General Discussion

brooklynite

(94,502 posts) Thu May 4, 2017, 12:54 PM May 2017

ACA repeal/replace momentum may be stalling...

Link to tweet

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

ACA repeal/replace momentum may be stalling... (Original Post) brooklynite May 2017 OP

FWIW UT_democrat May 2017 #1

Not enough for him to vote a big fat YES riversedge May 2017 #3

Keep calling folks riversedge May 2017 #2

My former rep Mike Coffman is voting no. Jake Stern May 2017 #4

Reichart's district voted overwhelmingly for Hillary Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin May 2017 #5

KEEP CALLING - JAM those phone lines! n/t CousinIT May 2017 #6

others report whip count now moving MORE towards repeal janterry May 2017 #7

UT_democrat

(143 posts)

1. FWIW

Reply to brooklynite (Original post)

Thu May 4, 2017, 12:57 PM

May 2017

Sen Mike Lee's (R-UT) office in SLC claims he has grave concerns about the proposed plan. I just got off the phone with them.

riversedge

(70,186 posts)

3. Not enough for him to vote a big fat YES

Reply to UT_democrat (Reply #1)

Thu May 4, 2017, 01:00 PM

May 2017

riversedge

(70,186 posts)

2. Keep calling folks

Reply to brooklynite (Original post)

Thu May 4, 2017, 12:59 PM

May 2017

Jake Stern

(3,145 posts)

4. My former rep Mike Coffman is voting no.

Reply to brooklynite (Original post)

Thu May 4, 2017, 01:03 PM

May 2017

Thanks for doing the right thing for once, Mike!

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(107,919 posts)

5. Reichart's district voted overwhelmingly for Hillary

Reply to brooklynite (Original post)

Thu May 4, 2017, 01:03 PM

May 2017

He better oppose Trumpcare 2.0 if he wants to keep his job.

CousinIT

(9,239 posts)

6. KEEP CALLING - JAM those phone lines! n/t

Reply to brooklynite (Original post)

Thu May 4, 2017, 01:09 PM

May 2017

janterry

(4,429 posts)

7. others report whip count now moving MORE towards repeal

Reply to brooklynite (Original post)

Thu May 4, 2017, 01:11 PM

May 2017

NYT: 16 No (-2 from this morning)
HuffPo: 18 No & Lean No (-1)
NBC: 16 No (-1)
The Hill: 16 No (-2)
WaPo: 17 No & Lean No (-3)

Reply to this discussion