General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump wants 'goddamned steam catapults on new aircraft carriers
http://thehill.com/policy/defense/333040-trump-wants-goddamned-steam-catapults-on-new-aircraft-carriers#President Trump said he has told the Navy to return to decades-old steam-powered catapult technology to launch aircraft from the new Gerald Ford-class aircraft carriers, rather than use a new digital launch system.
Trumps comments came during an interview with Time magazine, released in excerpts Thursday, where he bashed the new Electro-Magnetic Aircraft Launch System (EMALS) and said the Navy would instead be going to goddamned steam.
I said, You dont use steam anymore for catapult? No sir. I said, Ah, how is it working? Sir, not good. Not good. Doesnt have the power. You know the steam is just brutal. You see that sucker going and steams going all over the place, theres planes thrown in the air, Trump said in the interview.
It sounded bad to me. Digital. They have digital. What is digital? And its very complicated, you have to be Albert Einstein to figure it out. And I saidand now they want to buy more aircraft carriers. I said, What system are you going to be Sir, were staying with digital. I said, No youre not. You going to goddamned steam, the digital costs hundreds of millions of dollars more money and its no good.
So, if I'm reading this correctly, basically because Trump doesn't understand how the new digital tech works or how it's better than the decades old steam we now use we're not going with newer and what sounds like much better technology.
This just adds to my belief that the man is to stupid and mentally incompetent to be president.
Cha
(296,875 posts)krispos42
(49,445 posts)I mean... Jeez!
eShirl
(18,480 posts)Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(107,762 posts)smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Somewhere, a padded cell is awaiting an inmate.
Best_man23
(4,897 posts)Solly Mack
(90,758 posts)gratuitous
(82,849 posts)"They're using steam because I told them to! I'm, like, a really smart guy, and the Navy knew they should listen to me. I know more than all the admirals."
Such a needy little man.
Solly Mack
(90,758 posts)His supporters and defenders would call it insulting but it is an accurate observation...and a reason to be concerned. You don't want someone that needy in a position of power.
FuzzyRabbit
(1,967 posts)Everything You Need to Know About the Digital Catapults Donald Trump Thinks the Navy Doesn't Need: http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2017/05/11/donald_trump_is_complaining_about_the_navy_s_catapults_what.html
Solly Mack
(90,758 posts)DeminPennswoods
(15,265 posts)with managing systems and bringing new systems in, that article contains a lot of the classic rosy scenarios. New systems rarely live up to the hype. Electronic systems aren't inherently better or less maintenance than mechanical ones, either. Admittedly, I've been out of game for awhile, but I've worked on many systems where the BIT (system's self-diagnosing) hasn't lived up the claims. There's also sometimes issues with the test benches for the equipment. I have to wonder how the motors will fare in a salt water environment, which is also the biggest reason airframe life of carrier-based planes is shorter, the airframe just gets corroded no matter how many times the plane is hosed off.
For those who don't know, catapults actually pull the aircraft forward by attaching to the plane's nose landing gear and dragging it down the ships's runway. There's also a push from the jet engines thrusting against the jet blast deflector. Prop driven planes like E2/C2 don't use cats for takeoff. AV8's use cats, but could take off without one if needed.
MindPilot
(12,693 posts)The system is a big improvement over the steam catapult; it has essentially one moving part. The system can adjust in real time for the changing effective weight of the aircraft as the ship pitches. Its time from zero to operational readiness is measured in minutes instead of hours, requires far fewer people to operate, can handle an entire range of aircraft from small drone to something the size of an F35, and switch between the two in seconds. Because digital.
Wait 'till 45 finds out the same thing is happening on the recovery end, and the software for that is even more complicated.
DeminPennswoods
(15,265 posts)but my bet is on EMALS not living up to its supposed operation capability, reliability or maintenance costs and manhours/repair.
lunasun
(21,646 posts)Is this to show how business smart he is and what a strong decider he can be? Fail
gordianot
(15,234 posts)This delayed their introduction of a superior weapon that would have guaranteed the interception of bombers destroying the country's infrastructure by two years. The mad dictator lost his war and was unable to establish air superiority (thankfully). Lesson when you are narcissistic megalomaniac your megalomania is not in your best interest.
central scrutinizer
(11,637 posts)This must be satire
brush
(53,743 posts)the first one built, the USS Gerald R. Ford.
