Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
Wed Apr 5, 2017, 11:40 AM Apr 2017

UPDATED: Breaking: Bannon has been removed from the National Security Council - Bloomberg

more info and links as I get them UPDATED:

https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2017-04-05/bannon-removed-from-national-security-council-role-in-shakeup

President Donald Trump reorganized his National Security Council on Wednesday, removing his chief strategist, Stephen Bannon, and downgrading the role of his Homeland Security Adviser, Tom Bossert, according to a person familiar with the decision and a regulatory filing.

National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster was given responsibility for setting the agenda for meetings of the NSC or the Homeland Security Council, and was authorized to delegate that authority to Bossert, at his discretion, according to the filing.

Under the move, the national intelligence director, Dan Coats, and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Marine Corps General Joseph Dunford, are again "regular attendees" of the NSC’s principals committee.

Bannon, the former executive chairman of Breitbart News, was elevated to the National Security Council’s principals committee at the beginning of Trump’s presidency. The move drew criticism from some members of Congress and Washington’s foreign policy establishment.

35 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
UPDATED: Breaking: Bannon has been removed from the National Security Council - Bloomberg (Original Post) stevenleser Apr 2017 OP
MSNBC reporting this right now... Wounded Bear Apr 2017 #1
Good. Aristus Apr 2017 #2
Nothing on 3 network news Watchfoxheadexplodes Apr 2017 #3
Holy sh*t!! WoonTars Apr 2017 #4
I am guessing McMaster gave him an ultimatum. nycbos Apr 2017 #25
Reported as McMaster not willing to work with him rufus dog Apr 2017 #5
I hope they have a smoking gun with the Russian ties an Bannon still_one Apr 2017 #13
+1,000 malaise Apr 2017 #20
No doubt at the military's insistence - and with good cause. tenorly Apr 2017 #6
He now IS the national security council. Jonny Appleseed Apr 2017 #7
Probably was running through west wing channeling Mel Gibson Watchfoxheadexplodes Apr 2017 #8
On GEM$NBComcast now malaise Apr 2017 #9
Good, but I don't trust anyone for this to make a difference. Tommy_Carcetti Apr 2017 #10
Your 2nd paragraph: 100 percent accurate! VOX Apr 2017 #24
Yes, and Manafort 'left the campaign' to advise from Trump Towers. byronius Apr 2017 #33
Removed him because he f'ed up with the Nunes scam? Thomas Hurt Apr 2017 #11
I bet he already got access to everything he wanted anyway. nt JTFrog Apr 2017 #12
Bingo orangecrush Apr 2017 #15
Good, I wonder if Trumpy is getting tried of winning yet? FSogol Apr 2017 #14
On That Point ProfessorGAC Apr 2017 #18
He should be kicked out of the White House entirely jeanmarc Apr 2017 #16
This is good news Johnny2X2X Apr 2017 #17
Certainly that whole WWIII thing is bad gratuitous Apr 2017 #21
Bannon is a nazi POS workinclasszero Apr 2017 #22
Trump's night of the long knifes workinclasszero Apr 2017 #19
Washington Post confirming Bannon off NSC... VOX Apr 2017 #23
Bloomberg softened the headline from "removed" to loses.... heh Ellipsis Apr 2017 #26
Well, we know we are going to war in Syria, without congressional approval or maybe even Eliot Rosewater Apr 2017 #27
WSJ says it was at the behest of McMaster herding cats Apr 2017 #28
I suspect there is much more to this story? kentuck Apr 2017 #29
See, only Obama politicized the NSC with Rice bigbrother05 Apr 2017 #34
Bannon needs to be removed from the WH loop altogether Freethinker65 Apr 2017 #30
I wonder what he did to piss Putin off. Orrex Apr 2017 #31
I'm glad he's been removed but I think it means nothing more than Trump made Lint Head Apr 2017 #32
Recommended. H2O Man Apr 2017 #35

nycbos

(6,034 posts)
25. I am guessing McMaster gave him an ultimatum.
Wed Apr 5, 2017, 12:09 PM
Apr 2017

"He goes or I go."


