Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 08:39 PM Apr 2017

This message was self-deleted by its author

This message was self-deleted by its author (Ken Burch) on Thu Apr 27, 2017, 03:52 AM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.

221 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This message was self-deleted by its author (Original Post) Ken Burch Apr 2017 OP
Seems legit. dchill Apr 2017 #1
who is Warren Buffett voting for. He is a Democrat that likes to make Jim Beard Apr 2017 #106
He is also pro choice and has given to Planned Parenthood Alice11111 Apr 2017 #131
I thought the primaries ended last summer. Voltaire2 Apr 2017 #2
Me too. But some people are STILL campaigning against Bernie Ken Burch Apr 2017 #5
You are right KB, we ALL need to accept the fact Hillary lost to Trump. NOT Bernie! JoeOtterbein Apr 2017 #24
Bernie might want to check what his consituents think of him right now ehrnst Apr 2017 #66
Still the highest In the Senate karynnj Apr 2017 #104
All the Senators topping this list have small, white, primarily rural homogenous populations ehrnst Apr 2017 #189
Gas lighting doesn't work here, we can read Sanders RECENT statements and still think they're shitty uponit7771 Apr 2017 #28
+1000 (nt) ehrnst Apr 2017 #65
Gas lighting is in the running for the most useless fad word. Nt karynnj Apr 2017 #105
Its valid here, people are questioning the ire at Sanders as if there were no unfair bashing of the uponit7771 Apr 2017 #116
Buzzwords and bumpersticker slogans only work the first Exilednight Apr 2017 #152
Yep karynnj Apr 2017 #157
Gaslighting for the left... (nt) ehrnst Apr 2017 #190
Yes, they are still campaigning. zentrum Apr 2017 #40
Kaine has a 100% rating from NARAL lapucelle Apr 2017 #203
Oh God, okay... zentrum Apr 2017 #212
I'm disputing the Kaine - Mello lapucelle Apr 2017 #215
I know. zentrum Apr 2017 #218
He's been made outreach director of the Democrats. Last I heard, this board is called ehrnst Apr 2017 #64
He is still the highest of any Senator in that poll. Nt karynnj Apr 2017 #107
Among his constituents. All the top Senators in that list are from small, very homogenous ehrnst Apr 2017 #110
He is strongest in the most diverse, progressive town in the state karynnj Apr 2017 #115
He's the most popular Dem senator in his home state of all. Ken Burch Apr 2017 #119
You're right, the Dem primaries were over months ago but this pro-lifer was... brush Apr 2017 #117
Actually, Sanders also endorsed lapucelle Apr 2017 #209
You have nothing to say on his failure to endorse Ossoff for an immediate House seat? brush Apr 2017 #217
I've been saying a lot about it on other threads. lapucelle Apr 2017 #219
Burn him at the stake. Alice11111 Apr 2017 #132
But Bernie does not have the all important "D" behind his name. guillaumeb Apr 2017 #3
Even though he's more of a Democrat mac56 Apr 2017 #8
Which begs the question of who defines what a Democrat is. guillaumeb Apr 2017 #9
In what ways? (nt) ehrnst Apr 2017 #111
That's got npthing to do with it.. it's his divisive Cha Apr 2017 #27
There are many issues that divide Democrats. guillaumeb Apr 2017 #80
BS gets on TV all the time to Insult the Dems.. big Cha Apr 2017 #98
Some see division, some see needed critical analysis. guillaumeb Apr 2017 #100
As with Bernie's statements relegating women's health to a "social issue" ehrnst Apr 2017 #113
The Democrats unity tour fractured into disunity almost immediately after it began. Senator Bernie Cha Apr 2017 #130
Given that there can be many possible definitions of what progressive means, guillaumeb Apr 2017 #169
So if Ted Cruz said he was progressive, you would agree? ehrnst Apr 2017 #198
Obviously for Our Revolution, lapucelle Apr 2017 #210
Elizabeth Warren also endorsed Perriello. guillaumeb Apr 2017 #211
I have no problem calling Warren out on both this lapucelle Apr 2017 #213
Not in terms of social justice issues. (nt) ehrnst Apr 2017 #112
I believe that Sanders ranks the issues differently. guillaumeb Apr 2017 #120
We disagree on the definition of "dismiss." ehrnst Apr 2017 #193
Bernie SAYS he's not a Democrat. Why shouldn't we believe him? n/t pnwmom Apr 2017 #41
I am a believer in socialism, and describe myself that way. guillaumeb Apr 2017 #81
The post I was responding to was addressing the question of whether Bernie pnwmom Apr 2017 #92
I feel that his criticism is intended to be constructive. guillaumeb Apr 2017 #99
That's probably his intention but the effect is more often destructive.It lends to the misperception pnwmom Apr 2017 #101
AN excellent point, and I agree. guillaumeb Apr 2017 #102
You mean like "dismiss" them as a distraction to the "universal" ehrnst Apr 2017 #194
Class and economic issues affect everyone. guillaumeb Apr 2017 #204
No, but it does disqualify you as a Democratic Candidate if you disagree with the platform. (nt) ehrnst Apr 2017 #114
But US parties are NOT parliamentary style parties. guillaumeb Apr 2017 #122
I didn't say that they were. ehrnst Apr 2017 #195
If Cruz had a "D" behind his name, would he be considered one? guillaumeb Apr 2017 #205
My ideology is Democratic Socialist too. I always vote Dem, Alice11111 Apr 2017 #133
Why didn't he campaign for Ossoff to get an immediate House seat... brush Apr 2017 #47
I would agree that he could have done both. guillaumeb Apr 2017 #82
Why didn't the DNC? nt Kirkwood Apr 2017 #153
Who is the outreach chairman? brush Apr 2017 #155
So Bernie decides who the DNC supports and who they don't? Kirkwood Apr 2017 #160
So you don't think helping Ossoff gain a US House seat falls under the outreach ... brush Apr 2017 #164
The selection and omission are definitely deliberate ehrnst Apr 2017 #196
I'll say. Because as Outreach director, he's tasked ehrnst Apr 2017 #182
Tom Perez went to Georgia in fact and did campaign with Ossoff... Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #168
We're talking about going before the primary election, not after. nt Kirkwood Apr 2017 #171
Which primary? (nt) ehrnst Apr 2017 #173
No, the division is the sin treestar Apr 2017 #75
And the same holds for W. Virginia, and Missouri. guillaumeb Apr 2017 #83
So why does he rail against Dems with a progressive record that casts a single vote ehrnst Apr 2017 #199
I cannot answer for Sanders. Obviously. guillaumeb Apr 2017 #206
Imagine if we extended that sort of understanding to a presidential election ehrnst Apr 2017 #174
Being outside the DNC establishment is also a sin he commited. romanic Apr 2017 #118
In what way is he "outside the Democratic establishment"? ehrnst Apr 2017 #175
Post removed Post removed Apr 2017 #176
Can you be more specific? (nt) ehrnst Apr 2017 #178
This message was self-deleted by its author JTFrog Apr 2017 #184
Sen Sanders is not a Democrat. musette_sf Apr 2017 #125
His current party affiliation is all one needs to believe this. ehrnst Apr 2017 #180
The Primary is over SirBrockington Apr 2017 #4
Agreed. Which means that no one should be vilifying the guy any more Ken Burch Apr 2017 #6
No one should criticize him because it might drive him away. To where? Demit Apr 2017 #15
Good grief! He said "vilify" not "criticize". cheapdate Apr 2017 #29
I agree that they are different words. They even have different letters! Demit Apr 2017 #46
Make honest arguments and I'll unstick the cap-lock. Deal? cheapdate Apr 2017 #54
But the poster didn't specify that they made a distinction. (nt) ehrnst Apr 2017 #187
It was unequivocally a direct reply to the post that preceded it. cheapdate Apr 2017 #216
There is a difference between "vilifying" and legitimate criticism. moriah Apr 2017 #97
I don't think that critiquing him on his current job is "vilifying" or 'refighting the primary: ehrnst Apr 2017 #185
Biden is not in the Senate. Nt karynnj Apr 2017 #108
Biden isn't VP or Senator anymore as of January. (nt) ehrnst Apr 2017 #186
you have posted this several times and each time it has been pointed out to be inaccurate dsc Apr 2017 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author Ken Burch Apr 2017 #13
So you would accept that logic on banning a minimum wage dsc Apr 2017 #17
What matters is that Bernie didn't endorse Mello when the guy was doing those things. Ken Burch Apr 2017 #18
I have no problem with him endorsing Mello dsc Apr 2017 #19
+1, I don't like the ideological purism except when it comes to social issues folk. If Mello looked uponit7771 Apr 2017 #26
Mello voted for a law that denied insurance for abortion, and a 20 week ban...so Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #94
So now, Bernie is OK with things that people voted for in the past? ehrnst Apr 2017 #188
Oh, so, if he had made a protest vote wouldn't have made a difference? ehrnst Apr 2017 #67
What about this? Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #72
Yes, you are right. This is a TERRIBLE candidate, and look who is endorsing him Eliot Rosewater Apr 2017 #103
It's the selection and deliberate omission in who earns the blessing of "progressive" ehrnst Apr 2017 #197
Yes he did actually vote to restrict choice. Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #95
He voted for a 20 week ban. That is a deal breaker. Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #109
+1 La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2017 #37
Post removed Post removed Apr 2017 #10
not representing truth Cane4Dems Apr 2017 #11
Clearly not. (nt) ehrnst Apr 2017 #192
Not factual. sheshe2 Apr 2017 #12
Well.... sheshe2 Apr 2017 #14
There were two candidates in this race. Ken Burch Apr 2017 #20
First of all sheshe2 Apr 2017 #22
I called Mello's campaign office rpannier Apr 2017 #31
Happy to say that voting for them is not a 'choice' sheshe2 Apr 2017 #36
How very nuanced of you rpannier Apr 2017 #38
!!! Alice11111 Apr 2017 #135
Bernie said Jane Kleeb NE D party chair called him Omaha Steve Apr 2017 #140
not doubting it rpannier Apr 2017 #141
I agree we shouldn't be dwelling on the Omaha mayor's race. Ken Burch Apr 2017 #49
This message was self-deleted by its author tammywammy Apr 2017 #51
I agree that it is being used as a catalyst ehrnst Apr 2017 #70
There can be no economic justice without Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #73
I AGREE with you that there can be no economic justice WITHOUT social justice. Ken Burch Apr 2017 #138
I wish that was the actual thinking, but the reality is, when you say ehrnst Apr 2017 #151
I'm not dismissing any of that myself. Ken Burch Apr 2017 #170
Nebraska has a split electoral system. In 2008, we got 1 blue vote Alice11111 Apr 2017 #136
We do need to understand what the actual mistakes were before ehrnst Apr 2017 #172
I'll answer one of your questions. Exilednight Apr 2017 #158
So, why did Bernie choose this particular race and not the GA 6 to draw attention to? ehrnst Apr 2017 #68
Jane Kleeb from Our Revolution is the chair of the Nebraska Democratic party. Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #96
Ah, the one who went on about how we can have pro-forced birth Democrats.. ehrnst Apr 2017 #143
That is the one. Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #146
They are equating "pro-choice" with "pro-abortion," and "pro-life" with a moral stance ehrnst Apr 2017 #150
Yes which is why I looked at the voting records of both Mello and Perriello (VA Governor's race) Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #154
And interestingly enough Perriello "the true progressive" is taking dark money ehrnst Apr 2017 #156
I know...everything that the former party Purists complained about ...Perriello does...but for Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #161
And with anti-choice votes on his record, but still strongly endorsed. (nt) ehrnst Apr 2017 #162
I don't know why Bernie made the choices that he made there. Ken Burch Apr 2017 #137
will energize progressives and encourage strong candidates to run in 2018 Omaha Steve Apr 2017 #142
Why was Bernie compelled to say something about a mayoral race in NE? Zing Zing Zingbah Apr 2017 #129
So where was Bernie in the Ossoff race, rather than pointedly refusing to call him a progressive. ehrnst Apr 2017 #191
I honestly don't know what he was thinking there. Ken Burch Apr 2017 #208
No it was not identical and you know that. boston bean Apr 2017 #16
There were many much more pro-choice people HRC could have put on the ticket. Ken Burch Apr 2017 #48
"Tim Kaine is pro-choice, not pro-death" Cha Apr 2017 #50
Mello has pledged that, as mayor, he will effectively defend choice. Ken Burch Apr 2017 #53
Omaha Mayoral Candidate Under Fire For Anti-Choice Past Vows To Protect Reproductive Rights Cha Apr 2017 #56
You could have done all that without accusing Bernie of selling you out. Ken Burch Apr 2017 #57
Women's BackLash, Against Mello, Worked! Cha Apr 2017 #58
This was all set in motion by Bernie's selective endorsements ehrnst Apr 2017 #71
I do consider it a sell out of women's rights. Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #74
But it's the deliberate refusal to call Ossoff progressive, in a race that is far more ehrnst Apr 2017 #200
OK, I think he should have and should still call Ossoff progressive Ken Burch Apr 2017 #207
Actually, Kaine got a 100% from NARAL ehrnst Apr 2017 #69
Yup. Thank You eom Arazi Apr 2017 #21
Wow... 3 Threads On The Same Subject In A Matter Of Hours Me. Apr 2017 #23
I know SCantiGOP Apr 2017 #25
By The Same Poster No Less Me. Apr 2017 #34
I know, right? Because DU rules specify sharing only one article on a topic per member ehrnst Apr 2017 #144
Probably because this topic became the issue du joir for like 3 days in a row rpannier Apr 2017 #32
I Get That Me. Apr 2017 #159
ERMEGERD - did you see all the Ivanka in Berlin posts in as many hours???? ehrnst Apr 2017 #201
Totally Me. Apr 2017 #202
Defense of alt left hero. La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2017 #45
Bernie Sanders is not a democrat LostinRed Apr 2017 #30
And I am guessing, this will go on for another billion rpannier Apr 2017 #33
Saw the vid clip of Tom Perez shouting Bernie, Bernie, Bernie? Guess dae Apr 2017 #42
Perhaps some background might soften your view... perhaps not. This is being left out of the JudyM Apr 2017 #78
How many times are you going to sum up murielm99 Apr 2017 #35
How many times does it take to make a lie into a reality La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2017 #44
That is FALSE and you know it. Tim Kaine has never taken these positions: pnwmom Apr 2017 #39
Some people will lie through their teeth to defend their hero La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2017 #43
good god... chillfactor Apr 2017 #52
And next... fleabiscuit Apr 2017 #55
Kaine has a solid pro-choice voting record. Mello does not. emulatorloo Apr 2017 #59
Tim Kaine had the same positions as the Candidate for Mayor of Omaha in some matters... LovingA2andMI Apr 2017 #60
Yeah. Or people are lying about tim Kaine La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2017 #61
Not on women. Tim Kaine never voted against women - he got 100% from NARAL. ehrnst Apr 2017 #63
Kaine has a solid pro-choice voting record. Mello doesn't emulatorloo Apr 2017 #76
Yes....Bernie Is Capable of Defending Himself... LovingA2andMI Apr 2017 #79
I would vote for Mello if I lived in Omaha. But I don't need to misrepresent Kaine's voting record. emulatorloo Apr 2017 #84
Was Tim Kaine PREVIOUSLY.... LovingA2andMI Apr 2017 #85
He's got a 100% rating from Naral. He has a solid Pro-choice record, Mello doesn't. emulatorloo Apr 2017 #86
PREVIOUSLY....Defined Means.... LovingA2andMI Apr 2017 #87
"Promoting" adoption doesn't restrict access to safe and legal abortion. emulatorloo Apr 2017 #88
"promoting adoption and abstinence-focused education" LovingA2andMI Apr 2017 #89
"How do you feel about not allowing insurance to cover abortion" emulatorloo Apr 2017 #91
Nope. Tim Kaine never voted against women - he got 100% from NARAL. ehrnst Apr 2017 #62
And this must not go unpunished. n/t Orsino Apr 2017 #77
Sick of the condescending mansplaing and nondemocrat complaining about dems. we can do it Apr 2017 #90
Doesn't mansplaining suggest that men's opinions don't really count? FiveGoodMen Apr 2017 #139
Let me know when Tim Kaine's voting record looks like gestational slaver Mello: musette_sf Apr 2017 #93
No. That's incomplete. And you know it. NurseJackie Apr 2017 #121
The pro-corporate wing of the party is scared that his economic message will destroy their funding. killbotfactory Apr 2017 #123
Bingo. n/t QC Apr 2017 #134
That is nonsense. Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #147
Abortion rights will only get thrown under the bus if you let republicans win. Nt killbotfactory Apr 2017 #166
Sorry...endorsing an anti-choice candidate shows a willingness to shelve reproductive rights Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #167
"will not work to restrict choice" musette_sf Apr 2017 #124
Because Senator Sanders has NEVER castigated someone on the basis of their past votes ehrnst Apr 2017 #145
No betrayal. elleng Apr 2017 #126
So we become a 50 state party by throwing civil rights under the bus... Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #149
No such thing. elleng Apr 2017 #163
I heard his words...about pro-choice ...and the normalization movement of of anti-choice candidates Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #165
Long past time for the Bernie bashing to stop left-of-center2012 Apr 2017 #127
Long past time, for some to understand that when Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #148
Tim Kaine has a 100% rating from NARAL, lapucelle Apr 2017 #128
Keep beating that dead horse a bit longer...nt comradebillyboy Apr 2017 #177
And that whole Keystone XL Pipeline thing? Blue_Tires Apr 2017 #179
Not sure where you're going with that question Ken Burch Apr 2017 #181
But Tim Kaine never sponsored a bill to restrict (via sensationalism, i.e., ultrasounds) abortion. George II Apr 2017 #183
And so did Elizabeth Warren............. guillaumeb Apr 2017 #214
Yet 220 replies. Dorian Gray Apr 2017 #220
Self-deleting this thread because I did more harm than good in posting it. Ken Burch Apr 2017 #221

