General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsReally? Trump voters are starting a boycott against Starbucks this morning?
#boycottstarbucks is trending among trump supporters according to Business Insider: http://www.businessinsider.com/starbucks-boycott-after-ceos-refugee-support-2017-1
My trump-loving relatives are rural and there isn't a Starbucks within 30 miles AND they call anything that is not Folgers Coffee "high falutin' and librul."
ON EDIT: They are boycotting because the Starbucks CEO promised to hire refugees.
They ain't never set foot in a Starbucks.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)WhiteTara
(29,699 posts)to buy Starbucks anyway. I doubt it will have an effect on the company.
Or they just don't have any more food stamps left after picking up the Coors and Twizzlers...
WhiteTara
(29,699 posts)and beer is MUCH more important. I think twizzlers are considered food, so those are food stamp approved.
7962
(11,841 posts)Guess I've "boycotted" them since they opened because of that
IrishEyes
(3,275 posts)I don't drink coffee. The chocolate chunk cookie is about $2.
7962
(11,841 posts)Dulcinea
(6,616 posts)...but the hot chocolate is good. I drink that on occasion.
WhiteTara
(29,699 posts)a monetary choice. They are blinding following the "leader."
I thought they boycotted them a long time ago anyway for about 1/2 a dozen OTHER reasons!
ghostsinthemachine
(3,569 posts)I only get a dark roast. No lattes, just coffee. Two cups, two-fitty. Have people I know and always great conversations. I like coffee out,, always loved it, the social thing. Way back since Java City first opened in Sacramento (pre Starbucks here). I now get my coffee mostly at a deli, coffee shop that is family owned and run. But sometimes that group gets a bit testyn(Trump supporters) so I go a few days at Starbucks. Once in a while, Petes. I make a cup at home, before I go out. French press (the only way to make coffee) some French roast. Cream and a spoonful of agave. Yum. Nothing matches that, but that don't get me close to people.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Not really.
'Boycott', by its definition, implies withdrawal from an organization, country or person as a protest or punishment, not because one dislikes the price, regardless of how often we may allege that "i'm (sic) smart..."
7962
(11,841 posts)You're obviously starved for entertainment!
And you certainly COULD boycott a company because of a pricing issue if you wanted. For example, some called for a boycott of Uber when they started surge pricing.
steve2470
(37,457 posts)I brew my own coffee, and it's MUCH cheaper per cup than what they would charge. Even allowing for their expenses and profit, it's still way too pricey.
catbyte
(34,359 posts)Sucha NastyWoman
(2,743 posts)They only listen to each other anyway, and CB's/Hamm radios will do that job just fine. Or talk radio.
classof56
(5,376 posts)Sorry, couldn't resist. Welcome to DU, BTW!
izzybella
(236 posts)Solly Mack
(90,762 posts)That'll show'em!
dalton99a
(81,426 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)starshine00
(531 posts)that stuff is expensive and I can't afford it in my broker than ever days right now. But I will sell something if that's what it takes.
irisblue
(32,954 posts)Raster
(20,998 posts)...trust me, Charbucks will not be hurting because the trumplethinskins will be boycotting. I do, however, appreciate their commitment to sanity. There's just better, more economical coffee to drink.
tavernier
(12,374 posts)barbecue.
Leghorn21
(13,524 posts)tazkcmo
(7,300 posts)None of them have jobs because of Obummer's crappy economy. Add to that the fact that red states are the biggest recipients of "welfare" which also is too meager to afford a luxury like Starbucks.
They're also lazy because they're already boycotting Starbucks because of the War On Christmas and Starbucks' Atheist Coffee Cups.
Fucking GOPee-ers can't do anything right. Boycotts on things the both already boycott and can't afford anyway. Small "crowds" at their Big Events. Misspelled signs at their, again, shitty little protests.
Reminds me of a very racist "joke". Punch line, modified for relevancy:
Man: "You mean to tell me all the bigots are gone, the Tea Party is dead and there's no more MAGA hats?
Genie: "Yes, now what is your wish?"
Man: "Hell, I'll have a Starbucks!"
LonePirate
(13,413 posts)Then Starbucks has nothing to worry about. In fact, they will likely see a sales boost.
flygal
(3,231 posts)ismnotwasm
(41,974 posts)Shortly.
mreilly
(2,120 posts)Aren't the liberals supposed to be the easily-offended crybabies who can't handle criticism or opposition (at least, that's what these mindless lemmings insist)?
I think they should run along to their safe spaces and coloring books!
cwydro
(51,308 posts)What part of the country are you in?
Mrs. Overall
(6,839 posts)very rural and very white and very prejudiced.
I am considered high falutin' because I decided to go to college and move away. That is a term they use all the time and it means you are too proud, have achieved too much, have gone beyond your station in life.
Interesting you have never heard that term. I thought it was wide-spread.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)I wondered if it was a western thing. Never heard it used here in the south.
Beverly Hillbillies was the last I heard it!
Mrs. Overall
(6,839 posts)I know in my family, I have seen it in old letters (late 1800s and early 1900s) in reference to family members visiting San Francisco...."that high-falutin' city".
cwydro
(51,308 posts)I've heard it used in jest by friends and so on, just not by any of the rural folks I know.
Thanks for the info!
lark
(23,083 posts)Grandad did use that term. He died 2 decades ago, so it could just be an old term that's gone out of everyday usage?
cwydro
(51,308 posts)I think it's a western thing.
roamer65
(36,745 posts)Nonexistent.
Dark n Stormy Knight
(9,760 posts)Gift cards on the way!
Blaukraut
(5,693 posts)Maybe if we're lucky, all the Trump humpers boycotting them will starve to death.
jmg257
(11,996 posts)wait till i tell him - his head will explode.
Response to Mrs. Overall (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)thanks to a Christmas gift card. I don't drink coffee and make my own chai, but going forward, I'll try to visit at least once a week in honor of boycottin' Trumpkins.
get the red out
(13,461 posts)Let them just not enjoy the awesomeness of a Venti Skinny Vanilla Late with an extra espresso shot and an additional bit of syrup. ($5.88 and worth it on a bad day!)
TexasBushwhacker
(20,162 posts)that Starbucks will hire 10K refugees WORLDWIDE or that they already have an initiative to hire 10K veterans and have already hired 8K.
Now I'm going to go buy a Starbucks.
jeanmarc
(1,685 posts)BainsBane
(53,026 posts)Trump won incomes over $100k, Clinton won incomes under $100k.
Nwgirl503
(406 posts)With only cursory research, it seems as if the majority of his voters are not in the over-100k camp. From what I can tell, the majority of his voters come from areas that don't even break the average household income.
BainsBane
(53,026 posts)Last edited Mon Jan 30, 2017, 06:27 PM - Edit history (1)
I believe all the news organizations pool costs for exit polling.
http://www.cnn.com/election/results/exit-polls
Income is near the bottom of the page.
I assumed it was exit polls, but wasn't sure. Thanks for that link.
25k polled is like....thousands of one percent of voters? IMO, those numbers are not at all indicitive of the bigger picture of income levels of the typical voters. Looking at census info, just on a state by state basis, over 65% of the states he won have lower than average household incomes. Her states it's 2%.
The other poster was maybe being a little facetious in saying they can't afford Starbucks, but overall, their income levels are definitely lower than Clinton voters. It wouldn't surprise me if he had more over-100k voters than her, but that is not by any means the majority of his voters' income levels.
BainsBane
(53,026 posts)And I expect non-voters average lower incomes.
Nwgirl503
(406 posts)I couldn't find info on demographic breakdowns except for that exit poll you gave a link to (I'm sure it's out there but within the first few pages of Google nothing else came up but that exit poll or articles based on that exit poll). I just can't get my head around 25k being a representative sample, so I did some research.
Utah, which was the 2nd highest median income of all of Trump states (Alaska was his highest but their result breakdowns by county wasn't as easy to access as Utah's), here are some 2014 numbers on a county level:
Trump counties had an average median income of $49.8k
Clinton counties had an average median income of $76.9k
Trump counties had an average of 11.9% of $100k+ earners
Clinton counties had an average of 29.2% of $100k+ earners
https://www.irs.gov/uac/soi-tax-stats-county-data-2014
http://www.census.gov/quickfacts/table/PST045216/00
https://electionresults.utah.gov/elections/countyCount/300000
I'm going to see what other states I can easily access info by county just to see if this bears out. I mean, it bears out on the state level, and the county level for this one state at least. I'm actually really interested to know if it bears out across the board.
If you have other info besides that exit poll I'd be really interested in it. Or, if you have info on percentages of low-income people who don't vote or anything along those lines, please share.
BainsBane
(53,026 posts)Not least of which is they showed Clinton winning. Of course she did win the popular vote, but I believe they also had her ahead in key states she lost.
Another point to keep in mind is that Clinton drew a large portion of votes from people of color, who average lower incomes than white voters.
TomCADem
(17,387 posts)...in support.
svpadgham
(670 posts)I can drink my coffee in peace.
irisblue
(32,954 posts)Doreen
(11,686 posts)there would be people who would boycott them. If they thought it would come anywhere close to hurting them they would not be doing what they are going to do. So for those who are boycotting it does not make a difference to Starbucks. Think of it this way also, those of us who do like to go there will now run less risk of having to run into a miserable trumper and ruin our coffee experience.
Chakaconcarne
(2,439 posts)If not.............
Javaman
(62,510 posts)they will complain until their need for caffeine kicks in.
then they will make up some excuse to go to starbucks and complain about the people working behind the counter, regardless of their place of origin.
Then after a few weeks, they will then go in to starbucks as if nothing happened.
while the right wing loves to say they are all united and follow marching orders blah blah blah, they crumble very soon, because they one thing that over rules any right wing marching orders is the individual right wing mouth breath is, at the end of the day, a uniquely selfish person.
groundloop
(11,517 posts)I guess I'm in the group that prefers Maxwell House and Folgers, just good old boring coffee. But hell, I'll have to take my fat ol' redneck self to a Starbucks just once to show my support.
irisblue
(32,954 posts)Mr.Bill
(24,263 posts)They watch Hee-Haw reruns instead of the news.
