General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWorst case -Ossoff gets 48% -49% of the vote.
Last edited Tue Apr 18, 2017, 10:32 PM - Edit history (4)
That means the Deplorables would have to get >90% of the remaining votes in the run off.
on edit -added remaining. it was implied
malaise
(268,913 posts)Congrats Dems
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)But a slow demise for the Deplorables would be fine too.
malaise
(268,913 posts)but right now this is a disaster for the Con
Ilsa
(61,694 posts)Warpy
(111,242 posts)but I think he might have a good chance in a runoff election.
Remember, he's running against 4 GOPS and a whole fistful of other candidates from splinter parties. Remember also that this is Gingrich's old district.
Because of the district's history, if one of the horrible GOP candidates does win the runoff, it is going to be very close and that will send the same shockwaves through that racket, er, party, that the close election in Kansas did.
It will also tell the inside the Beltway crowd in our own party that even deep red districts are now within reach and will become more so as long as the GOP keeps Asshole in office.
mvd
(65,173 posts)I really want an outright win. We can still win in the runoff, but we need even higher turnout or some of those Republicans not to back Handel.
Jersey Devil
(9,874 posts)but only 16% of the vote in so far compared to 88% of Cobb and 95% of DeKalb. If Ossoff can outperform Clinton in Fulton he can still get 50%
BootinUp
(47,139 posts)Or forget about it.
johnnyrocket
(1,773 posts)...and we're screwed beyond belief.
mvd
(65,173 posts)can still brag away.
GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)Transfer this energy to the upper Midwest or Mid-Atlantic and things will be different.
And also some districts in Central Florida and Southern California. If we are losing districts by 2% that we have traditionally lost by 20%, that is a sea-change.
onenote
(42,690 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)That leaves 51-52% of the vote for everybody else. In the runoff he only has to get 5-10% of that 51-52%. The GOP candidate will have to get all of it.
onenote
(42,690 posts)He should, but it will all depend on turnout.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)So Dems might clear 50% tonight.
It seems to be the Deplorables need to be perfect in the run off and have no margin of error.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)The winner will have to get 50% + 1 vote to win, period. Claiming that anyone has to get >90% of the vote in a runoff is misleading.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)I have faith the denizens of this board are capable of that and much more.
Response to SickOfTheOnePct (Reply #19)
DemocratSinceBirth This message was self-deleted by its author.
superpatriotman
(6,247 posts)But his lead has faded.
Democrats need this win. Period.
LeftInTX
(25,232 posts)If all of those other candidates are R, then they agree to support the R candidate if their candidate lost. Their votes are diluted because there are so many R candidates.
We have non-partisan municipal elections where I live. There are no primaries. Right now we have 14 candidates running for mayor. Only three of those are serious. Tw will compete in a runoff. So much could happen between the first election and the run-off. Lots of dirty tricks etc. Last time, the candidate I supported won the first round, but lost the run-off.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)The GOP has to be perfect and the Deplorables are going to be pissed that their candidate got eliminated by a RINO.
mvd
(65,173 posts)Not impossible that he does and gets 50%+, but I agree that runoff looks likely. We better put resources into it.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)If Ossoff gets 49% of the vote tonight and the GOP gets all the remaining votes in the run off they win. But that means they have to be perfect. I suspect we will see a RINO-Deplorable war now in GA 6.