dchill

(38,471 posts)
1. Seems legit.
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 08:40 PM
Apr 2017
 

Jim Beard

(2,535 posts)
106. who is Warren Buffett voting for. He is a Democrat that likes to make
Tue Apr 25, 2017, 03:04 PM
Apr 2017

money and he is from Omaha.

Alice11111

(5,730 posts)
131. He is also pro choice and has given to Planned Parenthood
Tue Apr 25, 2017, 11:09 PM
Apr 2017

Voltaire2

(13,009 posts)
2. I thought the primaries ended last summer.
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 08:41 PM
Apr 2017
 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
5. Me too. But some people are STILL campaigning against Bernie
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 08:42 PM
Apr 2017

even though the primaries are over.

The man committed no betrayal.

JoeOtterbein

(7,700 posts)
24. You are right KB, we ALL need to accept the fact Hillary lost to Trump. NOT Bernie!
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 10:16 PM
Apr 2017
 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
66. Bernie might want to check what his consituents think of him right now
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 08:15 AM
Apr 2017

Down 12% in approval rating, and up 9% in disapproval rating since September.

karynnj

(59,501 posts)
104. Still the highest In the Senate
Tue Apr 25, 2017, 03:00 PM
Apr 2017

I assume you must think all the lower ranked Senators must be even more concerned.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
189. All the Senators topping this list have small, white, primarily rural homogenous populations
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 06:51 PM
Apr 2017

Because those small white homogenous primarily populations agree on things way more than diverse populations.

And Bernie is on a downward trend. Leahy is going to pass him by July at this rate.

uponit7771

(90,335 posts)
28. Gas lighting doesn't work here, we can read Sanders RECENT statements and still think they're shitty
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 10:40 PM
Apr 2017
 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
65. +1000 (nt)
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 08:14 AM
Apr 2017

karynnj

(59,501 posts)
105. Gas lighting is in the running for the most useless fad word. Nt
Tue Apr 25, 2017, 03:02 PM
Apr 2017

uponit7771

(90,335 posts)
116. Its valid here, people are questioning the ire at Sanders as if there were no unfair bashing of the
Tue Apr 25, 2017, 05:10 PM
Apr 2017

... DNC.

There is unfair bashing of the DNC seeing what Sanders DOES NOT say

Exilednight

(9,359 posts)
152. Buzzwords and bumpersticker slogans only work the first
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 09:43 AM
Apr 2017

time they are used. Anyone who repeats them just shows their lack of depth on a given subject.

My favorite game at work is sitting in meetings and spotting the moron who uses words like "synergy", "outside the box", "amplify" or my favorite to spot the stupid "ideate".

People resort to these words when they have nothing useful to add to the discussion and/or debate, but want to project a sense of knowledge or cleverness. Little do they realise they are doing the opposite.

karynnj

(59,501 posts)
157. Yep
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 10:00 AM
Apr 2017

Years ago, when I worked for the technical arm of a major company, when a group of us had to attend a meeting led by the Marketing department, someone created a list of buzz words and we voted before hand on which would be used most often. We then all tallied them as they were said by the manager saying them. It was amazing how many times most were used and how one person in particular, a fast track manager who few of us respected, seemed unable to complete a sentence without at least one buzz word.

