Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
1. The New York Times tells you
Sun Jan 29, 2017, 12:35 PM
Jan 2017
While the order requires the Department of Homeland Security to issue a report within 180 days providing detailed statistics on foreign nationals who commit acts of violence, terrorism researchers have already produced rich and revealing data. For instance, since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, no one has been killed in the United States in a terrorist attack by anyone who emigrated from or whose parents emigrated from Syria, Iraq, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen, the seven countries targeted in the order’s 120-day visa ban, according to Charles Kurzman, a sociology professor at the University of North Carolina.

Of Muslim Americans involved in violent extremism of any kind — for instance, charged with plotting terrorism or supporting a terrorist group — only 23 percent had family backgrounds in those countries, said Mr. Kurzman, who just published the latest of his annual studies of Muslim Americans and terrorism.

The larger point of experts is that jihadist attacks garner news attention that far outstrips their prevalence in the United States, and the president’s order appears to address not a rational calculation of risks but the visceral fears that terrorists set out to inflame.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/28/us/politics/a-sweeping-order-unlikely-to-reduce-terrorist-threat.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=a-lede-package-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0

Botany

(70,489 posts)
3. I figured the # was going to be zero.
Sun Jan 29, 2017, 12:39 PM
Jan 2017

Thanx. I see this as part of a pattern that is not going to end well.

dalton99a

(81,442 posts)
2. The question is how many attacks have been made on America from the Trump White House
Sun Jan 29, 2017, 12:39 PM
Jan 2017

every damn day.

Botany

(70,489 posts)
4. And how many attacks on America were made by his buddy Putin and the Russians.
Sun Jan 29, 2017, 12:40 PM
Jan 2017

Hell, the Russian hacking of our election got all the way to Green Bay Wisconsin.

Botany

(70,489 posts)
11. Meanwhile Russia is trying up and loose ends back home.
Sun Jan 29, 2017, 01:20 PM
Jan 2017

So are members of Trump's team providing information to Putin and the Russians?


*********

Rachel Maddow just nailed it. Russia is guilty.

Earlier this month they broke a breathtaking story. In December, one of the high ranking officials in the Russian security service, in the cyber security department was attending a routine staff meeting when several armed police officers, burst in, threw a hood over his head, and dragged him from the room. That is the last anyone has seen of him, and the State charged him with treason. They then broke the story that another high ranking intelligence official, this time in counter intelligence had been fired. There was sketchy information as to whether or not the official had also been imprisoned and charged.

Rachel’s point was simple and concise. Russia has denied involvement all along. OK, fine. That’s your story, and you’re sticking with it. But, if you’re innocent, then as a nation, you don’t need to do anything, there is no fire there, you didn’t do anything, and nobody can prove a negative. But when you have police storm into a routine meeting, bag and wrestle out a senior cyber official, and then cashier a senior counter intelligence official in charge of making sure nobody blabs, you have just waved a giant red flag. It means that Putin has looked at the information in the “dossier” that the ex MI6 intelligence officer compiled on information compromising Trump, and has looked at the information in at least the public release of the combined intelligence assessment of Russian interference in the election, and he has realized that there is actually fire behind that smoke. And Putin is taking aggressive steps to stamp out that fire so that it doesn’t occur again.

http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/1/27/1625826/-Rachel-Maddow-just-nailed-it-Russia-is-guilty?detail=email&link_id=6&can_id=9d9ab9550f6f19d630ddc2d594a7bd47&source=email-al-gore-saved-a-us-climate-change-conference-that-was-abruptly-canceled-after-trumps-election&email_referrer=al-gore-saved-a-us-climate-change-conference-that-was-abruptly-canceled-after-trumps-election___159185&email_subject=the-people-have-spoken-petition-to-trump-to-release-his-tax-returns-breaks-the-all-time-record

dawg

(10,624 posts)
10. Well, I'm pretty sure *we've* attacked all those countries at one time or another.
Sun Jan 29, 2017, 12:55 PM
Jan 2017

Besides, those countries have no Trump properties, so who cares?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I'm sorry but how many at...