Thu Feb 2, 2017, 12:14 PM
SHRED (28,136 posts)
Anyone remember that closed door meeting between Comey and Dem Congress leaders??When they came out really pissed afterwards? What was that meeting about and why aren't we hearing about it??
|
17 replies, 1639 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
SHRED | Feb 2017 | OP |
Amaryllis | Feb 2017 | #1 | |
SHRED | Feb 2017 | #2 | |
brush | Feb 2017 | #3 | |
SHRED | Feb 2017 | #4 | |
brush | Feb 2017 | #5 | |
SHRED | Feb 2017 | #6 | |
blueseas | Feb 2017 | #7 | |
SHRED | Feb 2017 | #8 | |
blueseas | Feb 2017 | #10 | |
milestogo | Feb 2017 | #9 | |
Horse with no Name | Feb 2017 | #11 | |
SHRED | Feb 2017 | #13 | |
NYETNYET | Feb 2017 | #12 | |
GliderGuider | Feb 2017 | #15 | |
mopinko | Feb 2017 | #14 | |
kacekwl | Feb 2017 | #16 | |
randr | Feb 2017 | #17 |
Response to SHRED (Original post)
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 12:17 PM
Amaryllis (8,390 posts)
1. Been wondering that myself. Still not clear on whether Trump can stop the intel investigations
or not. Keep hoping for a leak.
|
Response to Amaryllis (Reply #1)
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 12:18 PM
SHRED (28,136 posts)
2. I hope for a high def pee video...soon!
Response to SHRED (Original post)
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 12:18 PM
brush (25,634 posts)
3. We aren't hearing about it because Comey made sure the info was classified
Just a guess but I'm pretty sure it rubbed Comey's letter and Putin's interference in the Dems faces.
We just have to hope somebody leaks what was revealed. |
Response to brush (Reply #3)
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 12:20 PM
SHRED (28,136 posts)
4. I'm guessing Comey told them...
..."It's our ballgame now and fuck you". |
Response to SHRED (Reply #4)
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 12:22 PM
brush (25,634 posts)
5. Yep! What a dickhead.
Response to brush (Reply #5)
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 12:29 PM
SHRED (28,136 posts)
6. I so wish...if this is true...
...that just one of those Democratic Congress persons would have had the juevos to risk prison over this and tell us.
Again, if true...cowards. |
Response to SHRED (Original post)
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 12:29 PM
blueseas (11,443 posts)
7. I do!
Illegitimate! Was the word afterwards.
|
Response to blueseas (Reply #7)
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 12:32 PM
SHRED (28,136 posts)
8. Not good enough
Need more
|
Response to blueseas (Reply #7)
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 12:48 PM
blueseas (11,443 posts)
10. Check this link
Response to SHRED (Original post)
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 12:33 PM
milestogo (6,774 posts)
9. I thought we were going to hear from Maxine Waters on that.
![]() |
Response to SHRED (Original post)
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 12:50 PM
Horse with no Name (33,316 posts)
11. somebody needs to leak and NOW
for christ's sake....what is it going to take??
|
Response to Horse with no Name (Reply #11)
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 01:04 PM
SHRED (28,136 posts)
13. Well they have their careers to think of after all
![]() |
Response to SHRED (Original post)
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 12:54 PM
NYETNYET (172 posts)
12. WASN'T THAT THE...
Wasn't that the meeting about the classified pee-pee file. Wasn't that the meeting that detailed the information that caused four Russians to be arrested for treason, one dead in an unusual situation. That caused a retired British professional to go into hiding for his life. One other question I have. Who leaked these people to Putin.
|
Response to NYETNYET (Reply #12)
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 01:10 PM
GliderGuider (21,088 posts)
15. Flynn probably shopped them. nt
Response to SHRED (Original post)
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 01:09 PM
mopinko (54,829 posts)
14. hopefully they are polishing up the impeachment charges.
srsly, tho, leak already. what will it take to get to the truth.
imho, they found out that they did at least try to hack the vote totals. |
Response to SHRED (Original post)
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 02:53 PM
kacekwl (3,574 posts)
16. Remember the If you knew what we know line,
Guess we never will.
|
Response to SHRED (Original post)
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 03:16 PM
randr (10,042 posts)