Afterwards it was funny that we were praised by some these managers for listening and diligently taking notes.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
190. Gaslighting for the left... (nt)
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 06:52 PM
Apr 2017

zentrum

(9,865 posts)
40. Yes, they are still campaigning.
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 11:37 PM
Apr 2017

It's been quite something over the last two weeks. Thanks for nailing this issue. Mello is not worse than Kaine.

lapucelle

(18,250 posts)
203. Kaine has a 100% rating from NARAL
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 08:17 PM
Apr 2017

and their statement of strong support for his vice-presidential nomination.

Sanders endorsement of Mello earned a statement of condemnation from NARAL, Mello lied about havng a 100% rating and an endorsement from the pro-choice advocacy group Planned Parenthood Nebraska Voters.

PPNV also disputes Mello's claim that he voted with Planned Parenthood 100% of the time. He voted against their position three times, all abortion related.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/omaha-mayoral-candidate-under-fire-says-he-would-never-do-anything-to-restrict-access-to-reproductive-health-care_us_58f8e868e4b018a9ce590a84







zentrum

(9,865 posts)
212. Oh God, okay...
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 08:59 PM
Apr 2017

...bring on the Republican candidate.

lapucelle

(18,250 posts)
215. I'm disputing the Kaine - Mello
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 09:38 PM
Apr 2017

comparison. That particular talking point is is demonstrably false.

zentrum

(9,865 posts)
218. I know.
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 10:09 PM
Apr 2017
 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
64. He's been made outreach director of the Democrats. Last I heard, this board is called
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 08:14 AM
Apr 2017

Democratic underground.

If he was simply doing his job as the Independent Senator from VT, he would not be hearing from Democrats about what he is doing in that position.

The fact that he has dropped 12% in his constituent approval rating since September might reflect all that he has been doing on behalf of the DNC.

Is that clearer?

karynnj

(59,501 posts)
107. He is still the highest of any Senator in that poll. Nt
Tue Apr 25, 2017, 03:04 PM
Apr 2017
 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
110. Among his constituents. All the top Senators in that list are from small, very homogenous
Tue Apr 25, 2017, 03:16 PM
Apr 2017

white populations, where there's not a lot of diversity, and therefore not a lot to disagree about.

And he's slipping, and Leahy's rising, so I have to wonder why that is.

karynnj

(59,501 posts)
115. He is strongest in the most diverse, progressive town in the state
Tue Apr 25, 2017, 03:26 PM
Apr 2017

By the way, BOTH of those attributes owe something to him. He was mayor in the late 1980s when hittenton county became a refugee resettlement center aND he was an excellent progressive mayor.

Have you ever been to Burlington or Vermont for that matter?

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
119. He's the most popular Dem senator in his home state of all.
Tue Apr 25, 2017, 07:25 PM
Apr 2017

Nobody to his right on economics would be more popular, or capable of doing anything progressive if elected.

brush

(53,764 posts)
117. You're right, the Dem primaries were over months ago but this pro-lifer was...
Tue Apr 25, 2017, 06:58 PM
Apr 2017

endorsed this month and Ossoff wasn't.

Huge difference.

lapucelle

(18,250 posts)
209. Actually, Sanders also endorsed
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 08:29 PM
Apr 2017

Tom Perriello in the VA gubernatorial Democratic primary, another politician with a pro-life record who now has "no recorded stance on abortion" in his On the Issues profile.

Ralph Northam (Perriello's opponent in the primary) received an endorsement from NARAL earlier this week.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/virginia-politics/abortion-rights-group-naral-endorses-northam-in-virginia-democratic-primary/2017/03/13/7e6d401c-080d-11e7-b77c-0047d15a24e0_story.html?utm_term=.0facd5c0c49f

brush

(53,764 posts)
217. You have nothing to say on his failure to endorse Ossoff for an immediate House seat?
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 10:03 PM
Apr 2017

lapucelle

(18,250 posts)
219. I've been saying a lot about it on other threads.
Thu Apr 27, 2017, 06:38 AM
Apr 2017

I find it very extremely disturbing that he refused to endorse a Democrat over a Republican based on the ridiculous assertion that he didn't know enough about his credentials as a "progressive".

Alice11111

(5,730 posts)
132. Burn him at the stake.
Tue Apr 25, 2017, 11:10 PM
Apr 2017

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
3. But Bernie does not have the all important "D" behind his name.
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 08:41 PM
Apr 2017

SO he cannot be a "real Democrat" even if his positions on the issues put him firmly in the left-progressive wing of the political spectrum. That lack of a "D" is a sin.

mac56

(17,566 posts)
8. Even though he's more of a Democrat
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 08:47 PM
Apr 2017

than at least half of her party.

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
9. Which begs the question of who defines what a Democrat is.
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 08:53 PM
Apr 2017

Given that there are no parliamentary type parties in the US, with a defined platform that must be supported, we are left with people being self-defined as Democrats and that self-definition includes people who are against abortion and who do not support Federal funding for abortion.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
111. In what ways? (nt)
Tue Apr 25, 2017, 03:16 PM
Apr 2017

Cha

(297,154 posts)
27. That's got npthing to do with it.. it's his divisive
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 10:39 PM
Apr 2017

rhetoric. Gratuitously insulting the Democratic Party.

Of course he's not a Dem.. no Democratic Senator would get on the tv all the time and harangue on the Party that's on the Front Lines Fighting against the Fascistrumps.

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
80. There are many issues that divide Democrats.
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 11:45 AM
Apr 2017

Accepting corporate money, abortion access, war, and others. More conservative Democrats like Joe Manchin and Dan Lipinski and Claire McCaskill do not hold the same positions as some very liberal Democrats. But there are points of agreement.

And no matter who he endorses, or what letter is behind his name, Bernie Sanders is firmly in the very liberal camp.

Cha

(297,154 posts)
98. BS gets on TV all the time to Insult the Dems.. big
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 07:09 PM
Apr 2017

Divider.

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
100. Some see division, some see needed critical analysis.
Tue Apr 25, 2017, 02:51 PM
Apr 2017

I believe that 8 years of steady losses at the State and National levels show the need for criticism and rebuilding the base.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
113. As with Bernie's statements relegating women's health to a "social issue"
Tue Apr 25, 2017, 03:20 PM
Apr 2017

need some critical analysis.

Bernie has slipped in the approval ratings among his constituents, so there might be some room for criticism and rebuilding his support in Vermont, where he was sent to DC to represent their interests.

He's still doing that, in the sense trying to make those interests those of Democratic candidates in other states, which are a bit more diverse than Vermont.

Cha

(297,154 posts)
130. The Democrats unity tour fractured into disunity almost immediately after it began. Senator Bernie
Tue Apr 25, 2017, 10:43 PM
Apr 2017
Sanders of Vermont refused to say whether Jon Ossoff, the Democratic candidate trying to win a typically Republican district in Georgia while being outspoken in support of abortion rights, counts as a progressive"

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/25/opinion/why-abortion-is-an-progressive-economic-issue.html?action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=opinion-c-col-left-region

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
169. Given that there can be many possible definitions of what progressive means,
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 02:54 PM
Apr 2017

that label means whatever the speaker or listener feels that it means.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
198. So if Ted Cruz said he was progressive, you would agree?
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 07:11 PM
Apr 2017

And certainly Bernie has a very specific litmus test for what he thinks is progressive, and it has to do with how closely they adhere to his opinion.

Many here use that definition.

lapucelle

(18,250 posts)
210. Obviously for Our Revolution,
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 08:41 PM
Apr 2017

being progressive has little to do with securing and defending basic rights for women.

Both Sanders and Our Revolution have endorsed Tom Perriello over his opponent in the VA Democratic gubernatorial primary.

It didn't bother Our Revolution that Perriello has "no recorded stance" on the abortion issue according to his profile at On the Issues.

The candidate with a pro life record and who now refuses to reveal his position was endorsed nonetheless.

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
211. Elizabeth Warren also endorsed Perriello.
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 08:45 PM
Apr 2017

So, will we see a number of posts discussing Warren's choice?

lapucelle

(18,250 posts)
213. I have no problem calling Warren out on both this
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 09:18 PM
Apr 2017

and Perriello's second amendment views. Warren has a professional history with Perriello, so she knows he's strong on consumer protection issues, but that's not enough for me.

Northam


Perriello

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
112. Not in terms of social justice issues. (nt)
Tue Apr 25, 2017, 03:17 PM
Apr 2017

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
120. I believe that Sanders ranks the issues differently.
Tue Apr 25, 2017, 09:11 PM
Apr 2017

But that does not mean that he dismisses the issues.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
193. We disagree on the definition of "dismiss."
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 07:00 PM
Apr 2017

"Once you get off of the social issues abortion, gay rights, guns and into the economic issues, here is a lot more agreement than the pundits understand." Bernie Sanders, July 9, 2015
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/weekend-with-bernie-sanders-20150709

Get off? "social issues" and not "healthcare and basic employment protections that are integral to any economic justice?"

“These are guys getting hung up on gay marriage issues,” Sanders told Schultz. “They’re getting hung up on abortion issues. And it is time we started focusing on the economic issues that bring us together: Defending Social Security, defending Medicare, making sure that Medicaid is not cut, that veterans’ programs are not cut.” Bernie Sanders 2013

ttp://www.rawstory.com/2013/10/bernie-sanders-tells-ed-schultz-southern-democrats-are-tired-of-being-abandoned-by-the-party/

"Getting hung up?"

Of course if you are someone who supports the criminalization of abortion - against the consensus of all the mainstream medical organizations, well, that might not seem like such a bad thing to "prioritize" lower.

Right?

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
41. Bernie SAYS he's not a Democrat. Why shouldn't we believe him? n/t
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 11:37 PM
Apr 2017

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
81. I am a believer in socialism, and describe myself that way.
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 11:47 AM
Apr 2017

But I voted for Clinton in 2016 as the far better candidate. So does my belief in socialism disqualify me from any criticism of what I see as weaknesses in Democratic positions?

Sanders also said he voted for Clinton.

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
92. The post I was responding to was addressing the question of whether Bernie
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 01:43 PM
Apr 2017

was a real Democrat.

He doesn't claim to be a real Democrat

What bothers me about him isn't the lack of a D next to his name. It's that much of his "support" of Democrats consists of scolding and disparaging them.

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
99. I feel that his criticism is intended to be constructive.
Tue Apr 25, 2017, 02:47 PM
Apr 2017

My personal view of course.

