear attack.[1] Since 1949, Chinese military strategy as articulated by Chinese leader Mao Zedong continually emphasized the superiority of “man over weapons.” While weapons were certainly an important component of warfare, Mao argued that they were “not the decisive factor; it is people, not things, that are decisive. The contest of strength is not only a contest of military and economic power, but also a contest of human power and morale.”[1] In Mao’s view, non-material qualities, including subjectivity, creativity, flexibility, and high morale, were critical determinants in warfare.”[1]

The Soviets were not confident they could win such a conflict. A large-scale Chinese incursion could threaten key strategic centers in Blagoveshchensk, Vladivostok, and Khabarovsk, as well as crucial nodes of the Trans-Siberian Railroad.[1] According to Arkady Shevchenko, a high-ranking Russian defector to the United States, “The Politburo was terrified that the Chinese might make a large-scale intrusion into Soviet territory.[1] A nightmare vision of invasion by millions of Chinese made the Soviet leaders almost frantic. Despite our overwhelming superiority in weaponry, it would not be easy for the U.S.S.R. to cope with an assault of this magnitude.”[1] Given China’s “vast population and deep knowledge and experience in guerrilla warfare,” if the Soviets launched a major attack on China’s nuclear program they would surely become “mired in an endless war.”[1]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sino-Soviet_border_conflict


See post # 2 . China would bleed us dry. Even the Deplorables would realize war with China is a very bad idea.
 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
14. China has only 1 aircraft carrier
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 10:56 AM
Jan 2017

They are no match for us in a naval conflict. I tend to think it won't come to that. Both our economies would suffer and they have no hope of winning.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
15. Why would they need an aircraft carrier? They have nearly 3,000 aircraft.
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 11:02 AM
Jan 2017

The whole point of a blue water Navy is to extend your power.

We would be going 7,000 miles to attack them. The Chinese military isn't going to sit by for six months like Saddam's military did in 1991 while the whole world puts together an invasion force on their border.


We could defeat any military, but defeating Russia or China would come at such a cost as to be unfathomable.

It would likely be the end for them and us.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
16. I don't think it will come to that.
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 11:18 AM
Jan 2017

Our economies are so dependant on each other that a military conflict seems unlikely.

If they worst.did.happen it would still most likely be a limited conflict. I just don't see a war between them US and China in the near future. Maybe I am wrong but I kinda doubt it.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
17. You are 100% right. Trump is crazy but he's not that crazy...
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 11:27 AM
Jan 2017

If he "picks on" a nation militarily it won't be China. He even admitted we have some real strong enemies. Since Russia is his friend that leaves China. Even he knows a war with a nation with nearly 1,500,000,000 people would be catastrophic.

The USA would likely prevail, but at what cost?

And though Trump likes to talk a tough game he knows Americans of all political persuasions aren't go to go to a war with an economic and military behemoth like China.

One poster in this thread nailed it. He will make a nasty tweet at China's expense and his followers will believe he was vindicated.

thucythucy

(8,045 posts)
18. The same was said during the lead-up to World War I.
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 11:50 AM
Jan 2017

There was a best selling book of the time, arguing that European economies were so interdependent that a war between the great powers--France, Britain, Germany, Russia, Austria-Hungary--could never happen. Or if it did happen, it would be short. In fact, pretty much all the military plans of the time counted on a quick war, with a single decisive battle.

Then came Sarajevo, and that "damn fool thing in the Balkans" Bismark warned us about. After which came four years of incredible bloodshed and economic ruin.

There's nothing Putin would love better than a shooting war between the US and China. And we all know how much Trump admires his good pal Vladimir.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
19. Remember when Thomas Friedman said there could never be a war between two nations that...
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 11:58 AM
Jan 2017

Remember when Thomas Friedman said there could never be a war between two nations that had a McDonalds because they were united by an interest in commerce. How did that work out?

Cui bono?

Who would win a war between the #1 military power and the # 3 military power?


The #2 military power.


 

Lee-Lee

(6,324 posts)
21. It would never be a land invasion
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 12:23 PM
Jan 2017

Aside from maybe some of those little artificial islands the Chinese are building.

It would be Naval and Air Forces pretty much entirely.

 

Lee-Lee

(6,324 posts)
20. Technology wise their aircraft would stand little change to success
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 12:22 PM
Jan 2017

The real threat is they are developing or have operational anti-ship ballistic middles. Think a flight path into low space like a nuclear ballistic middle but with a conventional warhead and guidance system developed to sink capital ships like aircraft carriers.

In theory the Navy can shoot them down. In practice it's been done against one or two at a time but if they did a simultaneous volley of a dozen or more they only need one to get through.

A hit by one of those on a US carrier would probably produce more US casualties in one instant than all branches of the US Military took for the entire Iraq war.

The whole mess there has the potential to spin out of control fast even with rational hands guiding the path. The Chinese seem hell bent on expansionist dreams and claiming wide swaths of open ocean as territorial waters, something that in the past by any country has always been met with force or the threat of it to stop. Allowing them unimpeded is a bad choice. Pushing back too hard is a bad choice.

It's a mess that bothered me a lot a year ago. Now it's just terrifying what could happen.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
23. I was upset when China was bullying the Philippines.
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 01:01 PM
Jan 2017

The principle that large nations shouldn't bully small nations is worth upholding. I just don't see the point of rattling China's cage.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If Drumpf orders a blocka...