Sun Apr 23, 2017, 08:17 AM
HAB911 (8,220 posts)
PolitiFact's guide to fake news websites and what they peddle
At first look, BostonTribune.com certainly seems a trustworthy source. So does KMT11.com. And ABCNews.com.co. Even 24wpn.com has an official ring to it.
But all of these websites peddle bogus stories, either by making up fake news or sharing it from other sources. And it's not always apparent to readers that's the case. Since December, we at PolitiFact have been partnering with Facebook to root out fabricated reports shared by social media users. As of April 19, we've written more than 80 fact-checks about fake news stories. We've noted some trends along the way, chief among them that it can be really difficult for readers — from casual skimmers to seasoned newshounds — to spot fake news outlets when they pop up. It's also difficult to determine where these fictional stories come from, and just how they spread across the Internet. http://www.tampabay.com/news/perspective/politifacts-guide-to-fake-news-websites-and-what-they-peddle/2320923
|
37 replies, 12327 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
HAB911 | Apr 2017 | OP |
HAB911 | Apr 2017 | #1 | |
pintobean | Apr 2017 | #3 | |
HAB911 | Apr 2017 | #4 | |
SCantiGOP | Apr 2017 | #7 | |
HAB911 | Apr 2017 | #5 | |
pintobean | Apr 2017 | #34 | |
HAB911 | Apr 2017 | #35 | |
retrowire | Apr 2017 | #6 | |
pintobean | Apr 2017 | #11 | |
retrowire | Apr 2017 | #13 | |
m-lekktor | Apr 2017 | #16 | |
cannabis_flower | Apr 2017 | #12 | |
retrowire | Apr 2017 | #14 | |
cannabis_flower | Apr 2017 | #15 | |
HAB911 | Apr 2017 | #21 | |
Honeycombe8 | Apr 2017 | #17 | |
pnwmom | Apr 2017 | #37 | |
duncang | Apr 2017 | #2 | |
Stellar | Apr 2017 | #8 | |
WinkyDink | Apr 2017 | #22 | |
Stellar | Apr 2017 | #24 | |
WinkyDink | Apr 2017 | #36 | |
Thor_MN | Apr 2017 | #9 | |
TomVilmer | Apr 2017 | #18 | |
Duppers | Apr 2017 | #28 | |
Thor_MN | Apr 2017 | #29 | |
Duppers | Apr 2017 | #32 | |
ProfessorPlum | Apr 2017 | #10 | |
left-of-center2012 | Apr 2017 | #19 | |
WinkyDink | Apr 2017 | #20 | |
RDANGELO | Apr 2017 | #23 | |
Jim Lane | Apr 2017 | #33 | |
BumRushDaShow | Apr 2017 | #25 | |
killbotfactory | Apr 2017 | #26 | |
HAB911 | Apr 2017 | #27 | |
killbotfactory | Apr 2017 | #30 | |
HAB911 | Apr 2017 | #31 |
Response to HAB911 (Reply #1)
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 09:03 AM
pintobean (18,101 posts)
3. DU is on that list.
![]() |
Response to pintobean (Reply #3)
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 09:12 AM
HAB911 (8,220 posts)
4. holy shit
What do we do? That needs to be corrected.
|
Response to HAB911 (Reply #4)
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 09:47 AM
SCantiGOP (13,123 posts)
7. Read half the posts on this site
People here tend to repeat anything that fits their narrative, with no up front fact-checking.
|
Response to pintobean (Reply #3)
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 09:15 AM
HAB911 (8,220 posts)
5. submitted to Ask the admins board for review
Response to HAB911 (Reply #5)
Thu Apr 27, 2017, 05:01 PM
pintobean (18,101 posts)
34. It appears Politifacts has removed DU from the list.
Skinner's email must have done the trick. Good job.
|
Response to pintobean (Reply #34)
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 08:41 AM
HAB911 (8,220 posts)
35. YAY!
I was floored when I saw that on the list, but alls well that ends well
|
Response to pintobean (Reply #3)
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 09:38 AM
retrowire (10,345 posts)
6. At first I was like
Okay well I have seen some fake stuff make it through here sometimes.
But then I noticed conservativecave isn't on the list. Sooooooo wtf |
Response to retrowire (Reply #6)
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 10:07 AM
pintobean (18,101 posts)
11. That's because they're nobodies.
Most threads here get more views than that site.
|
Response to pintobean (Reply #11)
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 10:13 AM
retrowire (10,345 posts)
13. oh really?
I was under the impression that they were practically our counterpart since they seem to browse us and talk as much shit as they do.
|
Response to retrowire (Reply #13)
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 10:45 AM
m-lekktor (3,675 posts)
16. I suspect they don't get enough traffic to be worth mentioning. nt
Response to pintobean (Reply #3)
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 10:13 AM
cannabis_flower (3,678 posts)
12. I sent this email to them
You have DemocraticUnderground.com listed as a fake news site on https://infogr.am/politifacts_fake_news_almanac. .