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
101. That's probably his intention but the effect is more often destructive.It lends to the misperception
Tue Apr 25, 2017, 02:53 PM
Apr 2017

that the Dems are as bad as the Rethugs.

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
102. AN excellent point, and I agree.
Tue Apr 25, 2017, 02:56 PM
Apr 2017

I also feel that he allows economics and class analysis to take priority over racism and sexism and all the other things that divide.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
194. You mean like "dismiss" them as a distraction to the "universal"
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 07:06 PM
Apr 2017

issues that directly affect white straight men?

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
204. Class and economic issues affect everyone.
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 08:21 PM
Apr 2017
 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
114. No, but it does disqualify you as a Democratic Candidate if you disagree with the platform. (nt)
Tue Apr 25, 2017, 03:21 PM
Apr 2017

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
122. But US parties are NOT parliamentary style parties.
Tue Apr 25, 2017, 09:13 PM
Apr 2017

I grew up in a place with a parliamentary system. The official platform is supported by all elected politicians in a parliamentary system. If not, the parties deal with differing members.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
195. I didn't say that they were.
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 07:07 PM
Apr 2017

If Ted Cruz decided to run as a Democrat, would you consider him one?

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
205. If Cruz had a "D" behind his name, would he be considered one?
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 08:22 PM
Apr 2017

Alice11111

(5,730 posts)
133. My ideology is Democratic Socialist too. I always vote Dem,
Tue Apr 25, 2017, 11:22 PM
Apr 2017

and I'm a hard working member of the Dem Party. Still, I would like to see it be a stronger party and embrace socially humane standards more strongly. Some elected officisls do, and as a whole we are doing much better. The masses are rising up.

brush

(53,764 posts)
47. Why didn't he campaign for Ossoff to get an immediate House seat...
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 12:05 AM
Apr 2017

instead of campaigning for an obscure mayoral race in Utah?

And people are upset because he could have done both.

Priorities, Mr outreach chairman.

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
82. I would agree that he could have done both.
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 11:48 AM
Apr 2017

Assuming time and energy permitted.

 

Kirkwood

(58 posts)
153. Why didn't the DNC? nt
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 09:47 AM
Apr 2017

brush

(53,764 posts)
155. Who is the outreach chairman?
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 09:55 AM
Apr 2017
 

Kirkwood

(58 posts)
160. So Bernie decides who the DNC supports and who they don't?
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 10:24 AM
Apr 2017

And only him?

Wow. That's some unbelievable power they gave him.

brush

(53,764 posts)
164. So you don't think helping Ossoff gain a US House seat falls under the outreach ...
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 11:29 AM
Apr 2017

chairman's responsibility but helping in an obscure mayoral race does?

Why not both?

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
196. The selection and omission are definitely deliberate
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 07:08 PM
Apr 2017

and say a lot.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
182. I'll say. Because as Outreach director, he's tasked
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 06:27 PM
Apr 2017

with actually bringing people into the party, in a public way.

He accepted the position, and one would like to think that he was serious when he did.

Demsrule86

(68,552 posts)
168. Tom Perez went to Georgia in fact and did campaign with Ossoff...
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 02:43 PM
Apr 2017
 

Kirkwood

(58 posts)
171. We're talking about going before the primary election, not after. nt
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 03:23 PM
Apr 2017
 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
173. Which primary? (nt)
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 05:35 PM
Apr 2017

treestar

(82,383 posts)
75. No, the division is the sin
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 08:50 AM
Apr 2017

But Nebraska is Nebraska - it's so deep red, no Democrats would ever get elected if we did not give them some space.

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
83. And the same holds for W. Virginia, and Missouri.
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 11:50 AM
Apr 2017

And Sanders seems to be working on a 50 state approach that recognizes that voters in all states are not receptive to the exact same message.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
199. So why does he rail against Dems with a progressive record that casts a single vote
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 07:13 PM
Apr 2017

against an single symbolic amendment that Bernie has declared the test of a progressive?

That's certainly not a 50 state approach.

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
206. I cannot answer for Sanders. Obviously.
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 08:24 PM
Apr 2017

But the 50 state approach recognizes that there is no one single solution that appeals to all.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
174. Imagine if we extended that sort of understanding to a presidential election
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 05:38 PM
Apr 2017

which must, by virtue of the centrality of the office, require "space" that would allow them to encompass messaging to a population far, far, more diverse than someone who represents a small, very white, homogenous population would balk at.

romanic

(2,841 posts)
118. Being outside the DNC establishment is also a sin he commited.
Tue Apr 25, 2017, 07:03 PM
Apr 2017
 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
175. In what way is he "outside the Democratic establishment"?
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 05:39 PM
Apr 2017

Not sure what you mean. Please clarify.

Response to ehrnst (Reply #175)

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
178. Can you be more specific? (nt)
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 06:23 PM
Apr 2017

Response to Post removed (Reply #176)

musette_sf

(10,200 posts)
125. Sen Sanders is not a Democrat.
Tue Apr 25, 2017, 09:47 PM
Apr 2017

Period, end. He's not and never was a "real Democrat". Fact.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
180. His current party affiliation is all one needs to believe this.
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 06:24 PM
Apr 2017

Despite so much angst at the very idea.

SirBrockington

(259 posts)
4. The Primary is over
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 08:42 PM
Apr 2017

Senator Sanders is one of 48 members of the Democratic caucus along with Biden et al

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
6. Agreed. Which means that no one should be vilifying the guy any more
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 08:43 PM
Apr 2017

or trying to drive him away so he could be replaced by someone more subservient and conservative.

 

Demit

(11,238 posts)
15. No one should criticize him because it might drive him away. To where?
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 09:28 PM
Apr 2017

Where would he go? Would he be driven to form his own party? Is that what we're supposed to be afraid of? He might lead his followers, Pied Piper like, away from our two party system? He would blow everything up because he sees criticism as being "vilified"?

cheapdate

(3,811 posts)
29. Good grief! He said "vilify" not "criticize".
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 10:44 PM
Apr 2017

They are ENTIRELY DIFFERENT WORDS THAT MEAN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT THINGS!

The poster to whom you are replying NEVER SAID THAT CRITICISM WAS OFF LIMITS.

Stop making things up.

 

Demit

(11,238 posts)
46. I agree that they are different words. They even have different letters!
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 11:56 PM
Apr 2017

But they are not entirely different things. Calm down and unstick your caps key.

cheapdate

(3,811 posts)
54. Make honest arguments and I'll unstick the cap-lock. Deal?
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 12:41 AM
Apr 2017

Or don't. I don't really care all that much what you do. Twist the meaning however you want. Why not? Everyone else does it.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
187. But the poster didn't specify that they made a distinction. (nt)
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 06:45 PM
Apr 2017

cheapdate

(3,811 posts)
216. It was unequivocally a direct reply to the post that preceded it.
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 09:46 PM
Apr 2017

And the poster shifted the argument from 'don't vilify' to 'don't criticize.' It wasn't exactly subtle.

There's kind-of an informal "rule" in good-spirited debate to stay true to your opponent's arguments as best as you can and not twist or distort them. When you recap your opponent's argument for the purpose of rebutting it you should stay true to the argument as it was given.

Not a big deal in the grand scheme of things.

moriah

(8,311 posts)
97. There is a difference between "vilifying" and legitimate criticism.
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 02:05 PM
Apr 2017

You can look at my posts to see the difference. I just called out someone's suggestion that Bernie saying using threats of violence to suppress speech is a "sign of intellectual weakness" was in any way defending Ann Coulter herself.

-----

But there IS a difference between people like Kaine, who have never voted for anti-choice measures (and as governor did allow the "Choose Life" plates in VA but said he believed state law required it and would also require a "Trust Women" plate benefiting Planned Parenthood if proposed by the 350 individuals required) and Mello in the Nebraska Senate and Bob Casey in the US Senate from PA.

Casey did vote to avoid reinstating the "Mexico City" policy and has said he will defend Planned Parenthood, but he voted for cloture on an attempted 20-week abortion ban with only a life, not a health or even a "permanent damage" exception. Even though Casey knew there were enough votes to keep the bill from passing and that Obama would veto it if it ever hit his desk, he still used the opportunity to cast an anti-choice vote. Kaine voted against cloture, and has said repeatedly he wants both life and health exceptions in the 2nd half of the second trimester and beyond.

Fortunately as a mayor, Mello won't have a chance to do much related to abortion. That's the only reason I am okay with the DNC *or* Bernie supporting him until he at least states that he won't be co-sponsoring anti-choice legislation.

The question is what do we do if someone like Casey -- put up because the alternative in that seat is going to be rabidly anti-choice like Santorum -- won't toe the line and confine his attempts to show his personal beliefs to bills that won't go anywhere from here on out.

There are certain things that can't be compromised on.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
185. I don't think that critiquing him on his current job is "vilifying" or 'refighting the primary:
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 06:38 PM
Apr 2017

Ya think?

I think that Bernie can take it...

However, his constituents might be losing patience. He's down 12% among Vermont voters, and up 9% in his disapproval rating since last September.

Leahy is neck and neck with him now, so maybe Vermont is wearing thin on all the other stuff he's doing for a party that he didn't run under when they elected him.

https://morningconsult.com/senate-rankings-april-2017/

karynnj

(59,501 posts)
108. Biden is not in the Senate. Nt
Tue Apr 25, 2017, 03:07 PM
Apr 2017
 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
186. Biden isn't VP or Senator anymore as of January. (nt)
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 06:44 PM
Apr 2017

dsc

(52,155 posts)
7. you have posted this several times and each time it has been pointed out to be inaccurate
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 08:45 PM
Apr 2017

it is hard at this point to believe these are good faith errors. Kaine didn't restrict abortion, Mello did. You can tell all kinds of falsehoods in this regard but they are still false.

Response to dsc (Reply #7)

dsc

(52,155 posts)
17. So you would accept that logic on banning a minimum wage
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 09:32 PM
Apr 2017

or giving billions to some banker. that is horseshit. He voted for a ban on abortion after 20 weeks. I don't care if he did so on Mars or if his was the deciding vote or one of a margin of 1000.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
18. What matters is that Bernie didn't endorse Mello when the guy was doing those things.
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 09:49 PM
Apr 2017

Last edited Mon Apr 24, 2017, 04:42 AM - Edit history (2)

He endorsed Mello NOW...in a race where no candidate who filed had ALWAYS been unambiguously pro-choice and when the only opponent is a Neanderthal.

