Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIf Trump is a bull in a China shop, are we in fact the culprits for giving him the China shop?
Trump is like a bull in a China shop. But is he the culprit, or are those who allowed a bull to enter the China shop (presidential politics) the culprits?
Here is the view of Steven Reidbord, psychiatrist, on bulls in a China shop. He is not writing about Trump specifically, but seems very relevant:
The phrase "bull in a china shop" usually implies that the china shop was there first. The bull wandered in uninvited. But suppose we set up the scene another way. Picture a bull grazing in an open field. Yes, it's a big powerful animal, and maybe it's a bit clumsy. But it isn't hurting anyone; it is living in peace.
Then imagine someone sneaks up on this bull and builds a china shop around it. The animal suddenly finds itself constrained, unable to move without hearing the crash of broken porcelain. Its natural movements are now seen as destructive, as the china is surely at risk. Yet it isn't quite right to blame the bull.
Snip
There is no small measure of passive hostility in building a china shop around a bull. All too often we observers arrive late upon the scene, only to witness the wild animal haplessly bumping into fragile dinnerware. It can take a long time to realize that the bull was just being a bull, and that the root problem was the apparently innocent bystander who constructed a china shop the bull was almost sure to topple.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1263 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If Trump is a bull in a China shop, are we in fact the culprits for giving him the China shop? (Original Post)
Doodley
Mar 2017
OP
He came up with birther, precisely because he was given a platform. Should he have been given a
Doodley
Mar 2017
#2
"WE" didn't give him shit !! Russia, Comey and voter suppression in red states did
uponit7771
Mar 2017
#3
oldtime dfl_er
(6,930 posts)1. not relevant
The implication that Trump was doing no harm until he got to the White House is patently untrue. For years and years before he ran for office, he was a birther and a criminal many times over.
This kind of talk is, in the words of British Intelligence, nonsense and should be ignored.
Doodley
(9,076 posts)2. He came up with birther, precisely because he was given a platform. Should he have been given a
platform? Should a bull be given a platform? I don't think so.
uponit7771
(90,323 posts)3. "WE" didn't give him shit !! Russia, Comey and voter suppression in red states did
PoiBoy
(1,542 posts)5. +1,000,000..
...and the corrupt MSM who gave up 3 Billion dollars in free airtime to Trumputin...
world wide wally
(21,739 posts)4. In all reality, we Are the china shop
Doodley
(9,076 posts)6. Glad you got the point.