Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. Senate Invokes "Nuclear Option" on Supreme Court Nominees (Original Post) L. Coyote Apr 2017 OP
So they can't win without cheating Angry Dragon Apr 2017 #1
They changed the rules. They can't win elections without cheating. L. Coyote Apr 2017 #2
Changing the rules in mid-stream is cheating Angry Dragon Apr 2017 #5
Was it cheating when Harry Reid did it for lower court nominees? mythology Apr 2017 #9
yes Angry Dragon Apr 2017 #11
I understand why Harry Reid did it burnbaby Apr 2017 #16
They have been doing it all along. Baitball Blogger Apr 2017 #3
One more reason to have the 2016 election tossed. L. Coyote Apr 2017 #6
Impeachment requires more than not liking him mythology Apr 2017 #10
Well, he did commit plagiarism which is impeachable. OliverQ Apr 2017 #12
Mitch McConnell needs a boot up his ass. Initech Apr 2017 #4
he needs more than that bdamomma Apr 2017 #15
SAD! underpants Apr 2017 #7
Let's not worry... vi5 Apr 2017 #8
Any pretense that the republicans in the Senate were the 'grown-ups' of their party... WoonTars Apr 2017 #13
Imagine the squealing from the right if no judges leave before 2020 and Vinca Apr 2017 #14
Kennedy will go before then FBaggins Apr 2017 #17

L. Coyote

(51,129 posts)
2. They changed the rules. They can't win elections without cheating.
Thu Apr 6, 2017, 12:56 PM
Apr 2017

They would be the minority if they did not cheat on elections.

Baitball Blogger

(46,699 posts)
3. They have been doing it all along.
Thu Apr 6, 2017, 12:57 PM
Apr 2017

The question is, what is our next move since this Supreme Court justice is less legitimate than Clarence Thomas. I hear we have the potential to impeachment in 2018?

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
10. Impeachment requires more than not liking him
Thu Apr 6, 2017, 01:20 PM
Apr 2017

It boggles my mind that people want to say doing away with the filibuster is horrible so let's make impeachment a political weapon.

 

vi5

(13,305 posts)
8. Let's not worry...
Thu Apr 6, 2017, 01:16 PM
Apr 2017

.....the filibuster will be back once Democrats take control of Congress. The republicans will demand it, and the Democrats will do their best to accommodate that request, because they won't want Morning Joe to tsk tsk them.

Same thing with the aversion to executive orders.

And basically anything else that we were told couldn't and shouldn't be done when we controlled the government. Because you know, high road, adults, something something.

WoonTars

(694 posts)
13. Any pretense that the republicans in the Senate were the 'grown-ups' of their party...
Thu Apr 6, 2017, 01:35 PM
Apr 2017

...has forever been shattered by this move.

I hope they will come to regret this move sooner rather than later...

Vinca

(50,260 posts)
14. Imagine the squealing from the right if no judges leave before 2020 and
Thu Apr 6, 2017, 01:37 PM
Apr 2017

Democrats sweep the election. It could happen. People are really, really pissed.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»U.S. Senate Invokes "Nucl...