Top intel Dem hints at dragging Trump before House Intelligence Committee

[kpete]

Schiff raised important questions that have obvious, if unconfirmed, answers. White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer went to pieces when asked if Trump personally directed the Nunes cover-up, and Schiff is correct that the best person to answer that definitively is Trump himself.

Even Nunes has previously expressed a willingness to subpoena the Trump administration, and Schiff’s remarks seem to suggest that Trump’s tweets may end up putting him in the hot seat, under oath, before Congress.

The only question, then, will be if Trump asks for immunity.

http://shareblue.com/top-intel-dem-hints-at-dragging-trump-before-house-intelligence-committee/#.WOEdeDYoki4.twitter

[Jonny Appleseed]

1. Like Nunes' "willingness" means jack shit at this point.

[beachbum bob]

2. No chance while house is in conservative control. Just blah blah.. Blah.

[KingCharlemagne]

5. The principle of Separation of Powers means that even a Dem House could not

compel Trump to appear before its committees. See Watergate.

[C_U_L8R]

3. I want that orange clown under oath

Oh what fun.

[malaise]

4. Please please please

pretty please!

[MineralMan]

6. Why do so many people seem to forget who is in the majority

in Congress? This idea is foolishness. It won't happen. The President will not be subpoenaed to appear. I'm not even sure there's any way to do that, even if Democrats were in the majority.

We really should be looking for realistic options, not fantacizing, I think.

[SledDriver]

8. The voice of sanity and reason

Always wait for you to weigh in Sir

[world wide wally]

7. Get him under oath for anything, and you get him for perjury

He has no control over his lying