And even Trump is smart enough to realize that he can't have a story of losing two National Security Advisors in less than 100 days.

Tommy_Carcetti

(43,173 posts)
10. Good, but I don't trust anyone for this to make a difference.
Wed Apr 5, 2017, 11:44 AM
Apr 2017

Bannon's a cockroach and he's managed to create a Trump who has little use for existing administrative institutions.

He's not out of the picture. He's never out of the picture. None of these cretins are ever out of the picture. Let's not forget they "fired" Roger Stone.

byronius

(7,394 posts)
33. Yes, and Manafort 'left the campaign' to advise from Trump Towers.
Wed Apr 5, 2017, 01:15 PM
Apr 2017

Bad fakery. Won't make any difference.

Thomas Hurt

(13,903 posts)
11. Removed him because he f'ed up with the Nunes scam?
Wed Apr 5, 2017, 11:44 AM
Apr 2017

That little bit of propaganda had to come from that alcoholic fascist

ProfessorGAC

(64,995 posts)
18. On That Point
Wed Apr 5, 2017, 11:54 AM
Apr 2017

I'm no kid, and i don't recall anybody president ever having to replace top advisors in the first 90 days, except perhaps for health or something, and i can't even remember that happening.

Well oiled machine, my rear.

Johnny2X2X

(19,038 posts)
17. This is good news
Wed Apr 5, 2017, 11:53 AM
Apr 2017

Bannon literally wants WWIII. Now the guys that are still there are crazy and incompetent too, but nowhere near as apocalyptic as Bannon was.

The threat to the world by these maniacs is still dire, but has been reduced considerably by taking Bannon out of this role. A role for which he had zero qualifications for.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
21. Certainly that whole WWIII thing is bad
Wed Apr 5, 2017, 11:57 AM
Apr 2017

But I hardly believe that would make a dime's worth of difference to President Trump. No, I'm thinking that Bannon slighted someone in the immediate family. Being a Class A jerk is more of a qualification than a drawback, but affronting the First Family is like blaspheming against the Holy Spirit.

Ellipsis

(9,124 posts)
26. Bloomberg softened the headline from "removed" to loses.... heh
Wed Apr 5, 2017, 12:13 PM
Apr 2017

From a brief skim he never attended the meetings.... he got the minutes and agenda and data I would assume, yes?

Eliot Rosewater

(31,109 posts)
27. Well, we know we are going to war in Syria, without congressional approval or maybe even
Wed Apr 5, 2017, 12:13 PM
Apr 2017

knowledge.

Now this, what is next?

Is NK going to get WWIII going? With trump in the WH, that is likely.

herding cats

(19,564 posts)
28. WSJ says it was at the behest of McMaster
Wed Apr 5, 2017, 12:13 PM
Apr 2017

The WH is spin:

An official says Bannon was only on board to oversee now-ousted National Security Adviser Michael Flynn's work to "deoperationalize" the National Security Council from the broad purview it had under Susan Rice.
http://www.cnn.com/2017/04/05/politics/steve-bannon-white-house-national-security-council/

kentuck

(111,079 posts)
29. I suspect there is much more to this story?
Wed Apr 5, 2017, 12:16 PM
Apr 2017

He probably took himself off the Council since McMaster was unable to even remove the young punk that had come on board with General Flynn.

So, why would he remove himself from the NSC?

bigbrother05

(5,995 posts)
34. See, only Obama politicized the NSC with Rice
Wed Apr 5, 2017, 01:56 PM
Apr 2017

Donald is squeaky clean, top to bottom, only trying to bring businesslike efficiency to government

Those will be Faux News memes moving forward

Lint Head

(15,064 posts)
32. I'm glad he's been removed but I think it means nothing more than Trump made
Wed Apr 5, 2017, 12:56 PM
Apr 2017

news to deflect from his real problems.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»UPDATED: Breaking: Bannon...