Refusing to endorse Melo would not have served the pro-choice cause. Mello wasn't going to withdraw and be replaced by someone else.

dsc

(52,155 posts)
19. I have no problem with him endorsing Mello
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 09:50 PM
Apr 2017

if he had also endorsed Ossoff. But he didn't. Instead he left him to twist in the wind and endorsed Mello.

uponit7771

(90,335 posts)
26. +1, I don't like the ideological purism except when it comes to social issues folk. If Mello looked
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 10:39 PM
Apr 2017

... at a dollar from a banker I bet he'd be thrown under the bus and backed up on by the holier than thous.

Demsrule86

(68,552 posts)
94. Mello voted for a law that denied insurance for abortion, and a 20 week ban...so
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 01:49 PM
Apr 2017

he was actively anti-choice.

"Mello is a sponsor of the final version of a 20-week abortion ban approved by the governor in 2010, and cast anti-choice votes in favor of requiring physicians to be physically present for an abortion in order to impede access to telemedicine abortion care, and a law banning insurance plans in the state from covering abortions. He was endorsed in 2010 by anti-choice group Nebraska Right to Life."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/omaha-mayoral-candidate-under-fire-says-he-would-never-do-anything-to-restrict-access-to-reproductive-health-care_us_58f8e868e4b018a9ce590a84

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
188. So now, Bernie is OK with things that people voted for in the past?
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 06:46 PM
Apr 2017

How about the Iraq war resolution, or stuff that a FLOTUS supported back in the 90's, because that would be HUGE!

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
67. Oh, so, if he had made a protest vote wouldn't have made a difference?
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 08:17 AM
Apr 2017

Wow. And here I thought that the Iraq Resolution vote required a protest vote from any True Progressive.

Demsrule86

(68,552 posts)
72. What about this?
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 08:34 AM
Apr 2017

"Mello is a sponsor of the final version of a 20-week abortion ban approved by the governor in 2010, and cast anti-choice votes in favor of requiring physicians to be physically present for an abortion in order to impede access to telemedicine abortion care, and a law banning insurance plans in the state from covering abortions. He was endorsed in 2010 by anti-choice group Nebraska Right to Life."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/omaha-mayoral-candidate-under-fire-says-he-would-never-do-anything-to-restrict-access-to-reproductive-health-care_us_58f8e868e4b018a9ce590a84

Also, about the Ultrasound bill..."Sen. Heath Mello, a Democrat who said he opposes abortion, signed on as a co-sponsor, calling the measure a “positive first step to reducing the number of abortions in Nebraska.”

http://journalstar.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/states-may-require-ultrasound-before-abortion/article_3e406d52-1489-5adf-b16c-c627a48ac03e.html

Eliot Rosewater

(31,109 posts)
103. Yes, you are right. This is a TERRIBLE candidate, and look who is endorsing him
Tue Apr 25, 2017, 02:59 PM
Apr 2017

and may make it impossible for voters to vote for anyone but Bernie's choice or a republican.


I have been trying to explain this elsewhere but I am doing it poorly, apparently.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
197. It's the selection and deliberate omission in who earns the blessing of "progressive"
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 07:09 PM
Apr 2017

and who does not.

Demsrule86

(68,552 posts)
95. Yes he did actually vote to restrict choice.
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 01:51 PM
Apr 2017

The link I provide will take you to the excerpt below where you can click on certain words and NE voting document pop up.


"Mello is a sponsor of the final version of a 20-week abortion ban approved by the governor in 2010, and cast anti-choice votes in favor of requiring physicians to be physically present for an abortion in order to impede access to telemedicine abortion care, and a law banning insurance plans in the state from covering abortions. He was endorsed in 2010 by anti-choice group Nebraska Right to Life."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/omaha-mayoral-candidate-under-fire-says-he-would-never-do-anything-to-restrict-access-to-reproductive-health-care_us_58f8e868e4b018a9ce590a84

Demsrule86

(68,552 posts)
109. He voted for a 20 week ban. That is a deal breaker.
Tue Apr 25, 2017, 03:13 PM
Apr 2017
 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
37. +1
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 11:22 PM
Apr 2017

Response to Ken Burch (Original post)

Cane4Dems

(305 posts)
11. not representing truth
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 09:06 PM
Apr 2017

have you actually researched what Kaine's position is and what melo's is?

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
192. Clearly not. (nt)
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 06:57 PM
Apr 2017

sheshe2

(83,746 posts)
12. Not factual.
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 09:09 PM
Apr 2017

Stop it!

sheshe2

(83,746 posts)
14. Well....
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 09:21 PM
Apr 2017
No betrayal. No one thrown under the bus.



Perhaps you should ask a woman.

Seriously Ken, I do not need you to explain to me my rights or feelings. I am not a stupid woman and here you explain to me why I should not feel betrayed. Sorry Ken, My Body, MY CHOICE.

FYI...Bus meet woman. Boom, under you go.
 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
20. There were two candidates in this race.
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 09:51 PM
Apr 2017

The person Bernie endorsed and a Republican who was massively worse. Melo said he would defend choice as mayor. No one who had been unambiguously pro-choice from the start had even filed for the race.

How is this different than Hillary having Bob Casey speak for her as a surrogate(or the DSCC essentially imposing Casey as the US Senate nominee in PA the year he was elected?

sheshe2

(83,746 posts)
22. First of all
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 10:02 PM
Apr 2017

Why all this money and time over a mayors race when we have a good chance to win a Congressional seat?

As for Mello...and it is Mello not Melo Ken. He said he would defend choice?????????????????? He flipped his opinion and he sure as hell can flip it back again.

I call bull pucky.

As I stated elsewhere...Anti-Abortion is a far cry from Anti-Choice.

rpannier

(24,329 posts)
31. I called Mello's campaign office
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 10:53 PM
Apr 2017

A very nice person answered. I asked if Mello requested Sanders' help. She said she thought he did
The person I spoke to in Jon Ossoff's office was uncertain if the campaign had asked Sen Sanders to campaign for him
That could be the reason why he didn't show in Georgia

Curious, will you support Sen Heitkamp and Sen Manchin if they're the Party nominees for their states next year? Both of them are anti-abortion, members of Democrats for Life, support the Hyde Amendment and were vocally critical of the Party platform last summer in regards to the Party's platform position

sheshe2

(83,746 posts)
36. Happy to say that voting for them is not a 'choice'
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 11:19 PM
Apr 2017

I have to make. I am from MA.

Question, they are anti abortion, or are they anti choice?...that is the real question.

Not sure what I would do with Sen Heitkamp and Sen Manchin if I had to vote. Need to research it more, I have no intention of making a knee jerk response. Yet I do not believe anyone that represents the Democratic party should go out of their way to vigorously campaign for them.

Mello/ Ossoff....why is a mayors race far more important that a Congressional seat? As for being asked...the outreach person for Democrats has to be asked? I thought he spoke, as Dean did of a 50 state strategy.

rpannier

(24,329 posts)
38. How very nuanced of you
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 11:27 PM
Apr 2017

I agree with you.
I don't like either Heitkamp or Manchin; I don't like their energy policies, their support of the Hyde Amendment, etc. I am also not a Casey supporter
If I were in those states I'd have a difficult decision to make in the General Election
I do think the outreach needs to be at Ossoff's campaign and Quist's and whomever else is out there to reach out to people who should be voting Democratic.
I disagreed with the Party staying out of Kansas as they did. I don't get this play safe thing. If they're afraid of ramping up the Republicans in some district, they could have sent Manchin to campaign in Kansas; my understanding is he is part of the outreach team. He would probably appeal to the voters in that district. And if he didn't because he's too Republican-like, then send someone else who is more in tune. I can'rt believe the Party has no one.
If Mello wins, I'm not going to jump up and down. If he loses, whatever. I'm more fixated on Quist's special election in Montana (though I don't live there). I send money and am trying to see if I can fit a couple of days in going there to help out

Have a good evening

Alice11111

(5,730 posts)
135. !!!
Tue Apr 25, 2017, 11:32 PM
Apr 2017

Omaha Steve

(99,582 posts)
140. Bernie said Jane Kleeb NE D party chair called him
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 05:51 AM
Apr 2017

Jane also runs Bold Nebraska fighting the Keystone XXL pipeline.

http://boldnebraska.org/

rpannier

(24,329 posts)
141. not doubting it
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 06:37 AM
Apr 2017

Just saying that is what the woman in the office told me. Quite likely they both did

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
49. I agree we shouldn't be dwelling on the Omaha mayor's race.
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 12:20 AM
Apr 2017

The only reason it's being dwelled on is that some people are using this as another excuse to treat everybody who thinks economic justice matters as much as things like choice and LGBTQ rights.

Bernie endorsed the most pro-choice person IN THAT RACE. He didn't endorse Mello over somebody who was MORE pro-choice. Nobody who was stronger on that had even filed for this.

I agree that we need to fight for all the open congressional seats.

Response to Ken Burch (Reply #49)

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
70. I agree that it is being used as a catalyst
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 08:24 AM
Apr 2017

for people to come down on either the side of Bernie deciding what "progressive" means, or keeping the party definition of what "progressive" means.

And I think that was intentional.

Demsrule86

(68,552 posts)
73. There can be no economic justice without
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 08:46 AM
Apr 2017

social justice...you do know that women and people of color make considerably less than white men in general right? Who deserves economic justice? I say everyone including women and people of color.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
138. I AGREE with you that there can be no economic justice WITHOUT social justice.
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 12:12 AM
Apr 2017

Equally, there can be no social justice without economic justice.

Let's talk about how we create a program that backs justice for the majority, that acknowledges that there are different levels of suffering and oppression, but that the majority of people have been done badly by in various ways.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
151. I wish that was the actual thinking, but the reality is, when you say
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 09:27 AM
Apr 2017

"Once you get off of the social issues abortion, gay rights, guns and into the economic issues, there is a lot more agreement than the pundits understand,"

you are dismissing the levels of economic suffering of people who are losing their job or because they are gay, or a woman who will not be able to bring a pregnancy to term and care for her family.

"Get off" doesn't indicate an "equal" concern about those life and death matters. I think that statment is defaulting to the white straight male view as "universal."

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
170. I'm not dismissing any of that myself.
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 03:23 PM
Apr 2017

n/t.

Alice11111

(5,730 posts)
136. Nebraska has a split electoral system. In 2008, we got 1 blue vote
Tue Apr 25, 2017, 11:46 PM
Apr 2017

From Omaha/Lincoln. Since then, the Repub legislature split them up...one for Lincoln and 1 for Omaha. Until the Comey stunt, it looked close for the Dems to take both of those, though not the rural areas. Taking the Mayor could help the Dems in future elections, because the Omaha area and Lincoln area are pretty liberal swing areas. At least Bernie is making an effort that could have a big impact on future races...other than just the Mayoral.

