General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe U.S. Virgin Islands: One Hundred Years Under U.S. Rule
ST. CROIX As the Virgin Islands of the United States realized 100 years together, the territorys leaders, along with Washington representatives and the prime minister of Denmark whose ancestors sold the territory to the U.S. in 1917 for $25 million in gold on Friday expressed a balance of celebration and commemoration that marked the event, as leaders remembered the atrocities that had befall Virgin Islanders under the heavy hands of their then-Danish masters, while expressing gratitude for the benefits that came along with being under the U.S. flag.
To be sure, there was no lack of criticism of the U.S.s treatment of its territories, whose citizens are limboed in an undesirable place, unable to vote for president of the United States even as the territories children give their lives in service willingly under the American flag.
Delegate to Congress Stacey Plaskett, Senate President Myron Jackson, Centennial Chairperson Pamela Richards, and Governor Kenneth Mapp all made it a point to highlight the sacrifices made by Virgin Islanders for the U.S., while be unable to enjoy the nations most hallowed privilege: the right to vote.
And there were protesters who joined a parade organized for the commemoration, with its members calling for self-determination and freedom from colonial status. Few weeks back, as the Virgin Islands geared up for the Centennial, we authored a petition saying no to the Centennial, really calling on our policymakers to reconsider their positions with respect to celebrating our colonial status, said Genevieve Whitaker, president and co-founder of the Virgin Islands Youth Advocacy Coalition. In 1970 the United Nations deemed colonization a crime; here we are, one of the last remaining colonies in the world.
Read more: http://viconsortium.com/featured/the-u-s-virgin-islands-one-hundred-years-under-u-s-rule/
msongs
(67,395 posts)Igel
(35,300 posts)Having one group complain assumes they speak for a majority with due regard for minority's interests.
Advocates aren't noted for either. Advocates for majority interests lose the name; advocates have no need to be responsible or consider those other than who they advocate for.