They will have the latest technological improvements over the earlier Nimitz class carriers.
angrychair
(8,684 posts)The current class of carriers, built at Newport News Shipbuilding (the world's only builder of nuclear powered aircraft carriers), is the Ford class (Gerald R Ford).
TheBlackAdder
(28,168 posts)ThoughtCriminal
(14,046 posts)I thought for sure this was going to be "The Onion" again.
WePurrsevere
(24,259 posts)The first thing I asked was if it was an Onion or Borowitz piece. He said, no it's The Hill and my jaw literally dropped. Our country's realty all too often feels more satirical than actual satire now.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Solly Mack
(90,758 posts)Trump could simply slingshot the plane into battle.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Why didn't those good for nothing generals think of this?
Solly Mack
(90,758 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)One of my first thoughts when reading the headline.
dawg
(10,621 posts)one of Ghandi's tank invasions.
angrychair
(8,684 posts)This man is a fucking idiot.
Moving away from steam has allowed carriers to use space more effectively, dramatically reduce crew size and make them far more effective and efficient battle systems.
Carriers will cost less to build and far less to maintain.
Fuck that idiot.
Solly Mack
(90,758 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)The steam catapaults are rough on the drones.
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)AgadorSparticus
(7,963 posts)That is not by accident. He knows EXACTLY what he is told to do and say.
Girard442
(6,066 posts)There is no direction or strategy beyond being a loose cannon. Trump will just smash things at random, which suits Putin just fine.
oasis
(49,335 posts)and let the Navy run the U.S. fleet.
BeyondGeography
(39,351 posts)bullwinkle428
(20,628 posts)NastyRiffraff
(12,448 posts)You really can't tell the difference anymore.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,816 posts)This is why we shouldn't elect old people.
Over the years courts have not understood the internet. Hillary Clinton, from all reports, had trouble figuring out emails. And I'm not at all talking about her email server. The fact that she didn't seem to know how to retrieve or send them very well.
Don't get me wrong. I'm only a couple of years younger than Hillary, but I worked in an industry (airlines) that was one of the very first to move to computers. So for an old person, I'm relatively comfortable with computers, but I'm extremely aware of my limitations, of the many things I don't know and can't use. For instance, I don't have a smart phone.
Meanwhile, the technology moves on. Those in charge, at all levels, should be VERY good at using the technology, or at least of understanding it. I'm willing to bet that while Donald Trump can tweet with the best of them, he probably doesn't make much other use of technology. It would be interesting to learn if he uses email. I bet he's never mastered Word or any other word processing program. I wonder if he knows how to do a simple Google search. And those are such rock bottom basics that they shouldn't even need mentioning.
This actually comes back to part of the reason I am very opposed to most of the suggestions as to who we ought to nominate in 2020, because just about every single one of those people are over age 60 already. And while plenty of people in their 60's are quite up on the technology, many more are not. If you've been surrounded during your entire working life with minions who do the typing, who do the research, who prepare the papers and simply present you with the finished product, you are NOT up on the technology.
This OP is a prime example of why old people shouldn't be in charge. So okay, Donald Trump is an exceptionally bad example, but there's still a point to be made.
Even now, when someone is having some sort of problem with the computer system, and older person (meaning 50 or older) will grumble that we'd be better off without them. Nope. We wouldn't be.
Here's a non-computer example of the advances of technology. I went to work as an operator for Ma Bell in 1967. The woman that trained me had gone to work for them some 50 years earlier, which I found utterly fascinating. The telephone company at that time pointed out that if they had never gone to direct dial, by 1967 every adult woman in the country would have been needed to work as an operator to connect all the calls that were made every day.
You can extend that to any other field you wish.
technotwit
(71 posts)Fredrick Douglass just met with him to tell him the future is steam!
dalton99a
(81,406 posts)Fucking idiot
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)To the strawberries
Docreed2003
(16,850 posts)procon
(15,805 posts)Docreed2003
(16,850 posts)Goodheart
(5,308 posts)SCVDem
(5,103 posts)Coal.
