HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Looks like Gucci trolled ...

Wed Jan 25, 2017, 01:54 AM

Looks like Gucci trolled KellyAnne...

LMAO.




49 replies, 6552 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 49 replies Author Time Post
Reply Looks like Gucci trolled KellyAnne... (Original post)
pamela Jan 2017 OP
madaboutharry Jan 2017 #1
global1 Jan 2017 #2
riversedge Jan 2017 #3
Cha Jan 2017 #7
riversedge Jan 2017 #11
burrowowl Jan 2017 #13
Cha Jan 2017 #14
colorado_ufo Jan 2017 #20
brer cat Jan 2017 #27
Cha Jan 2017 #28
wordpix Jan 2017 #46
Stellar Jan 2017 #47
pamela Jan 2017 #10
Cha Jan 2017 #4
Maru Kitteh Jan 2017 #17
Cha Jan 2017 #18
Hamlette Jan 2017 #5
Freethinker65 Jan 2017 #6
Phoenix61 Jan 2017 #8
Freethinker65 Jan 2017 #9
Cha Jan 2017 #15
LisaL Jan 2017 #16
WePurrsevere Jan 2017 #23
logosoco Jan 2017 #31
WePurrsevere Jan 2017 #33
Freethinker65 Jan 2017 #34
Delmette2.0 Jan 2017 #36
WePurrsevere Jan 2017 #39
WePurrsevere Jan 2017 #38
Tanuki Jan 2017 #43
WePurrsevere Jan 2017 #45
calimary Jan 2017 #12
Maru Kitteh Jan 2017 #19
calimary Jan 2017 #21
JudyM Jan 2017 #26
crazycatlady Jan 2017 #32
Doremus Jan 2017 #35
calimary Jan 2017 #49
gratuitous Jan 2017 #42
Rollo Jan 2017 #22
kcr Jan 2017 #24
Jim Beard Jan 2017 #25
Achilleaze Jan 2017 #29
Mendocino Jan 2017 #30
Vinca Jan 2017 #37
karynnj Jan 2017 #40
Skittles Jan 2017 #41
Mc Mike Jan 2017 #44
wordpix Jan 2017 #48

Response to pamela (Original post)

Wed Jan 25, 2017, 02:03 AM

1. I need to research this.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pamela (Original post)

Wed Jan 25, 2017, 02:10 AM

2. Now That's Funny......

And to top it off her outfit had 'pussy' buttons. Got her - but good!!!!!!!!

K&R

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pamela (Original post)

Wed Jan 25, 2017, 02:10 AM

3. I laughed so hard when I saw kelly in that outfit last week.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to riversedge (Reply #3)

Wed Jan 25, 2017, 02:18 AM

7. I don't know why..



lol.. Answer.. Woody Woodpecker!

It's atrocious and emblematic of kac herself

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cha (Reply #7)

Wed Jan 25, 2017, 02:59 AM

11. ha ha. Great one Cha



And Hi back to you.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cha (Reply #7)

Wed Jan 25, 2017, 03:21 AM

13. She has red gloves

and Woody has white ones, I guess he wasn't dressed by Gucci!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to burrowowl (Reply #13)

Wed Jan 25, 2017, 03:24 AM

14. She should have taken

a clue from Woody.. white looks better. lol

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cha (Reply #7)

Wed Jan 25, 2017, 04:07 AM

20. Even down to her red collar

looking like his red neck! Great one!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cha (Reply #7)

Wed Jan 25, 2017, 09:35 AM

27. Great find, Cha.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to brer cat (Reply #27)

Wed Jan 25, 2017, 09:37 AM

28. I liked it

thanks, brer

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cha (Reply #7)

Wed Jan 25, 2017, 08:53 PM

46. woody! lol

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cha (Reply #7)

Wed Jan 25, 2017, 08:56 PM

47. Good one! And I think Woody Wood packer is more American in his red, white and blue.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to riversedge (Reply #3)

Wed Jan 25, 2017, 02:56 AM

10. I thought it was fake.

When I saw the original pic, I thought someone had photoshopped her head onto that ugly-assed outfit.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pamela (Original post)

Wed Jan 25, 2017, 02:13 AM

4. Looks better on the pattern drawing.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cha (Reply #4)

Wed Jan 25, 2017, 03:47 AM

17. Isn't THAT the truth Cha!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Maru Kitteh (Reply #17)

Wed Jan 25, 2017, 03:49 AM

18. Hey Maru..

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pamela (Original post)

