Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Spicer just said investigation on voter fraud will focus on bigger states (Original Post) octoberlib Jan 2017 OP
But not FL, PA, MI, or WI 50 Shades Of Blue Jan 2017 #1
or NC, where they purged voters from the rolls and used vote caging. octoberlib Jan 2017 #5
republicans have those states under control liberal N proud Jan 2017 #19
Bannon is registered in NY and FL underpants Jan 2017 #29
Not all the swing states where ELECTION FRAUD occurred, eh Whine House? blm Jan 2017 #2
Blue states, of course. alarimer Jan 2017 #3
Absolutely has to be blue states. jeanmarc Jan 2017 #11
He is absolutely delusional if he thought he would win New York. smirkymonkey Jan 2017 #36
Let me guess... workinclasszero Jan 2017 #4
It's a joke, unless the congress imposes rules on all states it doesn't fucking matter onecaliberal Jan 2017 #14
Good luck coming in to our state maggot. onecaliberal Jan 2017 #6
Holy shit Phoenix61 Jan 2017 #7
Spicer's got a press conference on NOW: elleng Jan 2017 #8
Thanks, elleng octoberlib Jan 2017 #12
Of course Hekate Jan 2017 #9
targeting states trump didn't win....how conveeeenient spanone Jan 2017 #10
Hear that CA and NY? Here comes voter intimidation! Rex Jan 2017 #13
you mean like Texas? Kber Jan 2017 #15
he loves the voter i.d. laws too.... spanone Jan 2017 #16
My GOD this sounds like a purge of all liberal voters Generator Jan 2017 #17
I'm a little concerned about Dennis Richardson in OR Kittycow Jan 2017 #33
I know I didn't vote for him Generator Jan 2017 #35
so, the White House just slapped a partisan sign on the investigation bigtree Jan 2017 #18
Exactly. octoberlib Jan 2017 #20
And to think Republicans used to be all about states' rights. Trust Buster Jan 2017 #21
Our country has become a farce world wide wally Jan 2017 #22
Trump is already making.. Else You Are Mad Jan 2017 #24
This is the first step... Else You Are Mad Jan 2017 #23
Translation: "BLUE states" PA Democrat Jan 2017 #25
LOLOL Skittles Jan 2017 #26
Without one illicit vote for evidence C_U_L8R Jan 2017 #27
Who is going to pay for this mr. trump??? riversedge Jan 2017 #28
Mexico get the red out Jan 2017 #32
What, no equal protection?! eleny Jan 2017 #30
Look out Spicer, Jerry Brown gonna kick your butt. HassleCat Jan 2017 #31
trace the logs of the servers that the tally programming runs on.....here's where the problem is Rene Jan 2017 #34
The two states he didn't have a chance in HELL of winning. smirkymonkey Jan 2017 #37

jeanmarc

(1,685 posts)
11. Absolutely has to be blue states.
Wed Jan 25, 2017, 02:27 PM
Jan 2017

He's from New York and he guaranteed he would win New York.

The people that know him best hate him.

 

smirkymonkey

(63,221 posts)
36. He is absolutely delusional if he thought he would win New York.
Wed Jan 25, 2017, 06:34 PM
Jan 2017

Most of the votes in New York come from NYC and about 90% of the people their despise him.

onecaliberal

(32,779 posts)
14. It's a joke, unless the congress imposes rules on all states it doesn't fucking matter
Wed Jan 25, 2017, 02:28 PM
Jan 2017

He got called to the carpet, so he has to do these nonsense things for the stupid to follow him.

When will Bannon be arrested for being registered in two states? Which isn't fraud

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
13. Hear that CA and NY? Here comes voter intimidation!
Wed Jan 25, 2017, 02:28 PM
Jan 2017

Trump is literally waving around his dick while he pisses on everyone's shoes and demanding we all be happy about it. Demanding!

 

Generator

(7,770 posts)
17. My GOD this sounds like a purge of all liberal voters
Wed Jan 25, 2017, 02:29 PM
Jan 2017

Talk me down. Tell me why I live in Oregon-I shouldn't get the fuck outta this fascist piece of nightmare country NOW. And people are talking about voting in 2018 or 2020? Are you serious? It's over.

Kittycow

(2,396 posts)
33. I'm a little concerned about Dennis Richardson in OR
Wed Jan 25, 2017, 03:36 PM
Jan 2017

as Secretary of State. Besides possibly screwing with our Vote by Mail, his current position might lead to a successful run for governor (which he lost before this ).

I apologize for not talking you down but I just wanted to mention it.

 

Generator

(7,770 posts)
35. I know I didn't vote for him
Wed Jan 25, 2017, 05:58 PM
Jan 2017

I never trust a Republicon. But you know what will happen if they mess with Oregonians. We won't stand for it. Who knows where we will be in four years.

bigtree

(85,977 posts)
18. so, the White House just slapped a partisan sign on the investigation
Wed Jan 25, 2017, 02:33 PM
Jan 2017

...forever tagging this as a partisan dog and pony show.

Else You Are Mad

(3,040 posts)
23. This is the first step...
Wed Jan 25, 2017, 03:11 PM
Jan 2017

In making it illegal to vote for a Democrat. I have no doubt that the people behind the scenes are trying to figure out how to disenfranchise every voter that voted for Hillary last year. And, I think they may be successful in the red states.

C_U_L8R

(44,988 posts)
27. Without one illicit vote for evidence
Wed Jan 25, 2017, 03:17 PM
Jan 2017

Trump is going to waste millions.
What the fuck, Republicans???

Rene

(1,183 posts)
34. trace the logs of the servers that the tally programming runs on.....here's where the problem is
Wed Jan 25, 2017, 03:39 PM
Jan 2017

I support scheduling software for distributed applications running on thousands of servers.....which are defined by url @'s.
The following is a scenario where applications run on either server for redundant processing...in case a server has an outage....with a minimal/transparent server switch technique.
Every application was built with a primary and secondary(backup) server...ServerA and ServerB.
We'd define a virtual name...ABC...that had both ServerA and ServerB defined to it.
Same named 'jobs/scripts' would be created on both servers.
We'd create a separate job/script that would 'switch' server definitions.
Virtual definition for ABC would show ServerA most of the time.
Run the 'switch job/script'....and ABC would refer to ServerB...and that's where the job would run as a 'backup' scenario..
Run the 'switch job/script' again and ABC would revert back to indicating script would run on ServerA. Same script name on ServerA and ServerB...could have different programming...ServerB's script name could be programmed to 'flip votes'.
ServerA could be in one location...i.e. a state's data center.....ServerB could be in a distant city with compromised same script name/programming that runs to 'flip votes'.
Someone watching their terminal would not even know that what they thought was processing on ServerA in a certain location was actually running on ServerB....miles away....and then processing/files switched back to ServerA to finish. You'd have to watch logs to see different URL's are in play. ServerA...ServerB...then back to A.
I believe this technique was first used in 1999....when a specific state's secretary of state's server was 'switched' like this......and I think strategic 'server switching' has happened since.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Spicer just said investig...