General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat the Fuck was the Russian Ambassador Doing at the Republican Convention ?
The Republican Convention. A number of Trump surrogates met with the Russian Ambassador at the Republican Convention in Cleveland. The only change to the Republican platform was to water down a platform plank that supplied arms to the nationalist in Crimea who were fighting the Russians.
What a fucking coincidence. Then, just before the Democratic Convention, there's a Russian inspired document dump that embarrasses the DNC and causes the chairwoman to resign.
What a fucking coincidence.
Let's put it this way. There is far more empirical and circumstantial evidence that the Trump campaign was in cahoots with Russia to undermine our free election process then there was that Raphael Cruz was involved in the JFK assassination, and Trump believed that.
Rex
(65,616 posts)nt
spanone
(135,791 posts)https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/02/us/politics/kushner-flynn-sessions-russia.html?_r=0
AnotherMother4Peace
(4,237 posts)DK504
(3,847 posts)Putin and his mob buddies have had meeting with people on the tRump team.
That Kiskyak was in Cleveland had damn well better be the breaking news tomorrow morning.
Initech
(100,038 posts)This whole thing is getting weirder by the day!
Takket
(21,528 posts)ornotna
(10,795 posts)and handing out bonus checks.
Well played, Takket.
Dallasdem1988
(77 posts)Ambassadors lobby at conventions. I have a friend from Argentina whose husband works for their government and she said the ambassador went to both rnc and dnc cconventions
louis c
(8,652 posts)who sells sandwiches next to the Washington Monument who says you're not accurate.
Would you Like some humble pie? I prefer to listen more than speak, lest I make a fool of myself.
http://www.embassyofargentina.us/en/ambassador-lousteau-attends-the-republican-and-democratic-conventions.html
louis c
(8,652 posts)but I notice that he held no meeting with anyone while he was there.
I can go see the Cleveland Cavaliers play basketball, but that doesn't mean I spoke or spent an hour with the players.
That story proves nothing.
Where was the lobbying part?
Dallasdem1988
(77 posts)What do you think they do there? See the beautiful sights of Cleveland?
You called me a liar. You accused me of being a troll. Then you edited your post.
I provided proof and you look like a fool. Stop being so emotional and irrational. It gives us a bad name.
uponit7771
(90,301 posts)... is the salient issue here.
But you guys are good, ... at least the obfuscation points are solid
Kingofalldems
(38,422 posts)Where have I heard that before? Hmmm.
Dallasdem1988
(77 posts)it's what someone says who is trying to stop us from getting labeled as a witch hunt.
Attack for the mountain of evidence we have, not for things this admin will easily deflect.
Dallasdem1988
(77 posts)Thanks again though DU. For making new members feel welcome.
louis c
(8,652 posts)Maybe after you know the difference between an "Ambassador" and a spy, and the difference between a meeting which resulted in a change in the Republican Party Platform from the norm, you can then stop being an apologist for Trump and Trump's associates' treason against the United States.
There is evidence that a quid pro quo was struck that resulted in the hacked emails of Hillary's to be released in a timely fashion that aided the Trump campaign for this substantial (and only) change to the RNC Platform. That's the point of the OP.
The fact that some twerp nobody Ambassador from Argentina also attended the conventions as some sort of spectator proves nothing but is a naïve attempt to give credibility to Trump's smoke screen.
Do you understand the difference now?
<snip>Current and former US intelligence officials have described Kislyak as a top spy and recruiter of spies, a notion that Russian officials have dismissed.<snip>
http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/02/world/sergey-kislyak-russian-ambassador-us-profile/
Dallasdem1988
(77 posts)Why was he allowed to remain in his position? Invited to the whitehouse dozens of times? Spending time with the democrats in recent days etc
I'm not a trump apologist, I never said trump didn't have shady Russian connections im just not understanding how an ambassador doing his job is "spying" and why if so the obama administration allowed him to remain in his position.
louis c
(8,652 posts)our intelligence agencies. Maybe our intelligence agencies are lying and the Russians and Trump are telling the truth. Or maybe you believe, as Trump and his supporters believe, that CNN is "false news". It can only be one or the other. That seems to be your point.
