General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat if Putin is pleased, not pissed, with Trump's attack?
Yesterday from Rep. Gabbard: "However, because of our attack on Syria, this investigation may now not even be possible. And without such evidence, a successful prosecution (of Assad) will be much harder."
What if Trump just helped eliminate evidence that implicated Putin? Gabbard said that what Trump did made it harder to prove who was behind the chemical attacks. Her full statement below.
http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-syria-missile-strikes-reckless-nuclear-tulsi-gabbard-2017-4
Trump still Putin puppet.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)HAB911
(8,867 posts)2naSalit
(86,332 posts)I agree that some are swallowing this red herring whole, though.
annabanana
(52,791 posts)You KNOW tRump didn't come up with it. Not nearly clever enough.
electron_blue
(3,592 posts)annabanana
(52,791 posts)(making damn sure no Russian assets were damaged) Syria moved people and assets before the bombing..
edit for link
http://abcnews.go.com/International/eyewitness-syrian-military-anticipated-us-raid/story?id=46641107
electron_blue
(3,592 posts)blm
(113,013 posts)be at odds in order to further their 500 billion dollar oil deal.
The 'strike' will APPEAR to be swift retaliation by a 'leader', and most of the US media will go along with it.
Putin is shoring up tRump.