General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNewt Gingrich wants to fire federal employees who voted for Clinton
"There wont be any real cooperation until we change federal law so we can fire them
SOPHIA TESFAYE
President-elect Donald Trump is set to assume control of the White House in a manner of hours, and his longtime adviser Newt Gingrich is giddy about reported plans to cut $10.5 trillion out of the federal government over 10 years by gutting federal agency budgets by as much as 10 percent while slashing 20 percent from the federal workforce.
The Trump transition team has reportedly met for months with career officials in the White House to outline a plan for massive cuts to the federal workforce. The plan, modeled after a budget championed by the ultra-conservative Heritage Foundation, essentially calls for cutting nearly all of the governments discretionary spending.
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich is so excited by the prospects that Trump will finally be able to deliver the extremely right-wing restructuring of the federal government hes championed for decades.
I would say by one week after the inaugural, it will be very interesting to look at how many things have changed, Gingrich recently said at a Heritage Foundation event. Gingrich predicted that Trumpism produces a balanced budget largely as a consequence of its policies rather than by focusing on the balance itself.
more
http://www.salon.com/2017/01/20/newt-gingrich-wants-to-fire-federal-employees-who-voted-for-clinton/
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)to build infrastructure, tax revenues will collapse and we'll be sent into a Depression.
shraby
(21,946 posts)dalton99a
(81,404 posts)liberal N proud
(60,332 posts)For if he was, he would want them jailed.
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)camps. Otherwise, it creates problems with the accounting and payroll.
greatauntoftriplets
(175,729 posts)One is a VA nurse; the other is an actuary for the Railroad Retirement Board. Both are civil service.
Doesn't this violate some law?
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)Initech
(100,041 posts)Else You Are Mad
(3,040 posts)Private citizens that voted for Hillary. The sad thing is that they are already planning on how they can do it.
Buckeye_Democrat
(14,852 posts)JHan
(10,173 posts)Kashkakat v.2.0
(1,752 posts)cornerstone of democracy? Well be all tracked and retaliated against now depending how we vote?
I know that sounds extreme and ridiculous but somebody's gonna have to help me out here because we are entering a new era of the extreme and ridiculous.
Buckeye_Democrat
(14,852 posts)Newt would probably like to fire anyone who isn't a registered Republican.
IndianaDave
(612 posts)about destroying the mechanisms of government that help ordinary folks. Even though they lost seats in the House and in the Senate, and their presidential candidate lost the people's vote by over 2.8 million, they seem to be trying very hard to convince themselves that they have a mandate. Maybe they're counting the Russian Factor. Kompramat can inspire you to do bizarre shit. And that looks like their plan.
spanone
(135,795 posts)Baitball Blogger
(46,684 posts)Because we know they will return it in kind.
dembotoz
(16,785 posts)alarimer
(16,245 posts)Certainly not for a vindictive asshole like you, Newt. Civil Service rules exist now to prevent this sort of political retaliation.
Proving once again that Republicans are undemocratic and anti-american. I've always thought they were Fascists at heart.