Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 03:38 PM Apr 2017

Abortion is economics and anyone dismissing it as a social issue

Is lying about the economic impact of an antichoice candidate in the lives of women.

It may not be economics for men, but it is economics for the rest of us.

So when you say economic issues must be highlighted but then you dismiss abortion what you are saying is 'only the economic issues of men matter'.






34 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Abortion is economics and anyone dismissing it as a social issue (Original Post) La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2017 OP
exactly!! niyad Apr 2017 #1
AMEN -eom Justitia Apr 2017 #2
I found out that the Niles Ohio school system does not offer paid maternity leave. Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #3
They're not as clever as they believe themselves to be. I've seen this shit before... NurseJackie Apr 2017 #4
Me too...this is ridiculous. Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #10
Not only abortion, but birth control, privacy, contraception..... LisaM Apr 2017 #5
Its both. lovemydogs Apr 2017 #6
x1000!!!!! romana Apr 2017 #7
completely agree bigtree Apr 2017 #8
Abortion & the 13th Amendment CrispyQ Apr 2017 #9
Very good. Ligyron Apr 2017 #25
Yes. Margaret Atwood wrote a novel about that Silver Gaia Apr 2017 #28
But white guys are feeling neglected. LexVegas Apr 2017 #11
Just So Me. Apr 2017 #12
k&r Starry Messenger Apr 2017 #13
It's not an issue to be dismissed. The situation wasn't just men, though, it was groups that wanted JudyM Apr 2017 #14
No it's about the defense of this guy La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2017 #15
It's not just men defending him though...? Including Pelosi, etc. Absolutely not an ideal candidate JudyM Apr 2017 #17
Is pelosi belittling the importance of abortion, La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2017 #18
. JudyM Apr 2017 #21
No, I'm saying the party can't be a cult around what sanders approves and doesn't approve of La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2017 #22
He can do what he wants... and it's our choice whether we like his general direction and can forgive JudyM Apr 2017 #24
He cannot do as he wants as outreach chair, he is part of a team. JHan Apr 2017 #33
Family planning impacts every single issue you just listed. AtheistCrusader Apr 2017 #27
I consider it, first and foremost, a civil liberties issue that has economic associations. phleshdef Apr 2017 #16
Rec. nt LexVegas Apr 2017 #19
"It may not be economics for men"? What should be one of the biggest pro choice points, but we brewens Apr 2017 #20
Name one patriarchal system that hasn't/doesn't suck Rural_Progressive Apr 2017 #23
All aspects of Family Planning, including Abortion are a bright red line for me. AtheistCrusader Apr 2017 #26
Anyone who dismisses women's reproductive health care and childbearing as a "social issue" ehrnst Apr 2017 #31
YES, YES, YES, a thousand times YES! +++ Silver Gaia Apr 2017 #29
It's a health care issue, and anyone who advocates for health care should know that is an economic ehrnst Apr 2017 #30
Yup. But I suspect what we mean by economic issue is issue white men care about La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2017 #34
YES. a power play to keep MALE status. pansypoo53219 Apr 2017 #32

Demsrule86

(68,556 posts)
3. I found out that the Niles Ohio school system does not offer paid maternity leave.
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 03:42 PM
Apr 2017

How are women supposed to survived...they are luckier than most as they can accrue their sick days.

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
4. They're not as clever as they believe themselves to be. I've seen this shit before...
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 03:43 PM
Apr 2017

... and I'm prepared to fight them until my dying breath. This is not negotiable.

LisaM

(27,805 posts)
5. Not only abortion, but birth control, privacy, contraception.....
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 03:43 PM
Apr 2017

I'd have to look it up, but I was reading somewhere recently that some business felt it was appropriate not to hire people who'd had an abortion. So shaming is part of the picture, and obviously economic too.

lovemydogs

(575 posts)
6. Its both.
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 03:55 PM
Apr 2017

It is a social issue but, also an economic issue.
And while it effects far more women then men, men can get hurt by lack of choice as well.
Like a husband and wife living on the edge and unable to afford a child.
It is a health issue as well. A woman who's life is threatened by pregnancy or the toxic that happens.
And while abortion should be between the woman and doctor, men also play a role at times as well.
Any kind of economic issue is not just a man's or just a womans.
It effects everyone.
Income Inequality hurts both. It hurts anyone, male or female who are not in the upper 1%. Especially if you are in the everyday workplace and not a corporate CEO.