Richard D
(8,750 posts)Does that mean I have to get coffee at Starbucks now? I'll do it to support them, but I really don't like their coffee.
brooklynite
(94,482 posts)elmac
(4,642 posts)JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,336 posts)So, no big deal.
Wake me when they boycott Cracker Barrel or Waffle House.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Seriously.
TwistedTinkerbelle
(137 posts)I live in a red state, small town an hour and half away from DFW...Yeah, this boycott thing sure is going to work...Worked so well with the war on Christmas boycott that there's another Starbucks opening up in a few weeks. Truth be known half the people here don't even know what's going on. They voted for TwitterFinger and they've moved on. Until they see a change in their pocketbooks they don't give a damn.
IronLionZion
(45,405 posts)asking people about it. People seemed supportive or didn't care. No one was against.
This is downtown DC.
I don't like their coffee, but I might get something because of this.
JHB
(37,158 posts)Plus a couple of others?
Some people don't understand that boycotts are an on/off thing. Doing several of them simultaneously is not several times as effective.
Especially if you wouldn't buy from them in the first place.
Cary
(11,746 posts)If you want to understand them then you have to dispense with all logic and reason (except for the segment of them that profits off of their stupidity) and you have to FEEEEEEEL.
They used to say that about us, but the reality they are all emotion. The emotions they ascribe to us are empathy and compassion. The emotion that floats their boat is hate.
JHB
(37,158 posts)...because we apparently live in a weird, shifting fog of anti-Americanism known as "political correctness."
I just finished trying to tell a friend that his "argument" that OPEC cut production when President Obama was inaugurated wasn't an argument. He got pretty pissed off at me, asking him to please get to his point.
They are beyond the looking glass, and emboldened by stealing this election.
IrishEyes
(3,275 posts)Of course, it will still fail. I think I might stop by Starbucks for a chocolate chunk cookie on my way home tonight.
ananda
(28,856 posts).. I'll start getting Tazo there at least
once a week!
Tree-Hugger
(3,370 posts)....If Starbucks brought back those Unity cups from last year. Just to make their heads explode some more.
10,000 refugees worldwide, including those who worked as translators FOR America. Yeah, boycott that, geniuses.
Raine1967
(11,589 posts)I really think these people have a self-inflated sense of self-importance.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)out in the middle of corn fields in redstates like Nebraska and Iowa.
Blue Idaho
(5,045 posts)I'm tired of having to listen to the rednecks talking about feeding Harry Reed into a chipper shredder feet first. Fuck all of them.
Barack_America
(28,876 posts)Or did they learn what an actual boycott is this time?
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)Stellar
(5,644 posts)and that's no fun at all. Besides, I've heard it was rather expensive for what I get in my retirement income.
And, I've never been in a StarBucks in my life.
marlakay
(11,446 posts)Got herbal tea in a big real starbucks cup $2. I guess i never said for here before, first time in all the years I have gone I didn't get paper cup. I thanked them for helping environment.
AlexSFCA
(6,137 posts)I don't want trump supporters anywhere near starbucks.
Runningdawg
(4,514 posts)since they told them their guns were no longer welcome in their stores.
sdfernando
(4,929 posts)to enjoy a leisurely morning sipping on my usual extra-shot Americano!
They can brew their own swill at home.
we can do it
(12,180 posts)GoneOffShore
(17,339 posts)Fuck!
AlexSFCA
(6,137 posts)So it's actually quite effective business strategy gor Starbucks and they were first to offer that.
politicat
(9,808 posts)Because last time, their "boycott" was giving their name as "trump" to force the baristas to shout it.
If they're going the fuck away, I might consider hitting a 'bucks when I need caffeine. (I have multiple coffee options because amazingly, liberal communities are great for small businesses. Who knew?)
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)The parking lot was packed to capacity at 11:30am. And, the weather was coldish for where I live. I live in a red-purple district.
erpowers
(9,350 posts)Well, if this boycott is anything like their last boycott, Starbucks will be fine. Last time they went to Starbucks, bought coffee, and signed Trump's name on the cups.
Gothmog
(145,046 posts)Gothmog
(145,046 posts)Gothmog
(145,046 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)ribrepin
(1,725 posts)I don't usually drink their coffee because it's expensive, but I'll make an exception today.
Squinch
(50,934 posts)all night.
I hate freaking Republicans.
doc03
(35,321 posts)jeanmarc
(1,685 posts)We don't have a good 'mom and pop' coffee shop nearby, so looks like I'm going to hit Starbucks a bit more often as well. Not a fan of their prices though.
Warpy
(111,222 posts)over every single cup the company has designed. I doubt any Starbucks will notice much of a drop in sales.
I wish I could choke coffee down, I'd be a patron from now on.
Tatiana
(14,167 posts)we can do it
(12,180 posts)ck4829
(35,041 posts)leftyladyfrommo
(18,868 posts)All they do is cause trouble.
liberalhistorian
(20,815 posts)the coffee at Starbucks, but I am now going to patronize them every chance I get, wherever I see one.