I wish I could laugh
Still In Wisconsin
(4,450 posts)malfunctioned completely and threw an F4 or F14 into the drink.
Steampunk Trump.
Mendocino
(7,482 posts)sharks with frickin laser beams attached to their heads.
Mountain Mule
(1,002 posts)Andrew Jackson could lead us to victory and the South would rise again - I mean the South would be great again. Bigly.
(God what a moron that traitor, Dolt 45 is.)
jmowreader
(50,530 posts)...that the only traditions of the Navy are rum, buggery and the lash.
BTW, who died and made Trump naval architect in chief?
kairos12
(12,843 posts)SergeStorms
(19,187 posts)in the steam industry. Just as he wants to bring back coal to power automobiles, lawn mowers and toasters, he sees the steam industry as America's future. He's a man before his time, to be sure.
Ilsa
(61,690 posts)wasn't operating at full power, or something. His aircraft plunged into the ocean. He was either knocked unconscious and drowned, or was killed upon impact. I don't remember if there was a RIO or second officer aboard; I don't remember what type of plane he flew. His fiancée was so devastated she killed herself.
I'd like the Ford class to have whatever works bests.
DesertRat
(27,995 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)What a fuckin idiot!
stopbush
(24,393 posts)Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)n/t.
EL34x4
(2,003 posts)DeminPennswoods
(15,265 posts)I've seen this play out so many times that the system delivered doesn't work as promised.
An interesting story from the Navy Times in 2015: http://www.navytimes.com/story/military/2015/06/16/emals-fails-in-first-public-launch/28808761/
Barack_America
(28,876 posts)I don't believe for a moment that Trump reads, let alone reads about aircraft carrier technology.
Doreen
(11,686 posts)He is going to make our trains go back to having coal in order to operate. If I remember they had ships that ran on coal also. Maybe he will get rid of electric heat and make us use coal stoves.
TeamPooka
(24,209 posts)Hekate
(90,564 posts)icymist
(15,888 posts)pansypoo53219
(20,955 posts)duncang
(1,907 posts)Who when asked about nuclear arms said he uncle was a nuclear scientist. And he told him nuclear would be big one day.
no_hypocrisy
(46,037 posts)Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)They fund the programs, the Navy buys what they appropriate money for.
Achilleaze
(15,543 posts)...to be competent.
sad
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)The Blue Flower
(5,434 posts)I also thought this headline was a joke.
Botany
(70,449 posts)Where did Trump get his degree in engineering?
Bettie
(16,076 posts)It is really hard to tell these days, but WTF?
lpbk2713
(42,741 posts)Does Trump think the crewmembers are as stupid as he is?
Trumpo, carriers have been usung nuclear propulsion since the 1960's.
If the crew can work with that they can manage a digital launching system.
niyad
(113,079 posts)WePurrsevere
(24,259 posts)Hopefully the Full moon in Scorpio gave this craziness a push towards a new beginning. We need all things hidden to be revealed asap.
niyad
(113,079 posts)WePurrsevere
(24,259 posts)I'm sure this shadow of him will eventually be too. Well, except for with the die hard fanatics. I don't hold out much hope for that bunch.
Unfortunately the slow process is frustrating as heck. I keep telling myself that it just feels like an eternity when in actuality it's just been a few months.
niyad
(113,079 posts)WePurrsevere
(24,259 posts)I have to keep reminding myself that it hasn't been that long. Logically I know investigations, etc can take a lot of time to do correctly but time is running out for too many. We have to reach Americans through the RW noise and b.s. so we can stop these greedy jerks from getting their way.
gademocrat7
(10,645 posts)jmg257
(11,996 posts)"As with any new system, its development hasnt always been a smooth ride. Its been beset by reliability issues over the years, and if anything, carriers need to be reliable. Without the ability to launch planes, the ship is a proverbial sitting duck.
But like most new things, the kinks will probably be worked out."
Paladin
(28,243 posts)All because trump isn't smart enough to understand current military technology?
Silver lining: trump has probably forgotten all about the matter. He has the attention span of a gnat.