It is not a fake news site. It is a message board for Democrats. While it is possible that some members might occasionally inadvertently post a fake news story from another website, it is not a fake news site any more than Facebook or Free Republic are fake news sites. Most of the time when people do post fake news other members debunk them in the comments. Please remove DemocraticUnderground.com from the list and please be more careful about deciding to label a site as fake news because when you misidentifiy a site as fake news, it calls into question the validity of your site. |
Response to cannabis_flower (Reply #12)
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 10:14 AM
retrowire (10,345 posts)
14. Excellently worded. Hope they consider it. Thanks for this! nt
Response to retrowire (Reply #14)
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 10:21 AM
cannabis_flower (3,678 posts)
15. I also posted it to their Politifact's Facebook site
I sent the email to both infogr.am and politifact.com , since it is posted at infogr.am but appears to be the work of Politifact
|
Response to cannabis_flower (Reply #12)
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 11:16 AM
HAB911 (8,220 posts)
21. Excellent! thank you!
Response to pintobean (Reply #3)
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 10:55 AM
Honeycombe8 (37,648 posts)
17. DU is not a news org. It IS a partisan site, obviously ("Democratic" Underground).
Don't know if it's a fake news site, although I've seen stories here that the poster didn't realize weren't true.
I get news from news organizations. CNN, Reuters, NBC, NYT, WaPo, etc. |
Response to pintobean (Reply #3)
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 09:14 PM
pnwmom (107,639 posts)
37. Weird, since DU isn't a news site. It's a discussion board. n/t
Response to HAB911 (Original post)
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 08:36 AM
duncang (1,907 posts)
2. I see a lot of them are out of scottsdale az. godaddy hosts them
Wonder who actually is running them?
BTW the two companies dipshit uses is Cambridge Analytica. (Former board member bannon and help push brexit in England) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambridge_Analytica And Giles-Parscale. Cambridge Analytica sent over some people to Giles-Parscale to help on the campaign. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brad_Parscale |
Response to HAB911 (Original post)
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 09:49 AM
Stellar (5,644 posts)
8. What?! No FOX 'news'?
What's wrongs with this story?
![]() |
Response to Stellar (Reply #8)
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 11:16 AM
WinkyDink (51,311 posts)
22. 'Tain't funny, McGee. This "rooting out," is, IMO, Fascistic at its core.
Response to WinkyDink (Reply #22)
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 11:53 AM
Stellar (5,644 posts)
24. Who is McGee?
FOX 'news' should definitely be on it.
|
Response to Stellar (Reply #24)
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 08:59 PM
WinkyDink (51,311 posts)
36. It's a very old Pop cultural reference.
Response to HAB911 (Original post)
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 09:55 AM
Thor_MN (11,843 posts)
9. Link to the actual list, rather than a story about the list
Response to Thor_MN (Reply #9)
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 11:02 AM
TomVilmer (1,771 posts)
18. Thanx for direct link...
... the layout of that list embedded on another company's page is deeply untrustworthy
![]() |
Response to Thor_MN (Reply #9)
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 01:50 PM
Duppers (26,263 posts)
28. "DemocraticUnderground.com"!
What? LOL.
|
Response to Duppers (Reply #28)
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 03:19 PM
Thor_MN (11,843 posts)
29. WTF? I didn't see that on there until you pointed it out.
Response to Thor_MN (Reply #29)
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 04:27 PM
Duppers (26,263 posts)
32. Really, WTF? How can they ding a forum linking to real articles?
Last edited Mon Apr 24, 2017, 12:28 AM - Edit history (1) Why not ding other forums? This is nuts.
Can we contact the authors? |
Response to HAB911 (Original post)
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 09:56 AM
ProfessorPlum (11,182 posts)
10. important, if exhausting, work
thanks to politifact for taking this on.
|
Response to HAB911 (Original post)
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 11:07 AM
left-of-center2012 (34,195 posts)
19. From the linked article ...
I liked this one:
"Sarah Palin Calls To Boycott Mall Of America Because 'Santa Was Always White In The Bible.' " This story referred to a factual development: Minnesota's Mall of America hiring its first black Santa Claus. |
Response to HAB911 (Original post)
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 11:15 AM
WinkyDink (51,311 posts)
20. Is the NYT on the list? What about the US Govt? And who scrutinizes the gate-keepers?
Response to HAB911 (Original post)
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 11:29 AM
RDANGELO (3,201 posts)
23. There needs to be some kind of law,
where you can't portray yourself as an information disseminater and knowingly put out fake news.
|
Response to RDANGELO (Reply #23)
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 04:20 PM
Jim Lane (11,175 posts)
33. That would be wide open to abuse.
According to some people (including some with enforcement authority), it's fake news to say that single-payer health care would reduce total administrative costs and provide better care for less money.
We have the First Amendment, for better or worse. |
Response to HAB911 (Original post)
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 12:24 PM
BumRushDaShow (109,780 posts)
25. Notice that Free Republic, Breitbart, Blaze, Drudge, Daily Caller
or hardly ANY RW bullshit and CT sites are on the list.
But DU is. Surprise surprise. ![]() |
Response to HAB911 (Original post)
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 12:48 PM
killbotfactory (13,566 posts)
26. Read past the headline
If it's full of inflammatory accusations and isn't sourced, consider it bullshit.
Propaganda wasn't invented during this election cycle. |
Response to killbotfactory (Reply #26)
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 01:32 PM
HAB911 (8,220 posts)
27. Are you saying PolitiFact is bullshit?
Response to HAB911 (Reply #27)
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 03:36 PM
killbotfactory (13,566 posts)
30. Not at all
![]() Bullshit propaganda is not a new phenomenon, and it's strange to me that people are shocked that organized groups will lie to push an agenda. |