General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSean Spicer: Merrick Garlands Supreme Court snub is different because it was Obama's "fourth term"
White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer on Tuesday insisted that Democrats had a responsibility to confirm any qualified Supreme Court nominee even though Senate Republicans had refused to hold hearings for President Barack Obamas nominee.
The default is if you are generally qualified and not extreme you are confirmed, Spicer told reporters ahead of the Tuesday night announcement of President Donald Trumps Supreme Court nominee.
One reporter pointed out that Republicans had not followed that standard after Obama nominated Judge Merrick Garland.
Theres never been a situation in which you had a fourth term, someone that late in an election cycle, Spicer opined. That had never occurred before. And I think the Senate Republicans were very clear that we should wait and let the voters have a choice. And thats exactly what happened.
In fact, Obama nominated Garland in the fourth year of his second term, 10 months prior to the election.
http://www.rawstory.com/2017/01/sean-spicer-merrick-garlands-supreme-court-snub-is-different-because-it-was-obamas-fourth-term/
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,580 posts)FSogol
(45,470 posts)world wide wally
(21,740 posts)unblock
(52,183 posts)Johonny
(20,829 posts)Phoenix61
(17,000 posts)The elected Obama and expected him to fill any empty seats in the Supreme Court.
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)izzybella
(236 posts)The people made it quite clear who they wanted to fill that opening.
gademocrat7
(10,653 posts)dem4decades
(11,282 posts)with a better, maybe even bigger (if possible) liar.
3catwoman3
(23,970 posts)...have a job in this administration?
dem4decades
(11,282 posts)She has to store up all her venom for the big Sunday shows. I loved that she actually threw up a little in her mouth just before she had to say alternative facts. Even she knew it was revolting.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)underpants
(182,736 posts)berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)and just keeps on going as if what he said was factual... eating his own shit sandwich as he goes.
MFM008
(19,804 posts)get used to it maggots.
BruceWane
(345 posts).....whatever's needed to suite your desired reality.
Nevermind actual history.........
"14 presidents have appointed 21 justices during presidential election years. A half-dozen presidents, classic lame ducks, filled Supreme Court seats even though their successors had been elected."
Full story at the Washington Post
Sean forgot to add his signature PERIOD to the end of his statement
DFW
(54,334 posts)This third-rate Göbbels must think he can make up his "alternate history" as he goes along, and no one will notice. He was obviously wrong about a "fourth term," and probably just outright lying (I can't believe he misspoke out of ignorance) about "There's never been a situation" where a president nominated (and got confirmed) a Supreme Court Justice in his last year in office. Of course there has, and the last two presidents to successfully nominate a SCOTUS member in their last year in office were Republicans (Taft and Hoover).
muntrv
(14,505 posts)Besides, we the voters didn't chose Roberts, Alito, or Thomas.