As someone said above, couldn't the Dems even lift a finger in Kansas. Until Rachael Maddow called them out, they ignored Georgia too. You would think they might have learned something from Wisconsin and Michigan.
Sorry, but I think the only way our party gets better and grows is we learn from our mistakes. This blind 3 silly monkeys, never speak up, position is self destructive.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
172. We do need to understand what the actual mistakes were before
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 05:34 PM
Apr 2017

we can learn from them.

I'm really concerned that isn't happening, and there are people who are using the resistance to build their brand rather than the other way around.

Exilednight

(9,359 posts)
158. I'll answer one of your questions.
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 10:06 AM
Apr 2017

You asked "Why all this money and time over a mayors race when we have a good chance to win a Congressional seat?"

The overwhelming majority of political decisions that affect your life are made at the local level. Those local level decisions can have major national implications.

A great example is public school textbooks. Since Texas has the largest public school system in the country they set the standard for what goes inside textbooks across the nation.

Another reason is control of federal government. Most court appointees are found on the local and state levels. There are over 30,000 state elected (that number doesn't include local municipal or county judges) appointed judges throughout the country. On the federal level there are less than 3000.

Like most jobs, judges come up through the ranks by serving on local and state benches. If we keep conceding, like we have been, local elections to Republicans, then we can look forward to even more conservative judges.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
68. So, why did Bernie choose this particular race and not the GA 6 to draw attention to?
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 08:21 AM
Apr 2017

particularly seeing Ossoff had way more progressive record, and is a much more consequential race nationally?

And why has Bernie refused to call Ossoff a progressive?

It seems as though Bernie is trying to establish the idea that he is the arbiter of what is progressive, and it doesn't have to do with "identity politics," and is encouraging Democrats to align and divide along that line.


Demsrule86

(68,552 posts)
96. Jane Kleeb from Our Revolution is the chair of the Nebraska Democratic party.
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 01:53 PM
Apr 2017

This is why in my opinion.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
143. Ah, the one who went on about how we can have pro-forced birth Democrats..
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 07:55 AM
Apr 2017

Demsrule86

(68,552 posts)
146. That is the one.
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 08:44 AM
Apr 2017

She has said as has Nina Turner that economic populism is the issue that needs to be used in determining progressive bonafides...social justice...not so much.


“Every single Democrat is not necessarily pro-choice,” said Nina Turner, a former Ohio state senator from Cleveland and an ally of Mr. Sanders. “And Democrats need to understand that, and not vilify people because of it.”

Holding up her city’s mix of African-Americans and heavily Catholic descendants of eastern Europeans, Ms. Turner said economic justice bound Democrats together. “I was raised in the black church, and my momma would probably be rolling over in her grave over how I stood up for reproductive health because I was raised a different way,” she said.

Jane Kleeb, the Nebraska Democratic Party chairwoman, helped organize the event for Mr. Mello and has since come under attack for saying that Democrats were “pro-life” and “pro-choice.” She offered no apology.

“If the abortion rights groups are truly serious about cross-issue organizing,” she said, “they should know the foundation of that has to be economic issues.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/21/us/politics/bernie-sanders-democrats-nebraska.html

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
150. They are equating "pro-choice" with "pro-abortion," and "pro-life" with a moral stance
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 09:19 AM
Apr 2017

There are many, many Dems who would never have an abortion, nor would approve of it morally. But they do not take the "pro-life" political stance.

The "pro-life" stance means you support criminalizing abortion.

If you think that abortion should not be criminalized, you are "pro-choice." Period.

If you vote for restricting access to abortion, you are anti-choice, and anti-medical science.

Dem candidates should not ignore medical science in their votes any more than they ignore climate science.

A few misguided souls here tried to say that Tim Kaine was a "pro-life" politician, because he said he had moral conflicts with it as a catholic, but he has always VOTED pro-choice.



Demsrule86

(68,552 posts)
154. Yes which is why I looked at the voting records of both Mello and Perriello (VA Governor's race)
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 09:50 AM
Apr 2017

both are anti-choice base on that.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
156. And interestingly enough Perriello "the true progressive" is taking dark money
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 09:57 AM
Apr 2017

Which has also apparently been deemed as "flexible" since tit's demonization 2016....


https://www.democraticunderground.com/10028975412

Demsrule86

(68,552 posts)
161. I know...everything that the former party Purists complained about ...Perriello does...but for
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 10:26 AM
Apr 2017

some reason... he is endorsed by them.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
162. And with anti-choice votes on his record, but still strongly endorsed. (nt)
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 11:04 AM
Apr 2017
 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
137. I don't know why Bernie made the choices that he made there.
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 12:08 AM
Apr 2017

n/t.

Omaha Steve

(99,582 posts)
142. will energize progressives and encourage strong candidates to run in 2018
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 06:44 AM
Apr 2017

https://www.thenation.com/article/why-was-heath-mello-thrown-under-the-bus/

 Mello, who finished three points behind Republican incumbent Jean Stothert in the five-way, nonpartisan primary on April 4, has been attracting national attention—and support—from progressives for months now. Our Revolution first endorsed Mello on March 9 as one of two dozen candidates the group is backing in 2017. Daily Kos jumped in after the primary, pointing out that in addition to offering the chance to flip City Hall (Omaha makes up most of Nebraska’s Second Congressional District, which the Democrats lost by just over one point), “a good showing” in the race “will energize progressives and encourage strong candidates to run” in 2018.

Zing Zing Zingbah

(6,496 posts)
129. Why was Bernie compelled to say something about a mayoral race in NE?
Tue Apr 25, 2017, 10:34 PM
Apr 2017

He's from VT. Seems kind of weird to me. He didn't have to open his mouth up about this one at all. I've never even heard of US senators endorsing mayoral candidates in their home state. I haven't noticed in Maine. It doesn't seem normal.

US senate is totally different from city mayoral races. We're talking about the difference between local, state, and federal government. US senators is federal government. We are all US citizens so the federal level races will be of interest to everyone in that these people will make decisions for all Americans while representing their state. Plus being that both Hillary and Bernie have been US senators, they would both know a lot about it. It makes sense to make those recommendations. Now making endorsements for state and local government races where you don't even live seems like needless meddling to me. I know Mainers really don't like out-of-staters commenting on their state and local elections. I don't know how people in Omaha, NE typically feel about it.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
191. So where was Bernie in the Ossoff race, rather than pointedly refusing to call him a progressive.
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 06:55 PM
Apr 2017

Perhaps testing the waters as to how much "discussion" it would inspire between his fans and those that think women's health care is more than simply a "social issue?"

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
208. I honestly don't know what he was thinking there.
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 08:26 PM
Apr 2017

What I'm getting at is that, Bernie aside, we should all be working for BOTH justice struggles.

Someday soon, we need to get there.

But I hear what you are saying.

boston bean

(36,221 posts)
16. No it was not identical and you know that.
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 09:30 PM
Apr 2017
 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
48. There were many much more pro-choice people HRC could have put on the ticket.
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 12:07 AM
Apr 2017

than Kaine.

And Melo has made it clear that he will not work to restrict choice as mayor.

Cha

(297,154 posts)
50. "Tim Kaine is pro-choice, not pro-death"
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 12:31 AM
Apr 2017

snip//

My understanding is that what Kaine is supporting is the right of a woman to choose whether or not to carry that embryo to term. This should be a private decision between a woman and her doctor, and Kaine has rightly assessed that neither the state nor the church should be involved in it.

http://www.latimes.com/opinion/readersreact/la-ol-le-tim-kaine-abortion-20161008-snap-story.html

Mello is "Aggressively Anti-choice" and BS calls him a "progressive" but wouldn't lift a hand to support Pro Choice, Jon Ossoff on Election Day in Georgia..

Sanders voiced his support for Mello in a statement published Wednesday by the Wall Street Journal. “If this fellow wins in Nebraska, that would be a shot across the board, that in a state like Nebraska a progressive Democrat can win, that will give hope to folks in other conservative states that perhaps they can win as well,” he said.

Why Is the DNC Embracing an Aggressively Anti-Choice Democrat

snip//

He was endorsed in 2010 by anti-choice group Nebraska Right to Life.

Heath Mello has sponsored a range of anti-choice measures, including a 20-week abortion ban.

Heath Mello is a sponsor of the final version of a 20-week abortion ban approved by the governor in 2010, and cast anti-choice votes in favor of requiring physicians to be physically present for an abortion in order to impede access to telemedicine abortion care, and a law banning insurance plans in the state from covering abortions.

snip// Dkos pulls their endorsement of Heath Mello

The Daily Kos, which describes itself as “a news organization, community, and activist hub,” pulled its endorsement of Mello after revelations about the Democrat’s stance on abortion. The site said it had been unaware of Mello’s anti-choice stance, but that “as soon as we learned this information, we withdrew our endorsement, because this legislation clearly runs contrary to Daily Kos’ deepest values, including our support for women’s reproductive rights and our staunch opposition to laws that in any way impede women’s access to reproductive health care.”

https://rewire.news/article/2017/04/20/why-is-dnc-embracing-aggressively-anti-choice-democrat/

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
53. Mello has pledged that, as mayor, he will effectively defend choice.
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 12:40 AM
Apr 2017

People seem to think Bernie endorsed Mello against someone who was MORE pro-choice. There was never any such candidate in this race.

Cha

(297,154 posts)
56. Omaha Mayoral Candidate Under Fire For Anti-Choice Past Vows To Protect Reproductive Rights
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 12:51 AM
Apr 2017

snip//

Mello co-sponsored a bill in 2009 requiring women to be informed that they could see an ultrasound before having an abortion, a move that national groups appeared to be unaware of until just now. Rewire reports further:

Mello is a sponsor of the final version of a 20-week abortion ban approved by the governor in 2010, and cast anti-choice votes in favor of requiring physicians to be physically present for an abortion in order to impede access to telemedicine abortion care, and a law banning insurance plans in the state from covering abortions. He was endorsed in 2010 by anti-choice group Nebraska

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/omaha-mayoral-candidate-under-fire-says-he-would-never-do-anything-to-restrict-access-to-reproductive-health-care_us_58f8e868e4b018a9ce590a84?ncid=inblnkushpmg00000009


All this Backlash, against Mello, from us Women is Working. .. no thanks to you and those spreading false information about Senator Tim Kaine and protecting Mello at all costs.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
57. You could have done all that without accusing Bernie of selling you out.
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 01:02 AM
Apr 2017

and without reviving the myth that the economic justice movement is your enemy.

