Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Yavin4

(35,437 posts)
3. Wouldn't allowing people to buy Medicare accomplish the same thing?
Sat Mar 25, 2017, 12:26 AM
Mar 2017

At some point private insurance would be cost prohibitive.

Squinch

(50,949 posts)
9. Aren't those two different things? Doesn't Medicare for all keep insurance companies in the picture?
Sat Mar 25, 2017, 06:00 AM
Mar 2017

Liberal In Texas

(13,546 posts)
5. First thing...Restore the risk corridor.
Sat Mar 25, 2017, 12:28 AM
Mar 2017

Could that happen with this bunch of RWers in power, probably not.

Freddie

(9,259 posts)
6. work for single payer, but...
Sat Mar 25, 2017, 12:38 AM
Mar 2017

Tax the rich a little more.
Use the $$ to: reduce out-of-pockets (most people's biggest gripe with exchange plans), improve the subsidies (instead of capping at $48000, a gradual drop-off $48000 to $75000), end the "family glitch". These things could be done with cooperation of a few in the "Tuesday Group". Or probably not.

TeamPooka

(24,221 posts)
8. The GOP will not do anything legislatively to "fix" healthcare in any way. Moot argument on repairs
Sat Mar 25, 2017, 12:58 AM
Mar 2017

like this so on to single payer.
But I like all your fixes and maybe we can do that in 2019 if we take back the house and senate in 2018

kentuck

(111,079 posts)
11. Offer Medicare in those counties with only one insurance company...
Sat Mar 25, 2017, 08:13 AM
Mar 2017

To make sure they have some competition.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
14. Very interesting "foot in the door" approach.
Sat Mar 25, 2017, 08:21 AM
Mar 2017

Also seems like it would be pretty basic and straight forward with respect to what the legislation would actually look like.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
13. Considering public opinion, I'm not sure it needs to be fixed.
Sat Mar 25, 2017, 08:20 AM
Mar 2017

When we get the numbers we will lose just as much clout going for Medicare for all compared to a buy in. Please don't get me wrong, I would be very happy with a buy in. I still say the next step can be to scrap the ACA. At some point we will need to make that bold move. I am all about instrumentalism in many areas. Considering public opinion, we might not want that approach here.

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
15. A better threshold for who qualifies for subsidies
Sat Mar 25, 2017, 08:21 AM
Mar 2017

It's pegged to a federal guide for poverty (if I recall) but COL in states like mine make what looks like a better income not mean much when looking at what is left in your budget after living expenses.

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
16. Phase in Medicare, first for the most vulnerable...
Sat Mar 25, 2017, 08:25 AM
Mar 2017

...and lower the age threshold. Allow some people to buy in. Begin to transition jobs in the private health insurance industry into Medicare billing. Merge Medicare and the VA.

Mz Pip

(27,439 posts)
17. Cost needs to be addressed
Sat Mar 25, 2017, 08:34 AM
Mar 2017

Costs for health care vary greatly. Over priced drugs, over priced procedures jack up the cost of health care.

I can see some specialized treatments being expensive but why should a broken wrist requiring no surgery cost $13,000?
Medicare for all would be great but costs still have to come down.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So, how should the ACA be...