In the NYT article about the investigation into trump's minions, if they didn't have concrete

[shraby]

proof, they wouldn't have named names.
This investigation is farther along than the article says.

[BlueCaliDem]

1. Agreed. They wouldn't risk publishing a story that they know those named would sue for

if they didn't have the evidence to back it up.

Just because the information is unverified, doesn't mean it's unsubstantiated although I hear M$M continue to say that the info published is unsubstantiated rather than unverified. Sounds similar, but it's not, and they know it. M$M still carrying water for Republicans and Trumputin.

[GusBob]

2. Follow the money

and its all in the wiretaps/intercepts

lets see them

[get the red out]

3. Nor would the democrats be so upset

Remember what John Conyers said.