Wed Jan 25, 2017, 02:13 AM

5. right down to the red gloves.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pamela (Original post)

Wed Jan 25, 2017, 02:15 AM

6. Funny but not real. Found real image on google search.

Center woman and dress unfortunately are not part of the original pattern, but cleverly done.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Freethinker65 (Reply #6)

Wed Jan 25, 2017, 02:26 AM

8. Your mistaken

It's an alternative fact

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Phoenix61 (Reply #8)

Wed Jan 25, 2017, 02:28 AM

9. Yeah...that too. 😃

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Phoenix61 (Reply #8)

Wed Jan 25, 2017, 03:25 AM

15. 'Zacttly

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Freethinker65 (Reply #6)

Wed Jan 25, 2017, 03:26 AM

16. I knew it wasn't real.

The figure looks exactly like her, and I know she didn't travel back in time.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Freethinker65 (Reply #6)

Wed Jan 25, 2017, 06:33 AM

23. Did you happen to bookmark the original you found?

I thought it looked like a very good PS but when I tried to find it last night, when I first saw it on Faceschnook, I didn't have any luck.

The thing that made me think it might be a PS is that although the styles on the package (including the one in the middle) look very much like the stuff from the early to mid 70s when I first started learning to sew with a pattern, the colors of the middle one weren't quite right. I'd love to see the original pattern package and preferably with the Simplicity pattern number for further verification.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to WePurrsevere (Reply #23)

Wed Jan 25, 2017, 10:37 AM

31. That outfit did make me think of the styles of the 70s!

It put me in mind of some red, white and blue shoes I begged my mom for (about 1971 when I was about 7). By the end of the day I HATED them! I was consoled only by my Easter stuffed rabbit with psychedelic pants! There is a photo of me in these shoes and it always reminds me of making bad choices!!!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to logosoco (Reply #31)

Wed Jan 25, 2017, 11:02 AM

33. Bad choices...

Lol.. oh yeah... I've had a 'few' of those too (like I 'wore' the psychedelic pants.. lol). They all seemed so good at the time though eh?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to WePurrsevere (Reply #23)

Wed Jan 25, 2017, 11:23 AM

34. Simplicity pattern 6554

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Freethinker65 (Reply #34)

Wed Jan 25, 2017, 02:49 PM

36. And it only cost $1.00!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Delmette2.0 (Reply #36)

Wed Jan 25, 2017, 03:31 PM

39. Yeah, and $1. would have bought around 3 gallons of gas back then.

If you hit a good sale at Joann Fabric you can still get patterns for around a dollar. I doubt we'll ever be able to say similar about gasoline again.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Freethinker65 (Reply #34)

Wed Jan 25, 2017, 03:26 PM

38. Thank you! nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to Tanuki (Reply #43)

Wed Jan 25, 2017, 08:51 PM

45. Thanks. I ran across this after I had been answered. It was posted by Snopes today...

So it probably wasn't there when I went info hunting yesterday or again early today. Snopes is normally a decent source and has long been one of my 'go to' places to check.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pamela (Original post)

Wed Jan 25, 2017, 03:08 AM

12. Oh dear ... someone has a pretty serious case of varicose veins.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to calimary (Reply #12)

Wed Jan 25, 2017, 03:55 AM

19. What would have been wrong with some sheer hose? Really.



I guess the outfit was a clear statement that she wasn't really interested in how she looked that day so to be fair - what does it matter.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Maru Kitteh (Reply #19)

Wed Jan 25, 2017, 04:14 AM

21. She could just as easily have opted for a pantsuit - oh, never mind.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to calimary (Reply #21)

Wed Jan 25, 2017, 08:51 AM

26. Ha, yes!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Maru Kitteh (Reply #19)

Wed Jan 25, 2017, 10:38 AM

32. I can't believe I'm defending this woman

But hose are evil and I don't blame anyone if they don't want to wear them. Seriously, they're probably the most uncomfortable garmet in existence.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to crazycatlady (Reply #32)

Wed Jan 25, 2017, 11:24 AM

35. pffft Those pointy toed shoes are 10x more painful than pantyhose lol

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to crazycatlady (Reply #32)

Thu Jan 26, 2017, 11:51 AM

49. Yeah, I know what you mean. But shit - it's frickin' January.

WHY would you want to go outside, barelegged, in the first place?

