Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is The First Lady Portrait Really A Jewelry Ad? (Original Post) lame54 Apr 2017 OP
More of an ad for cosmetic surgery gratuitous Apr 2017 #1
Her face photoshopped bigly. EOM elfin Apr 2017 #6
The eyes look artificial. Girard442 Apr 2017 #13
I think you are on to something. LisaM Apr 2017 #2
Well, it's certainly Photoshopped to hell like an advertisement. Atman Apr 2017 #3
When is she going to start her bully campaign?? Angry Dragon Apr 2017 #4
When she divorces her husband perhaps! sheshe2 Apr 2017 #9
I just assumed she was just a news anchor for 11 Action News. nt Tommy_Carcetti Apr 2017 #5
Clever. Whose idea his or hers or neither? caroldansen Apr 2017 #7
It may be, but I just looked at my ring finger GentryDixon Apr 2017 #8
Her comment on photo safeinOhio Apr 2017 #10
Thanks OldHippieChick Apr 2017 #20
The placement of the ring on her finger means nothing.... CherokeeDem Apr 2017 #11
yeah, I was gonna say, the rock is heavy enough so that the ring slides like that Fast Walker 52 Apr 2017 #14
But if you're sitting for a formal portrait gratuitous Apr 2017 #16
Having it prominently displayed is not by accident, Ms. Toad Apr 2017 #22
Well, maybe the Trumps couldn't afford to hire a really good photographer gratuitous Apr 2017 #24
It's not fitted properly JustAnotherGen Apr 2017 #12
Just be glad she's dressed. NightWatcher Apr 2017 #15
actually, it's not a great picture of her Fast Walker 52 Apr 2017 #17
Good catch, but it's probably more of an ego thing for Don. Vinca Apr 2017 #18
since there is nothing to indicate who the jeweler is onenote Apr 2017 #19
Have you ever worn a ring with a heavy stone Ms. Toad Apr 2017 #21
It's an ad showing a sample of the joys of learning Photoshop lunatica Apr 2017 #23

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
1. More of an ad for cosmetic surgery
Wed Apr 5, 2017, 04:29 PM
Apr 2017

Not that there's anything wrong with it, but my word! She has the unlined face of a six-year-old. Or maybe it's just airbrushing? Not that there's anything wrong with that, either, but goodness! I've seen china dolls with more expressive features.

Girard442

(6,066 posts)
13. The eyes look artificial.
Wed Apr 5, 2017, 04:58 PM
Apr 2017

Sort of like:


On edit: To see what she used to look like do a Google image search on "Melania Trump young."

LisaM

(27,794 posts)
2. I think you are on to something.
Wed Apr 5, 2017, 04:29 PM
Apr 2017

It seemed reminiscent of something. That's probably it.

It also makes me think of the hilariously huge "diamond" Lisa Douglas wore in 'Green Acres'.

GentryDixon

(2,947 posts)
8. It may be, but I just looked at my ring finger
Wed Apr 5, 2017, 04:34 PM
Apr 2017

and the ring is heading south! My little stone is not near the weight of what she is showing.

I will admit the ring is one of the first things that caught my eye in the photo.

CherokeeDem

(3,709 posts)
11. The placement of the ring on her finger means nothing....
Wed Apr 5, 2017, 04:42 PM
Apr 2017

I have a square cut diamond, nowhere near that large but it slightly big on me and it tends to seek it's own level because it's heavy. Right now, typing, that ring and the one on my right hand are both laying to the side.

That said....

I do not like her...

 

Fast Walker 52

(7,723 posts)
14. yeah, I was gonna say, the rock is heavy enough so that the ring slides like that
Wed Apr 5, 2017, 05:00 PM
Apr 2017

still-- gross to display such wealth in an official portrait

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
16. But if you're sitting for a formal portrait
Wed Apr 5, 2017, 05:01 PM
Apr 2017

Wouldn't you (or the photographer) make sure your clothes were all properly draped, your hair was in place, and your jewelry was arranged just so? The placement of that little bauble isn't by accident.

Ms. Toad

(33,999 posts)
22. Having it prominently displayed is not by accident,
Wed Apr 5, 2017, 05:51 PM
Apr 2017

But having it roll toward the ground is inattention to detail by the photobrapher.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
24. Well, maybe the Trumps couldn't afford to hire a really good photographer
Wed Apr 5, 2017, 06:13 PM
Apr 2017

He's on a fixed salary living in government housing, after all. Gotta cut back expenses where you can.

Vinca

(50,237 posts)
18. Good catch, but it's probably more of an ego thing for Don.
Wed Apr 5, 2017, 05:37 PM
Apr 2017

He wants everyone to see what a big rock he bought his wife. The biggest rock. The best rock. (And if it's as phony as he is, a cubic zirconia rock. LOL.)

onenote

(42,598 posts)
19. since there is nothing to indicate who the jeweler is
Wed Apr 5, 2017, 05:45 PM
Apr 2017

how is it an "ad"?

It's a airbrushed photo. As if in the grand scheme of things, this is what we should be concerned with?

Ms. Toad

(33,999 posts)
21. Have you ever worn a ring with a heavy stone
Wed Apr 5, 2017, 05:48 PM
Apr 2017

or, perhaps a class ring heavily weighted in the same area?

The constantly roll in the direction that gravity pulls them.

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
23. It's an ad showing a sample of the joys of learning Photoshop
Wed Apr 5, 2017, 05:53 PM
Apr 2017

Especially the miracle of using the Gauzian blur tool!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is The First Lady Portrai...