Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

IronLionZion

(45,427 posts)
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 06:32 PM Feb 2017

Sean Spicer claims that Houthi rebel assault on Saudi frigate was an Iranian attack on a US warship

http://boingboing.net/2017/02/02/sean-spicer-claims-that-houthi.html

Houthi rebels from Yemen attacked a Saudi frigate; White House spokesman Sean Spicer falsely claimed that this was Iranian forces attacking a US Naval ship and thus an act of war; no one from the White House press corps corrected him or followed up.

The White House Press corps wanted to know what being put “on notice” entailed, and Spicer responded by claiming that Iran’s government took actions against a U.S. naval vessel, which would be an act of war. “I think General Flynn was really clear yesterday that Iran has violated the Joint Resolution that Iran’s additional hostile actions that it took against our navy vessel are ones that we are very clear are not going to sit by and take,” he said.

Pentagon Spokesman Christopher Sherwood confirmed to The Intercept that the attack was in fact conducted against a Saudi warship, and that the Pentagon suspects Houthi rebels. “It was a Saudi ship – it was actually a frigate” said Sherwood. “It was [conducted by] suspected Houthi rebels off the coast of Yemen.”



Safe to assume that everything they put out are alternative facts? Not sure if there has been any truth from them yet.

"no one from the White House press corps corrected him or followed up." which is exactly why they needed to purge the white house press corps and pack it with their insane supporters.

Video at the link

More links:
Press Secretary Sean Spicer Falsely Accuses Iran of Attacking U.S. Navy Vessel, an Act of War
https://theintercept.com/2017/02/02/press-secretary-sean-spicer-falsely-accuses-iran-of-attacking-u-s-navy-vessel-an-act-of-war/

Trump administration 'officially putting Iran on notice', says Michael Flynn
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/feb/01/iran-trump-michael-flynn-on-notice

Do you think the American people have learned from past mistakes?
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sean Spicer claims that Houthi rebel assault on Saudi frigate was an Iranian attack on a US warship (Original Post) IronLionZion Feb 2017 OP
fabrication for war triron Feb 2017 #1
Hope China will back Iran triron Feb 2017 #2
I don't know if Putin will approve of Trump provoking Iran. world wide wally Feb 2017 #16
Gulf of Tomkin redux? no_hypocrisy Feb 2017 #3
Gulf of Tonkin or "Remember the Maine" for the modern era Docreed2003 Feb 2017 #4
Are you sure this is not the Onion?? Angry Dragon Feb 2017 #5
Spicer's Twitter Page: 1.45 m followers. 4 likes. dixiegrrrrl Feb 2017 #6
Remember the Maine it was a coal fire, Gulf of Tonkin not an attack. gordianot Feb 2017 #7
They want a war badly GusBob Feb 2017 #8
Sean Spicer said Groper Don the Con had the biggest inauguration crowd malaise Feb 2017 #9
would like to think that after colin powell and wmd and iraq the american public would not be as dembotoz Feb 2017 #10
Wow - yesterday its a Saudi Frigate and today it's "our naval vessel" - just wacky. jmg257 Feb 2017 #11
At the end of the clip, several do correct him partially - "Saudi vessel" muriel_volestrangler Feb 2017 #12
Impeach the asshole BEFORE he starts the fucking war! world wide wally Feb 2017 #13
I would LIKE to think he was just being sloppy and stupid.. annabanana Feb 2017 #14
Or all of the above IronLionZion Feb 2017 #17
Ginning up for war workinclasszero Feb 2017 #15
The problem is that .. ananda Feb 2017 #18
Ah - so he corrects himself with the help of a reporter just after he says "our navy vessel". jmg257 Feb 2017 #19

no_hypocrisy

(46,080 posts)
3. Gulf of Tomkin redux?
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 06:37 PM
Feb 2017

And something to divert from the fact that Trump ordered an ill-advised, if at all, raid, killing a serviceman and civilians.

malaise

(268,930 posts)
9. Sean Spicer said Groper Don the Con had the biggest inauguration crowd
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 06:45 PM
Feb 2017

PERIOD - you still believe that sicko?

dembotoz

(16,799 posts)
10. would like to think that after colin powell and wmd and iraq the american public would not be as
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 06:46 PM
Feb 2017

easily fooled

but alas prob wrong...trump did get elected

jmg257

(11,996 posts)
11. Wow - yesterday its a Saudi Frigate and today it's "our naval vessel" - just wacky.
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 06:50 PM
Feb 2017
The U.S. has put Iran “on notice” for carrying out a medium-range ballistic missile test and attacks by proxy forces on a Saudi frigate, White House National Security Advisor Michael Flynn said Wednesday, a cryptic comment that appeared to signal the Trump administration is taking a tougher stance on Iran than its predecessor.
...
Separately, Houthi rebels launched a suicide boat attack Monday against a Saudi Arabian military frigate as it transited off Yemen’s western coast in the Red Sea, killing two crew members and wounding three others.

The Houthis, a Shiite Muslim group backed by Iranian money and weapons, have been locked in a war with a Saudi-led coalition in Yemen since 2015 when they forced the country’s U.S.-backed president into exile and quickly swept across the Arab world's poorest nation.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,306 posts)
12. At the end of the clip, several do correct him partially - "Saudi vessel"
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 06:53 PM
Feb 2017

One reporter at the front says "they thought it was an American, but it was Saudi". Spicer agrees.

Spicer is obviously still either too incompetent to be able to do his job, or tried to get away with the lie.

The claim that "they thought it was American" seems to have been put out on Fox News a couple of days ago: http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/01/31/exclusive-pentagon-believes-attack-on-saudi-frigate-meant-for-us-warship.html

which looks like a complete guess with no evidence, to me. All they have is someone saying "allahu akbar (God is great), death to America, death to Israel, a curse on the Jews and victory for Islam." But they clearly can't think it's an American ship and an Israeli one, so it's just a general "al Qaeda, fuck yeah" shout.

It's worrying that "they thought it was American" seems to have been accepted by the press without question. That's still a way to find excuses for a war. And they know it was Houthis, but still take it as Iran wanting it; while Iran is allied with the Houthis, it doesn't have complete control, just as the USA doesn't have complete control over the Saudis' actions in Yemen. If they did, then the USA would be responsible for the attacks on civilian targets the Saudis have carried out.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
15. Ginning up for war
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 07:01 PM
Feb 2017

I give it two weeks or so, Trump and Bannon need to shed blood, their buddies in the MIC must be chomping at the bit.

Also see, Gulf of Tonkin incident: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Tonkin_incident

I pity all the folks with loved ones in Emperor Trump's military.

ananda

(28,858 posts)
18. The problem is that ..
Thu Feb 2, 2017, 07:05 PM
Feb 2017

.. those Houthis are backed by Iranian money.

Since Trump took office, Iran and Yemeni rebels
are really feeling their oats.

Trump and Bannon are loving this because they can
use it as an excuse to act tough and warlike and
make Obama look weak according to their warmongering
demented lights.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sean Spicer claims that H...