And there's therapeutic stockings and then just plain ol' tights or leggings or SOMETHING - that is purely cosmetic but conceals or minimizes the problem. Hell, she does that for a living (or tries to) having to bend reality to cover for trump. One would assume she'd obfuscate on looks, too.

I've noticed that sometimes she appears on camera looking just absolutely wretched - no makeup, the techniques for deemphasizing flaws - makes me think perhaps she got a phone call or something: "Get your ASS out there NOW!!! You gotta fix this!" or some such. ("But I haven't even had a cup of coffee yet, I'm just waking up..." "GET YOUR ASS OUT THERE NOW!!!"

Heck, I've had a few times where I got a call at home at an inopportune time, had to throw something/anything on and grab the car keys and GO, NOW. Like the "alternative facts" moment with Chuck Todd for example. No makeup (particularly, under-eye concealer or foundation and/or face powder because you could not avoid noticing the bags under her eyes - maybe she doesn't get much sleep), stringy hair (not much time to allow for grabbing a hairbrush). She looked like hell. Evidently got dispatched to do trouble-shooting either by trump or Bannon maybe. She's supposedly also managing a family and her husband is working, as I recall he's now under consideration for a big job in the White House, too, if he hasn't already been tapped for it.

I noticed that yesterday, she was on camera with a pale blue dress, a statement necklace of pearls, hair well-behaved and brushed and smoothed, makeup on, AND, as actresses have told me - properly lit. Which means they had a few extra moments and a proper studio so that they could light her in a flattering way. She looked like she was on her way to the wedding party. I tried to book an interview with an actress on a little public access show I had, years ago, and her first question was - how's the lighting? Because if you're not LIT well, carefully, strategically, you can look like death warmed over.

Seems awfully superficial. Certainly. But when you're on camera and you KNOW your looks matter, you're forced to take that into account. You want what you SAY to be what people talk about, NOT how much older or scrawnier or hag-like you looked on camera. In her case that time, though, the "alternative facts" statement was SO outrageous that it eclipsed everything else. Nitpickers like me notice all that stuff, but the "alternative facts" misadventure just sucked every molecule of oxygen outta the room. As it should have, frankly.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to calimary (Reply #12)

Wed Jan 25, 2017, 07:31 PM

42. Hadn't noticed that

But it reinforces my impression that Ms. Conway was wearing an outfit that a woman of her (ahem) station in life really ought not to be wearing. In fact, anyone past middle school probably shouldn't wear something like that.

As long as I'm slagging on someone's looks, is there something wrong with Conway's face? The two sides don't seem to match up very well in most of the photos I see of her.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pamela (Original post)

Wed Jan 25, 2017, 04:51 AM

22. Just wondering if she can goose step in that outfit...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pamela (Original post)

Wed Jan 25, 2017, 06:48 AM

24. Hilarious

And they totally trolled her with that clown outfit.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pamela (Original post)

Wed Jan 25, 2017, 08:17 AM

25. Cute outfit, just wish it had been someone to accent the clothes.......

 

better than the strong drug face of Conway.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pamela (Original post)

Wed Jan 25, 2017, 10:05 AM

29. Comrade KelleyAnne's outfit was designed by the multitalented Meredith McIver (IKGOPR*)



* Illegitimate KGOP Regime, Inc.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pamela (Original post)

Wed Jan 25, 2017, 10:27 AM

30. She looks like a meter maid

from Sgt Pepperland.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pamela (Original post)

Wed Jan 25, 2017, 02:56 PM

37. Snopes debunked it. The center image was photoshopped.

I don't think Simplicity wants to claim this outfit. LOL.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Vinca (Reply #37)

Wed Jan 25, 2017, 03:39 PM

40. What is funny is that the photoshopped pattern looks better than the Conway dress

I know the drop waist belt was 1970 style, but it really looks better with the button top than the belt at the waist. In addition having the white go all the way to the bottom looks nicer.

I guess this means that either I am stuck in the 1970s fashionwise or that Gucci designed a very unattractive dress for the little Trump toy soldier.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pamela (Original post)

Wed Jan 25, 2017, 06:48 PM

41. she looks ridiculous

which made it a very appropriate outfit for that farce of an inauguration

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pamela (Original post)

Wed Jan 25, 2017, 07:40 PM

44. Ab Fab.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pamela (Original post)

Wed Jan 25, 2017, 08:56 PM

48. she had a makeover tonight on Tweety

it helps but not what comes out of her mouth

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread