General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHeads up.....Fake News Alert! Fascists are spreading a new picture of the inaugural crowd
stating that MSM is lying to them about the size of the crowd...but didn't it rain yesterday?
madaboutharry
(40,209 posts)Wounded Bear
(58,647 posts)Horse with no Name
(33,956 posts)this is the REAL picture (per the fake news) and MSM is lying to everyone about the size of the crowd.
Stellar
(5,644 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Stellar
(5,644 posts)angstlessk
(11,862 posts)All that white space in the background is where his crowd did not show up!
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)malaise
(268,949 posts)about rain
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)malaise
(268,949 posts)suffragette
(12,232 posts)So he would be away from the White House and the MASSIVE crowd today.
malaise
(268,949 posts)suffragette
(12,232 posts)And add any you have seen.
2naSalit
(86,569 posts)he can't help but see the throngs in the streets all over the city if he so much as peeks out the window.
suffragette
(12,232 posts)Planning to use as his next prop.
2naSalit
(86,569 posts)suffragette
(12,232 posts)KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)Cattledog
(5,914 posts)KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)anneboleyn
(5,611 posts)So the fascists will be claiming that his speech was hacked -- the REAL speech was all about the sacrifices the CIA has made, not TRUMP's Time Magazine covers! Lmfao
Retrograde
(10,133 posts)DFW
(54,365 posts)I'm just across the Potomac in Virginia for the weekend. It was grey, overcast and lightly drizzling all day.
HopeAgain
(4,407 posts)With a fish-eye lens. Can't really see the long part of the mall, but you can see some of the white fooring. So it's a deceptive picture. Could be authentic but doesn't show the long part of the mall clearly. I do see the white areas behind the people gathered in the front of each section. Can't compare to the '09 pics taken from other end.
Old Vet
(2,001 posts)Had to mention that in front of the wall of heroes from the CIA.
onethatcares
(16,166 posts)is there?
Aw gaud, I thought the shrubs years were bad. I just hope I can make it through whatever lies ahead.
Rex
(65,616 posts)bdamomma
(63,840 posts)The corporate MSM is not telling the people the truth. They are accomplices.
It did rain yesterday. Well he is a pathological liar.
I guess he doesn't realize that their are many of us who are not fooled by him.
canetoad
(17,152 posts)At Obama's first inaguration, a mega-million pixel, ultra hi-res pic was stitched together. I reckon this is a copy of that pic.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)You can watch a video of the event and see.
TimeChaser
(5,551 posts)And brightened up to hide the shitty weather. You can still see how quickly the crowd thins out way before the Washington Monument
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)bluecollar2
(3,622 posts)Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)Were are the plastic tarps? This is the New Main Stream Media,FAKE NEWS.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)It is not fake news.
Cattledog
(5,914 posts)KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)Without question.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)Go to any website that has the full video of the event. About an hour into it, there are shots that are pretty much identical to this photo. Right before Melania walks down the steps with the marine, for example, there is a similar crowd shot.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Doesn't change anything, there still wasn't anyone there.
SammyWinstonJack
(44,130 posts)rallies held today.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)I mean, the video of the event is posted.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Lotusflower70
(3,077 posts)Was it from President Obama's Inauguration like the one on Trump's White House page.
Quackers
(2,256 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)The picture is not fake.
Horse with no Name
(33,956 posts)KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)Watch the video of the event. About an hour in there is a shot that looks exactly like this photo.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)Here's a similar photo with Trump actually at the podium:
Maybe the one in the OP had some color enhancement/correction.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)If you freeze it about an hour in, you will see a crowd shot similar to what is in this photo.
frankieallen
(583 posts)KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)Cattledog
(5,914 posts)he works for the Wash post. Here's the link
https://www.washingtonpost.com/people/ricky-carioti/?utm_term=.e0086f62c0d3
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)It's taken from an angle that minimizes the empty spaces, but you can still.see the mall is not nearly full. Nice try, Mr. President. I hope your presidency doesn't rely entirely on proaganda, because you ain't exactly Goebbels.
Blaukraut
(5,693 posts)Cattledog
(5,914 posts)They used it talking about the crowd size. It is obvious from the photo that there are about 250,000-300,000 in attendance. CBS also showed the reverse angle were you see the white tarps better. From the front you don't notice that. Why fight over this? Everyone knows his crowd was small compared to Obama and he is a liar. But to dismiss the photo as fake is not serving us well.
Princess Turandot
(4,787 posts)I refer to the area between the Capitol and the reflecting pool.
But the huge crowd at PBO's 2009 inauguration was standing between the pool and the Washington Monument. (See the Geo-Eye satellite image below.) The distance from the pool to the Monument is long, 1.1 miles; the crowd size there can't be inferred from the angle in the photo above. However, various aerial photos from 2009 vs 2017 show that far fewer attendees were in that part of the Mall in 2017. So even if the photo above is a frame from yesterday's video coverage, it still doesn't change the attendance figures.
justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)Horse with no Name
(33,956 posts)the fake news mill started up claiming that everyone was lying about the numbers of people at the inauguration.
This is the picture that they posted and claimed that the MSM was lying about the numbers.
This came from a fake news site....am I going to believe that it is legit? No.
justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)Notice the ponchos and the sky. Ponchos are missing from the above photo (as is a President).
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Here's a photo from the BBC:
If you watch the video of the actual event, you will note that the rain picks up about a minute into the speech and people start breaking out the ponchos.
justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)I woke at 8am and was awake all day... gray, gray, gray, all day.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)But it does depict the actual event.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)He just can't stand the fact that he was outnumbered by the women's march.