General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWould you use stolen oil?
6 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
Yes | |
3 (50%) |
|
No | |
3 (50%) |
|
0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)the white winger who put him in office would be fine with this.
NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)It all ends up in the market.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)I'm not going to lie and say no when nobody knows for sure which oil is which. It's an impossible question to answer.
nini
(16,672 posts)If I knew. hell no.
I need a cave to crawl in and hide
brooklynite
(94,502 posts)BainsBane
(53,031 posts)The US has a long history of taking national resources from sovereign nations. That is the essence of the history of US involvement in Latin America in the 20th century.
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)then it's refined and held in more tank farms until shipped to ultimate users.
At each of these stages title to the oil changes, so you have maybe dozens of owners by the time you pump your gas. How do you know who stole what?
Calculating
(2,955 posts)The oil is all mixed together anyway. We'd all be using it, even if we didn't want to. Oil isn't like food where you can only buy "Certified fair trade oil" or whatever.
HopeAgain
(4,407 posts)so tainted with the blood of our natural world, middle eastern peace, our workers and our climate that there's plenty of reason to not use so much as it is. For example, the Saudi elites steal their natural resources for the sole benefit of themselves as we speak, and commit civil rights atrocities with impunity because nobody wants to lose their oil.
By the way, it's not like fruit, oil never comes with a tag saying where it is from.
csziggy
(34,136 posts)surrealAmerican
(11,360 posts)Unless you boycott all oil if there exists any that was stolen, you will. Would a boycott even be possible?
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)appleannie1943
(1,303 posts)truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)It is not as if we could make a quick in-and-out raid and run off with it.
So the whole question (and Cheeto's asinine idea) is nonsensical.
The real question is "Are we willing to invade Iraq (or anywhere), wage war and stay for decades in order to control Iraq's oil?" We tried that once and it didn't work too well.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Mika
(17,751 posts)Paladin
(28,252 posts)The governments of the explored countries make billions off of the exploration efforts of countries like the U.S., Great Britain, France, Italy, et al. The people in those nations see little if any of the wealth, other than the social services which may (or may not) result from it---the U.S. is one of the very few countries with a common law basis for private citizens' ownership of oil and gas underneath their properties.
The notion that we can simply invade a country and take its oil is just more of trump's ignorant fantasizing. He's got a hell of a lot to learn about the energy biz; no surprise, there.....
TheBlackAdder
(28,183 posts)supernova
(39,345 posts)Last edited Tue Jan 24, 2017, 01:27 PM - Edit history (1)
Because that's the most honest answer.
As others have pointed out, it's all stolen from somewhere. When any of us pull up to the gas pump, we have no idea about the origin. There is no "estate bottled" or "country of origin" label at the pump.