Cha

(297,154 posts)
58. Women's BackLash, Against Mello, Worked!
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 01:21 AM
Apr 2017
 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
71. This was all set in motion by Bernie's selective endorsements
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 08:28 AM
Apr 2017

and Bernie has stated that "identity politics" - which is social justice concerns - are secondary to economic issues that affect white working class men.

So, Bernie's definition of economic justice seems to be narrower than the traditional definition, which acknowledges and acts on the huge role that racism and sexism play out in economics.

Also, Bernie seems convinced that when white men are happy with more wage equity and affordable health care (single payer - NOTHING ELSE), then nationalism and bigotry will just resolve - despite what we see in Europe.

http://www.vox.com/world/2017/3/13/14698812/bernie-trump-corbyn-left-wing-populism

Demsrule86

(68,552 posts)
74. I do consider it a sell out of women's rights.
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 08:47 AM
Apr 2017
 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
200. But it's the deliberate refusal to call Ossoff progressive, in a race that is far more
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 07:16 PM
Apr 2017

consequential, with a candidate that is far more progressive in those mere "social issues" of women's health that Bernie thinks are so distracting.

I wonder if it's because Planned Parenthood praised Ossoff, that Bernie wouldn't say he was progressive.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
207. OK, I think he should have and should still call Ossoff progressive
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 08:24 PM
Apr 2017

You're right on that.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
69. Actually, Kaine got a 100% from NARAL
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 08:23 AM
Apr 2017

So, no, there is not much more pro-choice cred than that.

His voting record was always pro-choice.

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/288952-pro-abortion-rights-group-give-kaine-nod-of-approval

Is that clearer?

Arazi

(6,829 posts)
21. Yup. Thank You eom
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 09:59 PM
Apr 2017

Me.

(35,454 posts)
23. Wow... 3 Threads On The Same Subject In A Matter Of Hours
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 10:12 PM
Apr 2017

What's the agenda?

SCantiGOP

(13,869 posts)
25. I know
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 10:29 PM
Apr 2017

Why is this suddenly all that is being talked about? Give it a rest people.

Me.

(35,454 posts)
34. By The Same Poster No Less
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 11:13 PM
Apr 2017
 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
144. I know, right? Because DU rules specify sharing only one article on a topic per member
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 07:58 AM
Apr 2017

Good GAWD, have you seen all the posts on Ivanka in Berlin???


rpannier

(24,329 posts)
32. Probably because this topic became the issue du joir for like 3 days in a row
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 10:54 PM
Apr 2017

on why Sanders is so terrible

Me.

(35,454 posts)
159. I Get That
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 10:06 AM
Apr 2017

But 3 threads in as many hours?

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
201. ERMEGERD - did you see all the Ivanka in Berlin posts in as many hours????
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 07:17 PM
Apr 2017

AWFUL, right?

Me.

(35,454 posts)
202. Totally
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 07:55 PM
Apr 2017

But were they by the same person, as these were?

Though she's pretty awful so I guess you could say she started the awful trend.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
45. Defense of alt left hero.
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 11:43 PM
Apr 2017

LostinRed

(840 posts)
30. Bernie Sanders is not a democrat
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 10:45 PM
Apr 2017

Who cares who he endorses. This is the billionth thread on this subject.

rpannier

(24,329 posts)
33. And I am guessing, this will go on for another billion
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 10:56 PM
Apr 2017

Until the Montana special election comes up and Rob Quist's campaign is in the spotlight and then back to Georgia
There's a group here who finds fault in everything and they'll keep it alive forever

dae

(3,396 posts)
42. Saw the vid clip of Tom Perez shouting Bernie, Bernie, Bernie? Guess
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 11:41 PM
Apr 2017

the anti-Berners will want his head now.

JudyM

(29,233 posts)
78. Perhaps some background might soften your view... perhaps not. This is being left out of the
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 10:56 AM
Apr 2017

narrative here:

“If you have a rally in which you have the labor movement, and the environmentalists, and Native Americans, and the African American community, and the Latino community coming together, saying, ‘We want this guy to become our next mayor,’ should I reject going there to Omaha? I don’t think so.”

murielm99

(30,733 posts)
35. How many times are you going to sum up
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 11:18 PM
Apr 2017

this erroneous assertion?

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
44. How many times does it take to make a lie into a reality
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 11:43 PM
Apr 2017

That many times I would guess

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
39. That is FALSE and you know it. Tim Kaine has never taken these positions:
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 11:35 PM
Apr 2017
Mello co-sponsored a bill in 2009 requiring women to be informed that they could see an ultrasound before having an abortion, a move that national groups appeared to be unaware of until just now. Rewire reports further:

Mello is a sponsor of the final version of a 20-week abortion ban approved by the governor in 2010, and cast anti-choice votes in favor of requiring physicians to be physically present for an abortion in order to impede access to telemedicine abortion care, and a law banning insurance plans in the state from covering abortions. He was endorsed in 2010 by anti-choice group Nebraska Right to Life.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/omaha-mayoral-candidate-under-fire-says-he-would-never-do-anything-to-restrict-access-to-reproductive-health-care_us_58f8e868e4b018a9ce590a84
 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
43. Some people will lie through their teeth to defend their hero
Sun Apr 23, 2017, 11:42 PM
Apr 2017

And then claim to be an ally to women and poc.

chillfactor

(7,574 posts)
52. good god...
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 12:38 AM
Apr 2017

can we get off the topic of bernie already...I am sick about hearing about him again, and again,and again on DU.

fleabiscuit

(4,542 posts)
55. And next...
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 12:50 AM
Apr 2017

"Al Giordano? @AlGiordano
And next they say, "YOU got the wrong candidate the nomination." Well, if we have that kind of power, shouldn't they be winning *us* over?"

emulatorloo

(44,116 posts)
59. Kaine has a solid pro-choice voting record. Mello does not.
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 01:34 AM
Apr 2017

I wish you would let go of this false equivalency you've made between Kaine and Mello in order to defend Bernie. .

Bernie's a tough guy, he can defend himself. Especially when it comes to the endorsements he makes.

LovingA2andMI

(7,006 posts)
60. Tim Kaine had the same positions as the Candidate for Mayor of Omaha in some matters...
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 01:46 AM
Apr 2017

WOW! Wonder where all the Tim Kaine threads are? Oh, he's not Bernie so....

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
61. Yeah. Or people are lying about tim Kaine
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 07:33 AM
Apr 2017

But some people love lies in defense of their heroes

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
63. Not on women. Tim Kaine never voted against women - he got 100% from NARAL.
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 08:11 AM
Apr 2017

emulatorloo

(44,116 posts)
76. Kaine has a solid pro-choice voting record. Mello doesn't
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 10:30 AM
Apr 2017

Saying Mello and Kaine are the same is a false equivalency.

There has got to be a way to defend Bernie with smearing and lying about other Democrats.

Better yet, Bernie's perfectly capable of defending himself.

LovingA2andMI

(7,006 posts)
79. Yes....Bernie Is Capable of Defending Himself...
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 11:44 AM
Apr 2017

And making the Choice to support who he wants or decides not to do so. It appears SOME are upset with Bernie because he did not openly support THEIR candidate of choice to support another candidate it's likely few even know -- since said candidate is running for a Mayor's position in Omaha, NE (like a Mayor in Omaha, NE will make policy on Pro-Choice Policy -- usually Mayor's deal with municipalities issues more so ((ALWAYS)) then Pro-Choice Policy).....

However, still, SOME are upset with Bernie because of his support of a candidate he chooses to support. Interesting....

Yet, SOME were not worried in the least about Tim Kaine's (a Senator who can have a vote on Pro-Choice Policies in the Senate) former stance on Pro-Life policies. Now, if Kaine has seen the light with his former alignment with Pro-Life policies, to vote in agreement for Pro-Choice policies, that is great considering his elected position actually can deal with these types of policies up close and personal.

But, a Mayor of a Town in Nebraska -- not so much.

emulatorloo

(44,116 posts)
84. I would vote for Mello if I lived in Omaha. But I don't need to misrepresent Kaine's voting record.
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 11:53 AM
Apr 2017

Bernie's not doing that. He's explained his endorsement very well.

He's not drawing false equivalencies between Kaine and Mello like some are here. Because that's not who Bernie is.

I certainly agree with you about the responsibilies of Mayor vs congressperson. To tell you the truth I'm not sure why the DNC is mucking around in a mayoral race.

LovingA2andMI

(7,006 posts)
85. Was Tim Kaine PREVIOUSLY....
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 11:56 AM
Apr 2017

Pro-Life or not? Yes or No. Did he change his position and voting record later on Pro-Life Issues? Yes or No.

Yes or No is all that is required to answer the questions above.

emulatorloo

(44,116 posts)
86. He's got a 100% rating from Naral. He has a solid Pro-choice record, Mello doesn't.
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 12:00 PM
Apr 2017

False equivalencies are false.

Mello's apparently seen the light recently. But he doesn't have a record to back it up yet.

Again Bernie's not drawing false equivalencies to explain his endorsement of Mello. Bernie's a straight shooter. He doesn't need DU'ers to smear Kaine.

LovingA2andMI

(7,006 posts)
87. PREVIOUSLY....Defined Means....
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 12:05 PM
Apr 2017
"3. Idioms
previous to, before; prior to:
Previous to moving here she lived in Los Angeles."

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/previously

And in 2005 (PREVIOUSLY) Tim Kaine had a Pro-Life position. It's documented. He has since being in the Senate, changed that position -- which is good -- but it is a change from his PREVIOUS stance on Pro-Life. Those are the facts.

Tim Kaine has been here before: a leading vice-presidential contender with a complicated stance on abortion that doesn’t neatly align with the one held by the top of the ticket.

His personal opposition to abortion generated significant scrutiny back in 2008 when Barack Obama, an abortion rights supporter, included the then-Virginia governor on his shortlist of running mates. Kaine’s hometown newspaper in Richmond flagged the potentially awkward partnership right away, pointing out the philosophical and policy differences in a side-by-side graphic widely republished by media outlets across the country.

Eight years later, Kaine is again a front-runner in the Democratic veepstakes, and again his views on reproductive rights — an issue central to the Democratic base — are under a microscope in the event Hillary Clinton selects him as her No. 2.

Since joining the Senate in 2012, Kaine has tried to cultivate an image as an abortion-rights champion. He’s pleased reproductive rights’ groups with a perfect voting record. He’s railed against GOP attempts to defund Planned Parenthood. And he’s celebrated in their legal victories, including last week’s Supreme Court ruling tossing out a Texas law that tried limiting a woman’s access to abortion clinics.

