Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dae

(3,396 posts)
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 10:44 AM Apr 2017

Slandering Populism article from Counterpunch

Trump was exposed long ago as anything but a Populist but our lazy media stays on message.

http://www.counterpunch.org/2017/04/28/slandering-populism-a-chilling-media-habit/

I imagine I’m not the only political and media observer sickened by the dominant (“mainstream”) corporate media’s habitual reference to xenophobic, right-wing, white-nationalist, and neo-fascist politicians like Donald Trump, Geert Wilders, Nigel Farage, and Marine Le Pen as “populists.” Populism properly understood is about popular and democratic opposition to the rule of the money power – to the reign of concentrated wealth. It emerged from radical farmers’ fight for social and economic justice and democracy against the plutocracy of the nation’s Robber Baron capitalists during the late 19th century. It was a movement of the left. As the left author and journalist Harvey Wasserman notes:

“The Morgans, Rockefellers and their ilk had captured the industrial revolution that dominated the U.S. after the Civil War. The farmers of the South and West fought back with a grass-roots social movement…They formed the People’s Party. Its socialistic platforms demanded public ownership of the major financial institutions, including banks, railways, power utilities and other private monopolies that were crushing the public well-being.”
..........

Contemporary populists worthy of the label are leftists. They back “human rights, social democracy, peace and ecological sanity” (Wasserman). They support racial and ethnic equality and unity in the interest of working class solidarity and struggle from the bottom up. They want government to serve the broad working class majority of the populace and the common good, not the wealthy corporate and financial Few.

.........

Trump is no populist. His tax plan released last Wednesday by Goldman Sachs veterans and White House officials Gary Cohn and Steven Mnuchin would slash tax rates for businesses from (a seldom paid) 35 percent to 15 percent. The Trump scheme includes a “pass-through” tax cut on business income that is currently taxed at the business owners’ individual income tax rates rather than the corporate rate.

Calling Trump’s proposal as “a very big step in precisely the wrong direction,” the Economic Policy Institute’s Josh Bivens and Hunter Blair say that the pass-through tax cut “will help private equity managers and people like President Trump: wealthy people who will now be able to reconfigure their taxes by reclassifying themselves as independent contractors.”

..........

Meanwhile the mainstream media writes off politicians closer to real populism – left leaders like Corbin and Melenchon – as “the extreme left.”

It’s too much, I suppose, to expect the U.S. corporate media to acknowledge that a neofascist sits in the White House as the representative of one of the nation’s leading two capitalist parties. One might at least hope they could use the F word (fascism) to describe the quite more openly fascistic white-nationalist militia groups that have seen chilling membership gains under Obama and Trump. So far, those groups too have avoided accurate description as fascist by “mainstream” U.S. news authorities (see this from “P”BS, for example) – a disturbing fact. It does not bode well.

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Slandering Populism article from Counterpunch (Original Post) dae Apr 2017 OP
I couldn't agree more. denverbill Apr 2017 #1
Counterpunch is useless struggle4progress Apr 2017 #2
+1. Completely agree. n/t FSogol Apr 2017 #3
+1 leftynyc Apr 2017 #4
Yep. nt stevenleser Apr 2017 #8
There is nothing good about populism. Expecting Rain Apr 2017 #5
populism is a style of rhetoric, not an actual ideology geek tragedy Apr 2017 #6
Correct, and almost always about demagoguery rather than actual real solutions stevenleser Apr 2017 #7

denverbill

(11,489 posts)
1. I couldn't agree more.
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 11:10 AM
Apr 2017

To say Trump campaigned as a populist is probably true. He told people he was going to give them better health care, more good jobs, tax cuts, etc, but he was just telling them what they wanted to hear to get their votes. He doesn't give a shit about little people any more than Paul Ryan or 90% of other Republicans do and way too many Democrats as well.

The media uses the word populism as a smear against liberals most of the time when they are running against moderate Democrats, and did so against Sanders regularly in 2016. The difference is Sanders is continually pushing populist laws and Trump is doing the exact opposite. Trump campaigned as a populist and governs as a fascist.

 

Expecting Rain

(811 posts)
5. There is nothing good about populism.
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 12:30 PM
Apr 2017

Populism (right-wing and left-wing variants alike) has only lead to misery and human suffering when such movements come to power.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
6. populism is a style of rhetoric, not an actual ideology
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 12:32 PM
Apr 2017

the politics of "us vs them, they are to blame for all of your problems" is very powerful, but also very dangerous

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
7. Correct, and almost always about demagoguery rather than actual real solutions
Fri Apr 28, 2017, 12:42 PM
Apr 2017

as you noted, very powerful but also very dangerous.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Slandering Populism artic...