CrispyQ

(36,461 posts)
9. Abortion & the 13th Amendment
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 03:59 PM
Apr 2017

I don't understand why the pro-choice groups don't use this argument. Especially if it irked Senator Specter so much.


2010
Forced Labor, Revisited: The Thirteenth Amendment and Abortion
Andrew Koppelman
Northwestern University School of Law, akoppelman@law.northwestern.edu

http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1031&context=facultyworkingpapers

snip...

I. The basic argument

The Thirteenth Amendment reads as follows:

1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

2. Congress shall have the power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

My claim is that the amendment is violated by laws that prohibit abortion. When women are compelled to carry and bear children, they are subjected to "involuntary servitude" in violation of the amendment. Abortion prohibitions violate the Amendment's guarantee of personal liberty, because forced pregnancy and childbirth, by compelling the woman to serve the fetus, creates "that control by which the personal service of one man [sic] is disposed of or coerced for another's benefit which is the essence of involuntary servitude."6

Such laws violate the amendment's guarantee of equality, because forcing women to be mothers makes them into a servant caste, a group which, by virtue of a status of birth, is held subject to a special duty to serve others and not themselves.


It's an interesting paper.


Silver Gaia

(4,544 posts)
28. Yes. Margaret Atwood wrote a novel about that
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 06:25 PM
Apr 2017

which has just become a series debuting on Hulu this week.

Me.

(35,454 posts)
12. Just So
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 04:21 PM
Apr 2017

“Raising children in the United States is expensive. Like, more than $230,000 per child (from birth to age 17) expensive. That includes food, transportation, housing, education (but not college), health care and child care. Oh, and daycare for babies is now more expensive than college tuition in most states.

Women in this country already face a well-documented motherhood financial penalty. Research shows, for example, that mothers are less likely to be hired for jobs and they are offered lower starting salaries when they are hired. (Men don’t appear to be similarly disadvantaged by becoming dads, and might actually benefit from it, career-wise.)

“Having a baby is the most expensive health event that families face during their childbearing years. At the same time, a lack of workplace supports for many women during this critical time means a woman may not have paid sick days for prenatal appointments or well-baby care, or paid family and medical leave to use after giving birth. Addressing all of these issues is central to achieving economic justice for women and families,” said Sarah Lipton-Lubet, vice president of the National Partnership for Women & Families.

Roughly 60 percent of women who have abortions are already mothers, which means they understand these factors not in some abstract way, but both deeply and personally. In fact, economic concerns are a major reason why women chose to end pregnancies. Estimates suggest that between 40 and 75 percent of women seeking abortions do so for financial reasons. “

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/reminder-abortion-is-an-economic-issue_us_58f8d11be4b018a9ce58dd4f?ncid=inblnkushpmg00000009

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
13. k&r
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 04:27 PM
Apr 2017

I'm starting to think they do know that, they just don't care. The pattern of what they feel is necessary to compromise on, as compared to their absolute lines in the sand, could not be more obvious.

Sadly for them, women are the backbone of the progressive coalition. The female section of the working class, already sizable, will be majority women of color by 2044. If I were a clueless WWC warrior, I'd be looking for ways to create bridges, not burn them, but hey, that's me.

JudyM

(29,233 posts)
14. It's not an issue to be dismissed. The situation wasn't just men, though, it was groups that wanted
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 04:51 PM
Apr 2017

the party to support this guy. Please don't dismiss the facts around this situation.

“If you have a rally in which you have the labor movement, and the environmentalists, and Native Americans, and the African American community, and the Latino community coming together, saying, ‘We want this guy to become our next mayor,’ should I reject going there to Omaha? I don’t think so.”

JudyM

(29,233 posts)
17. It's not just men defending him though...? Including Pelosi, etc. Absolutely not an ideal candidate
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 05:02 PM
Apr 2017

but the alternative is far worse. So what would you suggest?

JudyM

(29,233 posts)
21. .
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 05:19 PM
Apr 2017

You're jumping topics. Since you are apparently attacking Sanders again, why don't you take a look at his pro-choice record. These are the facts. The guy has worked to make choice happen, you might want to attack someone else instead who does actually belittle its importance.

Lifetime pro-choice record, plus funding for family planning

In 1993, Sanders co-sponsored the Freedom of Choice Act, which aimed to bar states from restricting the right to terminate a pregnancy before fetal viability or at any time when a termination is necessary to protect the health of a woman.

Bernie voted numerous times to allow women to travel interstate for abortions, supported permitting federal funding of organizations that conduct abortions, and voted to increase access and funding for family planning for women.

Bernie has actively worked to combat restrictions by co-sponsoring a bill that would lift restriction on abortion, known as the Women's Health Protection Act.

Bernie has repeatedly received ratings of 100% from NARAL Pro-Choice America

ontheissues.org


 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
22. No, I'm saying the party can't be a cult around what sanders approves and doesn't approve of
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 05:37 PM
Apr 2017

He seems to love anti choice mello, pro Assad tulsi, but can't call osoff a progressive or endorse him.

we can't shape the party depending On my what he likes or dislikes.

And whether sanders likes it or not abortion an economic issue

JudyM

(29,233 posts)
24. He can do what he wants... and it's our choice whether we like his general direction and can forgive
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 06:04 PM
Apr 2017

the things about him we don't like. Seems like a cult of hate against him, and he's just a guy who IMO is trying to make things better for people who've been ignored by the power.

JHan

(10,173 posts)
33. He cannot do as he wants as outreach chair, he is part of a team.
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 08:43 PM
Apr 2017

He may not wish to join the democratic party but he must understand that it is not just about him.

He should not be applying purity tests selectively, except when it comes to a woman's autonomy and gun control. He has never sold himself as a pragmatist yet wants to decide which issues we should be pragmatic on. How is pointing this out divisiveness? I don't need Bernie to tell me that healthcare is important. There are democrats who have been toiling in the fields for DECADES on these issues, getting real work done, and despite Obama facing over 300 filibusters from the GOP on everything from healthcare to infrastructure, to the minimum wage, we still think the problem is with us? How did this become a legitimate view? How did the democratic party become equated with Republicans when we are nothing like the Republicans in terms of philosophy or approach to governance? This only helps our detractors.

I am not asking for blind allegiance, I want us to get a clue and not spite ourselves while seeking to gain ground electorally. Ideology and strategy have been conflated - that doesn't help the party, it helps the ideologues. And it is tiresome for me as someone who is not a purist.

As if the shenanigans from last year wasn't enough, he's been sniping at the Democratic party - the only party strong enough to counter the GOP, affecting enthusiasm. The other effect is no connection being made between causes and solutions. It has become about individuals. I want all our Democrats to be hugely popular, I want our allies to be popular as well, what I don't want is the sniping fire and smearing of Democrats from the left. If it continues we are looking at a two term Trump presidency and a supreme court lost to us for over a generation.

brewens

(13,582 posts)
20. "It may not be economics for men"? What should be one of the biggest pro choice points, but we
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 05:11 PM
Apr 2017

only dare be so pro choice.

Some young woman has nothing going for her, wants nothing to do with the guy that got her pregnant, and really doesn't want to have a baby, fix it! Get rid of it! That's right, "it"! As in a bundle of cells that is not a person and does not even know it exists.

And make abortion easily available and free. Yes, paid for by us taxpayers. Many times a girl having an abortion saves us a whole shit ton of money. Any public assistance, social programs, medical care over the lifetime of the kid. It's economics for men alright, in fact many right-wingers should probably believe it would save us much more than it really would. The one's that don't lay awake at night thinking about abortion anyway.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
26. All aspects of Family Planning, including Abortion are a bright red line for me.
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 06:18 PM
Apr 2017

If we can't stand our ground there, I'll just pack my fucking toys and go home, because we then don't stand for a damn thing.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
31. Anyone who dismisses women's reproductive health care and childbearing as a "social issue"
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 06:39 PM
Apr 2017

is ignoring the medical community.

And that makes them no different than those that call climate change a "liberal issue."

Silver Gaia

(4,544 posts)
29. YES, YES, YES, a thousand times YES! +++
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 06:26 PM
Apr 2017

Thank you. I said basically the same thing to my husband yesterday (he agreed).

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
30. It's a health care issue, and anyone who advocates for health care should know that is an economic
Mon Apr 24, 2017, 06:37 PM
Apr 2017

issue.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Abortion is economics and...