Therefore, my conclusion is, that you are a Trump apologist.
This is my last response to you. If I wanted to argue with a Trump apologist, I can do it at work.
Response to louis c (Reply #69)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Kingofalldems
(38,422 posts)lapucelle
(18,187 posts)lapucelle
(18,187 posts)The ambassador you link to attended the conventions of both parties.
Like you, most others listen more than they speak as well, but 60 posts in the 25 days that you've been a member of DU is very good participation.
Dallasdem1988
(77 posts)thank you for mentioning that, I'm trying but people seem so ready to attack here.
It is very common for ambassadors to go to conventions. Lots of countries were respresented at both.
This whole trump thing is obviously fishy as hell I just know it's not uncommon for them go to these events.
Raine1967
(11,589 posts)I am trying to find this out.
Dallasdem1988
(77 posts)I'm trying to as well doesn't seem to be an exact list though I'm guessing he probably didn't.
lapucelle
(18,187 posts)and measured thing to say), proceeded to tell the OP that he was going to eat "humble pie" implying that he had "made a fool of himself", claimed outright that you made him "look like a fool" when you clearly failed to do so, and accused him of being "emotional and irrational".
And now you bemoan that "people seem so ready to attack here", at DU and complain about "not feeling welcomed"?
Alrighty, then.
Dallasdem1988
(77 posts)His original response was much different and my response reflects that. He edited it to save face. My comment string doesn't make sense because it isn't a response to his edited message, it's a response to his original one.
He accused me of lying, and making up the story, as well as being a troll. I posted verifiable proof of the ambassadors attendance.
He does look foolish for not taking the time to check and see if ambassadors attending conventions is a common practice. It is. This is information one can look up in a fraction of the time it takes to go out and right some rant on the matter.
I get people are upset, many of us have been since the election. But that doesn't mean we go out and just attack everyone who corrects us.
Instead of taking the time to try and defend the OP, and reinforce your own confirmation bias you should of probably gone and and checked the indormafion for yourself.
Thanks though.
Lol
Demit
(11,238 posts)When you're new, best to take it slow and not be so poised to counterattack. A mild response lets other people know you are not the aggressor, that the other person is. Longtime DU members recognize when other members are acting the bully to new members.
I was just pretty angry at the accusation. I shouldn't have snapped back so quickly and a member of 15 years contacted me and said don't worry about it. So I'm not. I enjoy the site and just was surprised when I made a innocuous statement and was attacked for my post count etc. you can read my posts, none are "trolls" or attacks on anyone.
But yes in the future I just won't respond.
lapucelle
(18,187 posts)Calling out rudeness does not comprise confirmation bias.
Don't you hate it when an undergraduate (overgrown or otherwise) learns a fancy new term and then then uses it ad nauseum and erroneously?
There is no edit history for the edits you are railing against.
Going to both conventions to listen, learn, meet, and advocate is a common practice. What the Russians and Republicans did is not.
And is the last three minutes of my time that I will ever squander on your nonsense again. Ignore is my friend.
LOL, indeed.
Dallasdem1988
(77 posts)Is exactly what it is when someone makes a ridiculous post about ambassadors being at conventions without taking the time to see if it's commonplace.
What you are doing, is holding so much resentment that you lash out at anyone who bothers to correct someone.
Enjoy your ignore button, DU apparently isn't enough of a safe space if someone corrects another members incorrect assumptions.
Sad.
The confirmation bias was on his part. I'm not sure where his post went but I'm sure he wouldn't deny accusing me on post count and join date.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)Response to Dallasdem1988 (Reply #51)
Maeve This message was self-deleted by its author.
alfredo
(60,071 posts)I don't think Gorky would have been an honored guest at the DNC convention.
certainot
(9,090 posts)alfredo
(60,071 posts)McCamy Taylor
(19,240 posts)Citizens United made it legal for anyone, from any country, to buy a candidate. So Russia bought a candidate. Or rather, Russian oil companies bought a candidate.
