Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Doodley

(9,076 posts)
Sat Mar 18, 2017, 01:29 AM Mar 2017

If Trump is a bull in a China shop, are we in fact the culprits for giving him the China shop?

Trump is like a bull in a China shop. But is he the culprit, or are those who allowed a bull to enter the China shop (presidential politics) the culprits?

Here is the view of Steven Reidbord, psychiatrist, on bulls in a China shop. He is not writing about Trump specifically, but seems very relevant:


The phrase "bull in a china shop" usually implies that the china shop was there first. The bull wandered in uninvited. But suppose we set up the scene another way. Picture a bull grazing in an open field. Yes, it's a big powerful animal, and maybe it's a bit clumsy. But it isn't hurting anyone; it is living in peace.

Then imagine someone sneaks up on this bull — and builds a china shop around it. The animal suddenly finds itself constrained, unable to move without hearing the crash of broken porcelain. Its natural movements are now seen as destructive, as the china is surely at risk. Yet it isn't quite right to blame the bull.

Snip

There is no small measure of passive hostility in building a china shop around a bull. All too often we observers arrive late upon the scene, only to witness the wild animal haplessly bumping into fragile dinnerware. It can take a long time to realize that the bull was just being a bull, and that the root problem was the apparently innocent bystander who constructed a china shop the bull was almost sure to topple.
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If Trump is a bull in a China shop, are we in fact the culprits for giving him the China shop? (Original Post) Doodley Mar 2017 OP
not relevant oldtime dfl_er Mar 2017 #1
He came up with birther, precisely because he was given a platform. Should he have been given a Doodley Mar 2017 #2
"WE" didn't give him shit !! Russia, Comey and voter suppression in red states did uponit7771 Mar 2017 #3
+1,000,000.. PoiBoy Mar 2017 #5
In all reality, we Are the china shop world wide wally Mar 2017 #4
Glad you got the point. Doodley Mar 2017 #6

oldtime dfl_er

(6,930 posts)
1. not relevant
Sat Mar 18, 2017, 01:33 AM
Mar 2017

The implication that Trump was doing no harm until he got to the White House is patently untrue. For years and years before he ran for office, he was a birther and a criminal many times over.

This kind of talk is, in the words of British Intelligence, nonsense and should be ignored.

Doodley

(9,076 posts)
2. He came up with birther, precisely because he was given a platform. Should he have been given a
Sat Mar 18, 2017, 01:37 AM
Mar 2017

platform? Should a bull be given a platform? I don't think so.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If Trump is a bull in a C...