General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums50 Shades Of Blue
(9,922 posts)octoberlib
(14,971 posts)liberal N proud
(60,332 posts)Along with Ohio, they can fix a election any time they want.
underpants
(182,623 posts)So that's one!
blm
(113,011 posts).
alarimer
(16,245 posts)Never mind that the only person arrested for voter fraud was a Trump supporter.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2016/10/29/trump-supporter-charged-with-voting-twice-in-iowa/
jeanmarc
(1,685 posts)He's from New York and he guaranteed he would win New York.
The people that know him best hate him.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Most of the votes in New York come from NYC and about 90% of the people their despise him.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)California? New York?
Any and all blue states?
Am I warm?
onecaliberal
(32,779 posts)He got called to the carpet, so he has to do these nonsense things for the stupid to follow him.
When will Bannon be arrested for being registered in two states? Which isn't fraud
onecaliberal
(32,779 posts)Phoenix61
(16,993 posts)Sadly, I don't think he is lying this time.
elleng
(130,732 posts)octoberlib
(14,971 posts)Hekate
(90,559 posts)spanone
(135,792 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)Trump is literally waving around his dick while he pisses on everyone's shoes and demanding we all be happy about it. Demanding!
Kber
(5,043 posts)spanone
(135,792 posts)Generator
(7,770 posts)Talk me down. Tell me why I live in Oregon-I shouldn't get the fuck outta this fascist piece of nightmare country NOW. And people are talking about voting in 2018 or 2020? Are you serious? It's over.
Kittycow
(2,396 posts)as Secretary of State. Besides possibly screwing with our Vote by Mail, his current position might lead to a successful run for governor (which he lost before this ).
I apologize for not talking you down but I just wanted to mention it.
Generator
(7,770 posts)I never trust a Republicon. But you know what will happen if they mess with Oregonians. We won't stand for it. Who knows where we will be in four years.
bigtree
(85,977 posts)...forever tagging this as a partisan dog and pony show.
octoberlib
(14,971 posts)Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)world wide wally
(21,738 posts)Else You Are Mad
(3,040 posts)The Bush administration look competent.
Else You Are Mad
(3,040 posts)In making it illegal to vote for a Democrat. I have no doubt that the people behind the scenes are trying to figure out how to disenfranchise every voter that voted for Hillary last year. And, I think they may be successful in the red states.
PA Democrat
(13,225 posts)Skittles
(153,113 posts)could these fascist bastards *BE* any more transparent???
C_U_L8R
(44,988 posts)Trump is going to waste millions.
What the fuck, Republicans???
riversedge
(70,084 posts)get the red out
(13,460 posts)eleny
(46,166 posts)HassleCat
(6,409 posts)Governor Moonbeam is no pushover.
Rene
(1,183 posts)I support scheduling software for distributed applications running on thousands of servers.....which are defined by url @'s.
The following is a scenario where applications run on either server for redundant processing...in case a server has an outage....with a minimal/transparent server switch technique.
Every application was built with a primary and secondary(backup) server...ServerA and ServerB.
We'd define a virtual name...ABC...that had both ServerA and ServerB defined to it.
Same named 'jobs/scripts' would be created on both servers.
We'd create a separate job/script that would 'switch' server definitions.
Virtual definition for ABC would show ServerA most of the time.
Run the 'switch job/script'....and ABC would refer to ServerB...and that's where the job would run as a 'backup' scenario..
Run the 'switch job/script' again and ABC would revert back to indicating script would run on ServerA. Same script name on ServerA and ServerB...could have different programming...ServerB's script name could be programmed to 'flip votes'.
ServerA could be in one location...i.e. a state's data center.....ServerB could be in a distant city with compromised same script name/programming that runs to 'flip votes'.
Someone watching their terminal would not even know that what they thought was processing on ServerA in a certain location was actually running on ServerB....miles away....and then processing/files switched back to ServerA to finish. You'd have to watch logs to see different URL's are in play. ServerA...ServerB...then back to A.
I believe this technique was first used in 1999....when a specific state's secretary of state's server was 'switched' like this......and I think strategic 'server switching' has happened since.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Hmmmm, I wonder what he's up to now?