But he hasn’t always advanced policies directly in line with those of abortion rights advocacy groups. He pledged in his 2005 gubernatorial campaign to reduce the number of terminated pregnancies in the state by promoting adoption and abstinence-focused education. That cycle, the state NARAL chapter ripped Kaine’s GOP opponent, Jerry Kilgore, as “an extremely anti-choice candidate” but still withheld its endorsement of Kaine because he “embraces many of the restrictions on a woman’s right to choose.”


http://www.politico.com/story/2016/07/tim-kaine-abortion-predicament-225053

and Yes or No, means Yes or No.

emulatorloo

(44,116 posts)
88. "Promoting" adoption doesn't restrict access to safe and legal abortion.
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 12:10 PM
Apr 2017

Nor does it shame women who choose to have an abortion.

LovingA2andMI

(7,006 posts)
89. "promoting adoption and abstinence-focused education"
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 12:54 PM
Apr 2017

That's the WHOLE quote. All of it. Also, Abstinence Focused Education is a stance of the Pro-Life movement -- thus Tim Kaine was PREVIOUSLY a Pro-Life supporter.

Either way, the point has been made four times over and we have other things to do.

emulatorloo

(44,116 posts)
91. "How do you feel about not allowing insurance to cover abortion"
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 01:27 PM
Apr 2017

If you truly believe "abstinence education" is the same as voting to not allow insurance companies to pay for legal abortions, I can't help you.

https://www.democraticunderground.com/10028970435#post36

36. How do you feel about not allowing insurance to cover abortion?

because Mello voted for that also...what about carrying dead babies? the 20 and 24 week bans have forced women to carry dead babies to term risking their health in states that have 20 or 24 week bans. you can click on the links in the except below...and see how Mello voted...it takes you to the actual NE bills.

Mello is a sponsor of the final version of a 20-week abortion ban approved by the governor in 2010, and cast anti-choice votes in favor of requiring physicians to be physically present for an abortion in order to impede access to telemedicine abortion care, and a law banning insurance plans in the state from covering abortions. He was endorsed in 2010 by anti-choice group Nebraska Right to Life.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/omaha-mayoral-candidate-under-fire-says-he-would-never-do-anything-to-restrict-access-to-reproductive-health-care_us_58f8e868e4b018a9ce590a84

----

Agreed, yes we have better things to do. You can say Mello and Kaine's are the "same" all you would like. The record does not support that assertion though.

Again Bernie's not pushing this false equivalency.

It really isn't necessary for DU'ers to push it because of some misguided idea that it "helps" Bernie.

It doesn't help Bernie at all.

Have a great week, I appreciate the discussion.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
62. Nope. Tim Kaine never voted against women - he got 100% from NARAL.
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 08:10 AM
Apr 2017

What one's voting record is makes a difference.

Please show me Mello's record.

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
77. And this must not go unpunished. n/t
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 10:49 AM
Apr 2017

we can do it

(12,182 posts)
90. Sick of the condescending mansplaing and nondemocrat complaining about dems.
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 01:10 PM
Apr 2017

FiveGoodMen

(20,018 posts)
139. Doesn't mansplaining suggest that men's opinions don't really count?
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 01:10 AM
Apr 2017

Isn't THAT condescending?

musette_sf

(10,200 posts)
93. Let me know when Tim Kaine's voting record looks like gestational slaver Mello:
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 01:45 PM
Apr 2017

LB 1103 Prohibiting Abortions After 20 Weeks of Pregnancy Bill Passed - Senate (44 - 5) Yea

LB 594 Abortion Screening Requirements Bill Passed - Senate (40 - 9) Yea

LB 22 Prohibits Insurance Coverage of Abortion Bill Passed - Senate (37 - 7) Yea

LB 521 Requires Physician Presence During Abortions Bill Passed - Senate (38 - 9) Yea

LB 675 Establishes Procedures for Ultrasounds Performed Prior to Abortions Bill Passed - Senate (40 - 5) Yea

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
121. No. That's incomplete. And you know it.
Tue Apr 25, 2017, 09:12 PM
Apr 2017

Stop it.

killbotfactory

(13,566 posts)
123. The pro-corporate wing of the party is scared that his economic message will destroy their funding.
Tue Apr 25, 2017, 09:22 PM
Apr 2017

They think if they can convince enough people that Bernie is an asshole, that his economic message will disappear.

QC

(26,371 posts)
134. Bingo. n/t
Tue Apr 25, 2017, 11:31 PM
Apr 2017

Demsrule86

(68,552 posts)
147. That is nonsense.
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 08:49 AM
Apr 2017

Abortion rights can not be thrown under the bus without push back from progressives/liberals.

killbotfactory

(13,566 posts)
166. Abortion rights will only get thrown under the bus if you let republicans win. Nt
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 02:04 PM
Apr 2017

Demsrule86

(68,552 posts)
167. Sorry...endorsing an anti-choice candidate shows a willingness to shelve reproductive rights
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 02:36 PM
Apr 2017

as a progressive issue...This is not the way to win votes by throwing women under the bus. Civil rights are not optional.

"At the same event where Sanders stumped for Mello, Jane Kleeb—a board member of Sanders' Our Revolution—gave an ecstatic speech, proclaiming that "the Democratic party is a broad party! We are pro-life, we are pro-choice!" When called out on this, Kleeb insisted that "we do have pro-life and pro-choice Democrats in our party and I welcome all of those folks."

http://www.elle.com/culture/career-politics/news/a44711/for-bernie-sanders-pro-choice-politics-continues-to-be-optional/

musette_sf

(10,200 posts)
124. "will not work to restrict choice"
Tue Apr 25, 2017, 09:45 PM
Apr 2017

Heath Mello has done a great deal to restrict choice.

LB 1103 Prohibiting Abortions After 20 Weeks of Pregnancy Bill Passed - Senate (44 - 5) Yea

LB 594 Abortion Screening Requirements Bill Passed - Senate (40 - 9) Yea

LB 22 Prohibits Insurance Coverage of Abortion Bill Passed - Senate (37 - 7) Yea

LB 521 Requires Physician Presence During Abortions Bill Passed - Senate (38 - 9) Yea

LB 675 Establishes Procedures for Ultrasounds Performed Prior to Abortions Bill Passed - Senate (40 - 5) Yea


 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
145. Because Senator Sanders has NEVER castigated someone on the basis of their past votes
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 08:00 AM
Apr 2017

or their support of their spouse's legislation decades ago.

He is all about understanding how politicians evolve on issues.

Always.

Demsrule86

(68,552 posts)
149. So we become a 50 state party by throwing civil rights under the bus...
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 09:00 AM
Apr 2017

including but not limited to abortion rights? I can not accept that sort of 50 state strategy...progressive voters who care about social justice will sit on their hands if this continues, and we snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. It is a betrayal.

elleng

(130,865 posts)
163. No such thing.
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 11:15 AM
Apr 2017

Pay attention, listen to his words.

Demsrule86

(68,552 posts)
165. I heard his words...about pro-choice ...and the normalization movement of of anti-choice candidates
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 12:03 PM
Apr 2017

in the hopes of appealing to Trump supporters...mostly white men.

"At the same event where Sanders stumped for Mello, Jane Kleeb—a board member of Sanders' Our Revolution—gave an ecstatic speech, proclaiming that "the Democratic party is a broad party! We are pro-life, we are pro-choice!" When called out on this, Kleeb insisted that "we do have pro-life and pro-choice Democrats in our party and I welcome all of those folks."

Sorry that is unacceptable."

left-of-center2012

(34,195 posts)
127. Long past time for the Bernie bashing to stop
Tue Apr 25, 2017, 10:15 PM
Apr 2017

It will only hurt us in '18, '20.

Demsrule86

(68,552 posts)
148. Long past time, for some to understand that when
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 08:55 AM
Apr 2017

Sen. Sanders endorses an anti-choice candidate not once but twice (Perriello in Virginia Governors primary), there will be push back. This is not 'bashing' but a legitimate difference of opinion. I do not believe economic populism should be the most important issue in the Democratic party,social justice must occupy an equally important position, or we become Republican lite.

lapucelle

(18,250 posts)
128. Tim Kaine has a 100% rating from NARAL,
Tue Apr 25, 2017, 10:23 PM
Apr 2017

and was given a full-throated statement of support for his vice presidential run.
NARAL condemned last week's endorsement of Mello.

And it seems that Mello may have misspoken about other endorsements and ratings he said he has received.

“Planned Parenthood Voters of Nebraska has never endorsed Heath Mello for public office nor has Planned Parenthood Voters of Nebraska given Heath Mello a 100% rating, as some media outlets have erroneously reported,” the group said in a statement.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/omaha-mayoral-candidate-under-fire-says-he-would-never-do-anything-to-restrict-access-to-reproductive-health-care_us_58f8e868e4b018a9ce590a84

https://www.prochoiceamerica.org/2017/04/20/naral-statement-dnc-chair-perez-senator-sanders-embracing-anti-choice-candidate-nebraska-today/

https://www.prochoiceamerica.org/2016/07/22/naral-statement-kaine-vice-president/

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/288952-pro-abortion-rights-group-give-kaine-nod-of-approval

comradebillyboy

(10,143 posts)
177. Keep beating that dead horse a bit longer...nt
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 06:19 PM
Apr 2017

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
179. And that whole Keystone XL Pipeline thing?
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 06:23 PM
Apr 2017

The left doesn't care about that anymore??

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
181. Not sure where you're going with that question
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 06:25 PM
Apr 2017

How does that relate to this thread?

Not trying to be argumentative, but you've lost me here.

As far as I know we're still against Keystone XL, but that's not going to be decided by who becomes mayor of Omaha.

George II

(67,782 posts)
183. But Tim Kaine never sponsored a bill to restrict (via sensationalism, i.e., ultrasounds) abortion.
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 06:30 PM
Apr 2017

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
214. And so did Elizabeth Warren.............
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 09:27 PM
Apr 2017

with far less outcry.

Dorian Gray

(13,491 posts)
220. Yet 220 replies.
Thu Apr 27, 2017, 06:40 AM
Apr 2017

hornet's nest.

Damn. I was team HRC throughout. Never liked Bernie all that much. But this divisiveness is crazy.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
221. Self-deleting this thread because I did more harm than good in posting it.
Thu Apr 27, 2017, 06:52 AM
Apr 2017

Still think Bernie didn't deserve all the blowback, And I want to help move us past the myth that we need to choose between "social justice" OR "economic justice" (we need to be working with equal passion for BOTH), but I got it wrong in the way I phrased the OP.

There was a double standard, but the positions of the two people I compared (while having significant common points) are NOT identical and I shouldn't have said they were.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This message was self-del...