Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

politicaljunkie41910

(3,335 posts)
Mon Jan 30, 2017, 04:04 PM Jan 2017

Trump says that he will announce his SCOTUS decision Tuesday live at 8:00p.m.

What if Trump made an announcement and the Opposition Party refused to show up? Would the tree make a sound?

FTR, that last statement was based on the question, "If a tree falls in the forest and no one hears it, does the tree make a sound?

Perhaps if the media aka the Opposition Party stops letting Trump jerk them by the chains while disrespecting them, he would stop it. The fact that he is moving up his SCOTUS announcement by two days probably means he wants to change the subject from how badly his administration screwed up this past weekend. We should not let him. And do we really care who his nominates for SCOTUS. We already know that the nominee will be cut from the mold of Justice Scalia. Do we really care what this one's name is?

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump says that he will announce his SCOTUS decision Tuesday live at 8:00p.m. (Original Post) politicaljunkie41910 Jan 2017 OP
He wants Prime time malaise Jan 2017 #1
So something's happening Wednesday. RedWedge Jan 2017 #2
Watch for Friday as well maryellen99 Jan 2017 #3
It would've been a fireside chat C_U_L8R Jan 2017 #4
.........................AFTER THE BREAK!!!!! Tommy_Carcetti Jan 2017 #5
THIS IS AN OUTRAGE!!!!! liberaltrucker Jan 2017 #6
Thomas Hardiman looks like the pick Kaotic Jan 2017 #7
Neil Gorsuch is another possibility... Kaotic Jan 2017 #8
There will be a big audience... brooklynite Jan 2017 #9
Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2017 #11
QVC should cover this and the family could hock Melania's jewlery. sarcasmo Jan 2017 #10
 

Kaotic

(83 posts)
7. Thomas Hardiman looks like the pick
Mon Jan 30, 2017, 04:55 PM
Jan 2017

As Trump readies to announce Supreme Court pick, one judge emerges as top candidate

http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-supreme-court-nomination-frontrunner-2017-1


Hardiman, at 37, was nominated by President George W. Bush to serve on the US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. He was nominated to the appeals court four years later.

A Notre Dame graduate who received his law degree from Georgetown, Hardiman would find himself in sparse company on the Supreme Court bench — each justice currently seated holds an Ivy League law degree.

As SCOTUSblog noted, Hardiman has reflected originalist opinions on Second Amendment cases. On abortion-related issues, Hardiman has not weighed in directly.
 

Kaotic

(83 posts)
8. Neil Gorsuch is another possibility...
Mon Jan 30, 2017, 04:59 PM
Jan 2017
http://www.scotusblog.com/2017/01/monday-round-up-334/#more-251432http://www.scotusblog.com/2017/01/monday-round-up-334/#more-251432

At Fox News, William Mears reports that Trump’s list has narrowed to two candidates, Judge Neil Gorsuch and Judge Thomas Hardiman, and that although “the president has privately kept one person in mind for some time,” “supporters of several candidates continue to solicit White House officials, knowing last minute change-of-hearts can and do happen.” In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that “those who know Gorsuch and have studied his decade of solidly conservative opinions on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit say he more resembles the man he would replace — the late Justice Antonin Scalia — than the more moderate Kennedy.” Also in The Washington Post, Kimberly Kindy reports that Judge William Pryor, another name on the shortlist, “is perhaps the most polarizing figure of the potential nominees, with some groups thinking he leans too far right while other groups view him as leaning too far left.” In The National Law Journal (subscription or registration required), Tony Mauro and Marcia Coyle report that Gorsuch, Hardiman and Pryor all “appear to qualify as millionaires, according to their most recent financial disclosure forms.”

Response to brooklynite (Reply #9)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump says that he will a...