General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe new Russian Army?
From CBS News yesterday (my bolding for emphasis):
How is this any different than 15,000 armed Russian troops invading the US? And that is only one instance. Much cheaper, and more effective, than tanks rolling into Eastern Europe? An actual invasion of the US? Who knows how many cybertroops the Russians have.
Pretty scary stuff.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/russian-meddling-investigation-misinformation-tactics-senate-intelligence-committee/
babylonsister
(171,056 posts)is terrifying because how does anyone stop it? And it's cheaper than a war. Good/bad? Oye. And then there are the dumbasses supposedly running this country.
I got nuthin'.
TomCADem
(17,387 posts)Schultz, in other words, went to work for Putie.
The transition would require a bit of adjustment.
Schultz now hosts RT Americas signature evening newscast, News With Ed Schultz, produced in a studio located three blocks from the White House. Schultz is the American face ruddy, beefy, with a megaphone voice of a Moscow-based media organization that reports the news a little differently than CNN or NBC.
Good evening, friends, Schultz boomed on his program one recent evening before swiftly segueing into the alleged hacking of the presidential election by Russia. Schultz skipped the latest details, such as President Obamas views on the matter or the consensus among American intelligence agencies about the extent of Russian meddling. Instead he went straight to Ed Schultzs view of the matter: This has become a lifeline for Clinton supporters in an effort to reverse the outcome of the election. .?.?. In the meantime, the story has entered the arena of outrageous.
TomCADem
(17,387 posts)The Young Turns has been going on a pro-Russian Bender.
https://tytnetwork.com/2016/10/28/blaming-russia-deflect-leaks-dnc-trying-kill-alternate-media-protect-wall-street/
Besides fighting Republicans, Donald Trump, and progressive liberals, the DNC and party lines have taken on a new opponent in the Russian government and media but why are they choosing to pick this fight, and how far are they willing to go?
When Hillary Clinton called out Russia for directly sabotaging the U.S. election, and days earlier, the U.K. unceremoniously cuts Russian Todays long-established bank accounts, we have to begin asking ourselves some difficult questions about why the Democratic party is so motivated to smear and alienate Russia and its international media conglomerate from the American consumer.
FreepFryer
(7,077 posts)KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)FreepFryer
(7,077 posts)...a Berlin Firewall.
Stinky The Clown
(67,786 posts)What is a Berlin Firewall?
FreepFryer
(7,077 posts)TomCADem
(17,387 posts)The Sane Progressive is a classic sock puppet that was often posted on liberal sites.
Response to TomCADem (Reply #5)
KittyWampus This message was self-deleted by its author.
TomCADem
(17,387 posts)Glenn Greenwald has been trying to one-up Trump in attacking allegations of Russian interference as fake news.
http://thedailybanter.com/2017/01/glenn-greenwald-obama-russian-hacks/
In his never ending crusade to rid America of moderate liberals and anyone who doesn't believe Ed Snowden is the second coming of Jesus Christ, Glenn Greenwald has been doing the media rounds desperately attempting to prove that Obama and the Democrats have been lying about the Russian DNC hacks.
Greenwald has published story after story undermining what he views as an "smear" job by the DNC and the mainstream liberal media, and has even appeared on Fox News to cast doubt on the veracity of the Obama administration's claims. Of course Greenwald is framing this as him "just asking questions" while the corrupt, slavish media blindly tows the official line from the government. Wrote Greenwald in early December: