General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNeil Gorsuch and the States Power to Kill
Its not entirely fair to judge a Supreme Court justice based on his first vote. Urgent matters arise unexpectedly, and the court must sometimes act quickly.
Still, its worth paying special attention to Justice Neil Gorsuchs vote late Thursday night to deny a stay of execution for Ledell Lee, an Arkansas man who was sentenced to death in 1995 for murdering a woman named Debra Reese with a tire thumper.
After Justice Gorsuch, along with the four other conservative justices, denied his final appeal without explanation, Mr. Lee, who maintained his innocence until the end, was executed by lethal injection.
He was pronounced dead at 11:56 p.m. Central Daylight Time, minutes before his death warrant expired. Arkansas had not executed anyone since 2005.
In short, the first significant decision by Justice Gorsuch, who was sworn in to office less than two weeks ago, was the most consequential any justice can make to approve a mans killing by the state.
More at:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/21/opinion/neil-gorsuch-and-the-states-power-to-kill.html?smid=tw-nytopinion&smtyp=cur
LOL Lib
(1,462 posts)Fuck all republicans!
malaise
(268,942 posts)dalton99a
(81,455 posts)moriah
(8,311 posts)That's what gets me. You're going to let a man with an actual innocence claim pending get executed as your first vote.... and agree so much that you don't think there's even a reason to explain it to the American people.
moriah
(8,311 posts)Arkansass decision to rush through the execution of Mr. Lee just because its supply of lethal drugs are expiring at the end of the month denied him the opportunity to conduct DNA testing that could have proven his innocence. While reasonable people can disagree on whether death is an appropriate form of punishment, no one should be executed when there is a possibility that person is innocent.
There's more about the evidence pointing to his innocence there.