The Sand Reckoner
(194 posts)Have you even read the decision? Can you quote the relevant portions that support your claim?
trof
(54,256 posts)The repub convention is party central.
certainot
(9,090 posts)C_U_L8R
(44,987 posts)KewlKat
(5,624 posts)https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/global-opinions/trump-campaign-guts-gops-anti-russia-stance-on-ukraine/2016/07/18/98adb3b0-4cf3-11e6-a7d8-13d06b37f256_story.html
Turbineguy
(37,291 posts)There's a bunch of republicans who need to file one of these:
https://www.fara.gov/forms/2014/OMB_1124_0001.pdf
(which I include in the spirit of helpful courtesy)
dchill
(38,442 posts)Or so the Russians would have us believe.
kairos12
(12,842 posts)lpbk2713
(42,736 posts)lapucelle
(18,187 posts)in the Republican platform.
mfcorey1
(11,001 posts)Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)Cha
(296,848 posts)Mr. Ected
(9,670 posts)Which is why the rabbit hole we are peering down may snare us a GOPPER harvest far beyond our wildest dreams.
Progressive dog
(6,899 posts)donor, and conspirator had to be invited to the celebration and be persuaded to help Trump in the general.
Raster
(20,998 posts)nolabels
(13,133 posts)of one of their MIG fighter planes.
Money laundered to DT's estate as a loan might not have been included
applegrove
(118,492 posts)conventions to observe democracy.
Doreen
(11,686 posts)bluedigger
(17,085 posts)TheBlackAdder
(28,167 posts)stonecutter357
(12,693 posts)onenote
(42,585 posts)including the 2016 Democratic National Convention.
It helps to do a little research before getting all outraged at something.
https://www.bciu.org/events/55798/business-reception-at-the-democratic-national-convention-with-foreign-ambassadors
Dallasdem1988
(77 posts)I came back to my post and was attacked and accused of being a troll for pointing this out.
No one is saying that the Russian/trump connection isn't obvious, all anyone is saying is that it's common for ambassadors to attend conventions.
onenote
(42,585 posts)I know a lot of folks want to characterize Russia as an "enemy" of the US. And while it certainly is not a friend, nor does its interests align with those of the US in many many respects, it is not an "enemy" in the formal legal sense. It is a nation with which we still have diplomatic relations, still engage in bilateral commercial activity, and still allow its citizens to visit our country and our citizens to visit their country -- not exactly the way that nations who are "at war" behave.
alarimer
(16,245 posts)We will have to just wait and see what the many investigations find out.
To me, it seems a bit like the Patrick Fitzgerald thing back during the Bush administration. Indictments were coming any day, until...they didn't.
I mean, it's clear Trump and company have shady motives (probably mostly related to enriching themselves) but the use of the word "treason" is premature and inaccurate, at least right now.
louis c
(8,652 posts)<Snip>Current and former US intelligence officials have described Kislyak as a top spy and recruiter of spies, a notion that Russian officials have dismissed.<Snip>
Link:
http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/02/world/sergey-kislyak-russian-ambassador-us-profile/
onenote
(42,585 posts)there's no reason that organizations wouldn't invite him to meet with people.
Lots of Democrats undoubtedly have met with this guy. The issue isn't meeting with him. It's what was discussed.
louis c
(8,652 posts)and I'm sure our government officials had to meet with him in the performance of their duties, but why did so many of Trump's political operatives in the campaign meet with the "spy ambassador" multiple times, in secret?
MFM008
(19,803 posts)Contacts.
Making that deal.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)Gothmog
(144,919 posts)niyad
(113,055 posts)kentuck
(111,052 posts)Why did all of Trumps emissaries show up to talk with him?