HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Cali Supreme Court rules ...

Fri Mar 3, 2017, 10:08 AM

Cali Supreme Court rules that elected officials' emails and texts are part of public record

Just wondering if there's anyone here who would argue against this decision, and on what grounds?

The public has a right to access emails and text messages about government business on the private phones and accounts of state and local officials and employees, the California Supreme Court ruled Thursday. In a unanimous decision, the court said those communications were subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and not shielded because they were sent or received in personal accounts.

"If communications sent through personal accounts were categorically excluded from CPRA, government officials could hide their most sensitive, and potentially damning, discussions in such accounts," Associate Justice Carol Corrigan wrote for the seven-member court.

The ruling came in a lawsuit against the city of San Jose. San Jose City Attorney Richard Doyle said he was not surprised by the decision and did not plan to challenge it. But he said it raised practical challenges for cities and counties.

"The question is how do we access those communications on personal devices without the government being overly intrusive," he said. "I don't expect and intend to have people turn over their phones."


http://abc7.com/news/california-supreme-court-says-officials-emails-are-public-records/1781371/

3 replies, 933 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 3 replies Author Time Post
Reply Cali Supreme Court rules that elected officials' emails and texts are part of public record (Original post)
True Dough Mar 2017 OP
C_U_L8R Mar 2017 #1
dalton99a Mar 2017 #2
PJMcK Mar 2017 #3

Response to True Dough (Original post)

Fri Mar 3, 2017, 10:10 AM

1. I always assumed they were.

Transparency is an essential part of the public service thing

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to True Dough (Original post)

Fri Mar 3, 2017, 10:15 AM

2. Good ruling.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to True Dough (Original post)

Fri Mar 3, 2017, 10:30 AM

3. Duh.

Not only is this a good judgement, it's the only logical decision.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread