General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow Much Is the ACA ‘Tax’?
Q: How much will the tax penalty be for going without health insurance?
A: The minimum assessment will be $695 per person (but no more than $2,085 per family) in 2016, when fully phased in. The amount can be higher depending on income. But there are exemptions for low-income persons and others.
But it will be less to start. The minimum penalty per person will start at $95 in 2014, the first year that the law will require individuals to obtain coverage. And it will rise to $325 the following year.
Starting in 2017, the minimum tax per person will rise each year with inflation. And for children 18 and under, the minimum per-person tax is half of that for adults.
http://factcheck.org/2012/06/how-much-is-the-obamacare-tax/
Zalatix
(8,994 posts)Nope, that won't hurt anyone's budget. Just get a second job to cover it, they're plentiful!
People in this tax bracket whose employers don't offer health insurance, or who have unemployed spouses, fuck them, they gotta pay, dammit.
I see the soup lines getting longer...
cliffordu
(30,994 posts)I wish I had such problems.
Zalatix
(8,994 posts)Where I live, rent is likely to be more than HALF that per year. If your household is making $28,000 you are likely behind on something unless you ride a bike, are single AND are living in a roach trap. Of course it might go further in Le Traileur Parque, Alabammer.
"Le Traileur Parque, Alabammer"
'Nuff said.
FarLeftFist
(6,161 posts)uponit7771
(90,335 posts)...at explaining these simple questions.
There should be an easy start app or website for ACA
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)OR you'd qualify for Medicare's extensions, depending upon the number of your dependents.
Zalatix
(8,994 posts)Those who do get a subsidy have to pay for the insurance FIRST and then get the subsidy. Kind of a case of too little, too late.
FarLeftFist
(6,161 posts)A family of 4 IS qualified for medicaid.
EC
(12,287 posts)the considered poverty group who won't be taxed. There is no penalty or enforcement remedies for not paying so you're not forced to pay.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Will get subsidies. Under the exchanges 133% of poverty, they qualify for...free healthcare.
derby378
(30,252 posts)It's a tax. The Supreme Court automagically converted the penalty into a tax yesterday.
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)B2G
(9,766 posts)How do you think they're going to collect that tax? Via your federal income tax returns, that's how.
EC
(12,287 posts)The law itself spells out that the IRS cannot use remedies to collect.
B2G
(9,766 posts)Want to wager on how quickly this will change upon implementation? All of the pertinent info will be on your W2.
And even if it remains as is, the penalty will be deducted from your return. So the only way they won't get it is if you owe money when you file. If you think they won't just add the HC tax to that amount, you're nuts.
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)...through HCI...why not just risk the tax and get on the spot HCI?
unless they're not going to offer on the spot HCI...
Regards
B2G
(9,766 posts)The penalty for people who forego insurance is the greatest of two amounts: a specified percentage of income or a specified dollar amount. The percentages of income are phased in over time at 1% in 2014, 2% in 2015, and 2.5% starting in 2016. The dollar amounts are also phased in at $95 in 2014, $325 in 2015, and $695 beginning in 2016 (with annual increases after that). The Congressional Budget Office projects that 3.9 million people will pay the penalty in 2016. The total penalty for the taxable year will not exceed the national average of the annual premiums of a bronze level health insurance plan offered through the health insurance Exchanges.
http://healthreform.kff.org/faq/will-everyone-have-to-buy-health-insurance.aspx
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Some of us will not be treated fairly, as the tax code is bigoted. It would be nice to see that addressed. But it won't be unless a huge stink is endlessly raised.
Ship of Fools
(1,453 posts)I'm totally a visual person. At www.healthcare.gov, the homepage
has a *little button* at the top: "Health Care Law & You."
It's orange, so it stands out FAIRLY well, but imo the homepage
should begin with a large print, bulleted list of the benefits
of ACA. Simple, easy-to-read. Defined straight out of the chute.
It's been my observation that if the good and really smart
folks here at DU find themselves scratching their heads about
some of these issues, I can't imagine what the average Joe 6-Pack
is doing (and I'm your average Joe 6-Pack, fwiw.)
And how about some bumperstickers from HQ with
the site name/address? Along the lines of
ACA: Got Questions? Go to blahblahhblah
Just some thoughts.
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)Namely the people who can afford insurance, but choose not to get it.
If you're too poor to afford it, either you get a subsidy, which may very well cover most of the cost for you, or if you're below 133% of the poverty line, you get on Medicaid, or if somehow you slip through those two scenarios, you can simply explain that you can't afford to buy insurance and get an exemption.
Really, if you're in a situation where you have to pay the individual mandate penalty, you deserve it.
Roselma
(540 posts)subsidies cannot be minimized. Who on earth would rather do without insurance than have it provided for nearly nothing? That's just stupid. Take 10 seconds, play with this calculator, and see if it would ever be worth turning down Medicaid or turning down federal subsidies.
http://healthreform.kff.org/SubsidyCalculator.aspx
liberal N proud
(60,334 posts)The dumbest questions of the day comes from those who think it would be smart to drop your insurance and pay the penalty.