Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(108,975 posts)
Mon Jan 23, 2017, 11:41 PM Jan 2017

Judge: AETNA lied about leaving the ACA -- it was not because of losing money.

http://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-hiltzik-aetna-obamacare-20170123-story.html

Aetna claimed this summer that it was pulling out of all but four of the 15 states where it was providing Obamacare individual insurance because of a business decision — it was simply losing too much money on the Obamacare exchanges.

Now a federal judge has ruled that that was a rank falsehood. In fact, says Judge John D. Bates, Aetna made its decision at least partially in response to a federal antitrust lawsuit blocking its proposed $37-billion merger with Humana. Aetna threatened federal officials with the pullout before the lawsuit was filed, and followed through on its threat once it was filed. Bates made the observations in the course of a ruling he issued Monday blocking the merger.

Aetna executives had moved heaven and earth to conceal their decision-making process from the court, in part by discussing the matter on the phone rather than in emails, and by shielding what did get put in writing with the cloak of attorney-client privilege, a practice Bates found came close to “malfeasance.”

Aetna tried to leverage its participation in the exchanges for favorable treatment from DOJ regarding the proposed merger.
— U.S. District Judge John D. Bates


The judge’s conclusions about Aetna’s real reasons for pulling out of Obamacare — as opposed to the rationalization the company made in public — are crucial for the debate over the fate of the Affordable Care Act. That’s because the company’s withdrawal has been exploited by Republicans to justify repealing the act. Just last week, House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wisc.) cited Aetna’s action on the “Charlie Rose” show, saying that it proved how shaky the exchanges were.
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge: AETNA lied about leaving the ACA -- it was not because of losing money. (Original Post) pnwmom Jan 2017 OP
damned right they lied. Doesn't matter much now because the ACA is history, and a lot of people are still_one Jan 2017 #1
No, no, no. It was merely an alternative fact. tanyev Jan 2017 #2
K&R. NT enough Jan 2017 #3

still_one

(92,130 posts)
1. damned right they lied. Doesn't matter much now because the ACA is history, and a lot of people are
Mon Jan 23, 2017, 11:53 PM
Jan 2017

going to be hurt, because if their is a republican replacement, there will be no doubt that it will be very bad

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Judge: AETNA lied about l...